Structuring the Acquisition of an Agent's Business with Debt Owed to Our Company
Our company is preparing a proposal to acquire an agent's struggling commission-based business (essentially their book of business). The agent currently owes our company approximately $750,000, and we're trying to find the optimal way to structure this transaction. We want to remove this accounts receivable from our books without recording it as bad debt, while also avoiding hitting the agent with a massive cancellation of debt (COD) income tax bill. What's the most efficient way to structure the purchase of this business in exchange for the value of the debt they currently owe us? I've considered several approaches: 1. Extending a loan to the agent for the $750k, having them pay down the original debt, then buying their business for a nominal amount ($1). We could establish a 10-year payment plan for the new loan, or create an earnout structure that gradually eliminates the debt if certain business targets are achieved. 2. Structuring the purchase explicitly as an exchange for debt cancellation. However, this would trigger COD income for the agent. Is there a way to structure this so the debt cancellation occurs gradually over several years to spread out their tax impact? 3. A hybrid approach where we loan them money to clear the current debt, purchase the business with no down payment, but set up a payment plan that provides them money over several years which they can use to repay the loan. Our CFO and legal team just asked for my thoughts on this situation, and I'm feeling a bit out of my depth on proposing the optimal purchase structure. Any insights would be greatly appreciated!
18 comments


Lucas Notre-Dame
What you're trying to do is fairly common in business acquisitions with distressed sellers. The key is structuring it properly to minimize tax consequences while achieving your company's goals. The most tax-efficient approach would likely be a combination of your options. Here's how I'd structure it: Set up an asset purchase agreement rather than buying the business entity itself. This allows you to allocate the purchase price across different asset classes, which has favorable tax treatment. Structure the deal with a nominal upfront payment plus an earnout agreement tied to future performance metrics. The earnout payments would be considered installment sale proceeds to the agent, not COD income. This spreads their tax liability over time based on when they actually receive payments. Meanwhile, your company can amortize the acquired assets (especially the customer list/book of business) over 15 years for tax purposes. You'll need to have the business properly valued by a third party to establish a legitimate purchase price independent of the debt. This helps prevent the IRS from recategorizing the transaction as debt forgiveness.
0 coins
Aria Park
•But wouldn't the IRS see through this if the valuation of the business is similar to the debt amount? Seems like they'd flag that as debt forgiveness in disguise. Also, how does this approach actually get the A/R off the books?
0 coins
Lucas Notre-Dame
•The key is having a legitimate third-party valuation that stands up to scrutiny. The IRS looks for substance over form, so the transaction needs business purpose beyond just eliminating debt. As for the A/R, you'd essentially be replacing one asset (the receivable) with another asset (the acquired business). When the agent pays you back with the new loan proceeds, you eliminate the original A/R. Then you record the business acquisition as a new asset on your books, and the new loan as a separate receivable that's tied to the earnout agreement.
0 coins
Noah Ali
I wanted to share my experience with a similar situation. After struggling to find the right structure for an acquisition with complicated tax consequences, I tried using https://taxr.ai to analyze our options. Their AI actually specialized in reviewing acquisition documents and tax structures - saved me from a massive COD situation. I uploaded our proposed agreement and it highlighted several red flags, then suggested alternative approaches that would protect both parties. The tool analyzed each approach from both the buyer and seller perspective, showing exactly how the IRS would likely view each transaction structure. It was honestly a game-changer compared to the confusing advice I was getting from different sources. Might be worth checking out for your situation.
0 coins
Chloe Boulanger
•Does it actually give you specific language for the agreements or just general advice? Our attorney charges by the hour and I'd love to have something concrete to bring him rather than just concepts.
0 coins
James Martinez
•I'm skeptical about these AI tax tools. Can it really understand something as complex as business acquisition structures? Did you end up having a tax professional review its recommendations anyway?
0 coins
Noah Ali
•It provides both specific contract language suggestions and general structural advice. You can even upload your existing documents and it will highlight problematic sections and offer alternative wording. I saved a ton on attorney fees by bringing them a more refined document to review. The AI is specifically trained on tax law and acquisition structures, so it definitely understood the nuances. We did have our CPA review everything, but he was impressed with the recommendations and only made minor tweaks. The final structure held up perfectly during our recent audit.
