Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls ā which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Quick question - does a legal separation need to be finalized before tax time to affect your filing status? My wife moved out in December and we're getting separation paperwork started but it won't be done before April.
Your marital status as of December 31st determines your filing status for the whole year. If you weren't legally divorced by December 31st, you're still considered married for tax purposes regardless of separation paperwork. My accountant was super clear about this when I was separating.
Zara Shah
I went through something very similar last year when my husband and I separated but hadn't finalized our divorce yet. Since you're still legally married as of December 31st, you can only file as married filing jointly or married filing separately - not single or head of household. Given that your finances are completely separate now and you're concerned she might file jointly without telling you, I'd strongly recommend married filing separately. This protects you from being liable for any tax issues on her side, and since you mentioned you're not communicating much, it eliminates the need to coordinate your filing. The downside is you'll likely pay more in taxes than if you filed jointly, but the peace of mind is usually worth it during separation. Since you're paying the mortgage alone even though her name is still on the house, make sure you can still claim the mortgage interest deduction - you should be able to since you're the one actually making the payments. You might want to consult with a tax professional who can run the numbers for both scenarios and show you exactly what the difference would be in your specific situation.
LongPeri
ā¢This is really helpful advice! I'm in a similar boat and was leaning toward filing separately for the same reasons. One thing I'm wondering about - when you say to make sure he can claim the mortgage interest deduction, does it matter that his wife's name is still on the deed/mortgage paperwork? I thought both people had to be liable for the debt to claim it, but if only one person is actually making the payments, how does that work exactly?
Join the conversation
CyberSiren
One thing nobody's mentioned - make sure you have SOLID documentation for those expenses if they were from 2023 but you're claiming them in 2024. The IRS tends to flag mismatched years, especially with new businesses. Keep receipts, bank statements, credit card statements, and maybe even take photos of the equipment showing you still own and use it. Better safe than sorry!
Yes! This is critical advice. I got audited for exactly this reason a few years back - the dates on my receipts didn't match the tax year I claimed them in. Ended up being fine because I had the paper trail to show they were legitimate startup expenses, but it was still stressful.
Great question! I went through something similar with my photography business. The key thing to understand is that the IRS distinguishes between when you incur expenses and when your business actually begins operations. Since you didn't start generating income until 2024, that's when your business truly "began" for tax purposes. You can definitely claim those 2023 expenses on your 2024 return. For the equipment (mowers, trimmers, etc.), you'll likely want to look into Section 179 deduction which allows you to deduct the full cost of qualifying equipment in the year you place it in service for your business - which would be 2024 in your case. The utility trailer might be handled differently depending on its weight and use, but don't worry about losing those deductions. Just make sure you keep all your 2023 receipts and any documentation showing when you actually started operating the business in 2024. The IRS is pretty reasonable about startup situations like this as long as you have good records.
This is really helpful! I'm actually in a similar boat with my new handyman business. Quick question - does the Section 179 deduction have any limits I should be aware of? I spent about $8,000 on tools and a work van last year but didn't start taking clients until this year. Want to make sure I understand all the rules before I file.
Join the conversation
Emma Davis
This entire discussion has been incredibly educational! I'm facing a similar situation and was completely overwhelmed trying to figure out the capital gains implications on my own. I owned a home for 13 years - lived in it as my primary residence for the first 10 years, then converted it to a rental property for the last 3 years before selling. I was initially calculating my exclusion using the proportional method (10/13), but after reading through all these responses, I'm realizing I may have been overcomplicating things. If I understand correctly from everyone's experiences, since my rental period came AFTER my primary residence period, those 3 rental years don't count as "non-qualified use" for the capital gains exclusion. This means I could potentially exclude my entire gain (around $85k) except for the depreciation recapture portion. I claimed about $19k in depreciation during those rental years, so I'd be looking at roughly $4,750 in recapture tax at 25% instead of the much larger amount I was expecting to pay. The tools and services mentioned throughout this thread sound like they could really help verify my understanding before I file. It's amazing how much clarity this community discussion has provided compared to trying to parse through IRS publications alone. Has anyone dealt with a situation where you made significant improvements during both the primary residence AND rental periods? I'm wondering if that adds any complexity to the basis calculations. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this has been invaluable!
Tate Jensen
ā¢Your understanding sounds exactly right! Since your rental period came after your primary residence period, those 3 years shouldn't count against you for the exclusion. You're looking at a much better tax situation than the proportional method would suggest. Regarding improvements made during both periods - this actually works in your favor! Any improvements you made during your primary residence years (like renovations, additions, etc.) increase your basis just like improvements during the rental period. The key is keeping good documentation of all improvement costs throughout the entire ownership period. For example, if you spent $20k on a kitchen remodel during year 5 (primary residence period) and another $10k on new flooring during year 12 (rental period), both amounts would increase your basis and reduce your overall gain. Just make sure you don't double-count any improvements when calculating depreciation during the rental years. The timing of when you made the improvements doesn't change how they're treated for basis purposes - they all help reduce your taxable gain. With your $85k gain and only $19k in depreciation recapture, you're in a really good position! I'd definitely recommend using one of the tools mentioned earlier in this thread to double-check your calculations. With numbers like yours, getting professional confirmation will give you peace of mind and ensure you're maximizing your exclusion correctly.
