How to Write a Statement Disagreeing with CP2000 Notice from IRS
I recently got a CP2000 notice from the IRS and I completely disagree with what they're saying. I think I understand why their system flagged my return, but I've never had to dispute something like this before. I'd really appreciate feedback on the statement I've drafted to send back to them. I received the CP2000 regarding my 2018 tax return. The IRS thinks I should have reported $11,101 as taxable retirement income on line 4b of my 1040, but I only reported $102. I'm pretty sure I did this correctly. Here's my situation: During 2017, I contributed $7,000 to a Traditional IRA, and in early 2018, I contributed another $7,000 (staying within the limits for each tax year). But when preparing my 2017 taxes, I discovered my income source (a fellowship stipend program) wasn't eligible for IRA contributions. To fix this, I withdrew everything from the IRA ($14,000 in contributions plus $102 in earnings) on April 15, 2018, before my 2017 tax return was due. Following the instructions for Form 8606 about returned contributions, I didn't report the contribution or distribution on Form 8606 or take any deductions. I reported the total distribution ($14,102) on line 4a of my 2018 Form 1040, but only included the earnings ($102) on line 4b as taxable income. I also paid the 10% early withdrawal penalty on those earnings. I think the CP2000 was triggered because my 1099-R from the investment company shows $11,101 in box 2a as taxable, but they didn't account for these being returned contributions. I've drafted a response letter explaining all this - am I on the right track? Are there specific phrases or documentation I should include? Thanks for any advice!
18 comments


Ellie Perry
You're definitely on the right track with your response. This is a common issue with returned excess contributions to IRAs. The IRS computer system often generates these notices because it simply matches the 1099-R against what you reported without understanding the nuance of returned contributions. Make sure your response includes specific references to IRS Publication 590-B which covers this exact scenario of returned contributions being treated as if never contributed. Include copies of your account statements showing the original contributions and the full withdrawal. Also attach a copy of your original return showing you properly reported the earnings on line 4b. The key phrase you want to emphasize is "returned contributions treated as if never contributed" - this is IRS terminology that helps clarify why the contributions portion isn't taxable. Also reference IRC Section 408(d)(4) which provides the statutory basis for this treatment. Don't forget to include documentation of the timing - proving the withdrawal occurred before the tax filing deadline is crucial to qualifying for this treatment.
0 coins
Landon Morgan
•Thanks for explaining that! So does the OP also need to mention anything about the 1099-R being coded incorrectly by the investment company? It seems like the financial institution should have coded the distribution differently to show most of it wasn't taxable. And should they get a corrected 1099-R from the company?
0 coins
Ellie Perry
•The 1099-R coding issue is a good point, but it's not necessarily coded incorrectly. Financial institutions often report the full distribution amount as taxable in Box 2a because they don't track the purpose of the withdrawal or your contribution history. They leave it to the taxpayer to properly report the taxable portion based on their specific situation. Getting a corrected 1099-R is rarely successful in these cases since technically the form may be correct from the institution's perspective. Instead, focus on explaining to the IRS why the reported amount on the 1099-R doesn't align with your tax return based on the returned contribution rules. The burden is on the taxpayer to explain the discrepancy, which is exactly what you're doing with your response letter.
0 coins
Teresa Boyd
After dealing with a similar CP2000 notice for my retirement account withdrawal, I discovered taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) which helped me figure out exactly how to respond. It analyzed my CP2000 notice and tax documents, then guided me through creating a proper response letter with all the correct tax code references. The system flagged that I needed to specifically mention IRC Section 408(d)(4) which covers returned IRA contributions and explained exactly which supporting documents I needed to include. It even helped me understand that my situation qualified as a "returned contribution" rather than a regular distribution. Their document analysis saved me hours of research and probably helped me avoid making mistakes that would have extended the back-and-forth with the IRS.
0 coins
Lourdes Fox
•I'm considering using this for a similar issue. Did it actually work when you sent your response to the IRS? How long did it take to get a resolution after you replied with their guidance?
0 coins
Bruno Simmons
•I'm a little skeptical about using third-party services for IRS notices. Couldn't you just call the IRS directly and ask them what documentation they need? Or is there something special this service provides that the IRS wouldn't tell you?
0 coins
Teresa Boyd
•It absolutely worked - the IRS accepted my explanation and closed the case about 6 weeks after I sent my response. The documentation package I created based on their guidance was apparently exactly what the IRS needed to see. The real value was in the time saved. Instead of spending hours researching tax codes and wondering if I had the right documentation, the system identified everything I needed within minutes. It's not just about what to include, but also how to present it clearly so the IRS reviewer can easily understand your case.
