


Ask the community...
This is exactly the kind of situation where you want to be proactive rather than reactive. The IRS has gotten much better at data matching over the years, and property sales are one of the transactions they scrutinize most closely. Here's what I'd recommend: Start gathering your records now, even though you don't plan to sell until 2035. Request tax transcripts for 2017-2019 from the IRS while they're still available, and reconstruct your depreciation amounts. Calculate what your potential recapture liability would be so there are no surprises later. The "allowed or allowable" rule is particularly important to understand - you'll owe recapture tax on the depreciation you should have taken during those rental years, regardless of whether you actually claimed it. For a 2.5 year rental period, this could be a meaningful amount depending on your property value. Consider consulting with a tax professional who specializes in real estate to review your specific situation. They can help you understand exactly what records to keep and how to calculate the recapture when the time comes. Better to spend a few hundred dollars now on proper advice than potentially face thousands in penalties and interest later.
This is really solid advice. I'm actually in a somewhat similar boat - converted my primary residence to a rental in 2019 and moved back in 2022. Even though I'm not planning to sell anytime soon, I'm already organizing all my depreciation records and keeping detailed files. One thing I learned from my tax preparer is that even if you can't get the exact depreciation amounts from old returns, you can reconstruct them using the property's fair market value when it was converted to rental use and applying the standard 27.5-year depreciation schedule. The IRS expects you to use the "allowed or allowable" calculation anyway, so having the methodology documented is almost as important as having the original forms. Paolo's point about consulting a real estate tax professional is spot on. The few hundred dollars I spent getting my situation reviewed gave me so much peace of mind and a clear roadmap for when I eventually sell.
Thanks for starting this discussion - this is such an important topic that many people don't think about until it's too late! I'm dealing with a similar situation where I converted my primary residence to a rental for a few years and now I'm back living in it. One thing I want to emphasize is that the IRS computer systems have become incredibly sophisticated at matching data. When you eventually sell, they'll receive a 1099-S showing the sale price, and their systems can cross-reference that against your historical Schedule E filings to look for potential depreciation recapture situations. The key thing to remember is that depreciation recapture is calculated on the LESSER of: (1) the total depreciation you claimed (or should have claimed) during the rental period, or (2) the gain on the sale. So even if your property appreciates significantly by 2035, you're only paying recapture tax on that 2.5 years worth of depreciation, not the entire gain. My advice would be to create a simple spreadsheet now documenting your rental period dates, the property's basis when converted to rental, and the annual depreciation amounts. Even if you lose your tax returns, having this basic information will help you (or your tax preparer) reconstruct the numbers accurately when the time comes. The peace of mind is worth the small effort now!
This is really helpful context about how the recapture calculation works! I didn't realize it was the lesser of depreciation claimed vs. gain on sale - that actually makes me feel a bit better about the potential tax hit down the road. Your point about creating a spreadsheet now is brilliant. I'm definitely going to do that this weekend while the rental period details are still fresh in my memory. Do you happen to know if there's a standard format or specific information I should make sure to include beyond the basics you mentioned? I want to make sure I'm documenting everything a tax preparer would need 15+ years from now. Also, when you say "basis when converted to rental" - is that the fair market value at the time of conversion, or the original purchase price? I've seen conflicting information on this and want to make sure I'm using the right number for the depreciation calculations.
Great question about the basis calculation! For depreciation purposes when you convert a primary residence to rental, you use the LESSER of: (1) your adjusted basis in the property (generally what you paid plus improvements, minus any prior depreciation), or (2) the fair market value at the time of conversion. This is actually a protective rule - it prevents you from depreciating more than what the property was actually worth when you started renting it out. So if you bought your house for $300k but it was only worth $250k when converted to rental, you'd use $250k as your depreciable basis. For your spreadsheet, I'd recommend including: conversion date, fair market value at conversion, original purchase price, cost of any major improvements before conversion, the calculated depreciable basis, annual depreciation amounts, and rental period start/end dates. Also keep records of any improvements made DURING the rental period, as those affect your basis too. One more tip: if you're not sure about the fair market value at the time of conversion, you can use online tools like Zillow estimates, tax assessments, or even get a simple appraisal. Having some documentation of how you determined that value could be helpful if questions arise later.
