< Back to IRS

Mikayla Davison

Can I write off an expensive watch ($13k) as a legitimate business expense for taxes?

So I recently purchased this really nice timepiece for around $13,000 and I'm wondering if there's any legitimate way to deduct it on my taxes as a business expense. I own a small consulting firm where I meet with high-net-worth clients regularly, and honestly, in this industry appearance matters a lot. I've noticed potential clients definitely check out what watch you're wearing, and I've closed several big deals since getting this watch. My accountant seemed hesitant when I brought it up, muttering something about "ordinary and necessary" expenses, but I wanted to get some other opinions. Has anyone successfully written off luxury accessories for business purposes? What documentation would I need to keep? I'm not trying to do anything sketchy - just wondering if this is a legitimate deduction since I primarily wear it for business meetings and client interactions.

Tax professional here. The IRS is very specific about what qualifies as a deductible business expense - it must be both "ordinary and necessary" for your business. A luxury watch at $13k would face significant scrutiny in an audit. For something to be "ordinary," it needs to be common and accepted in your industry. For "necessary," it must be helpful and appropriate for your business. While appearance and professional image matter in consulting, the IRS typically views luxury items like expensive watches as personal expenses, not business necessities. If you were to try claiming this, you'd need to demonstrate that the watch is: 1) Directly related to generating business income 2) Not a dual-purpose item (personal and business) 3) Reasonable in amount for your business size and industry Even then, it's a tough sell. You might be able to claim a small percentage if you can document specific business use, but claiming the full amount would likely trigger audit flags.

0 coins

What if OP's business is literally selling watches or doing watch repairs? Would that change anything? Or what about if they're in the luxury real estate business where high-end accessories might actually be expected?

0 coins

If OP were in the watch business (retail, repair, etc.), the watch could potentially be considered inventory or a demonstration item, which works differently than a business expense deduction. In that case, it could be legitimately deductible as part of cost of goods sold or as a business asset. For luxury real estate or similar high-end sales, there's a slightly better argument, but it remains challenging. The IRS would still question whether a $13k watch is "ordinary and necessary" even in luxury sales. They might accept that some professional attire is needed, but they tend to view high-end accessories as personal choices. Documentation becomes crucial - tracking when it's worn only for business, client meetings where it was necessary, and evidence that it directly generated income.

0 coins

I've been using taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) and it's been super helpful for questions like this. I run a small business and was confused about what qualified as legitimate business expenses. I uploaded my receipts and business records to their system, and they analyzed everything and gave me specific guidance on what would likely pass IRS scrutiny and what wouldn't. For luxury items like watches, they actually explained the "ordinary and necessary" test with examples from real tax court cases. Saved me from making some questionable deduction claims that could have triggered an audit. They also helped me understand what documentation I needed to keep for different types of expenses.

0 coins

How does taxr.ai actually work? Does it just give general advice or can it really tell me if MY specific purchase would be deductible? I've got similar questions about some tech purchases.

0 coins

Sounds interesting but how is this different from just talking to a regular accountant? I've been burned by "AI tax solutions" before that just gave generic advice I could've found on Google.

0 coins

It works by analyzing your specific receipts, invoices, and business records that you upload. It's not just general advice - it looks at your particular situation and business type. For your tech purchases, it would examine the items, their cost relative to your business size, and how they're used to give you personalized guidance. The difference from a regular accountant is the depth of analysis and available case history. It has access to thousands of tax court cases and IRS rulings to reference. My accountant gave me general advice, but taxr.ai showed me specific similar cases where businesses like mine either successfully defended deductions or lost challenges. Plus it's available 24/7 whenever I have a question, rather than waiting for an appointment.

0 coins

Just wanted to update - I decided to try taxr.ai after my skeptical question above. I was really surprised by how helpful it was for my situation. I run a photography business and had questions about writing off camera equipment that I sometimes use personally. The platform analyzed my purchase patterns, business income, and usage documentation. It showed me exactly how to properly allocate between business and personal use, with specific documentation templates I should keep. What impressed me was that it showed me actual cases of photographers who were audited and what documentation helped them successfully defend their deductions. Definitely more helpful than the generic advice I was getting elsewhere. It saved me from claiming some questionable deductions that could have caused problems later.