0 coins
James Martinez
I tried taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here and I'm honestly shocked at how well it worked for our situation. We were about to structure our business acquisition in a way that would have triggered a massive tax bill for the seller and potential future liability for us. The tool identified a much better approach using a combination of an installment sale and consulting agreement that spread the tax impact for everyone. It even flagged some state-specific tax issues I hadn't considered (I'm in California). What impressed me most was how it explained the reasoning behind each recommendation with actual tax code references. Made me feel much more confident going into negotiations with the seller. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with a complex acquisition structure.
0 coins
Olivia Harris
Have you tried calling the IRS directly to get clarity on how they'd view different transaction structures? I spent weeks trying to get through to someone who could actually help with a similar business question. Finally discovered https://claimyr.com and their IRS callback service (saw it demonstrated at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c). They got me connected to a business tax specialist at the IRS within a day. The agent walked me through exactly how they evaluate business acquisitions with debt forgiveness components and what documentation they look for during an audit. Saved me from making a costly mistake in how we structured our deal. Honestly, I was surprised at how helpful the IRS person was once I actually got through to the right department. They can't provide legal advice, but they gave me valuable insights into how they interpret these transactions.
0 coins
Alexander Zeus
•Wait, how does this actually work? The IRS never calls you back when you leave messages. Is this legit or some kind of scam?
0 coins
Alicia Stern
•I don't believe this for a second. The IRS doesn't give this kind of specific guidance on hypothetical business transactions. They'll just tell you to consult with a tax professional. Sounds like you're selling something.
0 coins
Olivia Harris
•It's not about leaving messages - they use a technology that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold for you. When they reach a live agent, they call you and connect you immediately. Completely legitimate service. The IRS won't give specific legal advice, you're right about that. But they absolutely will explain their general enforcement positions and what factors they consider when reviewing these transactions. The agent explained which parts of the tax code apply to debt forgiveness in business acquisitions and what documentation they typically request during examinations. That information was invaluable for guiding our planning.
0 coins
Alicia Stern
I was completely skeptical about this Claimyr service mentioned above until I actually tried it myself. I needed clarification on how the IRS treats earnout agreements in business acquisitions and whether they could be recharacterized as debt forgiveness. After three weeks of failing to get through on my own, I used their service. Within 3 hours, I was speaking with someone in the IRS business division who actually understood my question. They clarified that with proper documentation and business purpose, earnout structures typically stand up to scrutiny - but emphasized that the valuation needs to be defensible and the transaction needs legitimate business purpose beyond tax avoidance. This saved me from a potentially expensive restructuring mistake. Sometimes you need to hear it directly from the source to proceed with confidence.
0 coins
Gabriel Graham
You mentioned the agent owes about $750k. Have you considered a Section 338(h)(10) election if they're a corporation? This lets you treat a stock sale as an asset sale for tax purposes. The key benefit is you get a stepped-up basis in the assets while the seller can use losses to offset gains. We did this last year when acquiring a struggling insurance agency. Their debt to us was about $500k, and this structure worked well to minimize immediate tax impacts while getting their book of business.
0 coins
Layla Mendes
•I'm not entirely sure of their business structure, but that's definitely something I'll look into. How complicated was the paperwork for this approach? Did you need specialized legal help?
0 coins
Gabriel Graham
•The paperwork is definitely more complex than a straightforward asset purchase. We needed both our tax attorney and accountant involved to structure it properly. The election itself is made on Form 8023, but the agreement needs very specific language to support it. The biggest challenge was agreeing on the asset allocation with the seller since this impacts the tax consequences for both sides. We ended up allocating more value to assets that gave us better depreciation/amortization treatment while minimizing their gain recognition. It took about 6 weeks to finalize all the details, but the tax savings made it worthwhile.
0 coins
Drake
Has anyone considered the implications if the agent files bankruptcy before completing this transaction? I nearly got burned by this exact scenario.
0 coins
Sarah Jones
•Great point. If bankruptcy is filed within 90 days of any payment or transfer, it could potentially be clawed back as a preferential transfer. I'd recommend doing a solvency analysis as part of your due diligence.
0 coins