0 coins
Bruno Simmons
Just wanted to follow up about my experience with taxr.ai that I was skeptical about before. I ended up trying it for my CP2000 notice regarding some stock sales the IRS thought I didn't report correctly. I was really impressed by how it analyzed my situation. It spotted issues I would have missed, like pointing out that I needed to include my original purchase confirmations to prove my cost basis. The system explained exactly which parts of the CP2000 I should be responding to and which supporting documents would be most relevant. The response letter it helped me create was much more comprehensive than what I would have put together on my own. Got confirmation from the IRS last week that my case was closed with no additional tax owed. Definitely worth it for the peace of mind!
0 coins
Aileen Rodriguez
After dealing with several frustrating CP2000 notices over the years, I finally discovered Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). When the IRS sent me a CP2000 similar to yours, I knew I needed to talk to an actual human at the IRS to explain my situation, but I kept getting stuck in that endless phone queue. Claimyr got me past those automated systems and had an IRS agent actually call ME back. I explained my returned IRA contribution situation, and the agent was able to make notes in my file about the dispute before I even sent my written response. They even told me exactly what documentation would be most helpful to include. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c Having that conversation first made a huge difference in how quickly my dispute was resolved.
0 coins
Zane Gray
•How does this service actually work? Do they have some special access to the IRS that regular people don't have? Seems too good to be true that they can just magically get someone to call you back when the IRS phone lines are always jammed.
0 coins
Maggie Martinez
•I've tried calling the IRS numerous times about my own CP2000 and never got through. Sorry, but I find it hard to believe any service could actually get the IRS to call you back. The IRS barely has enough staff to process returns, let alone make outbound calls. This sounds like a scam that just takes your money and then you're still stuck waiting.
0 coins
Aileen Rodriguez
•They don't have special access - they use technology to navigate the IRS phone systems and hold your place in line. It's like having someone wait on hold for you, and when they reach a human agent, they connect you. I was skeptical too! The service doesn't make the IRS call you directly - it navigates the phone system for you and when an agent comes on the line, you get connected. Nothing magical about it, just smart use of technology to solve a frustrating problem. What made it valuable for me was getting personalized advice from an actual IRS agent about my specific CP2000 situation before sending my written response.
0 coins
Maggie Martinez
I need to publicly eat my words about Claimyr. After dismissing it as unlikely to work, I was desperate enough with my CP2000 situation to try it. Within about 2 hours of submitting my request, I got connected to an actual IRS representative who reviewed my case details. The agent explained exactly why my IRA distribution had been flagged (similar issue to OP - returned contributions that the IRS system didn't recognize) and walked me through exactly what documentation I needed to submit with my response. They even made notes in my account about our conversation so the person reviewing my written response would see them. I'd been trying to call the IRS for weeks with no success. Having that conversation before sending my written response gave me much more confidence that I was addressing the issue correctly. Sometimes being proven wrong is actually a good thing!
0 coins
Alejandro Castro
I dealt with almost this exact situation last year. One important thing to add to your response letter: be VERY clear about the timeline. The IRS is strict about the "before the tax filing deadline" requirement for returned contributions. Make sure you explicitly state: 1. When you made the original contributions 2. When you discovered they were ineligible 3. The exact date you withdrew the funds 4. The filing deadline that applied to you that year (including any extensions) In my case, I included a calendar with these dates highlighted and it seemed to help. Also, label all your supporting documents clearly (e.g., "Exhibit A: IRA Contribution Statement," "Exhibit B: Complete Distribution Statement") and reference them specifically in your letter. Makes it much easier for the IRS agent reviewing your case.
0 coins
Monique Byrd
•Should OP also mention that they paid the 10% early withdrawal penalty on the earnings? Seems like that might be another point in their favor showing they were following the rules correctly.
0 coins
Alejandro Castro
•Yes, absolutely mention the 10% penalty payment! That's a great point. The fact that you correctly calculated and paid the 10% penalty on just the earnings portion demonstrates you understood and followed the rules. Actually, this detail is very important because it shows you were aware of the tax treatment difference between the returned contributions (not taxable) and the earnings (taxable with penalty). It helps establish that your reporting wasn't an oversight but a deliberate application of the correct tax rules.
0 coins
Jackie Martinez
Has anyone else noticed that the IRS seems to be sending out way more CP2000 notices the last few years? I've gotten two in the past three years for totally different issues, and both times they were wrong. I'm wondering if their automated matching system is just flagging more returns without human review first.
0 coins
Lia Quinn
•Yes! My tax preparer told me the IRS is relying more heavily on automated systems due to staffing shortages. Apparently their computers just match documents like 1099s to what's on your return, and if there's any discrepancy, they automatically generate a CP2000 without anyone checking if there might be a valid explanation. It's frustrating because then the burden is on us to explain situations like OP's that are actually completely legitimate.
0 coins