I've been following this thread closely as someone who recently faced a similar dilemma. The consensus here is spot-on - there's a critical difference between what your employer allows and what the IRS considers legitimate for hardship withdrawals. Your situation might actually qualify under "preventing eviction/foreclosure" if you can genuinely demonstrate that your car payment is putting your housing at risk. The key word is "genuinely" - this needs to be real financial hardship, not just wanting to reduce expenses. Before proceeding, I'd strongly recommend: 1. Document your current financial situation thoroughly - bank statements, budget worksheets showing you can't meet all obligations 2. Contact a HUD-approved housing counselor for free advice and professional documentation of your hardship 3. Explore one more round of alternatives - credit union loans, auto lender hardship programs, or even selling the car for something cheaper If you do move forward with the hardship withdrawal, make sure you can honestly certify that you meet IRS criteria. The peace of mind of doing this legitimately is worth far more than the risk of audit issues and additional penalties down the road. Remember, the true cost of a 401k withdrawal includes not just taxes and penalties, but decades of lost compound growth. Make absolutely sure you've exhausted other options first.
This is really comprehensive advice, and I appreciate everyone sharing their experiences here. As someone new to this community, I'm impressed by how thorough and helpful everyone has been with this complex situation. One thing I'd add from my recent experience with similar financial challenges - if you do end up exploring the "preventing eviction/foreclosure" route, make sure you have a clear timeline documented. The IRS would likely want to see that this is an immediate threat, not just a general concern about future finances. I also wanted to mention that some employers have Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) that offer free financial counseling. It might be worth checking if your company has one of these programs - they can sometimes help you explore options you hadn't considered and provide documentation that could support a legitimate hardship claim if needed. The point about lost compound growth over decades is so important. I ran the numbers on a similar withdrawal amount, and what seems like $9,400 today could easily be $50,000+ in retirement savings if left alone. That perspective really helped me exhaust every other option first. Thanks for all the detailed guidance everyone - this thread has been incredibly educational!
I've been reading through all these responses and wanted to add something that might be helpful. As someone who works in retirement plan administration, I can confirm that while your employer may not require documentation upfront, they're still required to report the withdrawal to the IRS using specific hardship reason codes. The most important thing to understand is that when you certify that you qualify for a hardship withdrawal, you're making that certification to the IRS, not just your employer. If you're genuinely at risk of eviction or foreclosure because your total debt burden (including that car payment) is preventing you from making housing payments, that could legitimately qualify under the "preventing eviction/foreclosure" category. However, before going that route, I'd really encourage you to explore a few more alternatives: - Contact your auto lender about payment deferrals or modification programs - Look into credit union debt consolidation loans (they often have more flexible underwriting) - Consider selling the car even if you break even, then financing something less expensive If you do proceed with the hardship withdrawal, keep detailed records of your financial situation showing how eliminating the car payment is necessary to prevent housing default. Bank statements, budget worksheets, and any correspondence about late payments would all be important documentation to maintain. The key is making sure you can honestly certify that you meet the IRS requirements - the peace of mind is worth far more than the risk of potential audit issues later.
This is really valuable insight from someone who actually works in plan administration! I hadn't fully understood that the employer still has to report using specific hardship codes to the IRS - that's a crucial detail that changes the risk calculation. Your point about the certification being made to the IRS rather than just the employer really drives home why it's so important to make sure you genuinely qualify under their criteria. The reporting codes probably mean there's more of a paper trail than people realize. I'm curious about something you mentioned - when you say "preventing eviction/foreclosure" could apply if total debt burden is threatening housing payments, is there a specific threshold or documentation the IRS typically looks for? Like, do they expect to see actual notices from landlords, or is a documented budget showing insufficient funds for all obligations usually sufficient? Also, regarding those credit union debt consolidation loans - do you have any insight into what they typically look for in terms of debt-to-income ratios? I've been turned down by traditional banks but haven't tried credit unions yet, and I'm wondering if it's worth the credit inquiry if my DTI is already pretty high. Thanks for sharing your professional perspective - it's really helpful to get advice from someone who actually deals with these situations regularly!
