Reporting Adsense royalties from dormant YouTube channel - Schedule E or Schedule C for tax filing?
I've got this old YouTube channel that's been sitting dormant for years, but it still generates Adsense revenue somehow. Every year I receive a 1099-MISC showing around $1200-1300 in the royalties box. This has been happening consistently for the past 7+ years, and I've always just filed it on Schedule C. But this year I started wondering: since the income is specifically labeled as "royalties" on my 1099-MISC, and I haven't created any new content or even logged into the channel in literally years, should I actually be filing this on Schedule E instead? The channel has always been profitable since I have absolutely zero expenses associated with it these days, but it feels weird calling something a "business" when I'm completely hands-off with it. I'm totally fine paying the higher self-employment tax if that's what's required, but if I can legitimately file this as passive income on Schedule E, that would be preferable. When I searched online, I found mixed answers about YouTube Adsense royalties. Any advice? I'm in the US, filing for 2025 tax year.
20 comments


Ezra Collins
What matters here isn't so much how active you are with the channel now, but the nature of the income itself. YouTube Adsense revenue is generally considered royalty income, which technically can go on Schedule E. However, the IRS often views online content creation as a business activity, even when it's relatively passive. The key distinction is whether this was originally set up as a business activity (which it sounds like it was). If you created the content as part of a business venture, even if you're not actively working on it now, the IRS typically expects you to continue reporting on Schedule C. Think of it like an author who wrote a book years ago but still receives royalties - they typically report on Schedule C. If you switch to Schedule E, you avoid self-employment tax (saving about 15.3%), but there's a risk the IRS could question the change since you've been filing it as business income for years.
0 coins
Victoria Scott
•Thanks for the explanation. I have a similar situation but with digital products I sell on Etsy. I created them years ago and now they just sell without me doing anything. I've been using Schedule C, but would love to save on that SE tax if possible. Would the IRS flag a switch from C to E after years of reporting one way?
0 coins
Ezra Collins
•The IRS doesn't automatically flag a switch from Schedule C to Schedule E, but it could raise questions during an audit since you've established a pattern of reporting. If you decide to make this change, be prepared to justify your reasoning. For your Etsy situation, it's quite similar - since you initially created those digital products as part of a business activity, the continuing income would generally still be considered business income, not passive income, even though you're not actively working on it now. The IRS typically looks at the nature of how the income stream was established originally.
0 coins
Benjamin Johnson
After reading this thread, I wanted to share my experience with taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that really helped me with a similar Adsense royalty situation. Last year I was confused about reporting income from my old podcast that still generates royalties through various platforms. I wasn't sure if I should file on Schedule C or E since I hadn't recorded new episodes in years. I uploaded my 1099 forms to taxr.ai and their analysis tool immediately flagged the royalty income classification issue. They provided a detailed breakdown of IRS guidelines specifically for digital content creators and explained exactly how my situation should be handled. What surprised me was how they found a few deductions I could still take even though the podcast was inactive!
0 coins
Zara Perez
•How exactly does taxr.ai work? Do you just upload your tax documents and it gives you advice? I'm confused about my YouTube income too but I'm nervous about sharing my tax docs with some random website.
0 coins
Daniel Rogers
•Did taxr.ai actually tell you which schedule to use? I've been going back and forth with my accountant about my dormant blog income and we can't agree. Would be nice to have a definitive answer backed by actual IRS rules.
0 coins
Benjamin Johnson
•The service is actually really straightforward - you upload your tax documents (you can black out sensitive info if you're concerned) and their AI analyzes them for issues, opportunities, and compliance problems. It's all automated and secure, so your privacy is protected. Yes, they did give me a definitive answer about which schedule to use, complete with citations to specific IRS publications and case examples. They explained that in my case, since I originally created the content as part of a business venture, I needed to continue using Schedule C even though it was now passive. They included the exact IRS guidance that applied to my situation.
0 coins
Daniel Rogers
I was skeptical about taxr.ai at first, but after my accountant couldn't give me a straight answer about my blog income, I decided to try it. I uploaded my 1099-MISC forms from various affiliate programs and ad networks for a blog I haven't updated in 3 years. The analysis I got back was incredibly detailed! It clearly explained that even though my blog was inactive, the income was still considered business income because of how it originated. They cited specific IRS regulations and even provided examples of similar cases. The best part was that they identified several home office and software subscription deductions I could still legitimately claim, even with my inactive blog. Using their guidance, I filed confidently on Schedule C, but also properly documented why certain expenses were still deductible. Honestly saved me hundreds in taxes and gave me peace of mind. Much better than the conflicting Google results I was finding!
0 coins
Aaliyah Reed
For what it's worth, I spent 2 hours trying to get through to the IRS about this exact Schedule C vs Schedule E issue for my old YouTube channel. Kept getting disconnected or hitting endless holds. Finally, I used Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) and got connected to an IRS agent in about 20 minutes. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent confirmed that since I originally created my YouTube content as part of a business activity (even though it's dormant now), I should continue filing Schedule C. She explained that changing to Schedule E after years of Schedule C filings might trigger inconsistency flags. The IRS considers the nature of how the income stream was established, not just how passive it is currently.
