< Back to IRS

Ethan Moore

Can I claim non-prescription sunglasses as a legitimate business expense deduction?

I'm trying to figure out if I can deduct non-prescription sunglasses for my business. I'm a real estate agent in Arizona and spend literally hours every day driving clients around in the blazing sun. I've seen conflicting info online - some sites say sunglasses are totally deductible as a business expense, but when I dig deeper, it seems like the IRS regularly denies these claims. From what I understand, they're usually considered a personal expense regardless of how much you use them for work. But then I've also read something about them possibly qualifying as "protective equipment" in certain professions? I spent about $175 on a good pair last month specifically for work (my personal ones are cheap $20 ones), and I'm wondering if I can include this on my Schedule C for 2025. Has anyone successfully deducted sunglasses? Or had them rejected? What's the actual rule here? I don't want to risk an audit over sunglasses but also don't want to miss a legitimate deduction.

Yuki Nakamura

•

While sunglasses might seem like a legitimate business expense in your situation, the IRS generally considers them a personal item, even when used primarily for work. The key distinction is whether the item has substantial personal use outside of business purposes. For sunglasses to potentially qualify as a deductible expense, they would need to be: 1) Required specifically for your job 2) Not suitable for general/everyday wear 3) Not used outside of your business activities Standard non-prescription sunglasses almost always fail this test because they can be worn outside of work. However, there are some limited exceptions. For instance, specialized polarized sunglasses for fishing guides or special UV protection glasses for mountain guides might qualify if they're specifically designed for that profession and not typically worn elsewhere.

0 coins

StarSurfer

•

What about if I keep them in my work car and ONLY use them while showing properties? I've heard some tax preparers say that's enough to make it deductible if you can prove they never leave your work vehicle.

0 coins

Yuki Nakamura

•

Even if you keep them exclusively in your work vehicle, the IRS would likely still consider them a personal expense. The test isn't just about where you use them, but whether the item itself is inherently personal in nature. Standard sunglasses, regardless of where they're kept, serve a personal function (protecting your eyes from the sun) that benefits you personally rather than being primarily for business purposes. If you were required to wear specially-designed eyewear that wouldn't normally be used outside of work (like certain safety glasses with specific tinting for particular working conditions), that might be different. But regular sunglasses, even expensive ones kept at work, would likely be disallowed if audited.

0 coins

Carmen Reyes

•

After getting frustrated with conflicting tax advice about business deductions, I found https://taxr.ai and uploaded my receipts and documentation. Their AI analyzed my specific situation as a construction contractor where I buy equipment that might be personal or business. For items like my work boots and specialized sunglasses, they actually identified which ones would likely pass an IRS review as legitimate business expenses versus which ones wouldn't. They analyzed the specific requirements for my industry and gave me documentation to support the deductions in case of an audit.

0 coins

Andre Moreau

•

Does it work for service businesses too? I'm a photographer and have the same issue with equipment that could be considered "dual purpose" like my computer, phone, camera bags, etc.

0 coins

I'm skeptical - how does an AI know what the IRS will accept in an audit? Seems like they're just giving you their best guess which any tax pro could do. Do they guarantee their advice if you get audited?

0 coins

Carmen Reyes

•

For photography businesses, it works exceptionally well! The system analyzes your specific industry and understands the standard deductions for photographers. It can help categorize your equipment properly and identify what percentage might be business vs. personal use for things like computers and phones. The AI isn't just guessing - it's trained on actual tax court cases and IRS rulings, so it shows you similar situations where deductions were approved or denied. They don't guarantee audit protection, but they provide documentation explaining why each deduction should be allowed based on tax code and precedent. I was actually surprised by how specific the analysis was to my situation rather than just generic advice.

0 coins

Andre Moreau

•

Just wanted to follow up - I tried https://taxr.ai for my photography business deductions and it was actually super helpful! I uploaded my receipts for some high-end sunglasses I use for outdoor shoots and it flagged them as "high audit risk" but then suggested documenting them as "specialized equipment" rather than just "sunglasses" since I use them specifically to judge lighting conditions when setting up outdoor shoots. It also recommended keeping a log of business-only usage and storing them with my photography equipment to strengthen the business purpose. The analysis even cited some tax court cases where similar items were allowed for professionals who could demonstrate specific business purpose beyond normal personal use. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with these gray area deductions!