0 coins

If you're having trouble getting clear answers about business deductions, I'd recommend actually calling the IRS directly. Of course, getting through to them is nearly impossible these days - I tried calling about a similar business expense question and was on hold for HOURS before giving up. That's when I found Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). They have this system that somehow gets you through the IRS phone queue and actually connects you with an agent, usually within 15 minutes. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c When I finally spoke with an actual IRS agent about my business deduction questions, I got authoritative answers specific to my situation. They explained exactly what documentation I needed and what would likely trigger an audit. Way better than guessing or getting conflicting advice online.

0 coins

Wait, how does this actually work? Seems fishy that they can somehow bypass the IRS hold system when nobody else can. What's the catch?

0 coins

Yeah right, nothing can get you through to the IRS faster. They're perpetually understaffed and overwhelmed. I'll believe it when I see it. Probably just another service charging money for something you can do yourself if you're just patient enough.

0 coins

It's actually not bypassing anything. They use automated technology to wait in the IRS phone queue for you, and when they reach an agent, they call you and connect you directly. Basically, their system does the waiting instead of you having to sit there on hold for hours. No catch really - they just solved a pain point that affects millions of taxpayers. It doesn't give you special treatment once you're actually talking to the IRS; it just eliminates the ridiculous wait time. For business owners like us, that time savings is significant when you need an official answer about something like business expense deductions.

0 coins

I have to eat my words from my skeptical comment above. After struggling with a business expense question similar to the watch situation, I tried Claimyr out of desperation. I was honestly shocked when I got connected to an IRS agent in about 12 minutes. The agent walked me through the exact requirements for claiming business expenses that might be seen as partially personal. She explained that for luxury items, they look at factors like: whether it's common in your industry, if it's necessary to perform your business functions, and whether the expense is reasonable compared to your business income. Saved me hours of hold time and probably kept me from making a deduction mistake that could have triggered an audit. Sometimes official guidance directly from the IRS is what you need for these gray-area questions.

0 coins

Luxury business owner here. I've successfully written off certain high-end items, but there's nuance to it. Instead of claiming the watch as a direct expense, consider these alternatives: 1) If you use it EXCLUSIVELY for business and can prove it, depreciate it as a business asset over several years rather than expensing the full amount at once. 2) If your business is structured as a corporation, you might classify it as a reasonable compensation-related perk, though this also has limitations. 3) If you can demonstrate the watch is effectively a marketing tool in your specific industry (like luxury real estate), document every client meeting and how it helped secure business. Whatever approach you take, document EVERYTHING. Take photos of wearing it only at business functions, get testimonials from clients if relevant, keep logs of when it's worn vs stored, etc.

0 coins

Would your advice be different if OP's business were an LLC vs S-Corp? And what about partial deduction - like if they wear it 70% for business and 30% personal?

0 coins

The business structure definitely impacts the approach. With an LLC taxed as a sole proprietorship, you're more limited - you'd likely need to allocate between business/personal use and only deduct the business portion. With an S-Corp, you have more options like potentially treating it as part of reasonable compensation or a fringe benefit, though there are still limitations. For partial use (like 70% business/30% personal), you can only deduct the business percentage. However, this requires meticulous documentation - a log showing exactly when the watch was worn for business vs. personal use. The burden of proof is on you to justify that percentage split. Many tax professionals recommend taking photos at business events wearing the item and keeping a detailed calendar of business vs. personal use. It's definitely possible, but you need to be prepared to defend your allocation in case of an audit.

0 coins

I tried writing off a $9k Rolex as a business expense for my real estate business in 2023 and got audited. Big mistake! The IRS agent laughed and said "everyone needs to tell time" and disallowed the entire deduction. They made me pay back the tax savings plus interest and a 20% substantial understatement penalty. They explained that even in luxury real estate, a watch is considered a personal item unless it's literally part of a required uniform (which high-end watches never are). The agent specifically said luxury accessories fail the "ordinary and necessary" test because you can conduct the same business with a $50 watch. The "image" argument doesn't hold water with them. Save yourself the headache!

