IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

For anyone dealing with this issue in the future: always keep copies of your fee agreements. Unlike H&R Block or TurboTax which have transparent fee tracking, Liberty's system is less intuitive. Their customer service improves dramatically after April 15th. If you're filing next year, consider asking about their fee tracking options before choosing them as your preparer. Most importantly, calculate your expected refund amount before fees so you can verify if the correct amount was deducted.

0 coins

As a newcomer to this discussion, I want to add that if you're still having trouble accessing the MyLiberty portal or the Documents section mentioned by others, there's another way to verify your fee payment status. Check your original Liberty Tax paperwork - they should have given you a copy of the "Refund Transfer Agreement" when you filed. This document contains a confirmation number that you can use to track your fee payment status by calling their automated line at 1-800-REFUNDS (1-800-733-8637). The automated system is available 24/7 and often has more current information than their website. Just have your SSN and confirmation number ready when you call.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

This is really helpful! I didn't know about the automated phone line option. I've been struggling with the online portal all week and this seems like it might be faster than waiting on hold with customer service. Quick question though - do you know if that confirmation number is the same as the e-file number they gave me when I submitted my return, or is it something different? I want to make sure I'm looking for the right thing in my paperwork.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

@Sean Doyle The confirmation number on your Refund Transfer Agreement is actually different from your e-file number! The e-file number is what the IRS uses to track your return submission, but the Refund Transfer confirmation number is specifically for tracking the fee payment portion through Liberty s'bank partner. Look for a document titled Refund "Transfer Agreement or" Bank "Product Agreement -" the confirmation number is usually a 10-12 digit code starting with RT "or" RTA "."If you can t'find that paperwork, the automated line can also look you up using just your SSN and zip code, though it takes a bit longer to navigate through the prompts.

0 coins

Nia Watson

•

Just wanted to add my experience as someone who went through this exact same confusion last year! I had Texas Medicaid too and was totally stressed about the 1095-B form. Everyone here is absolutely right - you do NOT need to file it with your return. What helped me was understanding that the 1095-B is basically just a receipt showing "hey, you had qualifying health coverage this year." The IRS uses it to verify you weren't uninsured (which could trigger a penalty in some cases), but YOU don't need to do anything with it when filing. TurboTax will ask if you had health insurance coverage - just answer yes. It won't ask for any specific numbers or info from your 1095-B. Keep that form safe with your other tax records, but don't stress about entering anything from it into your tax software. You're good to go ahead and file!

0 coins

Chris King

•

This is super helpful! I'm in a similar situation with Texas Medicaid and was getting really anxious about whether I was missing something important. It's reassuring to hear from someone who went through the exact same thing. I kept second-guessing myself because the form looks so official and important, but it sounds like it really is just documentation for my records. Thanks for sharing your experience - definitely makes me feel more confident about moving forward with filing!

0 coins

I went through this same confusion with my 1095-B from California Medicaid last year! The stress is real when you're not sure if you're missing something important. Everyone here has given you solid advice - the 1095-B is purely for your records to prove you had qualifying coverage. What really clicked for me was realizing that the IRS already knows you had Medicaid coverage because they receive that information directly from the state. The 1095-B is just your copy of that same information. You're not missing any steps by not entering it into TurboTax. One thing that might give you extra peace of mind: if you look at the actual tax forms (like Form 1040), there's no line that asks for 1095-B information. There IS a line that asks if you had minimum essential coverage, which you did (Medicaid), but that's just a yes/no question. You're all set to file! Keep that 1095-B with your tax records for at least 3 years in case you ever need to prove you had coverage, but don't let it hold up your filing.

0 coins

This is exactly what I needed to hear! I've been staring at this 1095-B for days wondering if I was going to mess something up. The fact that the IRS already has this information from the state makes so much sense - I hadn't thought about it that way. And you're right about there not being a specific line on the actual tax forms for 1095-B info. I think I was overthinking it because TurboTax mentions so many different forms. Thanks for the reassurance about just keeping it for records - I feel much better about moving forward with my filing now!

