< Back to IRS

Darren Brooks

Resident Taxpayer received 1042-S form instead of 1099 - how to file correctly?

I recently started working with a client who became a resident alien for tax purposes starting in 2022. They have multiple brokerage accounts, and all except one correctly issued 1099 forms. However, one brokerage is still treating them as a nonresident alien and issued a 1042-S form. My client contacted the brokerage to fix the issue, but they just sent back a "corrected" 1042-S that was exactly the same as the first one. No actual changes. This is the first time I've run into this situation and I'm not entirely sure how to proceed. Since they're now a resident taxpayer, they should be getting 1099s, not 1042-S forms. Has anyone dealt with this before? Will the 1042-S provide all the information I need to file their taxes correctly, or do I need to hunt down additional transaction records from the brokerage? Any insight would be super helpful!

Rosie Harper

•

Having dealt with this situation several times, I can tell you that you can still file with the 1042-S. The 1042-S actually contains similar information to what would be on a 1099, just in a different format designed for non-resident aliens. Look carefully at Box 1 (Income Code) and Box 2 (Gross Income) on the 1042-S. These will tell you what type of income it is and the amount. For resident aliens, you'll report this income just as you would if it were on a 1099. For example, if Box 1 shows code 06 (dividends), you'd report it as dividend income on Schedule B. The one complication is that Box 7 (Federal Tax Withheld) on the 1042-S might show a higher withholding rate than would normally apply to a resident. This withholding is still creditable against your client's tax liability.

0 coins

This seems helpful but I'm confused about two things: 1) Will the IRS flag this as an issue since my wife recently got her green card but one of her accounts sent a 1042-S? and 2) The withholding rate is 30% which seems way too high now that she's a resident. Can we get that money back?

0 coins

Rosie Harper

•

The IRS shouldn't flag this as an issue since they recognize that financial institutions sometimes don't update their records immediately when status changes. Your wife is entitled to claim all withheld taxes shown on the 1042-S as a credit against her tax liability, just like any other withholding. Yes, you can absolutely get that money back if the 30% withholding exceeds her actual tax liability. When you file, the excess withholding will be part of her refund calculation. This is one benefit of filing - reclaiming any overwithholding that occurred because the institution still had her classified as a nonresident alien.

0 coins

Demi Hall

•

After spending hours trying to get brokerage firms to correct similar issues, I discovered taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) which has been a game-changer for my clients with international tax situations. I had a client with the exact same resident/1042-S problem, and the tool helped me correctly map everything from the 1042-S to the right places on their return. It basically analyzed their 1042-S and told me exactly where each number needed to go on their tax forms as a resident, plus it identified a few deductions they could take that I might have missed.

0 coins

Does taxr.ai handle other international tax documents too? My husband is a dual citizen and we get a mix of forms every year. Would be nice to have something that can tell us exactly what to do with each form.

0 coins

Kara Yoshida

•

I'm a little skeptical. How exactly does it know how to handle all the special cases? I've been burned by tax software before that claimed to handle international situations but then messed everything up and I had to file an amended return.

0 coins

Demi Hall

•

It definitely handles other international tax documents including foreign tax forms, FBAR requirements, and treaty positions. It's particularly helpful for dual citizens because it can analyze forms from both countries and guide you through proper reporting. The tool uses a combination of built-in rules based on international tax treaties and IRS regulations, so it catches those special cases. Unlike general tax software, it's specifically designed for international tax situations, so it asks targeted questions to determine which rules apply in each scenario. It updates whenever tax laws change, which is why I started using it - keeping up with international tax changes was becoming a full-time job on its own.

0 coins

I wanted to follow up about taxr.ai - I went ahead and tried it for my husband's mixed US/foreign income situation. It actually worked surprisingly well! It recognized the 1042-S forms we received and correctly mapped everything to the right spots on our US return. It also flagged a foreign tax credit we would have missed that saved us about $3,200. The document analysis feature was spot on - it even caught a mistake on one of our foreign bank statements that the bank had to correct. Definitely made filing a lot less stressful this year!