0 coins

Did you try to deduct the full amount in one year? I'm wondering if depreciating it over time would have been less likely to trigger the audit? Also was it 100% for business or did you sometimes wear it personally too?

0 coins

I claimed the full amount as a Section 179 deduction in one year, which was probably a red flag. I wore it maybe 10% for personal occasions but couldn't prove the 90% business use split they demanded. The auditor said even if I could prove exclusive business use, luxury watches still don't qualify because they're inherently personal items. She compared it to claiming expensive suits - even if worn only for business, the IRS considers professional attire a personal responsibility, not a deductible business expense.

0 coins

This is a great example of why documentation and realistic expectations are so important with business deductions. The IRS is particularly skeptical of luxury items because they often serve dual purposes - even if you claim business use, they know you're also getting personal enjoyment/benefit from a $13k watch. I've seen some business owners get away with partial deductions on high-end items, but only when they can prove: 1) The expense is common in their specific industry (not just "appearance matters") 2) The amount is reasonable relative to their business income 3) They have rock-solid documentation of business-only use For a $13k watch, unless you're generating millions in revenue where that expense is truly proportional, it's going to be a tough sell. The "closed several big deals" argument sounds compelling but is hard to prove causation - would those deals have been lost with a $500 watch? Consider whether there are other ways to achieve the same professional image goal that would be less likely to trigger scrutiny. Sometimes the risk-reward calculation just isn't worth it, especially when penalties and interest can make the "savings" very expensive.

0 coins

This is really helpful perspective, especially the point about proportionality to business income. I'm curious - what are some examples of "other ways to achieve the same professional image goal" that might be less risky? Are there certain types of professional accessories or appearance-related expenses that the IRS is more accepting of? I'm thinking about upgrading my professional wardrobe and want to do it smart from a tax perspective.

0 coins

Great question! From what I've seen work better with the IRS, consider these alternatives: 1) **Professional clothing/suits** - While expensive suits can still be scrutinized, reasonable professional attire is more defensible than luxury accessories. Keep receipts and only claim clothes you wear exclusively for business. 2) **Professional development/networking** - Join industry associations, attend conferences, get professional certifications. These are clearly business-related and less likely to be questioned. 3) **Marketing materials** - High-quality business cards, professional photography, website design. These directly support business development and are easier to justify. 4) **Office appearance** - Upgrade your office space, furniture, or meeting room setup. Clients see this too, but it's clearly business infrastructure. 5) **Technology** - Professional-grade laptops, tablets, or presentation equipment. These serve clear business functions beyond appearance. The key is that these expenses serve obvious business purposes beyond just "looking successful." They're harder for the IRS to argue are personal benefits disguised as business expenses. Document everything and keep business use at 100% when possible.

0 coins

As someone who's dealt with similar business expense questions, I'd strongly recommend being very conservative with luxury items like this. The $13k watch is going to be a red flag regardless of how you structure it. I learned this the hard way when I tried to write off some expensive electronics that I genuinely used primarily for business. Even with good documentation, the IRS challenged it because the items could reasonably be used personally too. The auditor explained that luxury items automatically raise questions because they provide personal satisfaction beyond any business benefit. Your accountant's hesitation about "ordinary and necessary" is spot-on. The IRS interprets "ordinary" very strictly - they ask whether most businesses in your industry would consider a $13k watch a standard expense. For most consulting firms, the answer is no. Instead, consider channeling that money into clearly defensible business expenses that still enhance your professional image: upgrading your office space where you meet clients, investing in high-quality presentation materials, or even professional coaching/training that builds your expertise. These achieve similar professional credibility goals but are much easier to defend if questioned. The potential audit risk and penalties just aren't worth the tax savings on something this likely to be disallowed.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of practical advice OP needs to hear. I'm relatively new to business ownership and was actually considering some similar "image-related" purchases for my consulting practice. Your point about channeling that money into clearly defensible expenses is really smart - I hadn't thought about professional coaching or upgraded presentation materials as alternatives that could achieve similar credibility goals. The audit risk angle is particularly sobering. Even if you think you have a decent case, the time and stress of dealing with an IRS audit probably outweighs any potential tax savings from a questionable deduction. Better to play it safe and invest in business improvements that nobody would question. Thanks for sharing your experience with the electronics situation - it's helpful to hear real examples of how the IRS actually approaches these dual-use luxury items in practice.