This thread has been absolutely incredible for understanding these complex capital gains rules! I'm in a very similar situation - owned a property for 16 years, lived in it as primary residence for 12 years, then rented it out for 4 years before selling recently. Like so many others here, I was initially using the proportional calculation (12/16 = 75% exclusion) and was prepared to pay a substantial tax bill. But after reading through everyone's experiences and explanations, I'm realizing I may qualify for the full exclusion minus depreciation recapture! I claimed about $24k in depreciation over those 4 rental years, so if I understand correctly, I'd only owe the 25% recapture tax on that amount (roughly $6k) rather than the much larger sum I was expecting based on my original calculation. What's really struck me is how many people in this thread discovered they had overpaid or were planning to overpay because of misunderstanding these rules. It really highlights how non-intuitive tax law can be, even for situations that seem straightforward on the surface. I'm definitely going to look into some of the tools and services mentioned here to get professional confirmation before filing. With the amounts involved, it's worth the peace of mind to make sure I'm applying these rules correctly. Thank you to everyone who shared their knowledge and real-world experiences - this community discussion has been more valuable than any tax guide I've tried to read!
Amina Diop
ā¢Your understanding is absolutely correct! You're in the same favorable position as many others in this thread. Since you lived in the home for 12 years as your primary residence before converting to rental, those 4 rental years don't count as "non-qualified use" under current tax law. You should be able to exclude your entire capital gain except for that $24k depreciation recapture, which means roughly $6k in taxes instead of whatever much larger amount you were calculating with the proportional method. I'm new to this community but have been following similar discussions, and it's really eye-opening how many people initially misunderstand these rules! The proportional calculation seems like the logical approach, but the actual tax law is more generous for situations like yours where the rental period comes after primary residence use. Definitely smart to get professional confirmation with one of those tools mentioned throughout this thread. With 16 years of ownership, you want to make sure you're also accounting properly for any improvements you made over the years that would increase your basis and further reduce your taxable gain. This whole discussion has been incredibly educational - thanks for sharing your situation and adding to the collective knowledge here!
Join the conversation
Has anyone looked into how the new proposed environmental regulations might affect these investments? I'm considering putting $75k into an oil and gas program for the 2025 tax year but worried about potential regulatory changes that might impact both the tax benefits and the long-term production value.
This is actually a legitimate concern. The current administration has been reviewing fossil fuel tax incentives. While the major oil and gas tax benefits are established in permanent tax code and would require legislative action to change, there are regulatory approaches that could indirectly affect profitability. I'd suggest making any investment smaller until there's more clarity after the next budget cycle.
I've been working with oil and gas tax investments for over a decade as a tax professional, and I want to add some practical perspective to this discussion. The tax benefits are absolutely legitimate - the IDC deduction alone can provide substantial first-year write-offs as mentioned. However, there are several key considerations that many promoters downplay: First, the "90% deduction" figure is often misleading because it assumes 100% IDC allocation, which varies significantly by project. Some programs allocate only 70-80% to IDCs, reducing your immediate deduction. Second, timing matters enormously. The drilling must be completed by December 31st of the tax year to claim the deduction. I've seen investors lose expected benefits because drilling was delayed into the following year. Third, these investments often come with ongoing tax complexity. You'll receive K-1s that can include items like depletion recapture, state tax issues, and Section 1231 gains/losses that complicate your returns for years. My recommendation: Only invest what you can afford to lose completely, focus primarily on the tax benefits rather than production returns, and work with a tax professional who understands oil and gas partnerships before making any commitments. The tax code is complex enough in this area that professional guidance is essential.
Ellie Kim
ā¢Thank you for this professional perspective! As someone new to these types of investments, the timing requirement about drilling completion by December 31st is something I hadn't considered. If I'm looking at an investment opportunity now for 2025 tax benefits, what questions should I be asking the promoter to verify they can actually complete drilling on time? Also, you mentioned that IDC allocation can vary - is this something that should be clearly disclosed in the partnership documents, or do I need to dig deeper to find this information?
Great questions! For timing verification, ask the promoter for their drilling schedule with specific start dates, and request to see their track record of completing projects on time in previous years. Also ask what contingency plans they have if drilling is delayed - some reputable operators will provide alternative investment opportunities if their primary project gets delayed. Regarding IDC allocation, this should absolutely be clearly disclosed in the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) or offering documents. Look for a section that breaks down the use of proceeds - it should show what percentage goes to IDCs (intangible drilling costs) versus TDCs (tangible drilling costs) and other expenses like management fees. If this breakdown isn't clearly stated, that's a red flag. Reputable operators will typically allocate 70-85% to IDCs, with the remainder going to equipment and other costs. One additional tip: ask if they've received any IRS audits on their previous partnerships and how those were resolved. This can give you insight into how well they document their cost allocations and whether their tax positions are defensible.
Carmella Fromis
Regarding the IRS Free Fillable Forms option - this is essentially the electronic equivalent of filling out paper forms manually. There's minimal guidance, no calculational assistance between forms, and no error-checking beyond basic math. I would not recommend this approach unless you have a good understanding of which tax forms you need and how they interrelate. For cryptocurrency transactions, FreeTaxUSA does support reporting these, though you'll need to manually enter the information rather than having it automatically imported. If you have a significant number of transactions, this could be time-consuming but would still likely save you money over TurboTax's premium pricing.
0 coins
Lily Young
I've been using FreeTaxUSA for the past two years after making a similar switch from TurboTax, and I can confirm your experience is spot on. The math is identical because they're all following the same tax code - you're basically paying TurboTax's premium for brand recognition and a slightly more polished interface. One tip for anyone considering the switch: if you have multiple investment accounts or a lot of transactions, take note of how much time the manual entry adds. For me, it's maybe an extra 30-45 minutes total, which is absolutely worth it for the $150+ savings. Also worth mentioning that FreeTaxUSA's customer support has been surprisingly good the few times I've needed it. Not that I needed much hand-holding, but they were responsive and knowledgeable when I had a question about a specific deduction. The biggest adjustment was just getting used to a slightly different interface flow, but honestly after the first year it felt completely natural.
0 coins