How to Calculate Taxable Amount on OPM Statement of Annuity Paid (Similar to 1099-R)
I have a retired client who received a Statement of Annuity Paid from the Office of Personnel Management (similar to a 1099-R), and I'm struggling to figure out how much is taxable. I haven't worked with this specific form before and could use some advice. Here's the breakdown of what's on the form: - Box 1: Gross distribution $25,000 - Box 2a: Taxable amount listed as "Unknown" - Box 9b: Total employee contributions $74,356 - There's also a footnote stating: "Gross annuity reduced by $14,530.80 paid to former spouse as part of divorce agreement" I'm thinking none of this is taxable since the employee contributions in Box 9b exceed the distribution amount in Box 1. But I've never seen Box 9b be larger than Box 1 on a 1099-R before, so I'm confused. Is the amount in Box 9b the basis in the plan, and will it be reduced by this year's distribution next year? What's throwing me off even more is that I looked at last year's tax return (prepared by another CPA), and they showed $19,000 of a $22,000 distribution as taxable. I'm trying to get last year's statement to compare, but this seems odd given the large employee contribution amount. Also, does the payment to the ex-spouse mentioned in the footnote affect the taxability at all? Really appreciate any help with this!
20 comments


Alexander Evans
You're dealing with a federal retirement benefit that follows the Simplified Method for determining the taxable portion. The $74,356 in Box 9b represents the retiree's total after-tax contributions to their federal retirement plan over their working years. With the Simplified Method, you need to find what portion of each payment represents a return of already-taxed contributions. First, determine the total expected return based on the annuitant's age at retirement using the IRS tables. Then divide the total contributions ($74,356) by that number to get the monthly tax-free portion. The previous CPA likely correctly applied the Simplified Method, which is why a significant portion was taxable despite having contributions in the account. The tax-free portion remains constant throughout the expected return period - it doesn't change based on remaining contributions. As for the divorce payment, that part is typically still considered part of the gross distribution to the primary annuitant for tax purposes, even though it's paid to the former spouse. The ex-spouse would report that income on their tax return, but your client still needs to account for it in their Simplified Method calculation.
0 coins
Ruby Garcia
•Thanks for explaining the Simplified Method - that makes more sense now. Do you know if there's a specific IRS publication that covers this situation for federal retirees? And how would I find the original expected return calculation if I don't have his retirement date or age at retirement?
0 coins
Alexander Evans
•IRS Publication 721 "Tax Guide to U.S. Civil Service Retirement Benefits" covers this topic specifically for federal retirement benefits. It explains the Simplified Method in detail for OPM annuities. You'll need to determine when your client began receiving the annuity and their age at that time. If you can't get that information directly from the client, check previous tax returns - particularly the first year they received the annuity, as there should be a worksheet showing the calculation. Alternatively, you could contact OPM directly with your client's authorization to request the starting date and original calculation.
0 coins
Evelyn Martinez
I had something similar with a client last year and found https://taxr.ai incredibly helpful for sorting out this exact scenario with federal retirement benefits. I was confused about the Simplified Method calculation too, especially with divorce payments involved, but their document analysis tool figured it out quickly. You upload the Statement of Annuity and any prior tax returns, and it shows exactly how to calculate the taxable portion step by step. It even generated the completed Simplified Method worksheet for me to include with the return. Saved me hours of research since these federal retirement forms are pretty different from regular 1099-Rs.
0 coins
Benjamin Carter
•Does it work with other retirement forms too? I have some clients with state retirement plans that always confuse me.
0 coins
Maya Lewis
•I'm skeptical about these online tools. How accurate is it really? The last thing I need is an audit because some algorithm messed up the calculations.
0 coins
Evelyn Martinez
•It works with all types of retirement documents including state retirement plans. The system recognizes different formats and applies the correct rules based on the specific plan type. Regarding accuracy, I was skeptical too initially, but it's actually designed by tax professionals who specialize in retirement taxation. It follows all IRS guidelines and shows you exactly which rules it's applying. I've used it for about 15 clients now with complex retirement situations, and everything has checked out perfectly when I've verified the calculations manually. The tool just makes the process much faster and eliminates the possibility of calculation errors.
0 coins
Benjamin Carter
Just wanted to follow up about my experience with taxr.ai for retirement forms. I tried it after seeing it mentioned here, and it was exactly what I needed! Uploaded my client's OPM statement that had me confused for days, and it immediately identified it as requiring the Simplified Method. The breakdown showed me that the taxable portion was higher than I expected because the monthly exclusion amount had been calculated years ago when they first retired. The tool even found a mistake in how the divorce payment was being handled on previous returns. My client ended up getting a small refund from an amended return we filed for the previous year. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with these unusual retirement forms!
0 coins
Isaac Wright
Have you tried contacting OPM directly? I spent THREE WEEKS trying to get clarification on a similar issue for my client last tax season. Impossible to get through to anyone who could actually explain how the taxable amount was determined. I finally used https://claimyr.com to get through to a real person at the IRS who specializes in retirement distributions. There's also a video showing how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent I spoke with confirmed that OPM annuities follow specific rules that even many CPAs get wrong. They walked me through exactly how to calculate it with the Simplified Method and explained why the taxable amount seems counterintuitive. Turns out the divorce payment complicates things further because of how it's reported on the form.
