IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls โ€“ which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Isaac Wright

โ€ข

I was in the exact same boat last year trying to figure out my Solo 401k contributions! What finally helped me was understanding that the "circular calculation" for employer contributions is the tricky part. You can't just take 25% of your net self-employment income - you have to account for the fact that the employer contribution itself reduces the income it's calculated on. Here's the simplified approach I use: First, max out your employee elective deferral ($23,000 + $7,500 catch-up = $30,500 for you). Then for the employer portion, use this formula: (Net SE income - ยฝ SE tax) รท 1.25 = maximum employer contribution. With your $81,000 income, after subtracting half the SE tax (roughly $5,733), you'd have about $75,267. Divide that by 1.25 and you get approximately $60,214 as your maximum employer contribution. But since your total can't exceed $69,000 (including catch-up), and you're already using $30,500 for employee contributions, your employer contribution would be capped at $38,500. The key is keeping good records of which bucket each contribution goes into when you make them!

0 coins

Zara Mirza

โ€ข

This is incredibly helpful! I've been struggling with that circular calculation for weeks. The formula you provided (Net SE income - ยฝ SE tax) รท 1.25 is so much clearer than trying to work through the IRS worksheets. I didn't realize the employer contribution reduces the income it's calculated on - that was the piece I was missing. Thanks for breaking this down in such simple terms!

0 coins

Maggie Martinez

โ€ข

The confusion around Solo 401k contribution splits is totally understandable - I went through the same headache when I first started! One thing that helped me was realizing that you essentially wear two hats: employee and employer. As the "employee," you can defer up to $30,500 ($23,000 + $7,500 catch-up since you're over 50) from your personal income. This is money you're choosing not to take as salary. As the "employer," your business can contribute up to 25% of your compensation, but here's where it gets tricky - your "compensation" for this calculation is your net self-employment earnings minus half of your self-employment tax AND minus the employer contribution itself (hence the circular math everyone mentions). Given your $81,000 net income, you should be able to max out both portions without hitting the overall $69,000 limit. The key is making sure you designate each contribution properly when you make it - your plan administrator needs to know which bucket each dollar goes into for proper tax reporting. Have you checked if your plan administrator has any calculators or guidance? Some of the bigger providers have tools that can help with the math, even if they don't do it automatically.

0 coins

Elijah Knight

โ€ข

This "two hats" explanation is brilliant! I've been reading about Solo 401k contributions for months and this is the first time someone explained it in a way that actually makes sense. The employee vs employer perspective really clarifies why the calculations are so different for each portion. One quick follow-up question - when you mention that some plan administrators have calculators, do you know if Fidelity or Schwab offer anything like that? I'm trying to decide between providers and having built-in calculation tools would be a huge plus for me. Also, do you happen to know if there are any penalties for getting the split wrong initially, as long as you don't exceed the overall contribution limits? I'm worried I might mess up the designation on my first attempt!

0 coins

Emma Davis

โ€ข

This thread has been absolutely incredible to read through! I'm also navigating my first 60-day review notice (got mine dated March 23rd) and - you guessed it - I'm another recent grad who claimed student loan interest deduction! ๐ŸŽ“ The pattern everyone's identified here is so reassuring. When I first got that CP05 notice, I was convinced I'd made some major error on my return, but seeing how routine this verification process is for people in our exact situation has been such a relief. Ashley, your organized approach with the color-coded folders and spreadsheet tracking really speaks to me - I've been doing something similar but wasn't sure if I was being overly detailed about it! ๐Ÿ˜… What I find most valuable about this discussion is the specific timeline data everyone has shared. Those real day counts (like CosmicCadet's 52-day resolution) are so much more helpful than the vague "60 days" estimate from the IRS. The 45-60 day window most people are experiencing gives me realistic expectations to work with. I've definitely fallen into the transcript checking obsession too - probably refreshing it way more than I should! But this community support makes the waiting period so much more manageable. It's amazing how sharing experiences transforms anxiety into understanding. Looking forward to following everyone's progress and hopefully celebrating successful resolutions together soon! ๐Ÿคž

