IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

This is a frustrating but unfortunately common situation. I went through something similar a few years ago and learned that timing is everything here. Since you mentioned this is for your first mortgage payment as newlyweds, here are some immediate steps: 1) Call your bank again TODAY and specifically ask to speak with their "Exception Processing" or "Funds Availability" department - not just customer service. Use those exact terms. 2) Explain that this is causing financial hardship due to a mortgage payment deadline. Many banks have expedited review processes for documented hardships. 3) Request they separate the hold on just the tax refund from your pre-existing account balance - there's no legal reason they should restrict funds that were already in your account. 4) Get a reference number for your case and ask for a supervisor's direct contact information. The marriage factor might actually be relevant here - if your tax return shows a different name than what's on your bank account (maiden name vs married name), that could be triggering their fraud detection system. If that's the case, bringing in your marriage certificate might help resolve this faster. Also, definitely contact your mortgage servicer today to explain the situation. Most will work with you if you're proactive about communication rather than waiting until after you miss the payment.

0 coins

Dylan Hughes

β€’

This is such great advice, especially about the name change issue! I hadn't thought about how getting married could trigger fraud detection if the tax return has a different name than the bank account. That's probably more common than people realize. The tip about asking for "Exception Processing" specifically is really smart too - I've noticed that using the right department names gets you transferred to people who actually have authority to help instead of just reading from scripts.

0 coins

I'm dealing with something similar right now! My bank froze my account after a tax refund deposit last week. What's really frustrating is that they won't even let me access the money that was already in there before the refund hit. After reading through all these responses, I'm realizing I need to be way more aggressive about this. I called once and just accepted their "we'll review it" response, but clearly that's not enough. Going to call back today and specifically ask for the Exception Processing department like someone mentioned above. Has anyone had success getting their bank to release just the pre-existing balance while they review the refund portion? That seems like it should be a reasonable compromise since those funds weren't part of whatever triggered their system. Also planning to file that CFPB complaint - didn't know that could speed things up so much. This whole situation is such a nightmare when you have bills due!

0 coins

Olivia Evans

β€’

Yes, I was able to get my bank to release the pre-existing balance! When I called, I specifically explained that freezing funds that were already in my account before the deposit was punitive and potentially illegal since those funds had nothing to do with their fraud concerns. I asked to speak with a manager and emphasized that I understood they needed to verify the tax refund, but holding my own money hostage was unreasonable. They released my original balance within 24 hours while keeping the refund portion under review. Be persistent and don't take no for an answer - you have rights here!

0 coins

Raj Gupta

β€’

Has your son considered taking the mother back to court to update the custody agreement? If the actual situation doesn't match the legal documents, that's a problem for tax purposes. The IRS generally follows the custody agreement. If he can get the agreement modified to reflect reality (that the child lives with him/you most of the time), it would be much easier to legitimately claim the child on taxes going forward. Also, make sure to look into the Child Tax Credit and the Credit for Other Dependents. Depending on your income and situation, you might qualify for one of these if you're able to claim your granddaughter.

0 coins

This is the most sensible advice. Tax issues aside, the custody agreement should reflect the actual living situation. If mom only has occasional visits, why does she have primary custody on paper? That needs to be addressed first.

0 coins

I went through something very similar with my grandson a few years ago. The situation you're describing - where you're providing all the care but someone else has legal custody - is unfortunately common. Here's what I learned: The IRS uses what's called the "tie-breaker rules" when multiple people could potentially claim the same child. Generally, the parent with whom the child lived for the greater number of nights during the year gets to claim them. But when parents aren't living together, the custodial parent (according to the divorce decree or separation agreement) typically has the right to claim the child. However, there's an important exception: if you can prove that your granddaughter lived with you for more than half the year (183+ nights) and you provided more than half of her support, you might be able to claim her as a "qualifying relative" rather than a "qualifying child." My advice: Start documenting everything NOW for next year's taxes. Keep a detailed calendar of where she sleeps each night, save every receipt for her expenses, and get letters from her school, doctor, etc. showing your address as her primary residence. You might also want to consult with a tax professional who specializes in family situations like this - the rules can be tricky but there are often ways to make it work legally.

0 coins

This is really helpful! I'm curious about the "qualifying relative" vs "qualifying child" distinction you mentioned. How exactly does that work? I thought grandchildren could only be claimed as qualifying children, not qualifying relatives. Also, would the grandmother need to meet any income requirements for the granddaughter to qualify as a qualifying relative? The IRS rules seem to have so many exceptions and special cases!

0 coins

Zoe Papadakis

β€’

Has anyone used FreeTaxUSA for this kind of situation? I'm in the same boat (1099-K with about $15k but actual profit only $280) and wondering if it handles this well. TurboTax keeps trying to charge me extra for the Schedule C even though I barely made anything.

