How to withdraw funds from an S-Corp with minimal tax impact as minority shareholder?
I'm in a family S-Corporation with my brother where we're doing pretty well financially. I hold 2% ownership while he holds 98%. We both get K-1s showing our portion of profits that go on our personal tax returns. We both take regular salaries, but we also do occasional distributions. Last year I took out a fairly large distribution. Here's what I'm trying to understand: If our company makes $120K in profits after all expenses in 2024, he gets a K-1 for $117,600, I get one for $2,400. We pay taxes individually on those amounts, and technically the retained earnings can be withdrawn tax-free. But that creates an issue because if I withdraw more than my 2% share, he's essentially paying taxes on money I'm taking out! What I'd like to do is take a distribution of something like $15K and have that count as an expense BEFORE the K-1s are calculated. So company makes $120K - $15K = $105K, brother gets a K-1 for $102,900, I get one for $2,100, plus I have this $15K that I need to figure out the tax situation for. I haven't contributed additional capital to the business, only received various profit distributions, usually exceeding what's on my K-1. Previously I've treated these as bonuses, but they're actually profit distributions. How can I get that $15K into my personal account with minimal tax exposure? We haven't finalized our 2024 company return yet, so if there's a more advantageous (but completely legal and ethical) way to account for this, I'd love to know. I've read something about distributions being taxed at long-term capital gains rates if they exceed the shareholder's stock basis. Could this apply here? I honestly don't know what my stock basis is or how to calculate it. I paid very little for my 2% back in 2010. How do these distributions affect my stock basis? If my basis was hypothetically $6K, and I took $15K last year, would my basis now be negative ($9K)? What's the relationship between stock basis and ownership percentage? Should we have been tracking stock basis for each of us and adjusting ownership percentages yearly? Is the stock basis amount on the K-1, or is it a separate equity account I should have been tracking that none of our accountants ever mentioned? I've reached out to our accountant but thought I'd see what others know. What's the relationship between stock basis, ownership percentage, K-1 amounts, and shareholder distributions in S-Corporation taxation? How do these elements affect each other? And most importantly, how do I withdraw money from an S-Corp where I'm a 2% shareholder, in amounts significantly higher than what's on my K-1? Thanks to anyone who made it through all that!
21 comments


Rhett Bowman
This is a common issue with S-Corps where ownership doesn't align with profit distributions. Let me help clear things up: Your stock basis is super important here. Your initial basis is what you paid for that 2% ($6K in your example), but it changes yearly. It increases by your share of company income (your K-1 amount) and decreases by distributions you take. You can't really treat these distributions as a company expense before K-1 calculations - that's not how S-Corps work. The profits flow through based on ownership percentages, period. What you're looking for is probably a guaranteed payment, which is like a partner's salary in partnerships, but these don't exist in S-Corps. Here are your options: 1) You could increase your actual salary (which is an expense to the company before profit calculations), but it needs to be reasonable market compensation for your work. 2) You could renegotiate your ownership percentage to better reflect your profit distributions. 3) Keep the current structure, but understand your brother is essentially gifting you money by letting you take distributions beyond your 2%. As for distributions exceeding basis - yes, once you've distributed more than your basis, those excess distributions are taxed as capital gains. Your basis can indeed go negative. You definitely should be tracking basis annually. It's not automatically shown on K-1s but should be calculated with each tax return.
0 coins
Danielle Campbell
•Thanks for the detailed explanation. That makes sense about not being able to treat distributions as company expenses. So if I understand correctly, if I want to take out more than my 2% would allow, the best option tax-wise would be to increase my salary rather than taking larger distributions? Also, you mentioned my basis could go negative - what happens then? Does that just mean any future distributions would automatically be taxed as capital gains until I've built the basis back up?
0 coins
Rhett Bowman
•Increasing your salary would be the cleanest way to get more money out of the business before profit allocation. Just remember the IRS requires S-Corp salaries to be "reasonable" for the work performed. If you're working full-time in a role that would command $80K in the market, paying yourself that salary makes sense and reduces the overall profit that gets distributed 98/2. When your basis goes negative, any distributions are treated as capital gains immediately. You're essentially borrowing against future profits. Your basis will increase each year by your share of company income, so over time it can return to positive. But until then, yes, distributions will be subject to capital gains taxes instead of being tax-free.