0 coins

Leo McDonald

โ€ข

Welcome to the community, Emma! ๐Ÿ˜Š It's honestly incredible how this thread has become such a supportive space for all of us recent grads going through the exact same situation. Your March 23rd notice date puts you right at the end of what seems to be the big wave of CP05 notices for student loan interest verification - we're all basically riding this out together! I totally relate to the initial panic when that notice arrived. Like you, I was convinced I'd messed something up on my return, but seeing this clear pattern has been such a relief. The organized approach definitely helps - there's something comforting about having all the details tracked and documented! ๐Ÿ“Š The transcript checking addiction is so real too - I keep telling myself I'll only check twice a week, but here I am refreshing it daily! ๐Ÿ˜… This community has turned what felt like an isolating experience into something we can navigate together. Looking forward to your updates and hopefully celebrating with everyone when these reviews wrap up! ๐ŸŽ‰

0 coins

Layla Mendes

โ€ข

I'm new to this community but had to jump in after reading through this entire thread - what an amazing support system you've all created here! I'm also dealing with my first 60-day review notice (received March 17th) and like practically everyone else, I'm a recent grad who claimed student loan interest deduction. The pattern is undeniable at this point! ๐ŸŽ“ Ashley, thank you so much for starting this discussion and being so thorough with your tracking approach. Your color-coded organization system sounds exactly like something I would do (and probably will start doing now!). Reading through everyone's experiences has transformed what initially felt like a terrifying mistake into understanding that this is just routine verification for people in our situation. The specific timelines everyone has shared - especially that 45-60 day resolution window - have been invaluable for setting realistic expectations beyond the IRS's vague "60 days." I've definitely caught the transcript checking obsession too, but knowing that so many others are refreshing theirs just as frequently makes it feel less neurotic! ๐Ÿ˜… This community's ability to turn individual anxiety into collective support and understanding is truly remarkable. It's so reassuring to know we're all navigating this together and that these reviews consistently resolve without major issues. Looking forward to following everyone's progress and hopefully celebrating successful resolutions soon! ๐Ÿคž

0 coins

Molly Chambers

โ€ข

Has anyone considered that this might actually be a reporting error? I've been doing backdoor Roth conversions for years, and I think there's confusion about how to report a loss on Form 8606. Line 14 should only have a value if you have remaining basis in IRAs that still have funds in them. Since the account was completely emptied, I think the software might be calculating this incorrectly. When I had a similar situation with a loss before conversion, my accountant reported the full contribution amount ($6000) on line 4, then reported the actual converted amount ($5900) on line 8, and ended up with $0 on line 14.

0 coins

Eleanor Foster

โ€ข

That's actually incorrect. The Form 8606 instructions specifically address this situation. When you convert less than your basis (whether due to investment losses or partial conversion), the difference remains as basis to be tracked on future Form 8606s. Line 14 is literally defined as "your basis in traditional IRAs" - not just for accounts with money still in them. The basis exists separate from the account balance. This is why Form 8606 needs to be filed even in years you don't make new contributions but still have basis. Your accountant may have made an error in your situation. I'd recommend checking your prior returns.

0 coins

StarSeeker

โ€ข

This is a great question that highlights how confusing IRA basis tracking can be! The tax software is actually correct - you do have $100 of remaining basis even though the Traditional IRA account is empty. Think of basis as separate from your actual account balance. When your spouse contributed $6,000, that became her basis (after-tax money). When she converted only $5,900 due to investment losses, she used $5,900 of that basis. The remaining $100 of basis doesn't just disappear - it gets carried forward on Form 8606. This is important because if your spouse ever has ANY pre-tax money in traditional IRAs in the future (like from a 401k rollover), that $100 basis would factor into the pro-rata rule for future conversions. The IRS wants to track every dollar of after-tax money you've put into traditional IRAs, regardless of whether those specific accounts still exist. For future backdoor Roth conversions, you'll add any new contributions to that $100 basis before calculating the taxable portion of conversions. Keep good records of your Form 8606 from year to year - this basis tracking continues indefinitely until it's all used up through conversions or distributions.

