< Back to IRS

Anastasia Popov

Where to find the code section for amortization of finance costs on Form 4562?

I'm struggling to complete the amortization section on Form 4562 for my partnership. There's a field asking for the "code section" for what I'm amortizing, and I'm trying to figure out what to put for our loan origination fees and other finance costs. I initially thought it might be 461(g) regarding prepaid interest, but after reading more, that seems to only apply to cash basis taxpayers, and we're on accrual. We paid about $23,500 in loan costs last year when refinancing our commercial property, and my understanding is these need to be amortized rather than expensed. But I can't figure out which tax code section to reference on the form. My tax software doesn't provide any guidance on this specific field. Has anyone dealt with this before? What code section should I be using for partnership loan/finance costs on Form 4562? Any help would be greatly appreciated!

This is a common point of confusion! For partnership loan costs/finance fees, you're looking at IRC Section 709 for organizational costs OR Section 167 for amortizable business startup costs. Sometimes Section 195 applies too, but that's more for startup expenses. In most cases for established partnerships with loan origination fees, you'd use Section 709 since it specifically addresses partnership organizational and syndication costs. However, if these are costs related to securing the loan itself rather than organizing the partnership, Section 167 would be more appropriate since it covers depreciation and amortization of business assets more broadly. Make sure you're amortizing these costs over the life of the loan, not just the standard 15-year period that applies to organizational costs. The IRS is particular about matching the expense to the timeframe of the benefit received.

0 coins

Thanks for the explanation! I'm in a similar situation but our loan costs were for refinancing an existing property, not for starting the business. Would Section 709 still apply? And do we need to specify if we're using straight-line amortization?

0 coins

For refinancing an existing property, Section 167 would be more appropriate since these aren't organizational costs but rather costs associated with securing financing for an existing business asset. Section 709 is really focused on costs incurred when creating or organizing the partnership itself. Yes, you should use straight-line amortization over the life of the loan. For example, if you have a 10-year loan term, you'd amortize 1/10th of the costs each year. You don't need to specifically indicate straight-line on the form, as it's the default method for this type of amortization.

0 coins

After dealing with a similar issue last year, I found that using taxr.ai really helped clear things up. I was totally lost with amortization code sections on my partnership's 4562, and my accountant was charging me for every little question. I uploaded our loan docs and prior returns to https://taxr.ai and got a detailed breakdown explaining I should use Section 163(d) for my investment interest expenses, plus it walked me through how to properly amortize everything. The site explained that while 461(g) applies to cash basis taxpayers, Section 163 is more relevant for our situation with investment interest. Saved me hours of research and probably a few hundred in accounting fees.

0 coins

How accurate was the information? I've tried AI tools before and got some questionable tax advice. Does it actually cite specific tax code or is it just general information?

0 coins

I'm skeptical that an AI could properly interpret something as complex as partnership amortization rules. Did you verify this with a professional afterward? The IRS will certainly not accept "the AI told me to do it this way" as an excuse if there's an audit.

0 coins

The information was surprisingly accurate. It doesn't just give general advice - it actually provided specific tax code citations and IRS revenue rulings related to my situation. I was able to verify everything against the actual code sections it referenced. What impressed me was that it analyzed my specific documents and identified that we had investment interest rather than just general business loan costs, which made Section 163(d) applicable. I did run it by my accountant afterward who confirmed it was correct, and he was impressed with the level of detail.

0 coins

I was super skeptical about using AI for tax advice like I mentioned above, but I finally broke down and tried taxr.ai when I got completely stuck on some complicated loan restructuring documentation. I uploaded our partnership docs and it correctly identified Section 163 for our interest expenses and Section 167 for the amortizable loan costs. What really impressed me was that it explained the difference between organizational costs (709), startup expenditures (195), and financing costs (167/163) with examples relevant to my situation. It even flagged that some of our costs might qualify as currently deductible under Rev. Proc. 2020-50 rather than requiring amortization. Saved me from making a costly mistake on our filing!

0 coins

If you're trying to reach the IRS to get clarification on this, good luck! I spent 3 weeks trying to get through to a human who could answer my question about amortization code sections. After giving up on hold for hours multiple times, I found https://claimyr.com through a colleague and used their service. You can see how it works at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c - basically they wait on hold with the IRS for you and call you when they get a representative. Got connected to a helpful IRS agent who confirmed for my similar situation that Section 167 was appropriate for loan costs related to existing business assets. The agent even emailed me the relevant section of the Internal Revenue Manual afterward for documentation. Worth every penny not to sit on hold for hours!

