IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Has anyone compared Free Tax USA to TurboTax for business filers? I've been using TurboTax for years but the price keeps creeping up every year. Now they want $170 just for the basic self-employed version before adding state filing!

0 coins

Thanks! That's really helpful. Did you find the switch process easy? I'm worried about losing all my previous years' data that's in TurboTax.

0 coins

The switch was actually pretty straightforward! You can't transfer data between the systems, but honestly I found that was kind of a blessing in disguise - it forced me to review all my business expenses and deductions from scratch, and I actually found some things I'd been missing in previous years. Free Tax USA has a good "prior year comparison" feature where you can reference what you claimed last year while entering your current info. Just keep your prior year return handy as reference. The most time-consuming part was just re-entering my business info and setting up my expense categories again, but that's really a one-time thing. One tip - if you're making the switch, start early in tax season so you're not rushed. But the actual filing process was just as smooth as TurboTax, and the savings were totally worth the minor inconvenience of not having my data auto-imported.

0 coins

I've been using Free Tax USA for my consulting business for two years now and it's been solid. One thing I'd add to what others have said - if you're worried about making mistakes, their customer support is actually pretty responsive via email. I had questions about how to handle some equipment depreciation and they got back to me within a day with clear guidance. The learning curve isn't too steep if you have your records organized. I keep a simple spreadsheet throughout the year tracking income and expenses by category, so when tax time comes I just reference that while filling out the forms. Takes me about 3 hours total now, compared to the 2-hour meeting + back-and-forth with my old CPA that cost 10x more. One heads up - make sure you understand the difference between business expenses and personal deductions before you start. The software will ask about both, but it's on you to categorize things correctly. When in doubt, err on the conservative side or do a quick Google search about what's deductible for your type of business.

0 coins

Alicia Stern

β€’

This is really helpful advice about keeping records organized! I'm definitely going to start that spreadsheet system you mentioned. Quick question - when you say "equipment depreciation," are you talking about things like computers and software? I bought a new laptop and some design software last year specifically for my freelance work and wasn't sure if I could deduct the full amount or if it needs to be spread out over multiple years.

0 coins

Mason Davis

β€’

Has anyone mentioned that if the house was the father's primary residence, he might have qualified for the $250,000 capital gains exclusion? Might not need to worry about basis at all.

0 coins

The primary residence exclusion ($250,000 for single, $500,000 for married filing jointly) only applies to the person who lived in and owned the home. When children inherit a house, they get a stepped-up basis, but they don't inherit the primary residence exclusion. The exclusion requires the owner to have lived in the home as their primary residence for at least 2 out of the 5 years before selling. Since the children inherited the house and then sold it (presumably without living in it as their primary residence for 2+ years), they can't use this exclusion.

0 coins

The property tax assessment approach should work fine for your situation, especially since the difference between your 2021 assessment ($187,500) and 2024 sale price ($195,000) is relatively small. That $7,500 gain over 3 years actually suggests the assessment was pretty close to market value at the time of death. A few practical tips from someone who's been through this: First, make sure you have a copy of the official 2021 property tax assessment document - not just the amount, but the actual assessment notice. Second, consider pulling a few comparable sales from late 2021/early 2022 in your neighborhood as supporting documentation. You can find these on sites like Zillow, Redfin, or your county's property records website. The IRS generally accepts property tax assessments for establishing FMV, especially when they're reasonable compared to eventual sale prices. In your case, the numbers tell a logical story. Just keep good records and you should be fine. The stepped-up basis is one of the few tax breaks that actually works in your favor!

0 coins

Sean Doyle

β€’

This is really helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation with my grandmother's property. Quick question - when you mention pulling comparable sales from late 2021/early 2022, how close in time and location do these need to be to be considered valid supporting documentation? Also, is there a specific way to format or present this information if the IRS asks for it later?

