Is $3000-5000 a fair price for Tax Attorney handling Offer in Compromise with IRS & STATE?
I'm currently working with a Tax Attorney to help me submit an Offer in Compromise to both my state tax agency and the IRS. The problem is I have no clue if what they're charging me is reasonable or if I'm getting fleeced. When I try to research online, the price ranges are all over the map - anywhere from $1,500 to $7,500 from what I can tell. My attorney seems knowledgeable, but they're asking for $4,200 upfront plus another $1,000 if we need to appeal. That feels steep, but maybe it's normal? I don't know anyone personally who's gone through this process. Has anyone here used a tax attorney or CPA for an Offer in Compromise? What did you end up paying for the service? Just trying to figure out if I should keep looking or if this price is actually standard in the industry. Thanks for any insight!
20 comments


Jamal Anderson
Having helped many clients through the Offer in Compromise (OIC) process, I can tell you pricing typically depends on the complexity of your case. The $4,200 you mentioned falls within the reasonable range for a tax attorney handling both state and federal OICs. The OIC process is time-intensive and requires substantial documentation. Your attorney will need to complete Form 656 (Offer in Compromise), Form 433-A (Collection Information Statement), compile supporting financial documents, craft a compelling narrative about your situation, and then negotiate with the IRS. The state process involves similar work. Each of these steps requires professional expertise and significant time. Most tax professionals charge between $3,000-$5,000 for a federal OIC alone. Adding a state OIC typically increases the fee by $1,000-$2,000. So for both federal and state, $4,200 is actually quite reasonable. The $1,000 contingency for appeals is also standard - appeals involve additional hearings and documentation.
0 coins
Mei Zhang
•Thanks for the breakdown. Do you think there's any advantage to using a tax attorney vs a CPA for an Offer in Compromise? I've heard attorneys have attorney-client privilege, but is that really important for tax issues? And do attorneys generally charge more than CPAs for the same service?
0 coins
Jamal Anderson
•Tax attorneys do have some advantages over CPAs for Offer in Compromise cases. Attorney-client privilege provides stronger legal protection for your communications, which can be valuable if there are sensitive issues in your tax situation or if there's any hint of potential fraud allegations. CPAs and Enrolled Agents can often handle straightforward OIC cases effectively and might charge 10-30% less than attorneys. However, attorneys tend to have stronger negotiation skills and better results when cases involve complex legal issues, substantial amounts, or potential litigation. If your case is straightforward and primarily about financial hardship, a CPA might be sufficient. If there are complex legal matters or large dollar amounts, an attorney is often worth the extra cost.
0 coins
Liam McGuire
I was in a similar situation last year with about $85k in tax debt. After trying to handle everything myself for months and getting nowhere with the IRS, I found this AI tax assistant at https://taxr.ai that helped me understand if my situation qualified for an OIC. The tool analyzed my specific financial situation and tax documents and confirmed I was a good candidate before I hired a professional. This saved me from wasting money on an OIC application that might have been rejected. The tool showed me how to properly document my financial hardship using the exact IRS standards they use to evaluate cases. Once I knew I qualified, I felt more confident negotiating with tax professionals about their fees because I understood the process better.
0 coins
Amara Eze
•How does this AI tool work exactly? Does it just ask questions about your finances or do you have to upload actual documents? I'm curious because I've got about $40k in back taxes and penalties but I'm not sure if I qualify for an OIC.
0 coins
Giovanni Ricci
•Sounds like marketing BS to me. How can an AI tool possibly know if the IRS will accept your offer? The IRS uses humans to review these applications and there's a lot of subjectivity in their decisions. I'd be skeptical of any tool claiming to predict OIC outcomes.
0 coins
Liam McGuire
•The tool works by having you upload your tax documents and financial information. It uses the same financial standards and calculations the IRS uses to determine reasonable collection potential. It doesn't just ask questions - it actually analyzes your real numbers against IRS guidelines. There's actually very little subjectivity in basic OIC qualification. The IRS has specific formulas for determining ability to pay based on income, expenses, and assets. While no tool can guarantee acceptance, it can accurately tell you if you're within the mathematical parameters the IRS uses. It helped me understand exactly how the IRS would view my financial situation before I spent thousands on professional fees.
0 coins
Amara Eze
Just wanted to update after trying that taxr.ai tool that was mentioned. I was skeptical at first, but it actually gave me a really detailed analysis of my OIC chances based on my financial situation. It showed me EXACTLY how the IRS would calculate my "reasonable collection potential" and gave me an estimated range for what offer amount might be accepted. Armed with this info, I felt much more confident talking to tax professionals. I ended up hiring a tax attorney for $3,800 (including both state and federal OICs), which seems pretty reasonable compared to other quotes I got. The attorney even confirmed that the analysis from the tool was spot-on with how they would approach my case. Definitely worth checking out before you commit to paying a professional.
0 coins
NeonNomad
After waiting on hold with the IRS for HOURS trying to get basic questions answered about the OIC process, I finally tried https://claimyr.com and it was a game changer. They somehow got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes instead of the 3+ hours I spent on previous attempts. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I got clear answers about the OIC process directly from the IRS, which helped me better understand what I should be paying a professional. The agent explained that while I could file myself, the acceptance rate is significantly higher with professional representation. This helped me realize that paying $3-5k for a tax pro might be worth it if it increased my chances of getting $45k in tax debt reduced.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashemi
•Wait, so this service just helps you skip the phone queue? How does that even work? The IRS phone system is notoriously horrible.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•Yeah right. Nothing can get you through to the IRS faster. They're deliberately understaffed and overwhelmed. This sounds like another scam targeting desperate people with tax problems. I'll believe it when I see it.
