< Back to IRS

Cole Roush

Can I claim non-prescription sunglasses as a business deduction for taxes?

Hey tax people, I really need some help figuring out if I can deduct my non-prescription sunglasses on my business taxes. I'm a real estate agent in Arizona and spend like 70% of my time driving clients around to different properties in the blazing sun. I bought some pretty expensive polarized sunglasses ($275) that I wear exclusively for work since they help me see better while driving and protect my eyes. I've found a bunch of websites saying sunglasses are deductible business expenses, but when I dig deeper, it seems like they're often denied by the IRS. Some sites say they count as "ordinary and necessary" business expenses while others say they're considered personal items regardless of work use. My accountant is on vacation and I'm trying to get my quarterly stuff organized. Has anyone successfully deducted non-prescription sunglasses? Do I need a doctor's note or something? Really confused about what's actually allowed here!

The confusion about sunglasses as a business deduction is pretty common. Here's the general rule: for non-prescription sunglasses to be deductible, they need to be both "ordinary and necessary" for your specific business AND not be considered a personal expense. For real estate agents in sunny areas, there's a decent argument that protective eyewear is necessary, but the IRS tends to view items that have substantial personal use potential with extra scrutiny. The key question is whether these sunglasses are substantially different from what you would normally purchase for personal use. If you can demonstrate that these particular sunglasses serve a specific business function (maybe they have special features that help with property viewing or driving safety) and you have a regular pair for personal use, you may have a stronger case. Documentation is crucial - keep receipts and note the business purpose in your records.

0 coins

Arnav Bengali

•

I was under the impression that anything that protects you from the sun can be considered a personal expense because everyone needs that protection. Is that not the case? Also, would it make a difference if OP bought a really basic pair just for work versus an expensive designer brand?

0 coins

Protection from the sun can be viewed differently depending on the occupation. If sun protection is just incidental to daily life, then it's personal. But if your job specifically requires extended exposure beyond what's typical, there may be a legitimate business purpose. The cost and type do matter. Basic functional sunglasses would be more defensible than luxury designer brands. The IRS looks at whether the expense is "lavish or extravagant" - a $275 pair with specific functional features for driving safety might be reasonable, while $500 designer frames with minimal functional difference from a $30 pair would likely be questioned.

0 coins

Sayid Hassan

•

I was in a similar situation with business expenses that seemed to be in a gray area. After a ton of frustration trying to figure out what I could legitimately deduct, I found this AI tool called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that analyzes your specific situation and tells you exactly what's deductible. I uploaded info about my real estate business including some expenses that were in that gray zone, and it gave me specific guidance based on actual tax code and precedents. It saved me from both missing legitimate deductions AND from claiming things that could trigger an audit. Really helpful for situations like yours where general advice online is contradictory.

0 coins

Rachel Tao

•

Does it actually tell you specifically what you can deduct or is it just general advice like we can find anywhere? I mean, can it really make a determination on something like sunglasses that seems to be a gray area?

0 coins

Derek Olson

•

I'm kinda skeptical about AI tax tools. How does it know better than an actual tax professional? And what happens if you get audited after following its advice?

0 coins

Sayid Hassan

•

It goes beyond general advice by analyzing your specific situation against the tax code and previous rulings. For sunglasses specifically, it would look at your profession, how they're used, and provide guidance based on precedent, not just generic advice websites offer. The tool is actually built on analysis of thousands of real tax cases and IRS determinations. It's not replacing professionals - many accountants actually use it themselves. If you get audited, the documentation it helps you create actually serves as support for why you made the deduction decisions you did.

0 coins

Derek Olson

•

I just wanted to follow up about that taxr.ai site someone mentioned. I was super skeptical (as you can see from my previous comment), but I decided to try it for my photography business expenses. I was shocked at how detailed the analysis was! It actually found three deductions I'd been missing for years, including specialized sunglasses I use for outdoor shoots. The explanation it gave about why my particular sunglasses counted as a business expense (specialized polarization needed specifically for my professional work that wouldn't be needed for personal use) was really thorough. It even helped me document everything properly in case of an audit. Way more specific than what my previous accountant told me!

0 coins

Danielle Mays

•

If you're having trouble getting clear answers about business deductions like these sunglasses, you might want to just call the IRS directly. That's what I tried to do but got stuck in an endless phone loop for 3+ hours before giving up. Then I found this service called Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) that somehow gets you through to an actual IRS agent quickly. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I used it when I had questions about some borderline business expenses (including some specialty clothing items). The IRS agent I spoke with gave me definitive answers about what would and wouldn't be allowed in my specific situation. Way better than guessing or getting contradictory info online.

0 coins

Roger Romero

•

How does that even work? The IRS phone lines are notoriously impossible to get through. Is this legit? How much did it cost you?

0 coins

Anna Kerber

•

This sounds like a scam. There's no way to "skip the line" with the IRS. They're a government agency. Anyone claiming they can get you through faster is probably just collecting your money for nothing.

