Lost EIC due to $24.95 over interest income threshold on 1099-INT - any workarounds?
I'm at my wits' end with this tax situation. Last year, my husband and I received a payment of $37,240.75 from the Homeowner Hardship Fund (HHF) for mortgage assistance we applied for during the pandemic when he was laid off. We actually ended up selling our house before we got approved, but they still sent the payment months after we sold. I just got the bank's breakdown after waiting almost a month for them to respond. Out of the total payment, $25,615.80 was actual HHF assistance money, and $11,624.95 was classified as "interest compensation" for the delay in processing our application. Here's my problem - I'm doing our taxes for the 2025 filing season and I discovered that the EIC threshold for interest income is $11,600. So because of just $24.95 over the limit, we're losing our entire $4400 refund AND now owe $760! It feels so unfair to be penalized this much for such a tiny amount over the threshold. I've tried calling the bank again but they're impossible to reach. Is there any possible way to reclassify this payment? Could I use some credit card interest we paid to offset it? Or maybe I could return the $25 to them somehow with a letter saying we don't accept it? I know we need to be honest with taxes but there's got to be some solution when we're talking about literally $24.95 costing us over $5,000.
18 comments


Ethan Moore
This is definitely a frustrating situation, but I can help clarify some things about your EIC eligibility and possible options. The interest income threshold for EIC is indeed strict, and the IRS doesn't have a "close enough" policy. Being even $1 over disqualifies you, which feels especially harsh in your case. Unfortunately, you can't spread interest income across multiple tax years - it must be reported in the year it was received. As for reclassification, this depends on what documentation you received. Does the 1099-INT specifically list this as interest income? If it's truly compensation for delayed payment, there might be an argument that it's not actually interest but rather a different form of income that wouldn't affect your EIC eligibility. You can't offset interest income with credit card interest you paid - those are handled completely differently on your tax return. And returning the money now won't help for last year's taxes since you had constructive receipt of the funds in that tax year.
0 coins
Aisha Ali
•Yes, we got a 1099-INT form from the bank that specifically lists the $11,624.95 as interest income. But honestly, I'm questioning if that's correct because it seems more like compensation for their delay rather than actual interest. Would it be worth trying to get the bank to issue a corrected form with a different classification? And if so, what classification would make more sense that wouldn't kill our EIC?
0 coins
Ethan Moore
•You raise a good point about the classification. If the payment truly was compensation for delay rather than interest earned, it might be more accurately classified as "other income" on a 1099-MISC instead of interest on a 1099-INT. This distinction could potentially preserve your EIC eligibility. It would definitely be worth contacting the bank to discuss reclassification if you believe it's been incorrectly categorized. Explain that this amount doesn't represent traditional interest but rather compensation for a delay, which is functionally different. Request they issue a corrected form. If they're reluctant, ask to speak with a supervisor or their tax department specifically. Sometimes persistence pays off in these situations.
0 coins
Yuki Nakamura
After reading your post, I wanted to share my experience with a similar issue involving misclassified income on tax documents. I was getting nowhere with the bank's customer service until I discovered taxr.ai at https://taxr.ai which helped me analyze my tax documents and identified that my funds were incorrectly categorized. The tool showed me exactly what language to use when contacting the financial institution and gave me specific regulations to cite. In a situation like yours where $24.95 is causing such a huge tax consequence, having the proper documentation analysis could make all the difference. I uploaded my 1099 form and their system flagged potential classification issues immediately. They also provided a sample letter template to send to the bank requesting a corrected form with proper explanation of why the classification should be changed. Made the whole process so much smoother than the weeks I spent getting nowhere on my own.
0 coins
StarSurfer
•How long did it take from when you submitted your docs until you got their analysis? I'm in a similar boat with a misclassified distribution and my tax appointment is next week. Does this actually work for getting financial institutions to issue corrected forms? My experience is they just don't care.
0 coins
Carmen Reyes
•I'm skeptical about these online services. How much does it cost? And what if they tell you there's nothing wrong with your documents after you've paid? Seems like the bank should be responsible for fixing their own mistakes without us having to pay some third party.
0 coins
Yuki Nakamura
•The analysis came back within 24 hours after I uploaded my documents, so you should have plenty of time before your appointment. I found that having the specific tax codes and regulatory language made a huge difference when dealing with the financial institution. Instead of being brushed off, they took me seriously because I was speaking their language. As for cost concerns, I completely understand the skepticism. The value really comes from their expertise in identifying issues that most people wouldn't catch. In my case, the potential tax savings were significant compared to the service cost. They also provide detailed explanations of their findings so you understand exactly what's wrong and how to address it, regardless of whether you choose to use their letter templates.