0 coins
Ella Russell
•Wait, how does Claimyr actually work? Is it just another hold service that calls for you? Not sure how that would be different than me just calling and waiting on hold myself.
0 coins
Mohammed Khan
•Sorry but this sounds made up. I've never heard of a service that can get you through to the IRS faster. Everyone knows their wait times are horrible. And even if you do get through, the agents rarely give definitive answers on classification questions like this. They usually just refer you to publications.
0 coins
Aaliyah Reed
•It's not another hold service - it uses a priority business line to connect you faster. You don't have to wait on hold at all - they call you when an agent is on the line. Basically, it navigates the IRS phone system and waits on hold for you, then calls your phone when an actual person answers. The advice from IRS agents can definitely vary, I won't argue with that. But in my case, I got a senior agent who was quite knowledgeable about digital content income. She specifically cited Publication 525 regarding royalty income versus business income and explained that the initial categorization of an income stream generally should be maintained unless the fundamental nature of the activity changes.
0 coins
Mohammed Khan
I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After struggling with Schedule C vs E questions for my podcast royalties, I broke down and tried it. Within 15 minutes I was talking to an actual IRS tax specialist - no waiting on hold for hours like I normally do. The agent was super helpful and explained that since I originally created my podcast as a business (filed Schedule C for years), switching to Schedule E now would raise flags in their system. She said the key factor isn't how active I am with it now, but the nature of how the income stream was created in the first place. She directed me to specific sections in Publication 525 that covered digital content royalties. I'm filing Schedule C again this year, but with much more confidence. I was also told I could still deduct certain ongoing costs related to hosting and domain registration, even though the podcast is dormant. Seriously saved me a potential audit headache!
0 coins
Gavin King
I think it also depends on your overall tax situation. If you're already filing Schedule C for other self-employment income, adding this YouTube revenue there might be simpler. But if this is your only "business" income, the question becomes more important. Something to consider: If you report on Schedule E, you avoid SE tax (saving ~15.3%), but you lose the ability to make retirement contributions based on this income (like SEP IRA or solo 401k). So if you're using this income to boost retirement savings, Schedule C might actually be beneficial despite the SE tax.
0 coins
Emily Parker
•That's a great point about retirement contributions I hadn't considered! I don't have any other self-employment income, so this YouTube channel is my only Schedule C currently. I haven't been making retirement contributions based on this income, but maybe I should look into that option. I guess I need to weigh the ~15.3% SE tax savings against potential retirement contribution benefits. How much can you typically contribute to a SEP IRA based on self-employment income?
0 coins
Gavin King
•For a SEP IRA, you can contribute up to approximately 20% of your net self-employment income, with a maximum of $69,000 for 2025. With your income level around $1,200-1,300, you could contribute roughly $240-260 per year. A Solo 401k might actually be better in your situation since you have no employees. With a Solo 401k, you can contribute as both the employee and employer. As an employee, you can contribute up to $23,000 for 2025 (subject to your earned income), plus an additional employer contribution of up to approximately 20% of your net self-employment income.
0 coins
Nathan Kim
Has anyone considered that the type of YouTube channel might matter? I have a gaming channel with income from both ads and gaming sponsorships. My tax preparer said the sponsorships are definitely Schedule C, but put the ad revenue on Schedule E since they're technically royalties from my existing content. Been doing it this way for 3 years with no issues.
0 coins
Eleanor Foster
•That's interesting! My accountant does the exact opposite. She puts my YouTube ad revenue on Schedule C and my book royalties on Schedule E. Her reasoning was that YouTube ad revenue is tied to a platform where I built a business presence, while book royalties are more passive. The IRS seems to accept both approaches.
0 coins
Eva St. Cyr
This is exactly the kind of gray area that drives people crazy during tax season! I've been dealing with a similar situation with my old blog that still generates affiliate commissions. After years of going back and forth, here's what I've learned: The IRS generally looks at the "origin and character" of the income rather than your current level of activity. Since you originally created YouTube content as part of what was essentially a business venture (even if informal), the income retains that business character even when the channel goes dormant. I'd recommend sticking with Schedule C for consistency, especially since you've been filing it that way for 7+ years. The IRS tends to scrutinize sudden changes in income classification, and you could face questions during an audit about why you switched approaches. One silver lining: even with a dormant channel, you might still be able to deduct certain ongoing expenses like internet costs (percentage used for business), software subscriptions for video editing tools you maintain, or even a portion of your phone bill if you use it to monitor analytics. These deductions can help offset some of that self-employment tax burden. The peace of mind from consistent filing often outweighs the SE tax savings, especially at your income level where we're talking about maybe $200 in additional taxes.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•This is really helpful, thank you! I hadn't thought about the "origin and character" concept - that makes a lot of sense. You're right that consistency is probably worth more than the potential tax savings, especially since I've been doing it the same way for so long. I'm curious about those deductions you mentioned though. I actually do still pay for Adobe Creative Suite since I occasionally think about making new videos (even though I never do), and I have a business internet plan that I've maintained. Are those still legitimate deductions even if I'm not actively creating content? I always assumed I needed to be actively working to claim business expenses.
0 coins