0 coins

Jamal Carter

β€’

I used FreeTaxUSA last year for exactly this situation! It was great - lets you file Schedule C without charging extra for "business income" like some other services. Super straightforward for entering all your expenses too. I ended up paying $0 in federal taxes since my profit was under $400, and just paid like $15 for the state filing.

0 coins

This is such a common confusion point! I went through the exact same thing last year with a similar situation - 1099-K showing around $19k but net profit of only $320 after legitimate business expenses. Here's what I learned after researching extensively and talking to a tax professional: Even though you're under the $400 self-employment tax threshold, you should still file a return with Schedule C to report the income and expenses. The key reason is that the IRS already knows about that gross income from PayPal's 1099-K reporting. If you don't file, their automated matching system will likely flag the "missing" income and you could get a CP2000 notice asking you to explain the discrepancy. It's much easier to file now showing how your expenses reduced that gross amount to under $400 than to deal with notices later. You won't owe any self-employment tax since you're under $400 net profit, and if this was your only income and you're under the standard deduction, you probably won't owe any income tax either. But filing creates a clear paper trail that prevents future headaches with the IRS matching system.

0 coins

Isabel Vega

β€’

This is exactly the kind of clear explanation I was looking for! Thank you for breaking down the CP2000 notice aspect - I hadn't realized that's what could happen if the IRS systems don't see a matching return for the 1099-K income. That automated matching system piece really helps explain why everyone is recommending to file even when technically not required. Better to be proactive than reactive with the IRS for sure.

0 coins

Nathan Kim

β€’

I want to emphasize something that might get overlooked in all the technical discussion - make sure you and your daughter are on the same page about this decision before filing. Even though you're providing most of the support, this can create family tension if not handled carefully. From a practical standpoint, you'll want to calculate whether claiming your granddaughter actually benefits your family more than if your daughter claims her. Sometimes the parent might qualify for credits (like EITC or additional CTC) that could be worth more than what you'd get, especially if they're in a lower tax bracket. Also, keep in mind that once you start claiming her, you'll need to be consistent about it or have clear agreements about alternating years. The IRS doesn't like seeing the same child bouncing between different tax returns without proper documentation. One more thing - if your daughter receives any government benefits that are based on household size or dependents, claiming the child on your taxes might affect her eligibility. Worth checking before you file.

0 coins

Joshua Hellan

β€’

This is such an important point that often gets missed! I learned this the hard way when I started claiming my nephew without properly discussing it with my sister first. Even though I was clearly providing more support, it caused some family drama because she felt like I was "taking" her child from her taxes. What really helped us was sitting down together and actually running the numbers both ways using tax software. We discovered that even though I got a bigger benefit from claiming him, when we factored in her potential loss of SNAP benefits, it actually worked out better for our overall family finances if she continued to claim him and I just helped support them both. @Nathan Kim is absolutely right about the government benefits piece - that can be a huge factor that people don t'think about until it s'too late. WIC, SNAP, housing assistance, Medicaid - a lot of these programs count tax dependents when determining household size and eligibility.

0 coins

Ethan Clark

β€’

This is exactly the kind of complex family situation where getting professional advice can save you from costly mistakes. As others have mentioned, you'll need to navigate the qualifying child vs. qualifying relative tests, and document everything carefully. One thing I'd add is to consider the timing of when you establish this arrangement. If you're going to claim your granddaughter, it's better to have all the documentation and agreements in place before the tax year ends rather than scrambling at filing time. Also, don't forget about state tax implications - some states have different rules or additional credits for dependents that might factor into your decision. The federal rules are complex enough, but state rules can sometimes tip the scales one way or another. Keep detailed records not just of direct expenses like food and clothing, but also indirect costs like the increased utilities, housing space, and transportation costs related to your granddaughter. These all count toward the support calculation and can really add up over a full year.

0 coins

Great point about the state tax implications! I'm dealing with a similar grandparent situation and hadn't even thought about how state rules might differ from federal ones. Do you know if most states just follow the federal dependency rules, or do they have their own tests? Also, when you mention documenting indirect costs like utilities and housing - how do you calculate the portion that goes toward supporting the grandchild? Do you just estimate based on household size or is there a more specific method the IRS expects? I'm trying to get all my documentation together before the end of the year like you suggested, but I want to make sure I'm doing the calculations correctly from the start.