0 coins

Philip Cowan

•

For anyone struggling to get their financial institution to correct this issue, I recommend Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). I was in the same boat - became a resident but my brokerage kept sending 1042-S forms. After multiple failed attempts to get through to my brokerage's international tax department, I used Claimyr to get through to the IRS. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. The IRS agent I spoke to confirmed that this is a common issue and gave me specific language to use when contacting the brokerage. They also put a note in my file about the situation so I wouldn't have issues later. Once I had the official IRS position, the brokerage finally issued the correct form.

0 coins

Caesar Grant

•

How does this actually work? I've been trying to get through to the IRS for weeks. Do they somehow magically give you a direct line or something?

0 coins

Kara Yoshida

•

Sorry but this sounds like complete BS. Nobody can get through to the IRS these days. I've tried calling about a missing refund for 3 months and all I get is "due to high call volume" messages. No way there's a service that can actually get you through.

0 coins

Philip Cowan

•

They use a system that navigates phone trees and waits on hold for you. Once an IRS agent picks up, you get a call connecting you directly to that person. It's not a direct line - they're just doing the waiting part for you. I was skeptical too, but after wasting entire afternoons on hold, I was desperate. I figured it was worth trying since my time is valuable. I got a call back about 3 hours after I submitted my request, and was connected to an actual IRS person who helped resolve my issue. It's definitely real - they're just using technology to handle the hold time instead of you having to do it yourself.

0 coins

Kara Yoshida

•

I need to eat my words about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I was still desperate about my refund situation so I tried it anyway. Honestly didn't expect much but figured nothing else was working. About 2 hours later I got a call connecting me to an actual IRS agent! The agent was able to see that my refund had been flagged for review because of a mismatch between my 1042-S and my resident status (similar to the original post situation). Got it resolved in one call. Would have never gotten through without the service. Still can't believe it actually worked!

0 coins

Lena Schultz

•

Another approach that worked for my client: have them request a "letter of explanation" from the brokerage stating they are aware the taxpayer is a US resident but their system issued a 1042-S instead of a 1099. Most brokerages will provide this because it's less work than reissuing forms. You can attach this to the return or keep it in your files in case of questions. The key data is all there on the 1042-S, just in different boxes.

0 coins

Darren Brooks

•

I like this practical approach. Have you ever had the IRS question a return where you did this? Does the letter need specific wording or will a general acknowledgment from the brokerage suffice?

0 coins

Lena Schultz

•

I've done this for three clients in the past four years and never had the IRS question it. The letter doesn't need super specific wording - just needs to acknowledge that the taxpayer is a US resident for tax purposes, but due to their systems/processes, a 1042-S was issued instead of a 1099. It's also helpful if the letter mentions something about them working to correct their records for future tax years. In my experience, the IRS understands this is a financial institution issue, not a taxpayer trying to game the system. Just make sure the income is properly reported on the correct schedules based on what it is (interest, dividends, capital gains, etc.).

0 coins

Gemma Andrews

•

Would it be simpler to use the amounts from the 1042-S and just report them on the proper lines as if they had been reported on a 1099? Ive done this for clients before and never had an issue. The IRS cares most that the income is reported and properly taxes paid, not so much what form it came on.

0 coins

Pedro Sawyer

•

This is what I've done too. It's all about reconciling the income and withholding. Just put the amounts on the correct schedules and forms where they belong. I once called the IRS practitioner hotline about this issue and they confirmed this approach is fine.

0 coins

Grace Durand

•

I've encountered this exact situation multiple times in my practice. The key thing to remember is that while the brokerage made an administrative error by issuing a 1042-S instead of a 1099, all the essential information you need is still there - it's just organized differently. Here's my systematic approach: First, decode the 1042-S income codes in Box 1 (06 for dividends, 01 for interest, etc.) and report those amounts on the appropriate schedules as if they came from a 1099. Second, claim all withholding from Box 7 as credits on Form 1040, even if it's at the higher non-resident rate - your client will get a refund for any overwithholding. I always document the file with a brief note explaining why we're using 1042-S data for a resident return, and I've never had the IRS question this approach. The most important thing is that the income gets reported correctly and the withholding gets claimed properly. Don't let the wrong form derail an otherwise straightforward filing!