0 coins

Honestly no one can reach the IRS to get a straight answer on stuff like this. I kept calling about a similar business expense question for months and couldn't get through. Finally used https://claimyr.com and had an actual IRS agent on the phone within 30 minutes. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent told me that for sunglasses specifically, they're almost always considered a personal expense unless they're specialized safety equipment required for a specific job function (like welding glasses or medical eye protection). Regular sunglasses, even if used 100% for business, are considered a personal expense because they primarily benefit you personally by protecting your eyes, not your business operations directly.

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

Wait what? There's a service that actually gets you through to a human at the IRS? How much does it cost and is it legit? I've been trying to get clarity on some business deductions for months.

0 coins

CosmicCadet

•

This sounds like a scam. Nobody can magically get you through to the IRS faster than their phone queue allows. They probably just keep you on hold themselves and then connect you when they finally get through.

0 coins

The service doesn't bypass any official IRS systems - it uses their callback feature but optimizes when and how to call based on their queue data. It's completely legitimate and works directly through the official IRS phone systems. They don't just keep you on hold - they actually navigate the phone tree and secure your spot in line before connecting you. I was skeptical too, but it works because they've figured out the patterns of when the lines are less busy and how to efficiently navigate the system. The video I linked shows exactly how it works if you want to see it in action.

0 coins

CosmicCadet

•

I have to eat my words and admit I was wrong about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment I decided to try it anyway out of desperation - I had been trying to reach the IRS for 3 months about my business deductions getting rejected. The service got me connected to an IRS agent in about 35 minutes. The agent explained that for items like sunglasses, they're considered personal items under "personal grooming and comfort" in their internal guidelines, even when used for work. BUT - and this is important - if they're specifically required safety equipment for your job (with documentation from employer or industry regulations) AND not suitable for everyday use, they might qualify. Saved me from making a questionable deduction that could have triggered an audit. Much easier than the hours I wasted trying to call them myself!

0 coins

Liam O'Connor

•

Has anyone tried deducting sunglasses as "uniforms and protective clothing" instead of just as a general business expense? My tax guy suggested this might work better for my landscaping business.

0 coins

Amara Adeyemi

•

I'm a tax preparer and would strongly advise against this approach. The IRS has specific guidelines for what qualifies as a "uniform" or "protective clothing" - it must be: 1) Required for your job 2) Not suitable for everyday wear 3) Have a clear business purpose beyond personal comfort Regular sunglasses almost never meet the second requirement. They can definitely be worn outside of work and primarily provide personal benefit (eye protection). Specialized safety glasses with UV protection for welders or medical professionals might qualify, but standard sunglasses for a landscaper would very likely be disallowed in an audit, regardless of how you categorize them.

0 coins

Liam O'Connor

•

Thanks for the detailed explanation. My tax guy seemed a little sketchy on this one but I wanted to believe him since I spend so much on good polarized glasses for work. I'll probably just keep it as a personal expense to be safe. Not worth risking an audit over a $200 deduction.

0 coins

I heard you can deduct 50% of sunglasses if you use them 50% for business. Is this true? My delivery driving job has me in the sun all day.

0 coins

Yuki Nakamura

•

Unfortunately, that's not correct for items like sunglasses. While some expenses can be proportionally deducted based on business vs. personal use (like a home office or cell phone), personal items that have incidental business use don't qualify for this treatment. The IRS views sunglasses as inherently personal items that primarily benefit you personally by protecting your eyes, regardless of where you wear them. The fact that you happen to be working while wearing them doesn't transform them into a business expense. This is different from something like a computer that has clear business functionality beyond personal benefit.

0 coins

My accountant let me deduct prescription sunglasses last year because I got a note from my eye doctor saying they were medically necessary for my outdoor construction work. But she said regular non-prescription ones wouldn't qualify. Maybe get a prescription pair if your eyes need correction anyway?

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

Thanks for this suggestion! I actually do need reading glasses but have been putting it off. Maybe getting prescription sunglasses is the way to go. Did your accountant file them as a medical expense or as a business expense?