0 coins
Lucy Taylor
•How does this Claimyr thing work? I thought it was impossible to get through to the IRS these days. I've spent hours on hold only to get disconnected.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•Sounds too good to be true. The IRS barely answers their phones for basic questions, let alone having specialists available to explain complex retirement tax issues.
0 coins
Isaac Wright
•The service basically holds your place in the IRS phone queue so you don't have to wait on hold yourself. They call you back when they've reached an actual human at the IRS, then connect you directly to that person. For specialists, you're right that they don't advertise having retirement experts, but once you get through to a real person, you can ask to be transferred to someone who handles retirement tax issues. Not everyone at the IRS knows everything, but they do have people who specialize in different areas. I was transferred twice before getting someone who really understood OPM annuities, but it saved me days of research.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
I was wrong about Claimyr and want to share my experience. I was skeptical (as you can see from my comment above), but I decided to try it anyway for a client with a complicated retirement distribution question that I couldn't figure out. The service connected me to the IRS in about 90 minutes (I was expecting days based on my previous attempts). Once connected, I explained the OPM annuity situation, and they transferred me to someone in their retirement division. The agent explained that when there's a divorce payment involved like in your situation, it requires special handling on the tax return. The payment to the ex-spouse is still considered part of the annuitant's distribution for purposes of the Simplified Method calculation, even though they don't receive that money. This clarification alone saved my client over $2,000 in taxes that the previous preparer had incorrectly calculated. Worth every penny just for the time saved not sitting on hold.
0 coins
KhalilStar
The key thing you're missing with OPM annuities is that the Simplified Method calculation was established when your client first started receiving payments. Each monthly payment contains the same amount of tax-free return of contribution, regardless of how much basis is left. Your client is receiving $25,000 annually, but part of that is a return of their already-taxed contributions ($74,356 total). Once they've recovered their entire contribution amount over several years, all future payments become 100% taxable. The divorce payment doesn't change the underlying tax calculation for your client, but the ex-spouse needs to report their portion as income on their own return.
0 coins
Ruby Garcia
•So if I understand correctly, I need to find out when they started receiving the annuity and what their age was at that time to properly calculate this? If the monthly exclusion was already determined years ago, would that number be on a previous tax return somewhere?
0 coins
KhalilStar
•Yes, the monthly exclusion amount should be on Form 1040 from the first year they received the annuity. Look for the "Simplified Method Worksheet" that should have been included with that return. If you can't find it, you'll need to recalculate it based on: 1. Their age when annuity payments started 2. Whether the annuity covers one life or multiple lives 3. The total employee contributions at that time The monthly tax-free amount stays the same until they've fully recovered their contribution amount. After that, all payments become 100% taxable. This is likely why the previous CPA showed most of the distribution as taxable - they were correctly continuing an established calculation.
0 coins
Amelia Dietrich
Im confused about how to handle the divorce payment. If the client doesn't receive that money, why does it affect their taxes? Doesn't the ex get their own tax form?
0 coins
Kaiya Rivera
•The OPM is weird about this. Ex-spouse gets a 1099-R but the original retiree's form still shows the full amount before the divorce payment. It's like they're paying tax on money they never received! But its actually more complicated - the Simplified Method calculation is still based on the full original benefit. The ex-spouse has to report their portion and pay taxes on it separately.
0 coins
Sofia Hernandez
I've handled several OPM annuity situations like this, and the key is understanding that the Simplified Method calculation was locked in when your client first retired. The $74,356 in Box 9b represents their lifetime contributions, but you can't just compare it to this year's distribution to determine taxability. When they first started receiving payments, a monthly exclusion amount was calculated based on their age and life expectancy at retirement. This same dollar amount is excluded from taxes each month until they've recovered their full $74,356 in contributions. After that, everything becomes taxable. Regarding the divorce payment - this is tricky. Your client's form shows the gross amount before the $14,530.80 payment to the ex-spouse, but for the Simplified Method calculation, you still use the full gross amount. The ex-spouse should receive their own 1099-R for the portion they received and will report that income separately. To get the correct calculation, you really need to find either the original Simplified Method worksheet from when payments began, or get the client's retirement date and age to recalculate it. The fact that the previous CPA showed most of the distribution as taxable suggests they were correctly applying an established exclusion amount that's much smaller than what you might expect.
0 coins
Javier Gomez
•This is really helpful! I'm new to dealing with federal retirement benefits and was getting overwhelmed by all the different rules. Your explanation about the monthly exclusion being "locked in" makes perfect sense now - I was thinking about it more like a traditional IRA where you just subtract contributions from distributions. One follow-up question: if I can't locate the original Simplified Method worksheet and the client doesn't remember their exact retirement date, would OPM have this information available? Or is there another way to reconstruct the calculation without having to guess at the timeline?
0 coins