0 coins

CosmicCruiser

•

I've handled this situation several times and want to add a few practical points that might help. First, when you're mapping the 1042-S information to your tax return, pay special attention to Box 3 (Chapter 3 Status Code) - this will confirm the brokerage's classification of your client, which helps document why they received the wrong form. Also, I recommend keeping detailed records of your client's attempts to get the brokerage to issue corrected forms. Even though you can work with the 1042-S, having documentation of the client's good faith efforts to get proper forms can be helpful if questions arise later. One thing I've learned is to double-check that all investment income from that brokerage is captured on the 1042-S. Sometimes when systems are mixed up about resident status, they might not report all transactions consistently. I usually ask clients to pull their year-end statements from the brokerage to cross-reference against the 1042-S to make sure nothing was missed. The good news is this is becoming more common as immigration statuses change, so the IRS is well aware of the issue and your approach of using the 1042-S data for a resident return is completely acceptable.

0 coins

Serene Snow

•

This is really helpful advice about checking Box 3 for the status code - I hadn't thought about using that as documentation. Quick question: when you mention cross-referencing with year-end statements, are you looking for specific types of transactions that might not show up on the 1042-S? I want to make sure I'm not missing anything for my client's situation.

0 coins

Good question! When I cross-reference with year-end statements, I'm mainly looking for a few specific things that sometimes get handled inconsistently when systems are confused about resident status. First, I check for any capital gains distributions or return of capital distributions - these sometimes get reported separately or not at all on 1042-S forms. Second, I look for any foreign tax credits that might have been withheld by foreign companies in the portfolio - these should show up but sometimes don't make it onto the 1042-S properly. Finally, I verify that any reinvested dividends are captured, as some systems handle DRIP transactions oddly when there's a status mismatch. The year-end statement gives you the complete picture of all account activity, which you can then match against what's actually reported on the 1042-S to catch any gaps.

0 coins

Yuki Sato

•

I've dealt with this exact scenario multiple times in my practice, and I wanted to share a few additional considerations that might help. One thing I always verify is whether your client has any foreign tax credits that should be claimed. Sometimes when brokerages issue 1042-S forms instead of 1099s, they don't properly report foreign taxes withheld by underlying investments, which could mean missing out on valuable credits. Also, make sure to check if the brokerage reported any capital gains or losses separately. I've seen cases where the dividend and interest income shows up on the 1042-S, but realized/unrealized gains get reported through a different process or not at all when there's a status classification error. From a documentation standpoint, I always include a brief statement in my workpapers explaining the situation - something like "Client received 1042-S in error due to brokerage classification lag following resident status change. Income reported per resident tax treatment." This helps if there are ever any questions during review or audit. The good news is that this issue is becoming more recognized, and I've never had the IRS push back when the income is properly reported and documented, regardless of which form it came on originally.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of comprehensive approach I was looking for! The point about foreign tax credits is particularly important - I hadn't considered that the brokerage's system confusion might affect how they report foreign taxes withheld. I'll definitely make sure to cross-reference any foreign holdings my client has with what's shown on the 1042-S. Your documentation approach is also really helpful - having a clear explanation in the workpapers seems like good practice for any unusual situations like this. Thanks for sharing your experience with this issue!

0 coins

Andre Laurent

•

I've been following this thread and wanted to add one more angle that might be helpful - timing considerations. If your client's resident status changed partway through 2022, you'll want to verify whether the 1042-S covers the entire year or just the period when the brokerage still had them classified as a nonresident. I had a similar case where the client became a resident in March 2022, but the brokerage issued a 1042-S covering January-December. In that situation, technically only the January-February income should have been subject to nonresident treatment, while March-December should have been treated as resident income. The practical solution was still to use all the 1042-S data and report it as resident income, but I made sure to claim the full withholding credit since some of it was overwithholding due to the status change timing. This resulted in a nice refund for the client. Also, don't forget to check if this affects any estimated tax payment requirements going forward. If your client has significant investment income and this brokerage continues to overwithhold at nonresident rates, they might not need to make estimated payments, or they could reduce them accordingly.

