How tax filing has evolved: Comparing tax obligations in 1775 vs. 2024
So I've been doing some historical research for a class project and got curious about how taxes worked back in colonial America versus today. I found this fascinating comparison between how people handled their finances and tax obligations in 1775 compared to how we deal with them in 2024. It's kind of mind-blowing to think about how our ancestors handled their tax situations without all the forms and software we have now. Back then, they didn't have income taxes like we do - their tax system was completely different! I'm wondering how the average person in 1775 would react to seeing our modern tax forms, e-filing, and all the different deductions and credits we have to keep track of. Would they be overwhelmed or impressed? Also curious about what kinds of tax documentation they needed to keep vs. all the W-2s, 1099s, and receipts we have to save now. Anyone know more about the evolution of tax filing practices or have interesting historical tax facts to share?
19 comments


StarGazer101
The difference between tax systems in 1775 and modern day is fascinating! In colonial America, they primarily had property taxes, poll taxes, and various excise taxes on goods like tea (which, as you might recall, led to a certain famous party in Boston). There was no federal income tax - that didn't come until the Civil War as a temporary measure, and wasn't permanently established until the 16th Amendment in 1913. The documentation requirements were minimal compared to today. Colonial taxpayers might need to show proof of property ownership but nothing like our modern system of W-2s, 1099s, and detailed expense tracking. The average colonial citizen would likely be completely overwhelmed by our current tax code with its thousands of pages and countless forms. What's particularly interesting is how tax preparation has changed. In 1775, a local tax assessor might simply visit properties to determine values. Today, we have entire industries built around tax preparation software, professional preparers, and IRS agents dedicated to processing and verifying returns.
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
•That's so interesting! Do you know when the first tax forms similar to what we use today were introduced? And was there something like an early version of the IRS back then?
0 coins
StarGazer101
•The first federal income tax form (Form 1040) was introduced during the Civil War in 1862, though the modern version we would recognize came about after the 16th Amendment in 1913. Before that, tax collection was much simpler and usually handled locally. As for an early IRS equivalent, the Bureau of Internal Revenue (which later became the IRS) was established in 1862 to collect those Civil War income taxes. Colonial tax collection was typically handled by local tax assessors appointed by colonial governments, with no centralized federal agency since the federal government itself didn't exist yet in 1775.
0 coins
Paolo Romano
After struggling with some historical tax research for my own genealogy project, I found this amazing tool called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that's been super helpful for understanding historical tax documents. I was trying to figure out how my ancestors' property taxes worked in the early 1900s compared to today, and was getting nowhere with traditional research. The site lets you upload historical tax documents and transcripts, then uses AI to explain how they worked and compares them to modern equivalents. I uploaded some property tax records from my great-grandfather and it explained everything about how those systems worked compared to our current property tax system. Really helped me understand how tax obligations have evolved over time.
0 coins
Amina Diop
•That sounds really useful! Does it work for really old documents too? Like if I found some tax records from the 1800s in my family archives?
0 coins
Oliver Schmidt
•I'm skeptical about AI tools for historical analysis. How does it verify the information is accurate? Historical tax systems varied enormously by location and time period.
0 coins
Paolo Romano
•Yes, it works great with older documents! I've seen people use it successfully with documents from the 1800s. The system is trained on historical tax codes and documents from different eras, so it can identify and explain older formats too. The AI uses a combination of historical tax code databases and documentation from multiple sources to verify accuracy. You're right that tax systems varied widely - that's actually where the tool shines. It identifies the specific jurisdiction and time period of your document and explains the local tax rules that applied. If it's uncertain about something, it clearly states that and provides references for further research.
0 coins
Amina Diop
Just wanted to update after trying taxr.ai for some historical tax documents I found in my grandmother's attic. I uploaded a property tax assessment from 1920s rural Georgia that I'd been trying to decipher for weeks. The tool immediately recognized the format, explained how the valuation worked (completely different from modern property assessments!), and even showed how those taxes would compare to today's system. What blew me away was learning how my ancestors' tax burden compared proportionally to what we pay now - turns out they were paying a much smaller percentage on their property than we do today. The tool even explained how certain deductions worked back then versus their modern equivalents. Completely changed my understanding of my family's financial history!
