< Back to IRS

Sasha Reese

IRS accepted my CP2000 response but I already filed in Tax Court - do I need to withdraw my case?

So I finally heard back from the IRS about my CP2000 response from last October. The good news is they completely agreed with my position! But here's my situation - I had already filed a petition in Tax Court because they sent me a CP3219A notice in January claiming I never responded to the original CP2000 (which I absolutely did). The new CP2000 response I got today says they recalculated what I owe based on my explanation, and they agree I was right. It also states that since I "never filed in Tax Court" I need to pay by mid-May. But I DID file in Tax Court literally the day before the deadline as a precaution when I got that CP3219A! The IRS already responded to my Tax Court petition a few weeks back with basically "We admit he received the notices but deny everything else." I'm not worried about making the payment (I've had that money set aside waiting for this), but I'm confused about what to do about the Tax Court petition. Do I need to withdraw it now? Is it safe to withdraw after I pay? I'm worried they might somehow come back later demanding the original higher amount they thought I owed. I tried searching online but all I found were services trying to get me to hire them or basic instructions on how to file in Tax Court in the first place. Any advice from someone who's been through this bureaucratic maze would be really appreciated!

This is actually pretty common - the IRS often resolves issues while Tax Court cases are pending. Based on what you're describing, the IRS has essentially conceded to your position through their latest CP2000 response. You should first pay the agreed amount by the May deadline to stop any additional interest from accruing. Then you have two options for the Tax Court case: you can file a stipulated decision with the Tax Court (where both you and the IRS agree to the outcome), or you can simply dismiss your petition. Since the IRS already agrees with your position based on the newest CP2000, the IRS attorney assigned to your case should be willing to work with you on a stipulated decision. This gives you the most protection because it creates a formal court record of the resolution. Call the IRS attorney who responded to your petition (their contact info should be on their response) and let them know about the new CP2000. They'll likely be happy to help wrap this up with a stipulated decision since it reduces their caseload.

0 coins

Sasha Reese

•

Thanks for the detailed response! So if I understand correctly, a stipulated decision would be better than just withdrawing my petition? The IRS attorney's info is on their response, but I wasn't sure if I should contact them directly or go through some official channel. Also, is there any chance the IRS could change their mind again after I've paid what they're now saying I owe?

0 coins

Yes, a stipulated decision is definitely better than simply withdrawing your petition. It creates an official court record showing exactly what was agreed to, which prevents the IRS from later changing position on this specific issue for the tax year in question. You can absolutely contact the IRS attorney directly - they're assigned to your case and expecting to hear from you or your representative. Once you have a stipulated decision filed with the Tax Court, the IRS cannot legally come back and try to collect more for the same issue in the same tax year. That's why getting this formal resolution is important rather than just quietly withdrawing your petition.

0 coins

Noland Curtis

•

I went through something similar last year with a CP2000 notice followed by a series of confusing communications from the IRS. What helped me tremendously was using https://taxr.ai to organize and analyze all my IRS notices. The tool actually identified contradictions between my notices that I hadn't even noticed! It lets you upload all your IRS correspondence and then gives you a clear analysis of what's happening and what actions you need to take. In my case, it showed me exactly how to document that I had responded to the original notice within the timeframe, which was crucial when I had to follow up. Really helped me organize my response strategy and understand the timeline of what was happening. Might be useful for you since you're dealing with multiple notices and responses that seem to be crossing paths.

0 coins

Diez Ellis

•

Does this actually work with the specific CP forms like CP2000 and CP3219A? I've tried other tools before but they couldn't handle the technical tax notice details.

0 coins

I'm kinda skeptical of these online tax tools... how did you actually get the IRS to acknowledge they made a mistake? In my experience, that's the hardest part.

0 coins

Noland Curtis

•

The system is specifically designed to work with IRS notices including CP2000, CP3219A and most other common notices. It can recognize the form types automatically and extract the relevant dates, amounts, and issues that need to be addressed. It's much more specialized than general document analysis tools. Getting the IRS to acknowledge their mistake came down to presenting a clear timeline with documentation. Once I uploaded all my notices and responses, the tool helped me draft a response that specifically pointed out when I had submitted my original response (with delivery confirmation) and how their CP3219A contradicted that fact. I included all this documentation in my follow-up, and that's what finally got them to correct the record.

0 coins

Diez Ellis

•

Just wanted to update that I tried out taxr.ai after seeing the recommendation here and it was incredibly helpful! I was dealing with a similar situation where the IRS was sending contradictory notices. The system organized all my notices chronologically and highlighted the key deadlines and response requirements for each one. What was most helpful was that it identified exactly where the communication breakdown happened - in my case, my response was received but not processed by the correct department. I was able to use the analysis to draft a clear response letter that referenced the exact dates and document IDs, which finally got the issue resolved. Saved me from having to hire a tax attorney just to decipher all the notices!

