Just remember that even abroad you have to report ALL your worldwide income to the US, including any interest from Irish bank accounts, investment income, etc. US citizenship = US tax filing forever unless you renounce. File form 8938 if your foreign financial assets exceed the threshold (lower than you might think!). File FBAR (FinCEN Form 114) for foreign accounts over $10k combined at any point in the year. And if you think "the IRS will never know about my Irish accounts" - think again. FATCA requirements mean foreign banks report US account holders directly to the IRS. My colleague tried to "forget" about his German accounts and got hit with a $10,000 penalty. Not worth the risk!

Sarah, congratulations on the job offer! As someone who's navigated similar waters, I'd strongly recommend getting professional guidance before making your final decision. The tax implications are complex but definitely manageable with proper planning. A few key points to consider beyond what others have mentioned: 1. **State tax implications**: Since you're currently in Florida (no state tax), make sure you properly establish non-residency before leaving. Florida doesn't have specific requirements, but you'll want to update your voter registration, driver's license, and bank accounts to avoid any future complications. 2. **Timing matters**: The date you move affects which tax year certain exclusions apply to. If possible, try to time your move strategically - either very early or very late in the tax year to maximize your exclusions. 3. **Employer support**: Ask your potential employer about their expat support services. Many larger companies provide tax preparation assistance or reimbursement for international tax compliance costs, which can be substantial. 4. **Health insurance**: Don't forget to factor in how your health insurance will work. US-based insurance often doesn't cover you adequately abroad, and you may need to purchase local coverage in Ireland. The $96k salary should work well with the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion, but definitely run the numbers on the total tax burden (US + Irish) versus what you'd pay on a comparable salary in the US. Dublin is also quite expensive, so factor in cost of living differences. Good luck with your decision!

This is such a common concern during PATH processing! That "Information Not Available" message is basically the IRS's way of saying "we're still working on your return" - nothing more, nothing less. The system automatically shows that generic adjustment language whenever a return is in active processing, even though you didn't actually request any adjustments. Your transcript showing $0.00 for 2021-2023 is actually really reassuring - it means your account history is solid and this is just temporary processing status. I know the waiting is brutal when you're expecting your refund, but this INFO notice is completely normal for returns caught up in PATH verification. Should clear up within the next couple weeks once they finish their review! 💪

I'm going through the exact same thing right now and this thread has been such a huge help! 😊 I've been checking my transcript multiple times a day and seeing that "Information Not Available" message for 2024 had me convinced something was wrong. But reading everyone's experiences here really put my mind at ease. It's honestly ridiculous how the IRS phrases things - using words like "adjustment" when they really just mean "we're still processing your return." The fact that you can see clean $0.00 balances for your previous years is definitely a good sign that your account is in good standing. I'm trying to be patient but this PATH waiting period is seriously testing my nerves! At least now I know this is totally normal and not something to panic about. Thanks for posting this question - clearly a lot of us needed the reassurance! 🙏

Congratulations on your marriage! I went through something very similar when I got married two years ago. Here's what I learned: Definitely update your W-4 with your employer ASAP - there's no official deadline, but the sooner the better. You've likely been overwithholding since June if you're still marked as single, especially with your husband working part-time. For your blended family situation, married filing jointly will almost certainly be better. The standard deduction is higher ($27,700 for 2023 vs $13,850 each filing separately), and you'll have access to credits that phase out quickly when married filing separately. One thing to keep in mind with your custody arrangement - make sure you and your ex coordinate who's claiming which child for 2023 taxes. The IRS gets really picky about this, and having it documented helps avoid any issues. I'd also recommend running the numbers both ways using tax software before filing. Most people in your situation (one full-time, one part-time income with dependents) benefit significantly from joint filing. You might be surprised by how much you save! Don't forget to update your address with the IRS too if you moved in together. Form 8822 is quick and easy to file.