0 coins

Quinn Herbert

β€’

Great question about audits and recent changes! I've been reporting gambling income using the session method for about 4 years now and haven't been audited, but I did have a close call that taught me a lot about record-keeping. Two years ago, I received a CP2000 notice from the IRS because they had records of a W-2G that I thought I had reported correctly, but there was a discrepancy in how I calculated it. It turned out I had mistakenly netted the W-2G amount against session losses instead of reporting the full W-2G amount. The detailed gambling diary and photos of my players club statements that people mentioned in this thread were exactly what saved me - I was able to provide documentation showing my actual play and losses, and the IRS accepted my corrected return without penalties. As for recent changes, the main thing to be aware of is that the IRS has been getting better at matching gambling income reports. Casinos are required to report W-2Gs and other large transactions, and the IRS computer systems are getting more sophisticated at flagging discrepancies. This makes good record-keeping even more important. One thing that's helped me is treating my gambling record-keeping like a business - I use a simple spreadsheet with columns for date, casino, games played, buy-in amount, cash-out amount, and net result. At year-end, it's easy to sum up winning sessions vs. losing sessions. The consistency everyone's mentioned really is key!

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

β€’

That's really valuable insight about the CP2000 notice! It's exactly the kind of real-world experience that helps put all this theoretical advice into perspective. Your point about the IRS getting better at matching gambling income reports is something I hadn't considered, but it makes perfect sense - they're probably cross-referencing W-2Gs and other casino reports more systematically now. I love your approach of treating gambling record-keeping like a business with the spreadsheet system. That sounds much more organized than my current method of just writing everything in a notebook. The fact that your detailed records helped resolve the CP2000 notice without penalties really reinforces how important good documentation is. One follow-up question - when you had that discrepancy with the W-2G reporting, how long did it take to resolve once you provided your documentation? I'm trying to get a sense of what to expect if something similar ever happens to me. Also, did you need to work with a tax professional for the response, or were you able to handle the correspondence with the IRS directly? This whole thread has convinced me to step up my record-keeping game significantly. Better to be over-prepared than caught off guard like you experienced!

0 coins

Malik Thomas

β€’

That CP2000 experience is really eye-opening! It's great that you were able to resolve it with your detailed records. I'm curious about something though - when you mention that the IRS is getting better at matching gambling income reports, does this mean they're also tracking regular session play that doesn't generate W-2Gs? Or is their enhanced matching primarily focused on the formal tax documents like W-2Gs and 1099s that casinos are required to file? I ask because I do a lot of smaller-stakes gambling that never hits the W-2G thresholds, and I'm wondering if the IRS has visibility into that activity or if they're mainly concerned with the documented wins that casinos report directly to them. Obviously I'm planning to report everything properly using the session method discussed here, but it would be helpful to understand what level of scrutiny to expect for different types of gambling activity. Your spreadsheet approach sounds perfect - I think I'm going to switch from my current notebook system to something similar. Having everything in a format that can be easily summarized at year-end seems much more practical for tax preparation.

0 coins

CosmicCadet

β€’

This thread has been absolutely fantastic for understanding gambling tax reporting! As someone who just started seriously tracking my casino visits this year, I was completely lost on the session method until reading through all these detailed explanations and real-world examples. One thing I wanted to add that might help other newcomers - I've found it really helpful to photograph my buy-in receipts and cash-out tickets at the casino, in addition to keeping the detailed diary everyone mentioned. This creates a visual backup of the paper trail that complements the written records. Plus, if you ever lose a physical ticket, you have the photo as backup documentation. I'm also curious about something that hasn't been discussed much - what about promotional credits or free play that casinos give you? I've received some free slot play credits as part of promotions, and I'm not sure how to handle those in my session tracking. Do you treat the promotional credits as part of your "buy-in" amount, or do you handle them differently since you didn't actually spend cash on them? The emphasis throughout this thread on consistency and good record-keeping has really given me confidence that I can handle this myself rather than paying for professional help. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical guidance that makes tax season less stressful!

0 coins

Great point about photographing the buy-in receipts and cash-out tickets! That's such a simple but effective backup strategy that I wish I had thought of earlier in the year. For promotional credits and free play, the general approach is to not count them as part of your initial "buy-in" since you didn't spend actual cash. Instead, track any winnings from free play as pure profit in your session. So if you get $20 in free play and turn it into $35, you'd record $35 in winnings for that portion of your session, not $15 net. However, if you lose your own cash but have some promotional credits that help extend your play, you'd still track your actual cash losses normally. The free play doesn't offset real money losses for tax purposes. One thing to watch for is that some casinos will issue tax forms if your promotional winnings exceed certain thresholds, even if it came from free play. Always keep records of what was promotional vs. cash play in case you need to explain the source of any reported winnings. Your approach of handling this yourself with good record-keeping is definitely the right call - you're already thinking about the details that matter most for tax compliance!

0 coins

Prev1...747748749750751...5643Next