0 coins

Danielle Mays

•

It works by using an algorithm that navigates the IRS phone system and waits on hold for you. When an agent actually picks up, you get a call connecting you directly to them. It's completely legitimate - they don't pretend to be you or anything shady. It's not about "skipping the line" - everyone still waits their turn. The difference is their system waits on hold instead of you having to do it personally. I was skeptical too but getting clear guidance directly from the IRS about my specific situation was worth it, especially since I was able to properly document some deductions I was unsure about.

0 coins

Anna Kerber

•

I need to apologize for my skeptical comment earlier. I actually broke down and tried Claimyr after getting absolutely nowhere with the IRS for two weeks trying to resolve a question about business deductions similar to the sunglasses issue. It actually worked exactly as advertised. Got a call back in about 50 minutes with an actual IRS representative on the line. The agent walked me through the specific requirements for deducting protective gear in my industry and cleared up my confusion. I'm still shocked it worked after my previous failed attempts. For anyone on the fence, it legitimately saved me hours of frustration.

0 coins

Niko Ramsey

•

So I've been a tax preparer for 10 years and the sunglasses question comes up a lot. Here's something important nobody's mentioned yet: if you're self-employed (Schedule C), you have more flexibility with these deductions than if you're a W-2 employee. W-2 employees lost the ability to deduct unreimbursed employee expenses with the 2018 tax law changes. So if you're a W-2 employee (even in real estate), you generally can't deduct these regardless of how necessary they are. But if you're filing Schedule C, then the "ordinary and necessary" test applies. Document WHY these specific glasses are necessary for business functions beyond normal personal use.

0 coins

Cole Roush

•

I'm an independent contractor (1099) in real estate, not W-2. So sounds like I might be able to deduct them? Would you recommend documenting anything specific about the sunglasses like the polarization feature or UV protection that helps with my job specifically?

0 coins

Niko Ramsey

•

Yes, as a 1099 contractor filing Schedule C, you're in a much better position to claim this deduction. The key is documenting the business necessity. I would definitely document the specific features that make these sunglasses necessary for your business functions - polarization reducing glare while driving clients, UV protection for extended outdoor work, etc. Also helpful to note the percentage of use that's business-related (sounds like it's primarily business in your case) and if possible, have a separate pair for personal use to strengthen your case that these are specifically for work. Keep the receipt and perhaps even take a photo of yourself using them in a work context.

0 coins

Maybe I'm missing something, but why not just buy prescription sunglasses instead? Those are much more clearly deductible as a medical expense if you actually need vision correction. I switched to prescription sunglasses last year and my accountant had no issues with the deduction.

0 coins

Jabari-Jo

•

That only works if you actually need vision correction though. If OP has perfect vision, getting unnecessary prescription lenses just for a tax deduction could be considered tax fraud.

0 coins

Kristin Frank

•

Did anyone consider that the $275 might actually need to be depreciated rather than expensed if the sunglasses are expected to last more than a year? I got flagged on this in an audit once for some equipment. Just something to consider.

0 coins

Tony Brooks

•

I actually had this exact situation come up in an audit a few years ago. I'm also in real estate in a sunny state (Nevada) and claimed similar polarized sunglasses as a business expense. The IRS agent focused on three main things: 1) Could I prove these were primarily for business use, 2) Were they substantially different from personal sunglasses I might buy anyway, and 3) Was the cost reasonable for the business purpose. What saved me was having documentation showing I already owned regular sunglasses for personal use, plus I had photos of me wearing the business ones during property showings and client meetings. The polarization feature was key - I could demonstrate it was specifically needed for reducing glare when showing properties with large windows or outdoor spaces. The $275 cost was actually fine because I could show similar professional-grade polarized glasses in that price range. Just make sure you can articulate the specific business need beyond general sun protection. Keep detailed records of when and how you use them for work.

0 coins

Emma Morales

•

This is really helpful info everyone! I'm feeling more confident about claiming these now. Based on what Tony and Niko said, I think I have a decent case since I'm 1099 and can document the business necessity. I already have regular sunglasses for personal use, so these $275 polarized ones are exclusively for work. The polarization really does make a huge difference when driving clients around - especially when we're looking at properties with lots of glass or near water where the glare is intense. I'm going to document the specific features (polarization, UV protection, anti-glare coating) and keep a log of business use. Maybe I'll even take some photos like Tony suggested showing me using them during property showings. Thanks for the real-world audit experience - that's exactly what I needed to hear! Going to claim them as a business expense and keep really detailed records in case it ever comes up. Appreciate everyone's help with this!

0 coins

Quinn Herbert

•

Just wanted to add that I'm in a similar situation as a new real estate agent here in Phoenix. The sun exposure really is intense when you're driving clients around all day! I've been hesitant to claim my work sunglasses but reading through everyone's experiences, especially Tony's audit story, makes me feel like I should document mine better too. One thing I'm wondering - should we be tracking mileage and client meetings where we specifically use these sunglasses? Like creating a log that shows "drove clients to 3 properties, wore polarized sunglasses for glare reduction during showings" or is that overkill? I want to be thorough but not go overboard with documentation.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today