0 coins

Diego Chavez

•

As a newcomer to this community, I'm amazed by the depth and quality of this discussion! I've been dealing with a similar Schedule D situation involving both unrecaptured Section 1250 gains from a rental property sale and some collectibles gains, and I was completely overwhelmed until I found this thread. The progression of explanations here is absolutely brilliant - from the initial technical breakdown to Hannah's "cake layers" analogy to the professional insights about tax policy. What really helped me was understanding that the 25% and 28% rates are protective maximums, not automatic rates. I was making the same mistake as many others, assuming I'd automatically pay 25% on my Section 1250 gains regardless of my tax bracket. The concept of the worksheet performing a "tax rate arbitrage" calculation really clicked for me. It's essentially ensuring I get the most favorable treatment possible by comparing different scenarios and applying the lowest rates available. That completely changed my perspective from seeing it as a confusing penalty to recognizing it as a taxpayer-friendly safety net. I'm definitely going to try the hybrid approach several people mentioned - using tax software for the calculations while working through a simplified version manually to verify my understanding. The planning strategies discussed here, especially the idea of timing sales across different years to manage bracket interactions, have given me a whole new appreciation for proactive tax planning. Thank you all for creating such an educational resource. This is exactly the kind of community knowledge sharing that makes complex tax topics actually understandable!

0 coins

Welcome to the community, Diego! I'm so glad this discussion helped clarify things for you as well. As another newcomer who was completely overwhelmed by the Schedule D Tax Worksheet initially, it's really encouraging to see how this thread has helped so many people in similar situations. Your point about the "tax rate arbitrage" concept really resonates with me. I think that framing - understanding that the worksheet is essentially running multiple tax scenarios to find the most favorable one - is what finally made everything click. It transforms the worksheet from this mysterious, intimidating calculation into something that's actually working in our favor. The hybrid approach you're planning sounds perfect. I'm considering the same strategy since it seems to offer the best of both worlds - the accuracy of professional software with the confidence that comes from understanding the underlying logic. Plus, as several people mentioned, that conceptual understanding becomes really valuable for future tax planning. I'm particularly excited about applying some of the planning strategies that were discussed, especially the timing considerations for future property sales. It's amazing how understanding these concepts opens up opportunities for proactive tax management that I never would have considered before. Thanks for adding your perspective to this already incredible discussion - it's wonderful to connect with others who are navigating these same complex tax situations!

0 coins

Olivia Kay

•

As someone who just went through this exact same nightmare with Schedule D, I completely feel your pain! I had both unrecaptured Section 1250 gains from selling a duplex and collectibles gains from some art pieces, and I was pulling my hair out trying to understand that worksheet. What finally helped me was realizing that the worksheet is essentially asking one simple question: "What's the lowest amount of tax you can legally pay given all these different rate structures?" It's not trying to confuse you - it's actually working in your favor by making sure you don't overpay. Here's the key insight that changed everything for me: Those 25% and 28% rates everyone talks about? They're MAXIMUMS, not minimums. So if you're in the 22% bracket, you'll pay 22% on your Section 1250 gains, not 25%. The special rates only kick in as a benefit when your regular marginal rate would be higher. Think of it like a price ceiling at the grocery store - you never pay more than the ceiling price, but if the regular price is lower, you pay the regular price. The worksheet does all those complicated calculations because it's essentially running two different tax scenarios side by side and giving you whichever one results in lower taxes. That's why it seems so convoluted - it's doing the math to prove you're getting the best deal possible under the tax code. For the practical stuff, I ended up using TaxAct software and then worked through a simplified version by hand just to verify I understood what was happening. The software handled all the complex line-by-line calculations perfectly, but doing the conceptual walkthrough gave me confidence in the results. Hope this helps! The good news is once you understand the logic, it actually makes a lot of sense - even if the IRS instructions are still terrible at explaining it.