0 coins

My accountant filed them as a medical expense, not a business expense. Prescription eyewear (including prescription sunglasses) can qualify as a medical expense if you itemize deductions. But remember, medical expenses only help if your total medical costs exceed 7.5% of your AGI, which is a pretty high threshold for most people. She did say that if I had a business requiring specialized eye protection, and the prescription sunglasses were specifically designed for that purpose (not normal-looking glasses), there might be an argument for a business deduction. But standard prescription sunglasses that look like regular glasses would still be a medical expense, not a business one.

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

•

As a fellow Arizona resident who deals with the intense sun daily, I completely understand your frustration with this gray area! Based on my research and experience with similar deductions, here's what I've learned: The IRS has a pretty strict test for business deductions - the expense must be "ordinary and necessary" for your business AND not primarily for personal benefit. Unfortunately, sunglasses almost always fail this test because they primarily protect YOU personally, not your business operations. Even though you're using them exclusively for work as a real estate agent, the IRS would likely argue that: 1) They provide personal benefit (eye protection) regardless of where you wear them 2) They're suitable for everyday wear outside of work 3) They're more about personal comfort than business necessity However, I've seen some success stories where agents documented their sunglasses as "professional equipment" when they could prove specific business purposes - like needing to clearly see property details in bright sunlight or reducing eye strain during long driving days with clients. Keep detailed records of when and why you use them for business. My advice? Be conservative with this deduction unless you can make a really strong case for why they're specifically required for your job function beyond normal personal use. The $175 deduction probably isn't worth the audit risk, but document everything just in case you decide to claim it.

0 coins

Omar Zaki

•

This is really helpful advice, Paolo! I'm also in Arizona (Phoenix area) and the sun here is absolutely brutal. I've been going back and forth on whether to claim my work sunglasses too. Your point about documenting them as "professional equipment" is interesting - I never thought about framing it that way. Do you think it would help to keep a log showing specifically when I wear them for client showings versus my regular personal sunglasses for everything else? I'm leaning toward your conservative approach though. Even if there's a small chance it could be legitimate, the audit headache probably isn't worth it for a couple hundred bucks. Better safe than sorry with the IRS!

0 coins

I've been dealing with this exact same issue as a tax professional for years, and unfortunately the reality is that regular sunglasses are almost never deductible, even for jobs that require lots of outdoor work. The fundamental problem is that the IRS considers sunglasses to be "personal, living, or family expenses" under IRC Section 262, regardless of how much you use them for work. They protect YOU personally, not your business operations. This is different from something like a computer or tools that have clear business functionality. I've seen countless audit cases where people tried to deduct sunglasses as business expenses - real estate agents, construction workers, delivery drivers, landscapers - and they're consistently disallowed. The IRS position is that if the item can be worn outside of work and provides personal benefit, it's a personal expense. The only exceptions I've seen successfully defended are: 1) Specialized safety eyewear required by OSHA or industry regulations (not regular sunglasses) 2) Prescription eyewear that qualifies as a medical expense (but this goes on Schedule A, not Schedule C) 3) Highly specialized protective equipment that's unsuitable for normal wear My strong recommendation? Skip this deduction. The $175 isn't worth the audit risk, and if you're selected for examination, this type of questionable deduction often leads the IRS to scrutinize your entire return more carefully. Save your energy for clear-cut business deductions that won't raise red flags.

0 coins

Ava Hernandez

•

This is exactly the kind of professional insight I was hoping to find! As someone new to navigating business deductions, it's really helpful to hear from a tax professional who's actually seen these audit cases play out. Your point about questionable deductions leading to more scrutiny of the entire return is something I hadn't considered - that's a great reason to be conservative beyond just the specific deduction amount. I'd much rather miss out on a $175 deduction than have my whole return picked apart over something that's clearly in a gray area. The distinction you made about IRC Section 262 and personal vs. business benefit really clarifies why this is such a consistent issue. I think I was getting confused by some of the online advice that doesn't explain the underlying tax code principles. Thanks for saving me from what would likely have been a costly mistake! I'll stick to the clear-cut deductions and leave the sunglasses as a personal expense.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today