0 coins
Abigail Patel
Hey there! I went through something similar with my family's business. Our accountant never explained basis calculations either until we had a big issue. Check out https://taxr.ai - it's been a lifesaver for understanding S-Corp distributions and basis tracking. I uploaded our prior tax returns and got a detailed analysis of my stock basis history, showing exactly how previous distributions affected it. Based on their guidance, I discovered I'd been misclassifying withdrawals for years and potentially setting myself up for an audit. The coolest feature was their S-Corp distribution calculator that showed how different salary vs. distribution scenarios would impact both my taxes and my brother's. Saved me thousands by structuring things correctly before our 2024 filing.
0 coins
Daniel White
•How much history can the system analyze? I've been in an S-Corp since 2012 and have never calculated basis. Is it even possible to reconstruct basis going back that far?
0 coins
Nolan Carter
•I'm skeptical about these tax tools. I tried one last year and it gave me completely wrong calculations for my QBI deduction. Does it actually handle the specifics of S-Corp law or is it just general tax advice?
0 coins
Abigail Patel
•They can analyze returns going back as far as you have them - in my case, we uploaded 7 years of returns and they reconstructed the entire basis history. It was actually fascinating to see how it changed over time. The system even flagged years where our accountant had made errors in basis calculations. As for handling S-Corp specifics, that's actually where it shines compared to general tax software. It's specifically designed for pass-through entity complexity. Unlike the tool you tried, this one correctly factored in the Section 199A implications of different salary/distribution combinations, the impact on self-employment taxes, and even identified opportunities for income shifting between tax years.
0 coins
Nolan Carter
I need to eat my words about being skeptical of tax tools. After my bad experience last year with generic software, I decided to try taxr.ai for my S-Corp issues with withdrawals exceeding basis. Completely different experience! The analysis actually caught that our accountant had been incorrectly calculating my basis for years. They showed exactly how each K-1 item affected the basis and identified that I had technically been taking distributions that exceeded my basis without reporting the capital gains. Their recommendation to restructure how I receive compensation (slightly higher reasonable salary + more strategic timing of distributions) is saving me about $7K in taxes this year. The basis tracking feature alone is worth it - now I have a clear dashboard showing exactly where my basis stands at any time.
0 coins
Natalia Stone
I dealt with almost identical issues in my family's S-Corp. After 3 years of frustration trying to reach someone knowledgeable at the IRS who could clarify the basis rules for unequal distributions, I discovered https://claimyr.com and their IRS hold time service. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c Got connected to a Tier 2 IRS rep in under 40 minutes (instead of the 3+ hours I wasted before) who actually specialized in S-Corps. The agent confirmed that our approach to handling disproportionate distributions was incorrect and helped me understand the proper documentation needed. It was honestly shocking to get clear, helpful guidance that quickly. The IRS agent even sent me specific reference materials about stock basis adjustments for S-Corp shareholders.
0 coins
Tasia Synder
•How exactly does this work? Do they just call the IRS for you? I've been on hold literally all day twice trying to get clarification about my S-Corp basis issues.
0 coins
Selena Bautista
•Yeah right. Nobody at the IRS knows anything about complex S-Corp issues. You probably just got generic advice that doesn't actually solve anything. I've called a dozen times and always get contradictory information.
0 coins
Natalia Stone
•They use a system that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold for you. When an agent picks up, you get a call connecting you directly to that agent. You don't waste hours listening to the hold music. The magic is they have technology that can stay on hold longer than a human reasonably could. It's definitely not generic advice if you request a Tier 2 specialist. The key is knowing exactly what to ask for when you get connected. I specifically requested an S-Corporation specialist regarding basis calculations for disproportionate distributions. The first agent transferred me to someone who walked me through the entire process of recalculating basis for multiple years and documenting it properly for potential audit protection.
0 coins
Selena Bautista
I can't believe I'm saying this, but I was completely wrong about the IRS help. After my skeptical comment, I tried Claimyr out of desperation because my accountant and I couldn't agree on how to handle my negative basis situation. The service connected me with an IRS tax law specialist in about 30 minutes. I was prepared with specific questions about basis calculation when distributions exceed ownership percentage. The agent not only explained it clearly but pointed me to the exact sections of the tax code and IRS publications that address my situation. She confirmed that my approach would likely trigger an audit flag and showed me the proper way to document everything. Most surprisingly, she identified a special election we could make that would help with our specific situation of unequal distributions that our accountant had completely missed. Best $20 I've ever spent on tax help. My accountant is now implementing everything correctly based on the guidance.