0 coins

Andre Dupont

•

Thank you so much for sharing your experience, Olivia! Your "price ceiling" analogy is absolutely perfect - that really drives home the concept that these special rates are protective maximums rather than automatic penalties. As someone who's been following this incredible discussion thread, I'm amazed at how many different ways people have found to explain the same underlying concept. Your grocery store comparison joins the "cake layers" and "tax rate arbitrage" explanations as another brilliant way to understand what the Schedule D Tax Worksheet is actually doing. I'm particularly interested in your experience with TaxAct since I've been debating which software to use for my own similar situation. Did you find that it provided any explanation of the calculations, or did it just handle them behind the scenes? I'm leaning toward the hybrid approach you mentioned - letting software handle the complex math while working through the concepts manually for my own understanding. Your point about the worksheet "proving you're getting the best deal possible" is such a helpful reframe. Instead of seeing it as this intimidating bureaucratic maze, I can now appreciate it as a mathematical guarantee that I won't overpay under any scenario. This entire thread has been such an education in how community knowledge sharing can make even the most complex tax topics accessible. Thank you for adding another valuable perspective to an already amazing discussion!

0 coins

I feel for you - this exact situation happened to me when my company relocated me from Seattle to Atlanta in late 2022, but they didn't process the tax implications until 2023. The shock of that unexpected withholding hitting months later is really jarring. A few things that helped me navigate this: **Get that itemized breakdown immediately** - When I finally got mine, I discovered about $1,800 in "relocation administration fees" that seemed excessive. I was able to get HR to explain (and ultimately reduce) some of these charges by asking specific questions about what services they actually covered. **Document everything from your 2023 move** - I kept all my emails, receipts, and moving company confirmations from when services were actually provided. While it didn't change the tax year reporting, it gave me leverage when negotiating with HR about the unfairness of the delayed processing. **Ask about spreading the withholding** - Most companies are very flexible about this. Mine let me spread it over 8 paychecks, which made the cash flow impact much more manageable. They'd rather accommodate you than deal with payroll complaints. **Push for a tax gross-up** - The strongest argument I made was that their delayed processing pushed the income into a different tax year where I was in a higher bracket. I framed it as "your administrative timing created a tax burden that wouldn't have existed if this had been processed when the services were actually received." They ended up providing a partial gross-up. The 22% withholding on supplemental income might actually help if you're normally in a lower bracket - you'll likely get a decent refund. Don't let them rush you into accepting this without exploring your options!

0 coins

Jacob Lewis

•

This is incredibly helpful, Giovanni! The specific language you used about "administrative timing created a tax burden" is exactly what I was looking for. That's a really compelling way to frame the unfairness of the situation. I'm particularly encouraged that you were able to get a partial gross-up by making that bracket argument. Do you remember approximately how long it took for HR to make that decision, or was it something they agreed to relatively quickly once you presented the case? The point about the $1,800 in administration fees is also eye-opening. I'm definitely going to scrutinize every line item when I get that breakdown. It sounds like these companies often pad the costs with administrative overhead that isn't necessarily justified. Thanks for the reassurance about spreading the withholding too - knowing that most companies are flexible about this makes me feel more confident about asking. Eight paychecks sounds much more manageable than taking the full hit at once.

0 coins

Avery Davis

•

I'm really sorry you're dealing with this situation - it's incredibly frustrating when employers spring tax surprises on you months after the fact, especially when it crosses tax years like this. Unfortunately, what your wife's employer is doing is legally permissible. Companies can report relocation benefits when they complete their accounting and receive all vendor invoices, rather than when you actually received the services. This is why your November 2023 move is hitting your 2024 taxes. Here's what I'd recommend: **Get an itemized breakdown immediately** - You need to see exactly what's included in that $10,500. Corporate relocations often include administrative fees, insurance costs, and services you might not have realized were being tracked. Sometimes there are errors or inflated charges you can challenge. **Document your 2023 timeline** - Gather all your flight confirmations, moving company receipts, and emails from November 2023. While it might not change the reporting year, it gives you leverage when discussing the unfairness of their delayed processing. **Ask about relief options** - Specifically inquire about: - Tax gross-up policies (some companies will cover the additional tax burden) - Spreading the withholding across multiple paychecks for cash flow relief - Any flexibility given their timing created a bracket issue you wouldn't have faced in 2023 **Consider the withholding rate** - This will likely be withheld at the flat 22% supplemental income rate, which might actually be higher than your normal bracket. You could see some of this back at tax time. The lack of upfront communication about tax implications is really poor practice on their part. Don't hesitate to advocate for yourself - companies often have more flexibility than they initially indicate, especially when their own administrative delays created the hardship.

