Do nonprofits need to collect W9 forms for every vendor purchase to track $600 threshold?
Our nonprofit's finance department recently implemented a new policy requiring us to collect W9 forms for every purchase we make to avoid exceeding the $600 reporting threshold. This means if we're purchasing something as routine as gas for a client, we'd need to get a W9 from the gas station before completing the transaction. We handle hundreds of transactions monthly across dozens of vendors, and this policy would dramatically slow down our service delivery and create a paperwork nightmare. The administrative burden seems excessive - calling ahead to every restaurant, store, gas station, etc. before making any purchase. Is it standard practice for nonprofits to collect W9 forms for literally every business transaction? Or is there a more reasonable approach to meeting IRS requirements without grinding our operations to a halt? Our primary concern is compliance while maintaining efficient service delivery.
26 comments


Gianni Serpent
This is definitely overkill and not how the $600 reporting threshold works. Your finance department is misunderstanding the requirement. The $600 threshold applies to cumulative payments to the same vendor within a calendar year. You don't need to collect W9s preemptively for every single transaction - that would be logistically impossible for any organization! Instead, implement a tracking system for vendor payments. When you approach $600 with any single vendor, then request a W9. Many accounting systems can generate reports showing vendor totals, making this easy to monitor. For places like gas stations and small one-time purchases, you're extremely unlikely to hit $600 with the same vendor anyway. Focus your W9 collection efforts on regular service providers or larger purchases.
0 coins
Henry Delgado
•But what if we don't realize we've hit $600 with a vendor until after the fact? Wouldn't we be liable for not having the W9 on file already? That's probably why the finance department wants them upfront.
0 coins
Gianni Serpent
•That's a good question. If you exceed $600 with a vendor and don't have a W9, you're not automatically in trouble. You can still request the W9 after you realize you've hit the threshold. The IRS understands this happens. If you can't get the W9 after multiple attempts, you may need to implement backup withholding on future payments, but that's a separate process. The key is to show reasonable effort to comply once you know you've reached the threshold. The finance department is being extremely cautious, but it's creating an unnecessary administrative burden that no functional nonprofit operates under.
0 coins
Olivia Kay
After struggling with similar W9 tracking issues at our nonprofit, I found an awesome solution with taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai). It analyzes your vendor payment records and automatically flags when you're approaching that $600 threshold with specific vendors. Instead of collecting W9s for every single transaction, we now just upload our expense data regularly, and the system tells us exactly which vendors need W9s. It saved our program staff from a mountain of unnecessary paperwork and helps our finance team stay compliant without disrupting operations.
0 coins
Joshua Hellan
•Does it work with QuickBooks or other accounting software? We use QB Online and I'm wondering if it can just pull the data automatically rather than us having to upload things.
0 coins
Jibriel Kohn
•I'm skeptical about adding yet another software solution. How much setup time does it require? Our staff is already overwhelmed with systems.
0 coins
Olivia Kay
•Yes, it integrates directly with QuickBooks Online and several other accounting platforms. You can set up automatic syncing so there's no manual uploading needed. It pulls vendor data and transaction history to track spending patterns. The setup is pretty straightforward - took us less than an hour. I understand the concern about adding more software, but this actually reduced our overall workload substantially. The time saved by not chasing unnecessary W9s far outweighs the minimal setup time. Our program staff were genuinely relieved when we implemented it.
0 coins
Joshua Hellan
Just wanted to update after trying taxr.ai for our nonprofit. It was a game-changer for our W9 situation! The system flagged only 4 vendors that were approaching the $600 threshold out of our hundreds of transactions. We were able to focus our efforts just on those vendors instead of the ridiculous "get W9s from everyone" approach our finance team initially wanted. The best part was showing our finance department the actual data - they quickly realized their blanket policy was unnecessary once they saw the real numbers. Now our operations can continue smoothly while still remaining compliant with IRS requirements.
0 coins
Edison Estevez
If you're still having issues getting your finance department to understand this and they won't budge on their policy, you might want to try Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) to speak directly with an IRS agent about the requirement. I used them when our board was insisting on an excessive W9 policy because they were afraid of an audit. Getting official clarification straight from the IRS solved our internal debate. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. Basically, they get you through to an actual human at the IRS without the typical 2+ hour hold times. I was seriously doubtful it would work, but I got through to an agent in about 15 minutes.
