< Back to IRS

Ryder Greene

Wash sale rule question for inverse ETFs and put options? TSLS tax implications?

I'm trying to figure out if I'll trigger a wash sale if I sell an inverse ETF at a loss and then immediately buy put options on the same underlying security. Specifically, I'm planning to sell my TSLS (the inverse Tesla ETF) positions which are down about 15% right now, but I still think Tesla is overvalued and want to keep some downside exposure. So I'm considering buying some Tesla put options after selling TSLS. Would the IRS consider these "substantially identical" securities for wash sale purposes? I understand the basic wash sale rule where you can't claim a loss if you buy the same stock within 30 days, but this is a bit more complicated with the inverse ETF and options combination. Has anyone dealt with this specific situation before? The last thing I want is to have my tax loss harvesting disallowed because of some weird technicality. Thanks for any insight!

The wash sale rule can definitely get tricky with more complex securities. From my understanding, for a wash sale to be triggered, you need to purchase "substantially identical" securities within the 30-day window before or after selling at a loss. In your case, there's a reasonable argument that put options on Tesla and an inverse Tesla ETF (TSLS) are not "substantially identical" securities. They have different risk profiles, different expirations (in the case of options), and different mechanisms for generating returns. The inverse ETF uses swaps and derivatives to create the inverse performance, while put options give you the right to sell at a specific price. That said, the IRS hasn't provided crystal clear guidance specifically addressing ETFs and options in combination. Some tax professionals take a conservative approach and suggest that if both investments are designed to profit from the same underlying security moving in the same direction, there could be a risk.

0 coins

But what if the put options have different expiration dates or strike prices than what the ETF is essentially replicating? Wouldn't that make them even less "substantially identical"?

0 coins

You've hit on an important distinction. Different strike prices and expiration dates do create additional differentiation between the securities. The further apart those parameters are from what the ETF is essentially replicating, the stronger your case that they aren't substantially identical. Put options with far different strike prices or expiration dates many months out would be less likely to be considered substantially identical to your original inverse ETF position. However, if you're buying at-the-money puts with very short expiration dates that closely mimic the behavior of the inverse ETF, you'd be in a grayer area.

0 coins

After struggling with a similar wash sale question last year, I found this awesome tool called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that actually analyzes these complex tax situations with AI. It saved me so much headache trying to interpret vague IRS rules! For my situation, I was dealing with regular ETFs and options, and wasn't sure if my tax loss harvesting would be invalidated. The tool analyzed my specific situation, showed me relevant tax code sections, and gave me a clear explanation I could actually understand without a tax law degree.

0 coins

Does it specifically address inverse ETFs though? My accountant seems confused whenever I bring up anything more complicated than basic stocks.

0 coins

How accurate is it really? I've seen so many AI tools that just make stuff up, especially with complex tax situations. Did you verify what it told you with an actual tax professional?

0 coins

It absolutely covers inverse ETFs and other complex securities. The tool has specific knowledge about different ETF structures including leveraged and inverse funds, and how they interact with tax rules. It pulled up several relevant examples that were really similar to what I was dealing with. Regarding accuracy, I was skeptical too at first. What impressed me was that it actually cited specific IRS regulations and tax court cases. I did run its recommendation by my tax advisor who confirmed it was correct and was actually surprised by how detailed the analysis was. The tool isn't just making up answers - it's analyzing actual tax code and precedent.

0 coins

Just wanted to follow up here - I tried that taxr.ai site after asking about it and wow, it actually gave me a really clear answer about my inverse ETF question. It analyzed the specific characteristics of TSLS and the put options I was considering, then walked through exactly how the wash sale rules would apply. It even provided the relevant sections of the tax code and some precedent cases where the IRS had ruled on similar situations. Much more detailed than what my accountant told me! Turns out I'm probably in the clear with my specific strategy, but it also showed me some potential pitfalls to avoid. Really helpful for these edge cases where the tax treatment isn't obvious.

0 coins

FYI for anyone trying to get clarity directly from the IRS on complex wash sale situations like this - good luck getting through on the phone! After trying for DAYS to speak with someone about a similar tax issue, I finally used Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) and got through to an actual IRS agent in under an hour. They have this cool system that navigates the IRS phone tree for you and calls you back when an agent is on the line. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I was about to give up on getting an official ruling on my own wash sale situation until I found this. The IRS agent I spoke with actually provided some useful guidance that saved me from making a costly mistake on my taxes.