0 coins

Xan Dae

•

I've been going through this exact same frustrating experience for the past week! The IRS fax system is absolutely broken right now and it's causing so much anxiety when you're working against their 30-day deadline. This thread has been incredibly helpful - it's amazing how this community has basically solved the IRS's infrastructure problems through shared experiences. That alternate fax number (855-215-1627) that Justin shared has been a lifesaver for so many people here. The detailed success stories from Maya, Fatima, and others give me real hope that there's actually a working solution. I'm definitely going to try the proven early morning method tomorrow around 4:15 AM: send the cover sheet with "8962/1095-A ACA SUBMISSION" clearly marked first, wait a full minute, then send the actual forms on "fine" quality setting. The consistency of success with this exact approach is really encouraging after days of nothing but busy signals. Already sent my certified mail backup today after learning about the postmark date rule from everyone here - it's such a relief knowing that protects me from deadline issues regardless of whether the fax eventually works. It's honestly ridiculous that we taxpayers have had to become fax machine experts and crowdsource workarounds for basic government services, but this community support has been invaluable. The IRS should be ashamed that citizens are solving their technical problems through Reddit threads! Thanks to everyone for sharing your successful strategies and turning this bureaucratic nightmare into something actually manageable.

0 coins

I've been dealing with this exact same nightmare for almost two weeks now! The IRS fax system is completely overwhelmed and it's driving me absolutely insane. After reading through everyone's incredibly detailed experiences here, I'm amazed at how this community has basically created the technical support that the IRS should have provided. That alternate fax number (855-215-1627) that Justin shared seems to be the real breakthrough - so many success stories using it during those early morning hours. I'm definitely going to try the proven method tomorrow at 4:30 AM: send cover sheet with "8962/1095-A ACA SUBMISSION" first, wait a full minute, then send forms on fine quality. Already sent my certified mail backup after learning about the postmark rule here - such peace of mind knowing that protects against deadline issues. It's absolutely ridiculous that we need multiple submission methods for basic tax documents, but this community has turned an impossible bureaucratic nightmare into something actually solvable. The IRS should be mortified that taxpayers are crowdsourcing solutions to their infrastructure failures through Reddit threads! But I'm so grateful for everyone sharing their successful strategies. This thread has been a lifesaver when government systems completely fail us. Will definitely report back on my early morning attempt to help others still fighting this battle!

0 coins

I'm in the exact same boat and completely understand your frustration! I've been trying to fax my 8962 forms for over a week now with zero success. This thread has been such a lifesaver - I had no idea there was an alternate fax number or that so many other people were dealing with this nightmare. That alternate number (855-215-1627) and the early morning approach really seem to be the key based on all these success stories. I'm setting my alarm for 4:00 AM tomorrow to try the exact method everyone's been using - cover sheet first with "8962/1095-A ACA SUBMISSION", wait a minute, then send the forms on fine quality. Already dropped my certified mail at the post office today after reading about the postmark protection here. It's crazy that we've all had to become experts at working around broken government systems, but this community has been amazing at sharing real solutions. The IRS really should be embarrassed that taxpayers are solving their technical problems for them! Thanks to everyone for turning this bureaucratic mess into something actually manageable. I'll report back on how my early morning attempt goes too!

0 coins

Prev1...973974975976977...5644Next