Just went through this exact situation with my EPD sale in my Traditional IRA last year. The key thing to understand is that while the sale itself doesn't appear on your personal tax return, you still need to monitor for UBTI implications. For your EPD K1, focus on Box 20 - specifically look for code V (Net section 751 gain) which captures the "hot assets" portion of your sale. This is the most likely source of UBTI from partnership unit sales. Also check if there's any code N (Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain) though EPD typically has minimal depreciation recapture. In my case, selling 200 units generated about $340 in UBTI (Box 20 code V), which was well under the $1,000 threshold so no additional taxes were owed. But it's important to track this annually since UBTI from all sources in your IRA gets aggregated. Pro tip: Keep records of your basis adjustments from previous years' K1s (Box 1 losses and Box 19 distributions) as these affect the gain calculation when you sell. The original poster mentioned holding for 15 years, so there's likely significant basis reduction to account for.
This is really helpful, thanks! I'm new to understanding K1s and this breakdown makes it much clearer. Quick question - you mentioned tracking basis adjustments from previous years. Since I've held EPD for 15 years, do I need to go back and look at all my old K1s to calculate my current basis? That seems like a lot of work. Is there a shortcut or does the partnership provide this information somewhere? Also, when you say "hot assets" what exactly does that refer to in the context of EPD?
Unfortunately, there's no real shortcut for the basis calculation after 15 years - you'll need to track down those historical K1s. EPD doesn't provide cumulative basis information to individual unitholders. However, if you use a major brokerage like Fidelity or Schwab, they sometimes track partnership basis adjustments in their systems, though it's not always 100% accurate. For "hot assets" in EPD's context, this typically refers to unrealized receivables and inventory-type assets that generate ordinary income rather than capital gains treatment. For a midstream MLP like EPD, this often includes things like product inventory, accounts receivable, and certain contract rights. When you sell partnership units, a portion of your gain gets recharacterized as ordinary income to the extent it represents your share of these "hot assets." The good news is that EPD's investor relations department maintains detailed guidance on their website about K1 reporting, including typical amounts for different types of transactions. You might also consider reaching out to them directly - they're generally helpful with questions about basis tracking and can sometimes provide historical distribution information that helps with the calculation.
As someone who's been managing MLP holdings in retirement accounts for over a decade, I can confirm that the confusion around K1 reporting for IRA sales is incredibly common. The key insight that many miss is that while the sale itself doesn't flow to your personal tax return, you absolutely need to monitor the UBTI implications. For your EPD sale, here's what to focus on: 1. **Box 20 Code V** - This shows "Net section 751 gain" which represents your share of ordinary income items (the "hot assets" portion). This is the most common source of UBTI from partnership sales. 2. **Box 1** - Check if there's any ordinary business income allocated from the sale transaction itself. 3. **Aggregate tracking** - Remember that the $1,000 UBTI threshold applies to ALL sources within your IRA for the year, not just this one transaction. Since you've held EPD for 15 years, your basis has likely been reduced significantly through accumulated losses and distributions from previous K1s. This means more of your sale proceeds could be treated as gain, potentially increasing any UBTI impact. One thing I learned the hard way: even though many IRA custodians are supposed to monitor UBTI automatically, it's wise to proactively notify them if you identify any reportable amounts. I've seen cases where custodians missed the 990-T filing requirement, leading to penalties later. The good news is that EPD typically generates relatively modest UBTI on sales compared to some other MLPs, so you'll likely be well within the safe zone.