0 coins

How does that even work? The IRS phone lines are literally impossible to get through. I've called like 20 times this year already.

0 coins

Sounds too good to be true. I've tried everything to get through to the IRS. No way some service can magically make their wait times disappear when millions of people are trying to call.

0 coins

The service basically acts like a virtual assistant that waits on hold for you. They have a system that calls the IRS, navigates through all those annoying menu options, and then waits in the queue. When they actually get a human IRS agent on the line, they call you and connect you directly to that agent. No magic involved - they're just handling the painful waiting process for you. Considering I had already wasted hours trying to get through myself, it was absolutely worth it. The IRS still has the same wait times, but you're not the one sitting there listening to that horrible hold music for hours.

0 coins

I need to eat my words. After being super skeptical about that Claimyr service, I decided to try it yesterday out of pure frustration after my 8th failed attempt to reach someone at the IRS about my own wash sale question with some SPY options and inverse ETFs. It actually worked! Got a call back in about 40 minutes, and was connected to an IRS tax specialist who was able to give me guidance on my specific situation. She explained that while the IRS doesn't have explicit rules on inverse ETFs vs options, they generally look at whether the economic risk is substantially similar. Saved me hours of frustration and actually got a useful answer. Still can't believe it worked after weeks of trying on my own.

0 coins

Another angle to consider with the inverse ETF and put options is how the timing might affect things. The wash sale rule applies to a window of time (30 days before and after). So if you're concerned, you could potentially wait 31 days after selling the inverse ETF before purchasing put options to be completely safe. The downside obviously is you're without the downside protection for a month, but if you want to be 100% certain to avoid any wash sale complications, that's the safest route.

0 coins

Thanks for the suggestion. I did consider waiting the full 30 days, but I'm concerned Tesla might drop significantly during that period and I'd miss out on the downside I'm expecting. Is there any wiggle room where I could maybe buy deep out-of-the-money puts that wouldn't be considered "substantially identical"?

0 coins

That's a valid concern about missing potential downside movement. Regarding the deep out-of-the-money puts, they would indeed be less likely to be considered "substantially identical" to your inverse ETF position. Deep OTM puts have a much different risk profile and delta compared to an inverse ETF. The further out-of-the-money they are, the less they'll behave like a direct inverse of the stock in smaller price movements. They're really more like disaster insurance than a direct inverse position.

0 coins

Has anyone actually been audited by the IRS specifically for wash sales involving ETFs and options? I've been doing similar trades for years and never had an issue, but I'm not sure if that's because the IRS approved of my strategy or just never noticed...

0 coins

I have a friend who got flagged during an audit for something similar. The IRS scrutinized some losses he claimed after trading between regular and leveraged ETFs of the same index. They disallowed some of his losses as wash sales. Not exactly the same as your inverse ETF/options scenario, but shows they do look at these complex ETF situations.

0 coins

I've been dealing with similar inverse ETF wash sale questions and wanted to share what I learned from my tax attorney. The key factor the IRS looks at is whether the securities provide "substantially identical" economic exposure, not just whether they're technically different instruments. For your TSLS/Tesla puts situation, a few things work in your favor: inverse ETFs use derivatives and daily rebalancing which creates tracking differences from simple short exposure, put options have specific strike prices and expiration dates that create different risk profiles, and the leverage factor in TSLS (if any) versus unleveraged put options creates additional differentiation. However, be careful about the timing and magnitude. If you're buying at-the-money puts immediately after selling TSLS, you're in riskier territory than if you buy far OTM puts or wait even just a week or two. The IRS has been getting more sophisticated about these strategies, especially with the increase in ETF complexity. My attorney's advice was to document your investment thesis clearly - if you can show the puts serve a different purpose (like hedging a larger portfolio position rather than just replacing the inverse ETF exposure), that strengthens your position if questioned.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice about documenting the investment thesis! I'm curious though - when you say "wait even just a week or two," does that actually provide meaningful protection under the wash sale rule? I thought the 30-day window was pretty rigid, so wouldn't waiting just 1-2 weeks still potentially trigger issues if the IRS considered the securities substantially identical? Also, regarding the leverage factor you mentioned - TSLS is actually a -1x inverse ETF (not leveraged), so it should track Tesla's inverse performance pretty closely on a daily basis. Would that make it more likely to be considered substantially identical to at-the-money puts, or do you think the derivative structure still provides enough differentiation?

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today