0 coins

Understanding Tax Consequences When Distribution is Treated as Sale of Shareholder's Stock and Corporation Recognizes Loss in Liquidation

I'm struggling with a corporate tax question about liquidation and would appreciate some help understanding the answer. The scenario involves a corporation (Zenith Inc) that's being liquidated. Brad owns 40% and Rachel owns 60%. They started the company 7 years ago, and Brad's current basis in his shares is $125k. When they liquidate Zenith, Brad receives property (Greenfield) that the corporation bought 4 years ago worth $780k with a basis of $600k. Rachel receives property (Yellowfield) worth $1.2M with a basis of $1.5M. Rachel had contributed this property in a Section 351 exchange 7 years ago. At that time, Rachel's basis in Yellowfield was $1.5M and its FMV was $1.3M. The question asks about tax consequences to Rachel and Zenith, with these options: a. Distribution to Rachel treated as dividend if Zenith has enough E&P b. Distribution to Rachel treated as redemption under Β§ 302(b)(2) c. Distribution treated as sale of Rachel's stock; Zenith won't recognize gain/loss d. Distribution treated as sale of Rachel's stock; Zenith recognizes $300k loss e. Distribution treated as sale of Rachel's stock; Zenith recognizes $100k loss I thought the answer was (c) but apparently it's (d) and I'm not understanding why. Can anyone explain why Zenith would recognize a loss in this situation? I thought distributions in liquidation were generally tax-free to the corporation.

Jamal Carter

β€’

This has been an excellent deep dive into corporate liquidation tax rules! As someone who handles corporate restructuring, I see these Section 336 issues frequently and this discussion really captures the key nuances. One additional point that might be helpful: when advising clients on liquidations, it's important to consider the timing strategically. If Zenith had significant E&P and wanted to avoid the loss recognition (perhaps due to limitations on loss utilization), they could have considered distributing the loss property in a non-liquidating distribution first (where Section 311 would disallow the loss), followed by a later liquidation of remaining assets. Of course, that strategy has its own complications and may not achieve the shareholders' business objectives, but it illustrates how the choice between liquidating vs. non-liquidating distributions can have dramatically different tax consequences for the corporation. The explanations here about Section 336's "deemed sale" treatment and the 5-year anti-abuse rules under 336(d)(2) are spot-on. This is exactly the kind of technical analysis that helps distinguish between seemingly similar answer choices on these corporate tax problems. Really appreciate everyone's contributions!

0 coins

Mason Stone

β€’

That's a really insightful strategic point about timing distributions! I hadn't considered how corporations might use non-liquidating distributions first to avoid loss recognition under Section 311, then follow with liquidation of remaining assets. It really highlights how the sequencing of transactions can dramatically impact tax outcomes. Your example makes me think about how important it is to consider the overall tax picture, not just the mechanical application of the rules. If Zenith had NOL limitations or other factors that made the $300k loss less valuable, the Section 311 strategy could make sense even with the additional complexity. This discussion has really opened my eyes to how nuanced corporate tax planning can be. What started as a question about why answer (d) was correct has evolved into a comprehensive analysis of liquidation rules, anti-abuse provisions, and strategic considerations. As someone relatively new to corporate tax, I'm grateful for all the practical insights shared here!

0 coins

This thread has been absolutely invaluable for understanding corporate liquidation tax rules! As a CPA working with small corporations, I encounter these Section 336 vs Section 311 issues regularly, and the explanations here have really clarified some concepts I've been struggling with. What I found most helpful was the step-by-step breakdown of why this is treated as a "deemed sale" under Section 336 rather than a regular distribution under Section 311. The key insight that complete liquidations have their own special tax regime really clicked for me. I've been making the mistake of trying to apply regular distribution rules to liquidation scenarios. The discussion about the 5-year rule under Section 336(d)(2) was particularly enlightening. I had a similar case last year where property was contributed 3 years before liquidation, and now I understand why only part of the loss was recognized. The built-in loss limitation makes so much sense from a policy perspective. For other practitioners dealing with these issues, I'd recommend always documenting the contribution dates and built-in gains/losses at the time of contribution. It's crucial for determining how much loss the corporation can actually recognize in a subsequent liquidation. Thanks to everyone who contributed - this has been one of the most educational threads I've seen on corporate tax!

0 coins

Manny Lark

β€’

This thread has been such a fantastic learning resource! As someone new to corporate tax, I really appreciate how everyone has broken down these complex concepts into understandable pieces. What strikes me most is how the timing element is so critical in tax law - the difference between a 3-year and 7-year contribution timeline completely changes the outcome under Section 336(d)(2). It really emphasizes the importance of maintaining detailed records and understanding the historical context of corporate transactions. I'm also grateful for the practical tips shared here, like creating timelines for asset contributions and considering strategic sequencing of distributions. These real-world insights go beyond just memorizing code sections and help understand how to actually apply these rules in practice. This discussion has transformed what seemed like a confusing exam question into a comprehensive understanding of how corporate liquidations work. Thanks to all the experienced practitioners who took the time to share their knowledge - it's exactly what newcomers like me need to build confidence in tackling these complex corporate tax issues!

