< Back to IRS

Vanessa Figueroa

Need help tracing lost ERC checks with Bureau of the Fiscal Service - checks cashed by someone else

I'm in a really frustrating situation with my Employee Retention Credit checks from the government. I was supposed to receive several ERC payments for my small business, but they never showed up. I went through the whole process of filing Form 3911 to trace them, and finally got a response from the Bureau of the Fiscal Service. Here's where it gets crazy - they sent me a letter saying my checks were cashed, with copies attached. But these are NOT my checks! They have a completely different business name (not mine), different signature (not mine), but somehow the exact same dollar amounts as my expected ERC payments. I've been calling the IRS repeatedly, but they just say this isn't their problem and they can't help. I've tried calling the Bureau of the Fiscal Service literally dozens of times but no one ever answers. I've sent faxes and written letters to both agencies explaining the situation. I'm completely stuck in this bureaucratic nightmare. The IRS won't reissue my ERC checks because the Bureau says they were cashed, but they clearly weren't cashed by ME or my business! Has anyone dealt with this kind of situation before? Any advice on how to get through to someone who can actually fix this mess?

Abby Marshall

•

This is unfortunately a common issue with ERC payments. First, you're absolutely right to be concerned - it sounds like there's been some kind of error in the processing system or potentially fraud. What you need to do is contact the Treasury Check Information System directly at 1-800-826-9434. Their specific focus is handling issues with Treasury checks, and they can often provide more detailed information than the general Bureau of the Fiscal Service line. When you call, ask for a "check claims specialist" specifically. Also, request a formal investigation by submitting a written statement to the Check Claims Branch. Include copies of everything you've received, a clear explanation of the situation (the checks were cashed but not by your business), and explicitly request that they investigate who actually cashed these checks. Another approach is contacting your local Taxpayer Advocate Service office. They can often step in when you're caught in this kind of bureaucratic loop between different government agencies. They have more direct channels of communication with both the IRS and the Bureau of the Fiscal Service.

0 coins

Thank you so much for these specific suggestions! I didn't know about the Treasury Check Information System - I'll definitely call that number tomorrow morning. Do you think I should also send a new Form 3911 specifically mentioning that the checks shown as cashed don't belong to my business? And about how long did the Taxpayer Advocate Service take to help when you worked with them?

0 coins

Abby Marshall

•

You don't need to submit another Form 3911 at this point since you already have evidence the checks were cashed - just not by you. Focus on the Treasury Check Information System and be ready to provide all details about your business, the ERC claim amounts, and the dates when the checks were supposedly issued. The Taxpayer Advocate Service typically takes 3-4 weeks to fully resolve cases like this, but they'll usually contact you within 5-7 business days of receiving your request for help. They can be extremely effective since they have the authority to cut through red tape between different departments. Just make sure you clearly explain that you've already attempted to resolve this through normal channels.

0 coins

Sadie Benitez

•

After dealing with a similar nightmare situation with my restaurant's ERC payments, I finally found help through taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai). Their system specializes in analyzing government correspondence and tax documents - which was exactly what I needed when the Bureau of the Fiscal Service claimed my checks had been cashed by someone else. Their document analysis confirmed what I suspected - there was a processing error where my EIN had been incorrectly associated with another business. They provided me with a detailed report explaining exactly what happened with my ERC funds and concrete steps to resolve it. The best part was they handled all my documentation correctly the first time, which saved me months of going back and forth with different departments. If you're stuck in this bureaucratic loop between the IRS and the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, I'd definitely recommend giving them a try. Dealing with check tracing issues is incredibly frustrating without specialized help.

0 coins

Drew Hathaway

•

How exactly does this work? I'm in a similar situation with an ERC check that supposedly went to my business but was actually cashed by someone with a completely different name. Does taxr.ai directly contact these agencies for you or do they just help you prepare the right documentation?

0 coins

Laila Prince

•

I'm super skeptical about any service claiming to help with government tax issues. The IRS and Bureau of the Fiscal Service barely talk to regular people, why would they work with a third party? Have they actually helped you get your money back or just gave you some fancy report saying what went wrong?

0 coins

Sadie Benitez

•

They don't contact the agencies for you - instead, they analyze all your documentation, identify exactly where the error occurred in the processing system, and provide you with a comprehensive report that shows precisely what went wrong and what needs to be fixed. The report includes all the specific codes and reference numbers needed to efficiently navigate the bureaucracy. They were able to identify that my EIN had been incorrectly linked to another business in the Treasury system due to a data entry error. Once I had their detailed analysis, I was able to speak with the right people using the correct terminology, which completely changed how my case was handled. Within three weeks of using their guidance, I received replacement checks for the full amount. It wasn't just a fancy report - it was actionable information that actually resolved my case when I was previously getting nowhere.