0 coins
Emily Nguyen-Smith
•How exactly does this work? I thought it was impossible to get through to the IRS these days. Our accountant says she's given up trying to call them about anything.
0 coins
James Johnson
•Yeah right. There's no way to skip the IRS phone queue. Sounds like a scam that will just take your money and leave you on hold anyway.
0 coins
Edison Estevez
•It uses a callback system that continuously tries to connect with the IRS for you. When you sign up, you specify which department you need to reach, and their system keeps dialing until it gets through. Then it calls you and connects you directly to the agent. I felt the same way - our accountant had given up on calling too. The way it works is their system essentially waits on hold so you don't have to. I was definitely skeptical at first, but it genuinely worked. I specified I needed help with 1099 reporting requirements for nonprofits, and when they called me back, I was connected to someone who answered all our questions about the W9 collection requirements.
0 coins
James Johnson
I need to eat my words about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I decided to try it because our finance director and I were still arguing about these W9 requirements. I got through to an IRS agent who specifically handles nonprofit tax compliance. She confirmed exactly what others here said - we only need W9s when we expect to pay a vendor more than $600 in a calendar year. She explained that most nonprofits track vendor totals quarterly and request W9s when vendors approach the threshold. Showed the finance director the notes from my call, and she finally backed down from the "W9 for every purchase" policy. Now we just flag vendors in our system who might exceed $600 annually, saving us hundreds of hours of unnecessary work.
0 coins
Sophia Rodriguez
As someone who's worked in nonprofit finance for 15+ years, here's a practical tip: create a simple vendor registration form that includes the W9 for all new vendors during onboarding. Then maintain a "preferred vendor" list that already has W9s on file. For random one-off purchases (gas stations, etc.), don't worry about W9s unless you expect to use that specific vendor regularly. For recurring vendors, get the W9 upfront during vendor setup. This balanced approach satisfies IRS requirements without creating operational nightmares.
0 coins
Ryder Ross
•That sounds like a reasonable middle ground. Do you have any recommendation for how to track when we're approaching the $600 threshold with vendors where we didn't collect W9s initially?
0 coins
Sophia Rodriguez
•Most accounting software can run vendor payment reports that will show year-to-date totals. I recommend running this report monthly or quarterly to identify vendors approaching the threshold. For smaller nonprofits without robust accounting systems, even a simple spreadsheet tracking vendor payments can work. The key is regular monitoring rather than trying to predict every possible vendor relationship from the start. Remember that the $600 threshold is about reporting requirements - you're not penalized if you exceed it and then collect the W9. The goal is making a good faith effort to comply with IRS regulations while maintaining operational efficiency.
0 coins
Mia Green
Has anyone dealt with vendors who refuse to provide W9s? We have a few local businesses that get suspicious when we ask, even though we're just trying to follow the rules.
0 coins
Emma Bianchi
•I've run into this a few times. For reluctant vendors, I explain that it's a standard IRS requirement, not something unique we're asking of them. I also emphasize that we need it to continue doing business with them. Sometimes showing them a blank W9 form helps - it only asks for information they already provide to customers (name, address, EIN). For the truly resistant ones, we've occasionally had to find alternative vendors. Better that than dealing with IRS issues later.
0 coins
Mia Green
•Thanks for the advice! I like the idea of showing them the actual form first. You're right that it's pretty basic info they already give out. Maybe I'll create a simple handout explaining the IRS requirement for vendors who seem confused. Our issue is usually with small local businesses who don't deal with this often, not the bigger companies.
0 coins
Nathan Kim
I've been following this thread and wanted to share our experience as a mid-sized nonprofit that went through similar W9 confusion last year. We initially had our finance team requesting W9s for every vendor too, but quickly realized it was creating more problems than it solved. What worked for us was implementing a two-tier system: automatic W9 collection for any vendor we expect to pay over $300 annually (giving us a buffer), and quarterly reviews of all vendor payments to catch anyone approaching $600. We use a simple Excel tracker that flags vendors at $400 and $550 thresholds. The key insight was that most of our vendor relationships are either very small (under $100 annually) or clearly going to exceed $600 - there aren't many vendors in that middle ground where tracking becomes tricky. For the 5-10 vendors per year that unexpectedly approach $600, we just request W9s when we notice during our quarterly reviews. This approach reduced our W9 collection efforts by about 80% while maintaining full compliance. Our program staff can focus on service delivery instead of chasing gas stations for tax forms!
