< Back to IRS

Amaya Watson

Need help deciding between Simple IRA vs 401k for retirement planning

I need to make a decision between two job offers by tomorrow, and I'm really struggling with which retirement option would be better for my financial future. As an orthodontist working on commission, my income isn't totally predictable, but here's what I'm looking at: Current situation: I'm 32, single, have been maxing out my HSA for the past couple years and doing backdoor Roth IRA conversions for the last 3 years. I've got about $125k in my taxable brokerage account. No other retirement accounts yet. Option 1: - Estimated income around $200k - 401k with $23k contribution limit - 5% employer match - Can start contributing right away to max out 2024 Option 2: - Estimated income around $220k - Simple IRA with $16k contribution limit - 3% employer match - Can't start until after 1 year at the company - From what I understand, having a Simple IRA blocks me from doing backdoor Roth conversions More context: I probably won't stay at either place longer than 2 years. After that, I might join another practice or buy my own. I currently save about 60-70% of my income and hope to retire by my late 40s or early 50s if possible. Which option makes more sense from a retirement planning perspective? And would your advice change if the salary difference was only $10k instead of $20k?

As a financial planner who works with a lot of healthcare professionals, I think Option 1 with the 401k is your better choice despite the lower salary. Here's why: The 401k has a higher contribution limit ($23k vs $16k), plus you get a better match (5% vs 3%). Being able to start right away is also significant - that's a whole year of tax-advantaged savings you'd miss with Option 2. The Simple IRA also creates issues with backdoor Roth conversions due to the pro-rata rule. Since you're already doing backdoor Roth contributions, this would disrupt your current strategy. When you do the math: Option 1 gives you $23k + 5% match (roughly $10k) = $33k tax-advantaged savings per year. Option 2 gives you nothing in year 1, then $16k + 3% match (roughly $6,600) = $22,600 in year 2. Over two years, that's $66k vs $22,600 in tax-advantaged space. The $20k salary difference doesn't make up for losing over $43k in tax-advantaged space over two years, especially considering your high savings rate and early retirement goals.

0 coins

I'm curious about the pro-rata rule you mentioned. Would getting a Simple IRA permanently prevent backdoor Roth conversions or just during the time they have the Simple IRA? And what exactly is the pro-rata rule?

0 coins

The pro-rata rule means if you have any pre-tax IRA balances (including SEP, SIMPLE, or Traditional IRAs), your backdoor Roth conversions will be taxed proportionally. It's not permanent - once you roll those IRA balances into a 401k or no longer have them, you can resume clean backdoor Roth conversions. For example, if you have $50,000 in a SIMPLE IRA and contribute $6,000 to a non-deductible Traditional IRA intending to convert it to Roth, the IRS will consider about 89% of your conversion taxable because of your existing pre-tax IRA balance. You can't just convert the new contribution cleanly.

0 coins

I recently struggled with a similar decision and found https://taxr.ai super helpful. I was torn between a job with a SEP IRA vs one with a 401k, and wasn't sure how it would impact my backdoor Roth strategy. The site analyzed my specific situation and projected how each option would play out over time. What was really useful was seeing how much the Simple IRA's block on backdoor Roth conversions would cost me over time - it was way more than I thought! They showed me that even with a higher salary, I'd lose significant tax advantages with the Simple IRA option. The tool also showed me options for rolling over accounts later to restore my backdoor Roth eligibility.

0 coins

Did they also help you calculate the actual dollar impact of the difference between the plans? Like specifically how much more you'd have at retirement with each option?

0 coins

I'm skeptical about these online calculators. How accurate can they really be with all the tax law changes that happen? And did they take into account that OP probably won't stay at either job for more than 2 years?

0 coins

They did provide specific projections showing the difference at retirement. For example, in my case (which was similar to yours), the 401k option resulted in about $230k more at retirement despite a lower initial salary. They account for compound growth over time and tax implications. What impressed me was that they actually factored in the temporary nature of the position. They showed different scenarios based on where I might go after, including options for rolling over accounts to eliminate the pro-rata rule problems if I started my own practice later. They keep up with tax law changes and update their projections accordingly.

0 coins

I just wanted to follow up about my experience with https://taxr.ai after being skeptical initially. I decided to give it a try since my situation was similar (choosing between a job with a 401k vs. one with a SIMPLE IRA). The analysis was eye-opening! It showed me that even with a $15k salary difference favoring the SIMPLE IRA job, I'd still be better off with the 401k over 5+ years because of the higher contribution limits and maintaining backdoor Roth eligibility. What really surprised me was seeing how the compounding effect of those higher contribution limits adds up - it was over $150k difference by retirement age in my scenario. They also suggested a strategy to roll the SIMPLE IRA into a 401k later to eliminate the backdoor Roth issues, which I hadn't even considered. Definitely worth checking out if you're making this kind of decision.