This is exactly the kind of comprehensive breakdown I was hoping to find! Thank you Kevin for laying out the specific boxes to check. I just pulled out my 2023 K1 and found Box 20 Code V showing $218 in section 751 gain from my sale - well under the $1,000 threshold as you mentioned. One follow-up question: you mentioned that basis reduction over 15 years could increase the UBTI impact. Should I be concerned about future sales if my basis has been reduced to near zero? I'm thinking about potentially selling more shares in the coming years and want to understand if there's a point where the UBTI becomes more problematic for larger sales. Also, has anyone here had experience with Schwab's tracking of MLP basis adjustments? I've been with them for the entire holding period and wondering if their records might save me from digging through 15 years of old K1s.
I've been following this thread and wanted to add my perspective as someone who recently went through a similar situation. The 17% you're seeing is definitely frustrating, but it's become the new normal in many major cities unfortunately. What really helped me was learning to research the tax situation before booking rather than being surprised at checkout. Most city government websites actually publish their hotel occupancy tax rates if you know where to look - usually under their finance or revenue department pages. I started doing this after getting burned a few times by unexpectedly high taxes. Also, I've found that timing can sometimes matter. Some cities have temporary additional taxes during major events or peak tourist seasons. If your trip is flexible, it might be worth checking if those dates coincide with any special assessments. One last tip - if you're a AAA member or have certain credit cards, some hotels offer packages that include taxes in the quoted rate rather than adding them on top. It doesn't save money necessarily, but it eliminates the sticker shock and makes budgeting easier. Worth asking about when you call for that breakdown others have suggested!
This is really helpful advice about researching ahead of time! I wish I had known to check city websites before my booking. Your point about timing and special events is something I never considered - that could definitely explain why tax rates seem to vary so much for the same destination. Do you have any tips on which specific section of city websites usually has the hotel tax information? I'd love to start doing this research myself but I'm not sure where to look - is it usually under "Business" sections or more in the general tax/revenue areas?
Great question about where to find this info on city websites! I usually start by looking under "Finance" or "Revenue" departments, then checking for subsections like "Tax Information" or "Business Taxes." Sometimes it's under "Visitors" or "Tourism" sections too. For example, if you search "[City Name] hotel occupancy tax rate" you'll often get direct links to the relevant pages. Some cities also have "Doing Business" portals that list all the various tax rates including hotel/lodging taxes. Chicago, NYC, and San Francisco have pretty comprehensive breakdowns on their official sites. It takes a few minutes of clicking around, but once you find it for a city, you can bookmark it for future reference!
This whole thread has been incredibly educational! I had no idea hotel taxes were so complex with all these different components. Reading everyone's experiences, I realize I've been making the same mistake of just looking at base room rates and then getting shocked at checkout. A couple of questions for the group: 1. For those who've successfully negotiated resort fees or facility charges - how do you approach that conversation with the hotel? Do you call before arrival or handle it at check-in? 2. Has anyone tried booking directly through hotel websites vs third-party sites to see if there's actually a difference in how taxes and fees are presented or calculated? I'm planning a trip to the Pacific Northwest next month and want to be better prepared this time. Based on what I've learned here, I'm going to research the local tax rates ahead of time and budget that extra 15-20% everyone mentioned. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and tips - this has been way more helpful than trying to figure this out on my own!
Great questions! For negotiating resort fees, I've had the most success calling 2-3 days before arrival rather than at check-in. The reservations team usually has more flexibility than front desk staff who are often just following policy. I explain specifically which amenities I won't use and ask if there's a "rooms only" rate available. Success varies, but I'd say it works about 30% of the time. Regarding booking direct vs third-party sites - there's definitely a difference in presentation. Hotel websites usually break down taxes more clearly and sometimes offer "inclusive" rates that build everything into one price. Third-party sites often just show that confusing "taxes and fees" lump sum. The actual tax amount is the same either way since those are government-set rates, but direct booking often gives you more transparency and sometimes better customer service if issues arise. For the Pacific Northwest, expect around 15-17% in major cities like Seattle or Portland. Washington state has no income tax so they rely more heavily on sales and lodging taxes. Good luck with your trip planning!