0 coins

Laila Prince

•

I need to apologize for my skepticism about taxr.ai in my earlier comment. After struggling for nearly four months with a missing ERC payment situation almost identical to yours, I finally gave them a try out of desperation. Their system identified that my check was cashed by a business with a similar EIN (just two digits transposed) but a completely different name and address. They provided me with a detailed analysis showing exactly where the error occurred in the Bureau of the Fiscal Service's processing system. Using their documentation, I was able to get through to the right department at the Bureau and speak their language. The case was resolved in about three weeks, and I finally received a replacement check last Thursday. What surprised me most was how they found patterns in the processing codes that showed this wasn't just a random error but a systematic issue affecting several businesses with similar EINs. For anyone dealing with ERC check tracing issues, having this kind of specialized help makes a huge difference when you're caught between agencies that keep pointing fingers at each other.

0 coins

Isabel Vega

•

After spending 6+ hours on hold with the IRS and Bureau of the Fiscal Service trying to resolve a similar ERC check issue, I discovered Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c They basically get you through to an actual human at these government agencies instead of waiting on hold for hours or getting disconnected. I was skeptical, but I was able to speak with a Bureau of the Fiscal Service representative within 30 minutes after trying unsuccessfully for weeks. The representative I spoke with explained that missing ERC checks that show as "cashed" often indicate a processing error rather than fraud. They guided me through exactly which department needed to initiate a formal investigation, and I was able to get my case assigned to an actual investigator rather than just floating in bureaucratic limbo. For anyone dealing with ERC check tracing issues, being able to actually speak with someone who can help is absolutely crucial. I went from getting nowhere for months to having my case actively investigated within a single day.

0 coins

How does this actually work? Do they just call for you or what? I've been trying to reach someone at the Bureau of the Fiscal Service for over a month about my missing ERC payment.

0 coins

Marilyn Dixon

•

This sounds like total BS. If it was possible to just "get through" to these agencies, everyone would do it. They probably just keep you on hold themselves and charge you for the privilege. Has anyone actually gotten their ERC check problems resolved this way?

0 coins

Isabel Vega

•

They don't call for you - they use a system that navigates the phone trees and holds your place in line, then calls you when they've reached a human representative. You do the actual talking with the government agent. It saves you from being stuck on hold for hours or repeatedly calling back after disconnections. I was also skeptical initially, but the difference was dramatic. I had previously spent approximately 14 hours across multiple days trying to reach someone at the Bureau of the Fiscal Service without success. With Claimyr, I was connected to a representative in about 27 minutes. The key is that once you actually speak with someone who understands ERC check tracing issues, you can make real progress instead of being transferred between departments or told to just "wait longer." The representative I spoke with immediately recognized the issue as a known processing error with certain batches of ERC payments and escalated my case appropriately.

0 coins

Marilyn Dixon

•

I need to eat my words about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I was so desperate with my own ERC check situation that I decided to try it anyway. Got connected to an actual Bureau of the Fiscal Service agent in 32 minutes after trying unsuccessfully for weeks on my own. The agent immediately recognized my issue as part of a known processing problem with a batch of ERC payments from March 2024 where checks were printed with correct amounts but incorrect payee information. They escalated my case to their Special Processing Unit and I received confirmation yesterday that replacement checks have been authorized. After four months of getting absolutely nowhere, my issue is finally being resolved. What made the biggest difference was actually speaking to someone who knew exactly what department handles these specific ERC check tracing problems. Turns out there's a dedicated team for these issues that you can't reach through the general helpline. Worth every penny just to bypass the hold time hell and actually get my case in front of the right people.

0 coins

Have you tried visiting your local IRS Taxpayer Assistance Center in person? I had a similar issue with an ERC check that was shown as cashed but wasn't mine. The local office was able to initiate a special trace using Form 14958 (not the standard 3911 you already filed) which is specifically for disputed Treasury check endorsements. Make an appointment online first at irs.gov/help/contact-your-local-irs-office. Bring all your documentation, including the letters showing the incorrect checks. The key is asking specifically for help with "Treasury check verification" not just general ERC questions. The in-person staff can often access different systems than the phone representatives. In my case, they were able to see notes on my account that phone reps couldn't access, which helped identify exactly where the error occurred.

0 coins

That's a really helpful suggestion - I didn't realize Form 14958 existed specifically for disputed endorsements. Did you find the in-person appointment more effective than phone calls? And approximately how long did the process take from your in-person visit until they resolved your case?

0 coins

The in-person appointment was dramatically more effective than phone calls. The IRS Taxpayer Assistance Center staff had access to a direct communication channel with the Bureau of the Fiscal Service that simply isn't available to phone representatives. The entire process took about 7 weeks from my in-person visit to having replacement checks issued. The first 3 weeks were for the initial investigation, then another 4 weeks for processing the replacement checks. What made the biggest difference was having someone who could actually document that the endorsed checks were fraudulent or misdirected, rather than just being told repeatedly that "the checks were cashed" without any recognition that they weren't cashed by me.