0 coins

Wait, how does this actually work? Do they just call the IRS for you? Can't they just give you the answer directly if they know enough to call the IRS with your question?

0 coins

This sounds like paying someone to wait in line for you. Does the IRS even allow this kind of service? Seems like it could be problematic from a privacy standpoint since you're involving a third party in your tax matters.

0 coins

They don't actually answer your tax questions themselves - they're not tax professionals. They literally just wait on hold with the IRS for you. When an IRS agent picks up, they call your phone and connect you directly to the agent. You're the one who speaks with the IRS, not them. The service just saves you from sitting on hold for hours. It's completely legitimate - you're still the one having the conversation with the IRS, providing your information, and asking your questions. They just handle the hold time. Think of it like a callback service, except it actually works, unlike the IRS's own callback system which is almost always "at capacity.

0 coins

I was really skeptical about the Claimyr service mentioned above - seemed too good to be true. But after waiting on hold with the IRS for 2+ hours on three separate occasions trying to get clarity on partnership amortization rules, I finally gave in and tried it. Within 45 minutes, I was connected to an IRS representative who was incredibly helpful! She confirmed that for our refinancing costs, Section 167 was the appropriate code for the Form 4562, and explained that we should amortize over the life of the loan (7 years in our case). Having that direct confirmation from the IRS gave me so much peace of mind. I'll never waste hours on hold again!

0 coins

Just to add another perspective - I'm pretty sure the correct code section for partnership loan costs is IRC Section 197. We've been using that for years on our partnership returns for loan origination fees, and have never had an issue with audits. Our CPA said Section 197 covers intangibles including loan costs and requires 15-year amortization regardless of the loan term.

0 coins

I don't think that's right. Section 197 is for goodwill and certain acquired intangible assets. Loan costs don't fall under Section 197 at all - they should be amortized over the life of the loan under either Section 163 or 167 depending on the specific circumstances. Using Section 197 with a 15-year period regardless of loan term doesn't follow the matching principle and might get flagged in an audit.

0 coins

You might be right - I just checked with our CPA and he clarified that we use Section 167, not 197. I must have misremembered. He did mention that prior to 2017, there were some situations where loan costs could be amortized as Section 197 intangibles, but that the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act changed some of those rules. Sorry for the confusion - this is exactly why I hire a professional instead of trying to figure it all out myself!

0 coins

When I encountered this issue last tax season, I found that Treasury Regulation 1.263(a)-5 actually addresses loan costs specifically. It requires capitalization of facilitating costs, including financing fees. Then you amortize those capitalized costs over the term of the loan under the OID rules in Section 1.446-5. Section 709 is only relevant if these are syndication or organization costs, which loan refinancing fees are not. Anyone using that section for regular financing costs is likely using the wrong code.

0 coins

Thank you so much for this specific reference! I looked up Reg 1.263(a)-5 and it does seem to directly address loan costs. So would I put "Reg 1.263(a)-5" in the code section field, or would I put "Sec 1.446-5" since that governs the amortization?

0 coins

You'd use "Sec 1.446-5" in the code section field since that's the section that specifically governs the amortization method for the capitalized costs. The 1.263(a)-5 regulation tells you that you need to capitalize the costs, but 1.446-5 is what tells you how to amortize them over time. Make sure you're amortizing over the exact term of the loan - so if it's 7 years and 3 months, you should technically use that precise period rather than rounding to 7 years. The IRS can be picky about matching the amortization period to the actual loan term since it's a timing issue for deductions.

0 coins

This is a great thread with lots of helpful information! I've been dealing with similar issues and wanted to add that the IRS Instructions for Form 4562 actually provide some guidance on this. On page 8 of the 2023 instructions, it specifically mentions that for amortization of costs to acquire a lease or financing costs, you should generally use Section 167. However, I noticed that several people mentioned different approaches (Section 163, Section 709, etc.) and it seems like the correct code section really depends on the specific nature of your costs. For loan origination fees on a refinancing like yours, Anastasia, Section 167 seems to be the most commonly accepted approach, with amortization over the loan term. One thing I'd recommend is keeping detailed documentation of exactly what costs you're amortizing - points, origination fees, legal fees, etc. - since different types of financing costs can sometimes have different treatment. The IRS tends to be pretty strict about proper characterization of these expenses during audits. Has anyone here actually been audited on partnership amortization issues? I'd be curious to hear what the IRS focused on during the examination.