ElectricDreamer
Great discussion here! As someone who went through this exact decision last year with my spouse's consulting business, I wanted to add a few practical tips that helped us figure out the best approach. First, don't forget about the QBI (Qualified Business Income) deduction - it's available regardless of filing status, but your combined income when filing jointly might affect the income thresholds where limitations kick in. For 2025, the phase-out starts at $383,900 for joint filers vs $191,950 for separate filers. Second, consider estimated tax payments. When filing jointly, you can use either spouse's income to cover the safe harbor rules for estimated taxes, which can make quarterly planning much easier with irregular business income. Finally, here's something that saved us money: filing jointly allowed us to bunch itemized deductions more effectively. We could time business expenses and personal deductions (like charitable contributions) in the same tax year to exceed the standard deduction threshold, then take the standard deduction in alternating years. This strategy doesn't work as well when filing separately due to the lower standard deduction amounts. Definitely run the numbers both ways, but in most cases the joint filing benefits outweigh the separate filing "safety" for business owners.
0 coins
Aisha Jackson
ā¢This is incredibly helpful! I hadn't considered the QBI deduction thresholds when comparing joint vs separate filing. Quick question - when you mention "bunching" deductions, how exactly does that work with business expenses? Can you time when you pay for business items, or are you talking more about the personal itemized deductions like charitable contributions? My wife's business has some flexibility in when she purchases equipment, so I'm wondering if we could strategically time those expenses along with our personal deductions to maximize the benefit in alternating years.
0 coins
Paloma Clark
ā¢Great question! For business expenses, you're generally required to deduct them in the year they're incurred for business purposes, so you can't really manipulate timing just for tax strategy. However, there is some flexibility with certain items like equipment purchases - if your wife buys business equipment near year-end, she might be able to choose between taking the full Section 179 deduction in the current year or depreciating it over time. The "bunching" strategy I mentioned works much better with personal itemized deductions that you have more control over - things like charitable contributions, medical expenses (if you can time elective procedures), or even property tax payments if your local jurisdiction allows it. The idea is to bunch these controllable deductions into one tax year to exceed the standard deduction, then take the standard deduction in off years. Since you're filing jointly, you have that higher $27,800 standard deduction threshold to work with, which makes the bunching strategy more effective than if you were filing separately with the lower $13,900 thresholds.
0 coins
Maya Jackson
One aspect that hasn't been covered yet is how filing jointly vs. separately affects your ability to claim business losses. If your wife's business has a loss in any given year, filing jointly often provides better tax benefits since the business loss can offset your W-2 income more effectively. With married filing jointly, you have access to higher income thresholds before passive activity loss limitations kick in. The at-risk rules and passive activity rules can be more favorable when you're combining incomes on a joint return. Also worth noting - if your wife's business qualifies as a "small business" under Section 448 (generally under $27 million average gross receipts), filing jointly might help you stay under various thresholds that could require more complex accounting methods. The key is really running both scenarios with your actual numbers. Every couple's situation is different, but I've found that the math usually favors joint filing unless there are specific circumstances like income-based loan repayments or one spouse having significant liability concerns.
0 coins
NeonNebula
ā¢This is a really important point about business losses that I haven't seen discussed much elsewhere! My spouse had a rough first year with her photography business and we actually ended up owing less in taxes because the business loss offset my regular job income when we filed jointly. I'm curious though - are there any situations where having business losses on a joint return could actually hurt you? Like does it affect eligibility for certain tax credits or anything like that? We're planning ahead for next year since her business is still building up and might have another loss year. Also, when you mention the Section 448 thresholds, does that $27 million limit apply to the business alone or our combined household income? Just want to make sure we understand this correctly since it sounds like it could affect our accounting requirements.
0 coins