0 coins
NeonNomad
•Yes, it literally just helps you skip the long hold times. They use a combination of technology and staff who continuously call the IRS until they get through, then connect you once they have an agent on the line. It's not magic - just persistence and technology. I was skeptical too until I tried it. After spending 4+ hours on hold over multiple days and getting disconnected twice, I was desperate enough to try anything. Within about 25 minutes I was talking to an actual IRS agent. It's not a scam - they don't ask for any sensitive financial information or tax details, they just call the IRS and connect you when they get through.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
I need to eat my words about that Claimyr service. After posting my skeptical comment yesterday, I decided to try it myself since I've been trying to reach the IRS about my own tax situation for weeks. It actually worked! Got connected to an IRS agent in about 35 minutes (not instant, but WAY better than the 3+ hours I'd been waiting previously). The agent I spoke with gave me valuable insights about the OIC process. She told me that while the average accepted offer is around 20% of the total tax debt, having proper representation can make a huge difference in acceptance rates. This actually helped me understand why tax pros charge what they do for OIC work. The agent explained that about 60% of self-filed OICs get rejected on technicalities or errors in the financial analysis. That conversation convinced me that paying a professional around $4K might be worth it if they can save me $30K+ in tax debt.
0 coins
Sofia Martinez
I paid $3,500 to a tax attorney last year for my OIC. They handled both federal and state tax debts totaling about $67,000. My settlement was accepted at $8,500 (about 13% of what I owed). The process took almost 9 months from start to finish. My attorney spent hours gathering documents, preparing financial statements, writing a hardship letter, and following up with the IRS multiple times. Based on the amount of work involved and the outcome, I feel the fee was completely reasonable. One tip: ask if they charge a flat fee or hourly rate. Flat fee was better for me because the process took longer than expected. Also ask about their success rate specifically with OICs.
0 coins
Dmitry Volkov
•Did you shop around before choosing your attorney? I'm getting quotes between $3,200 and $6,500 for similar services and not sure how to decide between them. Were there any specific qualifications or experience levels you looked for?
0 coins
Sofia Martinez
•I did shop around and got quotes from five different professionals - three attorneys and two CPAs. The quotes ranged from $2,800 (from a CPA) to $7,000 (from a large tax firm). I chose my attorney based on their experience specifically with OICs. They had handled over 300 OIC cases and had documentation showing their acceptance rate (about 85%). I also checked reviews online and called two references they provided. The cheapest option isn't always best for OICs. The CPA who quoted $2,800 had only handled about 20 OIC cases. Since the stakes were so high (potentially saving $50K+), I went with experience over cost. Ask specifically about their OIC experience, acceptance rate, and whether they've handled cases similar to yours. Also, be wary of firms that guarantee specific results or extremely high success rates like 99% - that's usually a red flag.
0 coins
Ava Thompson
I tried doing an OIC myself first and ABSOLUTELY REGRET it!! Wasted 5 months and got rejected for "incomplete financial information" even though I sent everything they asked for. Then I hired a tax attorney who charged $4,200 flat fee for both federal and state. They refiled everything and my offer got accepted 6 months later. Settled $93k of tax debt for $11k. So worth every penny of their fee!!! My advice: don't try to save money by doing it yourself or hiring the cheapest person. This is one area where experience really matters. I probably lost more in penalties and interest during those wasted 5 months than I paid my attorney.
0 coins
CyberSiren
•What made your attorney's submission different from what you submitted yourself? I'm trying to figure out if there are specific tricks or approaches that professionals use that individuals don't know about.
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•The main differences were in the financial documentation and presentation. When I did it myself, I just filled out the forms with basic numbers. My attorney created detailed spreadsheets showing my complete financial picture, included supporting documents for every expense claim, and wrote a compelling hardship narrative that explained WHY I couldn't pay the full amount. They also knew exactly which expenses the IRS allows vs. doesn't allow. For example, I had included some expenses that the IRS doesn't recognize, which weakened my case. My attorney restructured everything to show maximum allowable expenses while staying within IRS guidelines. The biggest difference was the negotiation aspect. When the IRS came back with questions, my attorney knew how to respond professionally and provide exactly what they wanted. When I tried to handle their questions myself, I apparently gave responses that raised red flags and led to the rejection.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
The $4,200 fee you mentioned is definitely within the reasonable range for handling both federal and state OICs. I went through this process two years ago and paid $3,800 to a tax attorney who successfully settled my $78k debt for $9,500. What really matters is the attorney's specific experience with OICs. When I was shopping around, I made the mistake of initially focusing only on price. The cheapest quote I got was $2,200, but when I dug deeper, that person had only handled about 15 OIC cases total. My final choice had over 200 OIC cases under their belt with documented success rates. A few questions to ask your attorney: How many OIC cases have they handled in the past year? What's their acceptance rate? Can they provide references from recent OIC clients? Do they have experience with cases similar to your debt amount and situation? The upfront investment might seem steep, but consider that a rejected OIC can cost you months of additional penalties and interest. Plus, you'd likely have to start over with a new professional anyway. Better to invest in proven experience from the start.
0 coins