0 coins

Great point about the Form 4562 instructions! I actually went through an IRS audit two years ago that included our partnership's amortization of loan costs. The examiner was very focused on two main things: 1) whether we properly capitalized ALL the financing costs (they caught that we had expensed some legal fees that should have been amortized), and 2) whether our amortization period matched the actual loan term exactly. What surprised me was that they didn't really care much about which specific code section we used on the form - they were more concerned with the substance of how we treated the costs. We had used Section 167 like you mentioned, and they seemed fine with that. But they did require us to amend returns to capitalize about $3,200 in additional costs we had missed. The documentation piece you mentioned is spot on - they wanted to see the HUD-1 settlement statement, loan agreements, and a detailed breakdown of every fee. Having that organized upfront saved us a lot of headaches during the audit process.

0 coins

This has been such a helpful discussion! I'm dealing with a similar situation for our partnership's Form 4562, and after reading through all these responses, it sounds like Section 167 is the most appropriate code section for loan refinancing costs. What I'm still unclear on is the distinction between costs that should be amortized versus those that might be currently deductible. Mateo mentioned that some costs might qualify as currently deductible under Rev. Proc. 2020-50 - can anyone elaborate on what types of financing costs would fall under that category? Also, for those who have been through audits on this issue, did the IRS require any specific language or justification in your records beyond just using the correct code section? I want to make sure we're properly documenting our position in case we get selected for examination. Thanks to everyone who has shared their experiences - this is exactly the kind of real-world guidance that's so hard to find elsewhere!

0 coins

Great question about Rev. Proc. 2020-50! That procedure allows partnerships to deduct certain costs immediately rather than capitalizing and amortizing them. Generally, it applies to costs under $5,000 per transaction (with some exceptions) and includes things like bank fees, title insurance, recording fees, and similar transactional costs. However, the major loan origination fees and points typically still need to be capitalized and amortized. The key is to separate out the smaller administrative fees that qualify for immediate deduction under the procedure from the substantial financing costs that must be amortized. For documentation during an audit, I'd recommend creating a detailed schedule that breaks down each cost, shows which treatment you applied (immediate deduction vs. amortization), and includes the specific authority (like Rev. Proc. 2020-50 for immediate deductions or Section 167 for amortization). Having a clear paper trail showing you considered each cost individually rather than just lumping everything together tends to impress examiners and shows you were thoughtful about the tax treatment.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly informative! As someone who's been wrestling with the same Form 4562 amortization issues, I want to emphasize something that several people touched on but might get lost in all the code section discussion. The most important thing I've learned from my CPA is that consistency matters more than perfection when it comes to these amortization elections. Once you choose your method and code section (whether it's Section 167, Section 163, or the OID rules under 1.446-5), you need to stick with it for the entire amortization period. You can't just switch approaches mid-stream if you find a "better" interpretation later. For partnerships specifically, I'd also add that you want to make sure your amortization approach aligns with how you're treating the costs on your books for financial reporting purposes. While book-tax differences are common, having wildly different treatments can raise red flags during an audit. One last tip: if you're still unsure after all this great advice, consider making a protective election in your tax return filing. You can note in your records that you're using Section 167 but would alternatively rely on Section 163 or the OID rules if the IRS disagrees with your primary position. This can help avoid penalties if there's a dispute about the proper treatment later on.

0 coins

This is such great advice about consistency! I'm just getting started with partnership tax issues and hadn't thought about the protective election approach. That seems like a really smart way to handle situations where there might be legitimate disagreement about the proper treatment. One follow-up question on the book-tax conformity point you mentioned - if we're using GAAP for our financial statements but the tax treatment differs (like amortizing over loan term vs. straight-line over 15 years), is that typically an issue? Or are you referring more to situations where the underlying characterization of the costs is completely different between book and tax? Also, does anyone know if there are any recent court cases or IRS guidance that might affect how we should be thinking about these amortization elections going forward? I want to make sure I'm not missing any recent developments before we file our return.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today