0 coins
StarSurfer
Just wanted to update everyone - I finally tried taxr.ai after posting here and it was exactly what I needed. They identified that my "interest income" was actually misclassified compensation for administrative delay, which falls under different tax treatment. The analysis showed me exactly what sections of tax code to reference when requesting a corrected form. I sent their template letter to my bank (with a few personal modifications) and after some back and forth, they agreed to issue a corrected 1099-MISC instead of the 1099-INT. This removed the income from the interest category that was affecting my EIC. What impressed me was how specifically they addressed my situation rather than just generic advice. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with potentially misclassified income on tax documents.
0 coins
Andre Moreau
Seeing your frustration with the bank reminds me of my nightmare trying to reach the IRS about a similar EIC issue last year. After weeks of busy signals and disconnections, I found Claimyr at https://claimyr.com and used their service to actually get through to a real IRS agent. You can see how it works in this demo: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c Instead of waiting on hold forever, they navigate the IRS phone system for you and call you back when they have an actual human on the line. The IRS agent I spoke with was able to confirm exactly how certain types of income affect EIC eligibility and gave me specific guidance about requesting corrected forms from financial institutions. In my case, I learned there was actually an exception I qualified for that my tax software hadn't picked up. Saved me thousands in refund money that I would have otherwise lost.
0 coins
Zoe Christodoulou
•How does this actually work? Can't the IRS just tell you to deal with the bank directly since it's their mistake with the 1099 form? I'm confused how getting through to an IRS agent helps with what seems like a bank classification error.
0 coins
Carmen Reyes
•This sounds like paying for something that should be free. Why should we have to pay just to talk to the government agency we fund with our tax dollars? I've spent hours on hold with the IRS before and eventually got through. Sounds like another company trying to profit off a broken system.
0 coins
Andre Moreau
•The IRS agents can actually provide official guidance on how specific types of compensation should be classified for tax purposes. While they can't force the bank to change the form, having documentation of an official IRS position on how your specific situation should be handled gives you leverage when dealing with the bank. It's not just about getting through - it's about getting authoritative answers you can reference. Regarding the cost concern, I completely understand your perspective. In an ideal world, reaching government services should be easier. For me, it came down to a simple calculation: the value of my time spent on endless hold attempts versus the cost of having someone else handle that part, especially when thousands of dollars in tax benefits were at stake. Everyone has to make that decision based on their own situation.
0 coins
Carmen Reyes
Ok I need to eat my words and apologize to everyone here. After my skeptical comments, I decided to try Claimyr as a last resort for my own situation with some questionable 1099 forms. Within 20 minutes (not hours, not days), I was actually speaking with an IRS representative who was incredibly helpful. The agent explained that in situations like the original poster's, compensation for administrative delays is often incorrectly classified as interest income when it should actually be reported as "other income" in most cases. She even provided me with the specific publication number to reference when contacting the financial institution. For anyone else dealing with income classification issues that affect tax credits like the EIC, getting the official word directly from the IRS gives you so much more leverage when asking for corrected forms. I wish I'd done this weeks ago instead of just accepting what my bank told me.
0 coins
Jamal Thompson
I went through almost the exact same situation last year! My advice: request a "technical advice memorandum" from the bank's tax department specifically addressing why they classified the payment as interest rather than compensation. In my case, the payment wasn't actually "interest" in the true tax sense because no principal was held that I had allowed them to use. It was actually a penalty payment / compensation for their administrative delay, which can be classified differently. When I pressed this issue and demanded to speak with someone who actually understood tax law (not just customer service), they eventually reclassified it properly. It took escalating to a manager and being very persistent, but it saved me thousands in tax benefits.
0 coins
Aisha Ali
•That's really helpful! What specific language did you use when requesting this "technical advice memorandum"? And how long did the whole process take from your initial request until they actually issued a corrected form? I'm worried about tax filing deadlines approaching.
0 coins
Jamal Thompson
•I basically said: "I'm formally requesting a technical advice memorandum explaining the tax classification of this payment under IRC Section 61 and why it constitutes interest income rather than compensation for damages or administrative delay. Please include references to the specific tax code provisions and rulings you're relying on for this classification." The whole process took about 3 weeks, but I started early. If you're concerned about deadlines, you can always file for an extension to give yourself until October. Just remember that if you end up owing, you still need to pay the estimated amount by the regular filing deadline to avoid penalties. But based on what you've described, I think you have a strong case for reclassification.
0 coins
Mei Chen
Has anyone considered that the HAF payment itself might be tax exempt? In most states, HAF assistance isn't considered taxable income by the feds. So the real question might be whether the "interest" portion would fall under the same exemption as the main payment. Based on guidance from my state's HAF program, the funds themselves aren't taxable, but I'm not sure about any interest or supplemental payments. Might be worth looking into the specific HAF program rules for your state!
0 coins
CosmicCadet
•This is a really good point! My sister received HAF assistance in 2023 and didn't have to report it as income. The IRS website (I just checked) says that payments from qualified disaster relief programs are generally not taxable. I wonder if the "interest" portion could be considered part of the overall assistance package rather than traditional interest income.
0 coins