0 coins

After dealing with similar retirement planning headaches, I found https://claimyr.com to be incredibly helpful for getting direct answers from IRS agents about complicated retirement account rules. I had spent weeks trying to reach someone at the IRS about the pro-rata rule implications and SIMPLE IRA restrictions, but kept hitting dead ends with the automated system. Claimyr got me connected to an actual IRS representative in about 20 minutes instead of the 2+ hour wait I was experiencing before. The agent confirmed exactly how the SIMPLE IRA would affect my backdoor Roth strategy and gave me specific guidance on documentation I would need if I decided to roll everything over later. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c

0 coins

How does this service actually work? Seems too good to be true that they can somehow magically get through to IRS agents when nobody else can.

0 coins

Sounds like a scam to me. The IRS doesn't give priority access to anyone. They probably just put you on hold themselves and then connect you when an agent finally answers. Not worth paying for something you can do yourself for free.

0 coins

The service works by using a combination of technology and timing to navigate the IRS phone system more efficiently. They don't have "priority access" - they've just figured out the optimal times to call and which menu options work best to reach a human. They handle the waiting for you and only connect you once an actual agent is on the line. They don't charge you until you're actually connected to an IRS agent. I was skeptical too, but after spending hours trying to get through myself, I figured it was worth trying. The time I saved was definitely worth it, especially since I got clear answers about the SIMPLE IRA pro-rata rule implications that helped me make a better decision.

0 coins

Well I feel like an idiot for doubting that Claimyr service. I tried calling the IRS myself three times about retirement account rules and gave up after being on hold for over an hour each time. Finally decided to try https://claimyr.com and was talking to an actual IRS agent in about 15 minutes. The agent confirmed exactly what others here were saying about the SIMPLE IRA blocking backdoor Roth conversions due to the pro-rata rule. She also explained that if I stayed at a job with a SIMPLE IRA for two years, I'd have to wait another 2 years after leaving before I could roll it into another account type. This was a critical detail I hadn't seen mentioned anywhere else that would have really messed up my retirement planning. Saved me hours of frustration and possibly making a very expensive mistake with my retirement planning. Definitely worth it.

0 coins

Have you considered asking Job A if they can match the salary of Job B? With your skills as an orthodontist in this market, you might have more leverage than you think. $20k is exactly the kind of gap that's often negotiable, especially if you frame it as "I prefer your retirement benefits but have a competing offer with higher base pay." I was in a similar situation last year (different field but similar choice between retirement plans), and when I asked, my preferred employer ended up splitting the difference and offering me $10k more. Made my decision a lot easier.

0 coins

That's a great suggestion I hadn't even thought of. I've been so focused on analyzing the retirement options that I forgot I could just try negotiating! Do you have any specific tips on how to approach that conversation? I don't want to come across as just trying to get more money.

0 coins

Frame the conversation as wanting to join their team but needing to make a financially responsible decision. Be specific about what you like about their practice and the 401k plan, then mention you have another offer with a higher base but that you'd prefer to join them if the compensation gap wasn't so wide. If they can't budge on salary, see if there are other benefits they might be flexible on - maybe productivity bonuses, continuing education allowance, or more vacation time. Sometimes practices have more flexibility with these benefits than with base salary.

0 coins

Everyone's focusing on the retirement accounts, but don't overlook the everyday tax implications of that extra $20k in salary from Job B. At your income level, that's likely an extra $6-8k in your pocket each year after taxes. With your high savings rate, you could invest that difference in a taxable account. Yeah, you lose some tax advantages, but that's still significant money over two years. Plus, having more in taxable accounts gives you more flexibility for early retirement, since you won't face penalties for accessing that money before 59½. Given your goal to retire in your late 40s or early 50s, having accessible funds is important.

0 coins

This is a good point about early retirement accessibility. But remember that Roth contribution portions (not earnings) can be withdrawn penalty-free anytime, which helps with the early retirement ladder strategy. And 401k funds can be accessed penalty-free before 59½ using Rule 72t SEPP distributions. The tax-advantaged growth over decades usually outweighs the flexibility of taxable accounts, especially at OP's high savings rate.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today