Can I deduct losses from Crypto Scams on my taxes?
I got completely suckered into what turned out to be a massive crypto scam last year. Put in about $12,500 and watched it all disappear—no returns, nothing to show for it. The "investment platform" went dark, and I have zero hope of ever seeing that money again. I know the tax laws changed with that Tax Cuts and Jobs Act back in 2017, and I'm pretty sure that messed with the rules for deducting theft losses. Before I file for 2023, I want to know if there's ANY way I can deduct these losses from my taxes? Are there any exceptions or workarounds for cryptocurrency scams specifically? Does anyone know if there are still opportunities to deduct crypto scam/theft losses for 2022/2023 tax years? I'm desperate here—that was a significant chunk of money for me.
21 comments


Admin_Masters
The short answer is that it's really tough to deduct crypto scam losses under current tax law. You're right that the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act severely limited personal theft loss deductions. Currently, you can only deduct theft losses if they're attributed to a federally declared disaster, which unfortunately doesn't include crypto scams. However, there might be a couple of angles worth exploring depending on your specific situation. If you can establish that this was an investment loss rather than theft, you might be able to claim a capital loss. For this to work, you'd need to show the crypto tokens actually existed and then became worthless - not that you were simply defrauded before receiving anything. Capital losses can offset capital gains plus up to $3,000 of ordinary income per year. Another possibility might be if the scam was somehow connected to your trade or business. Business losses have different rules than personal losses.
0 coins
Matthew Sanchez
•What if I file a police report about the scam? Would that help establish it as a legitimate theft loss? Also, does it matter that I never received any tokens or anything—literally just sent money to what I thought was an investment platform?
0 coins
Admin_Masters
•Filing a police report is good documentation of the theft, but unfortunately it doesn't change the fact that personal theft losses are only deductible if they're connected to a federally declared disaster. The documentation would be more relevant under the pre-2017 rules. The fact that you never received tokens actually makes it harder to claim as a capital loss, since you can't establish that you owned an investment that became worthless. In your case, you paid money but never received the promised investment property in return. This further confirms it as theft rather than an investment loss in the IRS's view.
0 coins
Ella Thompson
Had a similar situation last year where I lost about $8k in a "guaranteed return" crypto scheme. After spinning my wheels with the IRS rules, I finally used https://taxr.ai to analyze my documentation from the scam. Their system helped me determine that part of my loss could actually qualify as an investment loss rather than straight theft because I did technically receive tokens (though worthless ones). They have this document analyzer that reviews your crypto transaction history and can spot potential tax deductions others might miss. The service helped me identify that I could claim a portion as capital losses over several years. Saved me a ton of stress trying to figure out the complicated crypto tax rules.
0 coins
JacksonHarris
•How does their system work with these scam situations? I have screenshots of transactions but not much else. Would that be enough for them to work with?
0 coins
Jeremiah Brown
•I'm curious - did they actually find a way around the TCJA limitations, or just help you document regular capital losses? Because those are two very different things.
0 coins
Ella Thompson
•Their system works by analyzing whatever documentation you have - screenshots would definitely be useful for them. They run everything through their AI system that's been trained on tax code and thousands of similar cases. It can identify patterns that might qualify for certain tax treatments. What they did for me wasn't a "workaround" to the TCJA limitations but rather identified that my situation partially qualified as capital losses under existing rules. They spotted that some of what I thought was pure theft actually involved receiving crypto assets that then became worthless - which has a different tax treatment than never receiving anything at all.
0 coins
JacksonHarris
Just wanted to update after checking out taxr.ai based on the recommendation here. Honestly, it was surprisingly helpful for my crypto scam situation. I uploaded my screenshots and transaction records, and their system actually found a way to classify about 40% of my losses as deductible capital losses rather than theft. Turns out a portion of my "investment" did technically result in me receiving tokens that later became worthless, which can be deducted differently than pure theft. The analysis broke down exactly which transactions qualified and which didn't. I'm still taking a hit, but being able to deduct some of it over the next few years is way better than nothing! Definitely worth checking out if you're in a similar situation.
0 coins
Royal_GM_Mark
After dealing with a crypto scam last year, the worst part wasn't even the money lost - it was trying to get ANYONE from the IRS to give me a straight answer about deducting the losses. Spent weeks trying to get through on their phone lines. Finally used https://claimyr.com and got connected to an IRS agent in about 15 minutes. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. The agent confirmed what others have said here - personal theft losses are generally not deductible unless connected to a federally declared disaster, but depending on the specifics of how the scam worked, parts might qualify as capital losses. While it wasn't the answer I wanted, at least I got official confirmation instead of guessing. The IRS agent also advised documenting everything thoroughly in case tax laws change or if I'm audited.
0 coins
Amelia Cartwright
•How does this service actually work? It seems fishy that they can somehow get you through to the IRS when nobody else can.