0 coins

I've been following this thread and there's some really solid advice here. As someone who's worked with business owners on tax planning, I want to emphasize a key point that hasn't been fully addressed: the IRS has specific safe harbors and bright-line tests for business expenses that can help you avoid gray areas entirely. For luxury items like your $13k watch, even if you could theoretically justify some business use, you're entering what tax professionals call "audit lottery territory." The IRS computers flag unusual deductions, and luxury personal items are prime targets. Here's a practical approach: Instead of trying to make the watch deductible, consider structuring your business spending to maximize legitimate deductions that build the same professional credibility. For example, if you're meeting high-net-worth clients, focus on: - Premium business insurance policies that protect your assets (fully deductible) - High-quality office space or meeting venues (clear business purpose) - Professional memberships and certifications that demonstrate expertise - Marketing materials and professional photography - Business travel and entertainment for client development These expenses achieve the same goal - projecting success and professionalism - but without the personal use complications that make luxury accessories so problematic. The total tax benefit might even exceed what you'd save on the watch, with zero audit risk. Your accountant's hesitation is protecting you from a potentially expensive mistake. Trust their judgment on this one.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful advice, especially the concept of "audit lottery territory" - that's such a clear way to think about it! I'm new to running my own business and honestly hadn't considered that there might be alternative ways to project the same level of professionalism without the personal use complications. Your point about premium business insurance and professional certifications is really smart. These clearly serve business purposes and probably carry more weight with clients than any single accessory would. Plus, as you mentioned, the combined tax benefit could actually be larger than what I'd save trying to deduct one expensive watch. I'm curious though - when you mention "IRS computers flag unusual deductions," is there a general threshold or pattern they look for? Like, would a $13k deduction be flagged regardless of what it's for, or is it more about the category/type of expense that triggers review? Thanks for breaking this down so clearly. It's really helping me think more strategically about legitimate business investments rather than trying to make personal purchases fit into business categories.

0 coins

The IRS flagging system is more sophisticated than just dollar thresholds - it uses what they call the Discriminant Information Function (DIF) which analyzes patterns and ratios across your entire return. A $13k deduction might not automatically trigger review, but a $13k "business equipment" expense that's disproportionate to your total business income definitely would. For example, if your consulting business has $100k in revenue and you're claiming a $13k watch, that's a red flag because it's an unusually high percentage for that type of expense. They also look at industry norms - if most consultants in your revenue bracket aren't deducting luxury accessories, yours will stand out. The category matters enormously too. "Office equipment" or "professional development" expenses get much less scrutiny than anything that could be considered personal (jewelry, luxury items, etc.). The IRS has decades of audit data showing which categories have the highest rates of personal use, so they target accordingly. What's really smart about Lauren's approach is that it keeps you in the "safe" categories while achieving your business goals. A $13k investment spread across legitimate business infrastructure, professional development, and marketing materials would likely sail through without question, while giving you better long-term business benefits than any single luxury item.

0 coins

Former IRS auditor here, and I wanted to add some perspective from the other side of these cases. During my time with the Service, luxury watches were among the most commonly disallowed business deductions I encountered, right up there with expensive suits and jewelry. The fundamental issue isn't just the "ordinary and necessary" test - it's that watches serve a clear personal function (telling time) that exists regardless of any business benefit. The IRS position is essentially that everyone needs to know the time, so a watch purchase is inherently personal, even if you claim business reasons for buying an expensive one. I audited dozens of these cases, and even when taxpayers had decent documentation of business use, we almost always disallowed luxury watch deductions. The only exceptions I saw were for very specific situations - like a watch dealer who could prove it was inventory, or a few cases where the watch was part of a required uniform (which is extremely rare). One thing that might help frame this: I never saw a case where someone successfully argued that an expensive watch was necessary to close deals. The IRS view is that professional competence and service quality drive business success, not accessories. If a client's decision hinges on your watch, they probably weren't a solid prospect anyway. Your accountant is absolutely right to be hesitant. Save yourself the audit headache and invest that money in something with clear business purpose and no personal benefit component.