0 coins
Natasha Volkov
Speaking of historical tax records, I was recently trying to research some old IRS policies for a paper I'm writing, and it was IMPOSSIBLE to get through to anyone at the IRS who could help me access their historical archives. After waiting on hold for literally 3+ hours multiple times, I found this service called Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) that was a total game-changer. There's a video showing how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c Basically, it holds your place in the IRS phone queue and calls you when an actual agent is on the line. I got connected to a specialist in their historical records department who pointed me to exactly where I could find tax documentation examples from the 1920s-1950s for comparison with modern forms. Saved me days of research and frustration.
0 coins
Javier Torres
•How does that even work? Does it just automatically dial the IRS number over and over until someone answers?
0 coins
Oliver Schmidt
•Yeah right. The IRS barely answers their phones for urgent tax issues. I find it hard to believe they connected you to some special "historical records department" that helped with research for a paper. Sounds like marketing nonsense.
0 coins
Natasha Volkov
•It doesn't redial repeatedly - that wouldn't work with the IRS queue system. Instead, it uses a combination of automated systems to maintain your place in line without you having to stay on the phone. When an agent answers, it immediately connects you. It's completely legitimate and works with the existing IRS phone system. No marketing nonsense here - I was surprised too! To clarify, it wasn't a department called "historical records" specifically - it was a knowledgeable agent in their research division who pointed me to their publicly available archives of historical tax documentation. The IRS actually maintains quite extensive historical records for research purposes - most people just don't know how to access them because it's so hard to get someone on the phone who knows about these resources.
0 coins
Oliver Schmidt
I'm back to eat my words about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it myself since I've been trying to get through to the IRS about a historical tax transcript I needed for some family research. I've literally been trying for WEEKS to talk to someone. Used the service yesterday and got connected to an IRS agent in 47 minutes without having to sit by my phone the whole time. The agent was able to help me request archived tax information from the 1960s that I needed for comparing historical tax brackets to today's system. They even emailed me a resource guide for historical tax research that I never knew existed. I've spent more time on hold with the IRS than I care to admit, so this was honestly life-changing. Sorry for being so dismissive before.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
My history professor mentioned that the entire concept of tax deductions and credits that we have today would have been completely foreign to people in 1775. Apparently, the earliest tax "loopholes" were much simpler - like colonial merchants sometimes underreporting the value of imported goods to pay less in customs duties. I think they'd be amazed at the complexity of modern tax planning strategies. One interesting fact: the first federal income tax had just two rates - 3% on incomes from $600-$10,000 and 5% on incomes above $10,000. Imagine if our tax code was still that simple!
0 coins
QuantumLeap
•Would people in 1775 have had to keep receipts or other records for tax purposes? Or was it mainly just based on what property you visibly owned?
0 coins
Emma Wilson
•In 1775, record-keeping requirements were minimal compared to today. Tax collection was mostly based on visible property (land, buildings, livestock) that tax assessors could easily verify by visiting. For merchants paying customs duties, they would keep basic transaction records, but nothing like our modern receipt-tracking systems. Most ordinary colonists wouldn't need to maintain extensive documentation since their taxes weren't based on complex calculations of income, deductions, and credits like ours. The concept of keeping shoe boxes full of receipts for potential tax deductions would have seemed completely unnecessary to them!
0 coins
Malik Johnson
Does anyone know what the actual tax RATES were like in 1775 compared to now? I'm curious if we're paying more or less of our income to taxes than colonists did.
0 coins
StarGazer101
•It's actually difficult to make a direct comparison because the tax systems were so fundamentally different. Colonial Americans didn't pay income taxes at all - they paid property taxes, poll taxes (fixed amount per person), and various excise taxes on specific goods. As a percentage of total economic activity, colonial era taxes were much lower than today - historians estimate roughly 1-2% of colonial GDP went to taxes, compared to around 26-30% of GDP in modern America (including all federal, state and local taxes). However, this isn't a perfect comparison since government provided far fewer services then.
0 coins
Makayla Shoemaker
This is such a fascinating topic! What really strikes me is how the colonial tax system was so much more transparent and straightforward. When a tax assessor came to your property, you could literally see what you were being taxed on - your land, your house, your livestock. There was no mystery about deductions, credits, or hidden calculations. Compare that to today where most people have no idea how their tax liability is actually calculated, even with software doing it for them. We have this incredibly complex system that requires professional expertise to navigate, while colonists could probably understand their entire tax obligation in a single conversation with the assessor. I wonder if there's something to be said for that simplicity, even if it meant fewer services from government. At least people knew exactly what they were paying for and why. The irony is that the Boston Tea Party was partly about "taxation without representation," but nowadays many people feel like they have representation but still don't understand their taxation!
0 coins