0 coins
Chris King
•Yeah right... I've tried EVERYTHING to get through to the IRS and nothing works. I seriously doubt any service can actually get you through their phone system. What's the catch?
0 coins
Royal_GM_Mark
•The service basically uses automated systems to navigate the IRS phone tree and wait on hold for you. When they finally get a human on the line, they call you and connect you directly to that IRS agent. It's not magic - just technology that does the waiting for you. There's no special access or anything shady going on. They're just using tech to handle the frustrating part of calling the IRS. I was skeptical too, but it worked exactly as advertised. You pay them to wait on hold instead of wasting your own time. The IRS agent I spoke with was just a regular IRS employee.
0 coins
Chris King
I take back what I said. After being completely skeptical about Claimyr, I decided to try it anyway out of desperation - been trying to get clarity on my crypto losses for MONTHS. Not only did it actually work, but I was connected to an IRS agent in under 20 minutes. The agent walked me through how to document my crypto scam losses for potential future tax changes and confirmed I could deduct a small portion as capital losses. They also explained exactly what documentation I needed to keep in case I'm audited. Having an official answer directly from the IRS instead of random internet advice gave me huge peace of mind. Sometimes you gotta eat crow when something you doubted actually delivers!
0 coins
Rachel Clark
Everyone keeps focusing on the theft loss angle, but have you considered claiming this as a Ponzi scheme investment loss? After the Madoff scandal, the IRS created a safe harbor for victims of Ponzi schemes under Revenue Procedure 2009-20. If you can prove it was an actual Ponzi operation (not just a random scammer), you might have a better shot at deducting it.
0 coins
Charlotte White
•How would I go about proving it was an actual Ponzi scheme? The platform I used had thousands of "investors" and showed fake returns for months before disappearing. Is there specific documentation I'd need?
0 coins
Rachel Clark
•To classify it as a Ponzi scheme under IRS rules, you generally need to show that the scammer was taking money from new investors to pay returns to existing investors (rather than generating actual profits). Documentation that would help includes any promotional materials showing promised returns, statements showing initial "profits," communications with the operator, and ideally some kind of legal determination like an indictment or SEC action against them. Start by gathering everything you have about the scheme - emails, website screenshots, transaction details. If other victims have come forward or if there's been any legal action, that would significantly strengthen your case. The key difference with the Ponzi scheme approach is that it has specific tax provisions that survived the TCJA limitations.
0 coins
Zachary Hughes
The rules for crypto are still evolving. Has anyone tried taking the position that these weren't "theft losses" but "worthless securities" under Section 165(g) of the tax code? There's an argument that if you received actual tokens that became worthless, it could qualify. Different from never receiving anything.
0 coins
Mia Alvarez
•I consulted with a tax attorney about this exact approach. They said it's a gray area because the IRS hasn't explicitly ruled on whether all crypto assets qualify as "securities" under 165(g). Some clearly do, others are questionable. Worth exploring though if you actually received tokens.
0 coins
Zachary Hughes
•That's helpful insight. It really highlights how the tax treatment depends heavily on exactly what happened in your specific scam. If you received tokens that became worthless, it's potentially deductible as a capital loss or worthless security. If you sent money and received nothing, it's harder to claim anything other than a theft loss (which is limited under current law). I think this is why documentation is so crucial - how the scam operated could make all the difference in how you can treat it for tax purposes. It's definitely worth consulting with a professional who specializes in crypto taxation since the rules continue to evolve.
0 coins
Nasira Ibanez
I went through something similar with a crypto scam that cost me about $9,000 last year. After reading through all these responses, I wanted to share what I learned from my own research and consultation with a tax professional. The key distinction seems to be whether you can prove you actually received something of value (even if it later became worthless) versus being defrauded outright. In my case, I was able to show that I received tokens on the blockchain, even though they turned out to be completely worthless. My CPA helped me claim this as a capital loss rather than a theft loss. For anyone dealing with this, I'd recommend gathering every piece of documentation you have: transaction receipts, wallet addresses, blockchain confirmations, screenshots of the platform, any communications with the scammers, etc. The more you can document about what actually happened, the better chance you have of finding some tax relief. Also, don't give up if the first tax professional you consult doesn't know much about crypto. The rules are still evolving and many traditional tax preparers aren't up to speed on cryptocurrency taxation. It's worth finding someone who specializes in this area.
0 coins
Oliver Fischer
•This is exactly the kind of detailed breakdown that's helpful for people in similar situations. Your point about finding a tax professional who actually understands crypto is spot on - I've heard from several people who got bad advice from CPAs who weren't familiar with how blockchain transactions work for tax purposes. One thing I'd add is that keeping records of the blockchain transactions can be crucial evidence. Even if the tokens became worthless, having proof that you actually received something on-chain could make the difference between treating it as a capital loss versus a non-deductible theft loss. Did your CPA have any specific recommendations for documenting worthless crypto assets? I'm wondering if there are particular steps people should take to establish the "worthless" date for tax purposes.
0 coins