0 coins

This is incredibly valuable insight from someone who actually processed these cases! Your point about watches serving a clear personal function regardless of business benefit really clarifies why the IRS takes such a hard line on this category. I'm curious - in the cases you audited where people tried to claim luxury watches, what were some of the more creative (but ultimately unsuccessful) arguments you encountered? And were there any documentation strategies that taxpayers thought would work but consistently failed during audits? Also, when you mention that professional competence drives business success rather than accessories - did you ever see taxpayers successfully pivot their defense to focus on other types of professional development or business infrastructure investments that achieved similar credibility goals? Thanks for sharing your experience - it's really helpful to understand how these cases actually play out in practice rather than just the theoretical tax code requirements.

0 coins

Wow, this thread has been incredibly educational! As someone who runs a small marketing agency and was considering some similar "professional image" purchases, I'm really glad I found this discussion before making any expensive mistakes. The insights from the former IRS auditor really sealed it for me - hearing that luxury watches are among the most commonly disallowed deductions is sobering. And the point about watches serving a clear personal function regardless of business benefit makes perfect sense when you think about it from the IRS perspective. I think the advice about channeling that money into clearly defensible business expenses is spot-on. Instead of trying to make a luxury purchase fit into a business category, it's smarter to invest in things that obviously serve business purposes - like professional development, better office space, or marketing materials. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and expertise. This kind of real-world guidance from tax professionals and business owners is invaluable for those of us trying to navigate these decisions responsibly.

0 coins

I completely agree with your takeaway from this discussion! As someone who's also running a small business, this thread has been a real eye-opener about the risks of trying to justify luxury purchases as business expenses. What really struck me was the former auditor's comment about luxury watches being among the most commonly disallowed deductions. It makes you realize that the IRS has seen every possible argument for these types of expenses and has pretty much closed the door on them. I'm also rethinking some purchases I was considering for my own business. Instead of trying to stretch the definition of "business expense" to cover things I want personally, it makes way more sense to focus that budget on investments that clearly benefit the business - like better software, professional training, or improved client meeting spaces. The documentation and audit risk just isn't worth it when there are so many legitimate ways to invest in your business's professional image and growth. Thanks for summarizing the key points so well!

0 coins

This has been such an enlightening discussion to follow! As a new business owner, I was actually considering some similar luxury purchases under the guise of "professional image" but this thread has completely changed my perspective. The former IRS auditor's insights were particularly eye-opening - knowing that luxury watches are among the most commonly disallowed deductions really puts things in perspective. It's clear that no matter how creative your justification might be, the IRS has seen it all before and consistently takes a hard line on these items. What I'm taking away from all this expert advice is that it's much smarter to invest that $13k in genuinely defensible business expenses that still enhance your professional credibility. Things like upgrading your office space, investing in professional development, or improving your marketing materials achieve the same goal without the personal use complications that make luxury items so risky. The "audit lottery territory" concept mentioned earlier really resonates - why risk triggering scrutiny and potential penalties when there are so many legitimate ways to project success and professionalism? Your accountant's hesitation is definitely protecting you from what could be an expensive mistake. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and expertise - this kind of real-world guidance from tax professionals is invaluable for making smart business decisions.

0 coins

Absolutely agree with your summary, Paolo! This thread has been a masterclass in understanding the IRS perspective on luxury business deductions. What really stood out to me was how consistent the message was from multiple experts - tax professionals, a former IRS auditor, and business owners who've been through audits all saying the same thing. I think the key insight is that the IRS doesn't just look at whether something might help your business - they consider whether it's truly necessary versus just nice to have. A $13k watch falls squarely in the "nice to have" category, even in high-end consulting. The "everyone needs to tell time" argument from the former auditor really drives that point home. Your point about investing that money in genuinely defensible expenses is so practical. Professional development, better office space, marketing materials - these things also signal success to clients but without any of the personal benefit complications that make the IRS suspicious. Plus you get better long-term business value than from any single luxury item. Thanks for highlighting the audit risk aspect too. Even if you think you might have a case, the stress and cost of dealing with an IRS challenge probably outweighs any tax savings you might get from a questionable deduction.