0 coins

Chloe Martin

β€’

Does anyone know if TaxAct handles the home sale exclusion the same way as TurboTax? I'm in a similar situation but using different software.

0 coins

I used TaxAct last year for my home sale. It works similarly - there's a section for real estate transactions where you'll enter all your info. It will calculate if you qualify for the exclusion automatically. The interface is different but it asks all the same questions about purchase date, sale date, improvements, etc.

0 coins

Layla Mendes

β€’

@Hiroshi, based on your situation, you should be in great shape! With 6+ years of primary residence and only $78k in profit, you're well under the $500k exclusion limit for married filing jointly. In TurboTax, look for the "Federal Taxes" section, then "Wages & Income," and you should see "Investment Income" or "Less Common Income." There will be a section for "Stocks, Mutual Funds, Bonds, Other" - click "Start" there and look for "Sale of Your Home" or similar wording. The software will ask you about: - Purchase date and price - Sale date and price - Any major improvements you made - How long you lived there as primary residence Don't stress about finding a separate "worksheet" - TurboTax handles all the calculations behind the scenes using Forms 8949 and Schedule D. Just answer their questions honestly and the software will automatically apply the Section 121 exclusion. One tip: gather receipts for any major home improvements you made over those 6 years (new HVAC, kitchen remodel, roof, flooring, etc.) as these increase your basis and further reduce any potential taxable gain, though you likely won't need them given your numbers. You've got this! The exclusion was designed for exactly your situation.

0 coins

GalaxyGlider

β€’

This is really helpful! I'm in a similar boat - sold my home after living there for 4 years and made about $65k profit. One question though: when you mention gathering receipts for major improvements, how far back should I go? I have some receipts from 2019 but others I might have lost. Will the IRS accept bank statements or credit card statements as proof if I don't have the original contractor invoices?

0 coins

Mason Kaczka

β€’

Don't forget that you need to keep really good records if you're deducting medical expenses! I learned this the hard way when I got audited two years ago. Make sure you have proof of when you actually paid each bill (receipt with date or credit card statement). Also, the threshold is 7.5% of AGI which is higher than it used to be. For many people it doesn't make sense to itemize anymore unless you have really high medical costs or other big deductions like mortgage interest.

0 coins

Sophia Russo

β€’

What kind of documentation did the IRS want during your audit? I've been keeping all my medical bills but not necessarily proof of payment for everything.

0 coins

During my audit, the IRS wanted to see both the medical bills/invoices AND proof that I actually paid them. Just having the bills wasn't enough - they needed bank statements, credit card statements, or cancelled checks showing the payment date and amount. They were particularly strict about matching the payment dates to the tax year I claimed the deduction. I had one expense where I claimed it in 2022 but my credit card statement showed I paid in January 2023, and they made me amend my return to move it to the correct year. My advice is to keep everything - the original bill, proof of insurance payments if any, and your payment method documentation (bank/credit card statements). It's a pain but way better than dealing with an audit later!

0 coins

Great thread everyone! I just wanted to add that if you're using HSA (Health Savings Account) funds to pay for medical expenses, the same timing rules apply. You can only reimburse yourself from your HSA for expenses that were incurred after your HSA was established, but the key is when you actually paid for the expense, not when the service was performed. So if you had that December 2024 procedure but paid in January 2025, you could reimburse yourself from your 2025 HSA contributions for that expense. Just make sure to keep good records showing the service date AND payment date, especially if you're not reimbursing yourself immediately. The IRS allows you to reimburse yourself years later as long as you have proper documentation. Also, remember that HSA reimbursements are tax-free, so if you're eligible for an HSA, that might be a better option than trying to itemize medical deductions on Schedule A, especially with that 7.5% AGI threshold.

0 coins

Mia Roberts

β€’

This is really helpful information about HSAs! I didn't realize you could reimburse yourself years later as long as you have documentation. Just to clarify - if I have both an HSA and want to potentially itemize medical deductions, I need to choose one or the other for each expense, right? I can't double-dip by using HSA funds AND claiming the same expense as an itemized deduction?

0 coins

Prev1...674675676677678...5645Next