0 coins

Diego Ramirez

•

This timing consideration is brilliant and something I definitely need to keep in mind! I'm actually dealing with a similar situation where my client's status changed mid-year. The brokerage seems to have applied the nonresident withholding rate for the entire year even though she was only a nonresident for the first few months. Your point about the overwithholding creating a potential refund opportunity is really valuable - I hadn't fully considered how significant that could be. I'll make sure to calculate what the withholding should have been for each period and claim the full amount. Thanks for bringing up the estimated tax angle too - that's going to be important for planning next year's payments.

0 coins

Emma Johnson

•

I've been dealing with this exact issue more frequently lately, and one thing I'd add to the excellent advice already shared is to pay attention to any state tax implications. If your client lives in a state that doesn't automatically follow federal treatment for foreign-sourced income, you might need to make adjustments at the state level even after properly handling the federal return. Also, I've found it helpful to send the brokerage a copy of your client's green card or other documentation proving resident status along with the request for correction. While many firms are slow to update their systems, having official documentation can sometimes expedite the process for future years. One more practical tip: if the 1042-S shows any backup withholding in addition to the standard nonresident withholding, make sure you understand what triggered it. Sometimes when systems are confused about resident status, they'll also apply backup withholding rules incorrectly, which can result in significant overwithholding that your client is entitled to recover. The bottom line is that while it's frustrating when brokerages don't update their records promptly, you absolutely can work with the 1042-S data to file a proper resident return. Just make sure you're capturing all the income correctly and claiming all available withholding credits.

0 coins

Benjamin Kim

•

Great point about state tax implications! I'm new to handling these international status change situations and hadn't considered how different states might treat this differently from federal. Do you have any examples of states that commonly require adjustments when using 1042-S data for resident returns? Also, your tip about sending documentation to the brokerage is really practical - I'm definitely going to try that approach with my client's firm. It seems like having that paper trail could save a lot of headaches in future years. Thanks for sharing these insights!

0 coins

I'm a relatively new tax practitioner and this thread has been incredibly helpful! I've been hesitant to take on clients with international tax situations because they seem so complex, but reading through everyone's experiences makes this 1042-S/resident status issue seem much more manageable than I initially thought. One question I have - for those of you who have handled this situation multiple times, do you find that certain types of brokerages (discount vs. full-service, domestic vs. international) are more likely to have these system issues? I'm wondering if there are any red flags I should watch for when onboarding new clients who recently changed their tax status. Also, I'm curious about timing - how long should clients reasonably expect it to take for brokerages to update their systems once they provide documentation of their status change? It sounds like some of you have had clients wait months or even through multiple tax seasons before getting proper forms. Thanks to everyone who shared their experience - this is exactly the kind of practical guidance that helps newer practitioners feel confident taking on these situations!

0 coins

Arnav Bengali

•

Great questions! From my experience, larger discount brokerages (think Schwab, Fidelity, E*Trade) actually tend to be better at updating their systems once you provide proper documentation - they usually have dedicated departments for tax status changes. The real problems I've seen are with smaller boutique firms or international brokerages that don't handle status changes frequently. As for timing, I typically tell clients to allow 2-3 months for the change to take effect, but to request the update immediately after their status changes. The key is getting it done well before year-end so the following year's forms are correct. Some firms are faster - I've seen updates in 2-4 weeks - while others can take a full tax season. Pro tip: Have clients request written confirmation that the change has been processed and ask when it will be effective. This creates a paper trail and gives you realistic expectations for when you should start seeing proper forms. Don't be discouraged by these international situations - once you handle a few, the patterns become very familiar and they're actually quite manageable!

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today