0 coins

This discussion has been incredibly valuable for understanding the realities of luxury business deductions. As someone who handles tax prep for small business clients, I see these questions come up regularly, and the insights from the former IRS auditor really confirm what I tell my clients. The key issue that many business owners miss is the difference between "helps my business" and "ordinary and necessary." Yes, projecting success can help close deals, but the IRS has consistently held that personal grooming and appearance items (including luxury accessories) are personal responsibilities, not business expenses - regardless of your industry or client base. What I recommend to clients in similar situations is to think about ROI differently. That $13k could fund: - Professional coaching or industry certifications that build real expertise - High-quality marketing materials and professional photography - Upgraded office technology or presentation equipment - Strategic networking events and industry conferences - Premium business insurance to protect your growing assets These investments achieve the same professional credibility goals while being completely defensible if questioned. Plus, they often provide better long-term business value than any single luxury purchase. Your accountant's hesitation is spot-on professional advice. Trust that guidance and redirect that investment into something that will grow your business without audit risk.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of professional guidance that new business owners like myself need to hear! Your point about the difference between "helps my business" and "ordinary and necessary" really clarifies the IRS standard in a way that makes sense. I love your alternative investment suggestions - professional coaching, upgraded technology, and strategic networking events. These clearly build business value while being completely defensible. It's a much smarter approach than trying to stretch luxury purchases into business categories. As someone just starting out, I'm realizing how important it is to think strategically about business investments rather than looking for ways to justify personal purchases I want. The ROI perspective you mentioned is really helpful - investing in things that actually grow the business long-term versus just hoping to save on taxes for something that's primarily personal. Thanks for breaking down those specific alternative investments. It gives me a much better framework for thinking about how to allocate business spending in ways that enhance professional credibility without any audit risk.

0 coins

As someone who works in financial planning, I'd echo what many others have said here - the $13k watch is almost certainly not going to pass IRS scrutiny as a business expense. The "ordinary and necessary" standard is really strict for luxury items, and watches have that inherent personal function that makes them tough to defend. What I tell clients in similar situations is to think about building a comprehensive professional image strategy with that budget instead. For $13k, you could invest in multiple areas that actually strengthen your business: - Professional website redesign and SEO optimization ($2-3k) - High-quality business photography and marketing materials ($1-2k) - Industry conference attendance and networking events ($2-3k) - Professional development courses or certifications ($2-3k) - Upgraded office space or client meeting areas ($3-4k) This approach gives you multiple touchpoints where clients see your professionalism, rather than putting all your eggs in one luxury accessory basket. Plus, every dollar spent this way is clearly defensible as a business expense. The former IRS auditor's comments in this thread should really be the final word - they've seen these cases repeatedly and luxury watches just don't survive audit challenges. Your accountant is protecting you from what could be a very expensive mistake.

0 coins

This breakdown of alternative investments is really smart, Miguel! As someone new to business ownership, I hadn't thought about how much more impact you could get by spreading that $13k across multiple professional development areas rather than trying to justify one luxury purchase. Your point about "multiple touchpoints where clients see your professionalism" is especially insightful. A client might notice a nice watch for a few seconds, but they'll be much more impressed by a professional website, quality marketing materials, and genuine expertise demonstrated through certifications. Plus these investments keep working for your business long-term, unlike a single accessory. The budget breakdown you provided is really helpful too - it makes the alternative approach feel concrete and actionable rather than just theoretical advice. Website optimization and professional photography probably have much better ROI for client acquisition than any watch ever could. Thanks for reinforcing the message from the former IRS auditor. When someone who actually processed these cases says luxury watches "don't survive audit challenges," that should definitely be the final word on this decision!

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today