Congratulations on your marriage! You're definitely not alone in forgetting to update things after getting married - it happens to the best of us! Yes, you should absolutely update your W-4 with your employer's HR department. Since you got married in June, you've likely been having taxes withheld as if you were single for the past several months, which could mean you're overwithholding (especially with your husband working part-time). There's no strict deadline, but the sooner you update it, the better your withholding will align with your actual tax situation. For your filing strategy, married filing jointly is usually more beneficial for couples in your situation. With one spouse working full-time and the other part-time, joint filing often results in a lower overall tax rate. Plus, you'll get a higher standard deduction ($27,700 for 2023 if filing jointly vs. $13,850 each if filing separately) and access to credits that might be limited when married filing separately. With your blended family setup, just make sure you coordinate with your ex about who's claiming which child for 2023 taxes. It sounds like you already have a good system in place with the alternating years. I'd recommend documenting this arrangement (even just via text/email) to avoid any confusion. Consider running the numbers both ways using tax software before you file - most couples in similar situations save significantly by filing jointly, but it's always worth double-checking with your specific numbers!

This just happened to my sister too! She made a copy of her return, wrote a letter explaining the situation, included proof that her check was cashed, and sent it all certified mail. Make sure you keep the certified mail receipt! She called a couple weeks later to confirm they received it, and they told her it would take 8-10 weeks to process but she wouldn't be charged any penalties since she had proof her payment was received on time.

I went through something very similar earlier this year! The key is to respond quickly and keep everything organized. Here's what worked for me: 1. Make copies of EVERYTHING - your original return, the CP80 notice, bank statements showing the cashed check, and any correspondence 2. Write "COPY - DO NOT PROCESS" in red at the top of each page of your tax return copy 3. Include a cover letter explaining that they cashed your check but claim they didn't receive your return - reference the CP80 notice number 4. Send everything via certified mail to the address listed on your CP80 notice I also recommend calling the IRS (even though it's painful) to get a representative to note in your account that you're responding to the notice. This creates a paper trail that you're addressing the issue proactively. The whole process took about 10 weeks to fully resolve, but I didn't get hit with any penalties since I had proof of timely payment. Stay organized and document everything - you'll get through this!

I've seen this exact scenario play out multiple times with clients, and unfortunately the PEO is misleading you. The fundamental issue is that the IRS doesn't care about the administrative structure - they care about economic reality. Your clients remain 2% shareholders of the S-Corp regardless of whether their paychecks come through a PEO. The health insurance premiums will still need to be included in box 1 of their W-2s per IRC Section 1372(a) and Notice 2008-1. The PEO arrangement doesn't create any legitimate tax advantage here. I'd recommend having a frank conversation with the PEO about their claims. Many PEO sales reps either don't understand the nuances of S-Corp taxation or they're deliberately stretching the truth to close deals. Your instincts are absolutely correct - if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. The only real benefits of a PEO in this situation would be potential cost savings on insurance premiums through group purchasing power and reduced administrative burden, not tax advantages.

I've been dealing with S-Corp taxation for over a decade and this PEO "workaround" comes up regularly. The answer is definitively no - there's no legitimate tax advantage here. The core issue is that IRC Section 1372 treats 2% S-Corp shareholders as if they were partners for purposes of fringe benefits, including health insurance. This treatment is based on their ownership percentage in the corporation, not on who technically provides the insurance or processes payroll. When a PEO provides health insurance to these shareholders, the premiums must still be included in their W-2 wages (Box 1) because they're considered self-employed individuals for health insurance purposes. The fact that the insurance comes through a PEO's group plan rather than directly from the S-Corp is irrelevant from a tax perspective. I've seen multiple audits where taxpayers tried similar arrangements, and the IRS consistently disallows these strategies. They apply the substance-over-form doctrine - what matters is the underlying economic relationship (shareholder-employee of S-Corp), not the administrative mechanics of how benefits are delivered. The PEO may genuinely believe their interpretation is correct, but they're likely confusing employment law concepts with tax law. While PEOs can be "employers of record" for certain labor law purposes, this doesn't override federal tax classifications for S-Corp shareholders. Bottom line: stick with the established rules and avoid potential penalties from an aggressive tax position that lacks solid legal foundation.