0 coins

Abby Marshall

•

When I had a similar situation last year, I spent WEEKS trying to reach someone at the IRS who could actually help resolve the contradiction between my CP2000 response and their follow-up actions. After dozens of attempts on their regular line, I found https://claimyr.com and watched their demo at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c - it was a total game-changer for getting through to a real person. The service basically waits on hold with the IRS for you, then calls you once they've got an actual human on the line. I was honestly shocked when I got a call back with an IRS agent already on the line within a couple hours, after I'd wasted days trying on my own. The agent I spoke with was able to see both my original response and their new determination, and manually noted in my file that the case should be considered resolved per the latest CP2000. They also gave me direct instructions on what to do with my Tax Court petition, which saved me so much stress.

0 coins

Sadie Benitez

•

Wait, how does this actually work? Do they use some special connection to the IRS that regular people don't have?

0 coins

Drew Hathaway

•

Sounds too good to be true. The IRS holds are like 2+ hours sometimes. Are you saying they just sit on hold for you? What's the catch?

0 coins

Abby Marshall

•

They don't have any special connection - they use the same phone lines everyone else uses. The difference is they have automated systems that can stay on hold for hours so you don't have to. They navigate the IRS phone tree, wait through the hold times, and only call you when they've actually reached a human representative who can help with your specific issue. No catch - they literally just wait on hold for you. Yes, sometimes that means they're on hold for 2+ hours, but that's the whole point - you don't have to waste your day listening to the IRS hold music. You just go about your day and wait for them to call you when an agent is on the line. The service exists exactly because those ridiculous hold times make it nearly impossible for most people to get through during their work day.

0 coins

Drew Hathaway

•

I'm honestly shocked at how well Claimyr worked. After reading about it here, I was super skeptical (as you can see from my previous comment). My situation with the IRS was similar - confusing notices that contradicted each other, and I desperately needed to talk to someone. I tried the service expecting it to be a waste of money, but about 90 minutes after signing up, I got a call with an actual IRS representative already on the line. The rep was able to see all my notices and confirmed that my latest CP2000 response had been accepted but hadn't been properly recorded in all their systems. The agent put notes in my file to prevent any further collection actions and gave me clear instructions on what to do next. Would have taken me days of trying to accomplish the same thing on my own. For something as important as tax court filings, being able to actually speak to someone who can access your full file is invaluable.

0 coins

Laila Prince

•

Another thing to consider - make sure you get everything in writing! Even after you pay what they say you owe now and even if you get a stipulated decision, keep ALL documentation from this entire process. I had a similar situation where the IRS agreed with my response to a CP2000, but then two years later, I got a notice about the same issue again because different departments weren't communicating. Having all my previous correspondence, including the written acceptance of my explanation, saved me from having to fight the same battle twice. Also, make sure you send your payment with a clear memo/note referencing your specific case number from the CP2000. This helps ensure it gets applied to the correct tax year and issue.

0 coins

Sasha Reese

•

That's a really good point about keeping all the documentation. Should I also be sending the payment by certified mail or some other trackable method? And do I need to include a copy of the latest CP2000 with my payment?

0 coins

Laila Prince

•

Absolutely send your payment via certified mail with return receipt requested. That gives you proof of exactly when you sent it and when they received it. I would recommend including a copy of the payment voucher from the CP2000 (not the entire notice), along with a brief letter stating that this payment is for the agreed amount on your CP2000 dated [specific date] for tax year 2019. Include your Social Security number, the notice number, and any other reference numbers on the CP2000. Better to include too much identifying information than not enough.

0 coins

Isabel Vega

•

Has anyone else noticed how often the left hand of the IRS doesn't know what the right hand is doing? Last year I had THREE different departments giving me THREE different answers about the exact same issue. One suggestion I haven't seen mentioned yet - if you can afford it, it might be worth getting a brief consultation with a tax attorney who specializes in Tax Court cases. They might only charge you for 30 minutes and could give you specific advice for your situation. Sometimes spending $150 on a consultation can save you thousands in headaches later.

0 coins

Totally agree about the IRS departments not communicating. I work at an accounting firm and we see this constantly. The examination department will agree to one thing while the collections department is still pursuing the original amount. For the OP, you might check if your local Low Income Taxpayer Clinic (LITC) can help. If you qualify based on income, they provide free representation.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today