0 coins

TommyKapitz

•

Does anyone know if this is going to cause problems for the business that actually received and cashed your checks? I'm actually on the opposite side of this - we received and deposited ERC checks that were made out to our business name and EIN, but now the IRS is saying they were meant for a different company and wants the money back. But we legitimately applied for those ERC credits and the checks had OUR name on them!

0 coins

You should immediately contact a tax attorney who specializes in ERC issues. This sounds like either a duplicate payment situation or a case where two businesses with similar identifiers both applied. The fact that the checks had your name means you might have legitimate claim, but the IRS requesting repayment suggests there's some underlying issue with eligibility or processing.

0 coins

Ryder Ross

•

This is an incredibly frustrating situation that unfortunately affects more ERC recipients than most people realize. Based on your description, it sounds like there was likely a processing error where your EIN or business information got cross-referenced with another company's details in the Treasury payment system. Here's what I'd recommend doing immediately: 1. File a complaint with the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) at tigta.gov. They handle cases involving potential fraud or systemic errors in tax processing. Your situation - where checks with your payment amounts were cashed by a completely different business - suggests either a processing error or potential fraud that TIGTA needs to investigate. 2. Document everything meticulously. Create a timeline showing when you filed for ERC, when payments should have been issued, when you filed Form 3911, and when you received the Bureau's response. Include copies of all correspondence and the fraudulent checks they sent you. 3. Consider filing a police report for check fraud. Even though these are government checks, someone cashing checks that weren't meant for them could constitute fraud, and having a police report number can help when dealing with government agencies. 4. Contact your congressional representative's office. They have direct lines to both the IRS and Bureau of the Fiscal Service that can often resolve cases that get stuck in normal channels. Bring all your documentation and explain that you're caught between two agencies that won't take responsibility. Don't give up - this kind of error is resolvable, but it requires persistence and the right approach. The fact that the amounts match your expected ERC payments but the business details are completely wrong strongly suggests a systematic processing error rather than a simple mix-up.

0 coins

Oliver Weber

•

This is exactly the kind of comprehensive approach I wish I had known about when I first started dealing with this mess! The TIGTA complaint angle is particularly interesting - I hadn't thought about this potentially being a systematic processing error that affects multiple people. I'm definitely going to file that complaint tomorrow and also reach out to my congressional representative's office. It's encouraging to hear that these errors are actually resolvable, even though it feels impossible when you're in the middle of it. One question - when you mention documenting everything meticulously, should I also include records of all the failed phone calls and hold times? I've been keeping a log of every attempt to reach someone, but wasn't sure if that level of detail would be helpful or just look petty. Thank you for taking the time to write such a detailed response - it gives me hope that there's actually a path forward here!

0 coins

Absolutely include your phone call logs! Those records actually demonstrate that you've made good faith efforts to resolve this through proper channels before escalating to TIGTA and your congressional representative. Government agencies take note when you can show you've exhausted normal processes. I'd suggest organizing your phone log to include dates, times, departments contacted, hold times, and outcome of each call. This shows a pattern of being unable to get help through standard channels, which strengthens your case for needing higher-level intervention. Also, when you contact your congressional representative's office, ask specifically to speak with their "federal case worker" or "constituent services specialist." They deal with federal agency issues daily and often have direct contact information for supervisors at both the IRS and Bureau of the Fiscal Service who can actually make decisions rather than just take notes. The key is showing that this isn't just an impatient taxpayer complaint, but a legitimate case where normal processes have failed and you need someone with authority to cut through the bureaucracy. Your detailed documentation will make their job much easier and increase the likelihood of a quick resolution.

0 coins

Hannah Flores

•

I went through almost the exact same nightmare with my ERC payments last year. What finally worked for me was getting everything escalated through the Treasury's Office of Inspector General (OIG), not just TIGTA. While TIGTA handles IRS issues, the Treasury OIG specifically deals with problems at the Bureau of the Fiscal Service. The key breakthrough came when I realized this wasn't just my problem - there was apparently a batch processing error that affected multiple businesses in early 2024. The Treasury OIG was already investigating similar cases and was able to fast-track my resolution once they saw the pattern. Here's what made the difference: I submitted a detailed complaint to Treasury OIG showing that the cashed checks had completely different business information but identical dollar amounts to my ERC claim. They immediately recognized this as part of their ongoing investigation into processing errors. Within 6 weeks of filing with Treasury OIG, I had replacement checks issued. The investigator explained that there was a data mapping error in their system that caused some ERC payments to be issued with correct amounts but wrong payee information from a different batch of applications. Don't just focus on TIGTA - make sure you also file with Treasury OIG since they have direct oversight over the Bureau of the Fiscal Service. The combination of both agencies investigating really seems to move things along much faster.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today