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
•This two-tier approach sounds really smart! I'm curious about your Excel tracker - do you have it set up to automatically pull data from your accounting system, or do you manually update it each quarter? We're trying to find the right balance between automation and simplicity for our small team. Also, have you found that the $300 threshold gives you enough lead time to collect W9s before hitting $600? I'm wondering if that buffer is sufficient or if we should set it even lower to account for sudden large purchases.
0 coins
Ava Johnson
•@c65f4899104a Nathan, I love this two-tier approach! As someone who's been wrestling with this exact issue, your system sounds much more practical than what we've been trying. Quick question - when you do your quarterly reviews and find a vendor approaching the threshold, have you ever had situations where they refuse to provide the W9? And if so, do you just stop using that vendor or is there another workaround? Also, for the Excel tracker, are you manually categorizing which vendors fall into the "expected over $300" category, or do you have some criteria that help determine this automatically? We're trying to figure out the best way to predict which vendor relationships will grow over time.
0 coins
Samuel Robinson
•@c65f4899104a This two-tier system makes so much sense! I'm actually kicking myself for not thinking of this approach earlier. The $300 buffer threshold is brilliant - gives you plenty of time to collect W9s without the panic of realizing you've already hit $600. I'm curious about implementation though - when you set up a new vendor relationship, how do you decide whether they fall into the "likely to exceed $300" category? Is it based on the type of service, initial contract value, or do you have other criteria that help you make that determination upfront? Our challenge has been that some vendors start small but then we end up using them more frequently than expected. Your quarterly review system would definitely catch those cases, but I'm wondering if there are any red flags or indicators you've noticed that help predict which vendor relationships might grow over time.
0 coins
Micah Franklin
•@c65f4899104a Your two-tier system is exactly what we needed to hear! We've been struggling with the same issues and your approach sounds much more sustainable than our current mess. For our Excel tracker, we're thinking of setting it up to pull monthly vendor totals from QuickBooks and then flag anything over your suggested thresholds. Have you found that quarterly reviews are frequent enough, or do you ever get surprised by vendors who jump from $400 to over $600 in a single month? Also, I'm wondering about seasonal vendors - like if we use a landscaping company heavily in spring/summer but barely at all the rest of the year. Do you adjust your tracking frequency for vendors with irregular payment patterns, or does the quarterly system catch those situations reliably? Thanks for sharing such a practical solution - this thread has been incredibly helpful for getting our finance team to see reason!
0 coins
Zoe Walker
•@c65f4899104a This is such a practical solution! I'm definitely going to propose this two-tier approach to our board. One quick question - do you find that vendors are more cooperative about providing W9s when you explain it's part of your standard process for vendors over a certain threshold, rather than asking for it reactively after they've already hit $600? I imagine it comes across as more professional and less like you're scrambling to catch up on compliance. Our current ad-hoc approach makes us look disorganized when we suddenly ask established vendors for paperwork they've never heard us mention before.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
•@c65f4899104a Thanks for the detailed breakdown of your two-tier system! To answer some of the questions others have asked - we set up our Excel tracker to manually pull quarterly data from QuickBooks, which takes about 30 minutes every three months. The $300 buffer has been sufficient in most cases, though we did lower it to $250 for a few vendor categories where spending can spike quickly (like IT services or emergency repairs). For vendor categorization, we typically flag any service contracts, recurring suppliers, or vendors where the initial purchase is over $100 as "likely to exceed $300." One-time small purchases (under $50) rarely make it to that level. You're absolutely right that explaining the W9 requirement upfront as part of our vendor onboarding process gets much better cooperation than asking retroactively. Vendors appreciate the transparency and it positions us as organized rather than scrambling. The seasonal vendor issue is a good point - we do run an additional mid-summer check for landscaping, HVAC, and other seasonal services to catch those irregular patterns. Has saved us from a few surprises!
0 coins