0 coins
Mohamed Anderson
One approach you didn't mention is changing the S-Corp to have different classes of stock with different distribution rights. Talk to a corporate attorney about amending your articles/bylaws to create a Class A (voting) and Class B (non-voting) structure with different distribution rights. My family business did this - my father kept 100% of the voting shares while we restructured the non-voting shares to have disproportionate economic rights. We now legally distribute profits at percentages different from ownership, all properly documented. The key is it must be formally structured in your corporate governance documents, not just handled informally. It's more complex but provides a permanent solution.
0 coins
Ellie Perry
•But doesn't having different classes of stock terminate S-Corp status? I thought S-Corps were required to have only one class of stock to maintain their tax election.
0 coins
Mohamed Anderson
•You're absolutely right to raise that concern. S-Corps can only have one class of stock regarding liquidation and distribution rights. Where people get confused is that you CAN have differences in voting rights while maintaining S-Corp status. What we actually did was maintain identical distribution rights on paper but adjusted compensation packages with employment agreements that achieved similar economic outcomes through guaranteed payments and performance bonuses tied to specific metrics. This accomplished our goal of disproportionate economic benefits without violating the single class of stock requirement. Thanks for pointing this out - I should have been clearer about maintaining S-Corp compliance in my original comment.
0 coins
Landon Morgan
I think everyone's missing the simplest solution here: Get your salary right! If you're working in the business more than your 2% would suggest, you should be paid a reasonable salary for that work BEFORE profits are distributed. My CPA recommended we document market rate compensation for everyone's actual roles. This totally legitimizes paying you more through salary (a business expense) before calculating the profits that flow through based on ownership.
0 coins
Teresa Boyd
•This is the right approach. S-Corp owners constantly try to minimize salary to avoid payroll taxes, but in your case, you actually WANT more salary! Just document comparable compensation for your role with some market research.
0 coins
Cass Green
This is exactly the situation I found myself in a few years ago! The key insight that saved me was understanding that S-Corp taxation is rigid - profits MUST flow through based on ownership percentages, period. You can't change that. However, you have flexibility in how you get compensated BEFORE those profits are calculated. Here's what worked for me: 1) **Salary adjustment**: Document your actual role and responsibilities, then research market rates for similar positions. If you're doing $50K worth of work but only getting paid $30K salary, increase it to market rate. This reduces company profits before the 98/2 split. 2) **Track your basis religiously**: Start now, even if you have to reconstruct it. Your basis increases by your K-1 income each year and decreases by distributions. Once it goes negative, all future distributions are capital gains until you build it back up. 3) **Consider the gift tax implications**: If you're taking distributions beyond your ownership percentage, your brother is essentially gifting you money. This might have gift tax consequences for him if the amounts are large. The harsh reality is there's no magic way to avoid this fundamental issue - either increase your ownership percentage, increase your salary to reflect your actual contribution, or accept that excess distributions will have tax consequences. Don't try to get too creative with the accounting - the IRS has seen every trick with S-Corps and family businesses. Keep it clean and defensible.
0 coins
Mateo Sanchez
•This is really helpful, especially the point about gift tax implications - I hadn't even considered that aspect! When you say "reconstruct" your basis, how far back did you go? I'm worried I might have missed tracking this for several years and don't know if it's even worth trying to figure out the historical numbers at this point. Also, regarding the salary adjustment approach - did you run into any pushback from the IRS about suddenly increasing your salary significantly? I'm concerned about red flags if I go from a modest salary to something much higher, even if it's market rate for the work I actually do.
0 coins
GalacticGladiator
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation in our family S-Corp where I'm a 15% owner but contribute much more labor than that percentage would suggest. One thing I learned from our tax attorney that might help: if you're genuinely performing services worth more than your current salary, the IRS actually WANTS you to pay reasonable compensation. They're more concerned about S-Corp owners who try to minimize salaries to avoid payroll taxes than those who pay market rates. We documented my role with job descriptions and used salary surveys from the Department of Labor and industry associations. When we increased my salary from $35K to $65K (which was actually conservative for my responsibilities), it reduced company profits by $30K before the ownership split, which was exactly what we needed. The key is having solid documentation showing the salary increase reflects actual market compensation for work performed, not just a tax strategy. We kept detailed records of hours worked, responsibilities, and comparable positions at similar companies. As for basis reconstruction - it's definitely worth doing even if you have to go back years. I had to reconstruct 8 years of basis calculations using old tax returns and bank records. It was tedious but revealed I had been unknowingly taking distributions that exceeded my basis for three years. Getting this cleaned up before an audit was invaluable. The biggest surprise was learning that my excess distributions should have been reported as capital gains on Schedule D all along. We had to file amended returns, but it actually resulted in lower total tax liability than the way we had been handling it.
0 coins