0 coins

Having been through this exact situation (UK resident with US income and 30% wrongly withheld), I'd recommend filing a 1040NR yourself if you're comfortable with forms. The key is including Form 8833 to claim the treaty benefits specifically. You need to cite the exact treaty article (usually Article 10, 11, or 12 depending on your income type) and explain why you qualify for reduced withholding. Also check if your income type qualifies for complete exemption - some royalties and certain types of interest payments between the US and UK have 0% withholding rates under the treaty!

0 coins

Emma Davis

โ€ข

Wouldn't you need a US taxpayer identification number to file these forms? I thought that was part of the complexity.

0 coins

Yes, you do need either a Social Security Number (SSN) or an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN). If you don't already have one, you'll need to apply for an ITIN using Form W-7 which you would submit simultaneously with your 1040NR. That's probably what the accounting firm meant by "US tax registration" in their quote. Getting an ITIN can be tricky as you need to provide certified copies of identification documents (passport usually). You can either mail certified copies (certified by the issuing agency) or use an IRS-authorized Acceptance Agent who can verify your original documents.

0 coins

Isaac Wright

โ€ข

Based on my experience helping clients with similar 1042-S overwithholding issues, the pricing you were quoted is unfortunately quite standard for this specialized work. However, there are a few things worth considering: First, make sure you understand exactly what type of income this was - dividends, royalties, interest, or other payments. The UK-US tax treaty has different withholding rates for different income types, and some may qualify for complete exemption rather than just reduction to 15%. Second, you have options beyond hiring a full-service accountant. You could potentially use services like those mentioned by others here to help analyze your situation and provide guidance, then file the 1040NR yourself if you're comfortable with forms. The main complexity is getting an ITIN if you don't have one, and correctly citing the treaty provisions on Form 8833. Given that you're looking at recovering $4000, even paying the quoted fees would net you a significant amount. But shopping around is definitely worthwhile - try to find firms that specifically advertise UK-US tax expertise rather than general international tax services.

0 coins

Adriana Cohn

โ€ข

This is really helpful context! I'm curious about the ITIN process since that seems to be a major component of the cost. If someone already has an ITIN from previous US tax filings, would that significantly reduce both the complexity and the fees charged by these specialized firms? Also, when you mention "correctly citing treaty provisions on Form 8833" - are there common mistakes people make that could delay processing or cause the claim to be rejected?

0 coins

Mateo Sanchez

โ€ข

Has anyone used FreeTaxUSA for filing with a single-member LLC and W2 income? I'm trying to avoid the higher fees from TurboTax but not sure if the cheaper options handle Schedule C well.

0 coins

Aisha Mahmood

โ€ข

I've used FreeTaxUSA for the past two years with my W2 job and side LLC. It works great for Schedule C and costs way less than TurboTax. The interface isn't quite as pretty but it asks all the same questions and gets the job done. Federal filing with Schedule C was $0 and state was only $15 last year.

0 coins

Andre Laurent

โ€ข

As someone who went through this exact transition two years ago, I'd say start with good tax software first before jumping to a CPA. With $18K in LLC income, you're definitely in manageable territory for self-filing. The key things that made my first year smooth: 1) Keep meticulous records of ALL business expenses (even small ones add up), 2) Set aside about 25-30% of your LLC profits for taxes (you'll owe self-employment tax on top of income tax), and 3) Don't forget about potential quarterly payments for next year. I used TaxAct Business which handled my Schedule C perfectly and cost way less than TurboTax. The software walked me through everything step-by-step, including home office deductions and business use of vehicle if applicable. One thing I wish someone had told me - even though you're a single-member LLC, make sure you're treating it like a real business from a record-keeping standpoint. Separate bank accounts, proper receipts, detailed mileage logs if you drive for business. The IRS scrutinizes Schedule C filers more than W2-only folks, so having everything documented properly is crucial.

0 coins

Niko Ramsey

โ€ข

This is really helpful advice! I'm curious about the separate bank accounts - is that legally required for a single-member LLC or just a best practice? I've been using my personal account for some business expenses and wondering if I need to go back and separate everything before filing.

0 coins

Prev1...8283848586...5645Next