IRS
CommunityGovernment Services
Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
160,000+ people connected since 2021
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Can I pay the IRS with 183,000 individual $1 Money Orders as revenge?
So I've been absolutely screwed over by the IRS and my former employer, and I'm beyond furious about it. The whole situation is a nightmare that I won't bore you with right now (maybe another time), but every single person I talk to basically says I'm out of luck. I've been fantasizing about the most annoying way possible to pay this ridiculous $183,000 tax bill they claim I owe. Originally I was thinking about paying in pennies, but that would be a nightmare for me too. Then it hit me - what about sending them 183,000 individual $1 money orders? I checked the IRS website and it says they accept large payments with multiple money orders, but doesn't specify a maximum number. Has anyone tried anything like this before? Would this even work as a form of protest? I'm curious what would actually happen if someone submitted thousands of tiny payments. (To be clear, this is mostly just a revenge fantasy - I don't actually have $183K sitting around, and I'm not seriously planning to do this... though the thought does bring me some satisfaction after what they've put me through!
Join the conversation
Can the American Opportunity Credit (AOC) be claimed for law school after using it 3 times during undergrad?
My son blazed through his bachelor's degree in only 3 years and we claimed the American Opportunity Credit (AOC) for all of those years. He's currently working a corporate job to save up some money and plans to start law school next fall. I'm trying to figure out if we can still claim the AOC one more time when he begins his law school program since he only used it 3 times instead of the full 4 years that are allowed. He's been financially independent since graduating but we're helping with his law school tuition and might be able to claim him as a dependent again during that first year. I know there are specific rules about the AOC and which types of education qualify, so I'm not sure if law school counts as the right type of program for this credit. Any advice on whether we can use that final AOC credit during his first year of law school would be really helpful!
Join the conversation
Has anyone noticed how dumb it is that they don't let you use your unused AOC years for grad school? Like... why does it matter what level of education it is if you haven't used all 4 years? The tax code makes no sense sometimes!
The AOC was specifically designed to encourage and support undergraduate education. The government allocated funds differently for different education levels. It's not about logic so much as different policy priorities. Graduate education is subsidized through other mechanisms like the Lifetime Learning Credit.
FYI - make sure to keep really good records of which education credits you claim each year. My son had his return flagged for review because we apparently claimed the AOC for too many years (we didn't realize his community college year counted toward the 4-year limit). The IRS is definitely tracking this stuff!
Is W2 for settlement taxable on full 60k when I only received 40k check?
I just got a settlement for $80k last year. After my lawyer took his cut and fees, I was handed a check for $54k. But the kicker is they sent me a W2 for the entire $80k amount! So now when I'm doing my taxes, I'm totally confused. Do I have to pay taxes on the full $80k even though I only actually received $54k? This seems ridiculous that I'd have to pay taxes on money I never saw. I'm using TurboTax and when I entered the W2, it's calculating that I owe based on the full settlement amount. This can't be right, can it? I'll end up paying thousands more in taxes for money that went straight to my attorney! This is for my 2023 taxes and I'm regretting trying to do this myself. Thinking about going to a professional but after reading horror stories about places like H&R Block, I'm hesitant.
Join the conversation
Here's what people aren't mentioning - the type of settlement matters HUGELY for how it's taxed. If your settlement was for physical injuries or illness, that part is generally NOT taxable (even the attorney portion). If it was for emotional distress, lost wages, or punitive damages, different rules apply. What was your settlement for? That makes all the difference in whether you pay taxes on the full amount or not. Some settlements are completely tax-free while others are fully taxable.
It was an employment lawsuit - wrongful termination and some back wages. Does that change things? I'm still confused about whether I need to itemize to deduct the attorney fees or if I can take the standard deduction AND still deduct the attorney portion somehow.
That's actually good news! For employment-related lawsuits including wrongful termination, you can deduct your attorney fees as an "above-the-line" deduction. This means you can still take the standard deduction AND deduct your attorney fees. You'll want to look at Schedule 1, Line 24 "Other adjustments" and write "ATTORNEY FEES" next to it with the amount. This way you're not taxed on money that went straight to your attorney. Employment cases specifically have this special treatment thanks to a tax law change that was made specifically to address this unfair situation.
The issue isn't just with settlements - it's with our stupid tax code in general. You're being double-taxed on money you never received! Your lawyer also pays taxes on that same money as income. So the government gets to tax the same dollar twice. And depending on your income level and state, you might end up paying 40%+ in taxes on money that you never even saw. The whole system is designed to extract maximum revenue.
While I agree the tax code is complex, this isn't quite accurate. For employment-related cases (which OP mentioned in comments), the attorney fees can be deducted as an above-the-line deduction. Congress actually fixed this problem for certain types of cases, including employment claims, civil rights cases, and whistleblower claims specifically to prevent double taxation.
Need CPA or lawyer experienced with Syndicated Conservation Easements for regenerative agriculture project
Hey fellow tax nerds! I'm working with a small non-profit that focuses on regenerative agriculture and restoring water systems. We've been brainstorming ways to fund our work, and I had this idea about using syndicated conservation easements to help acquire land and implement our projects. Basically, I'm wondering if we could use the tax credits from these easements to fund installing regenerative agriculture systems and water management projects. Our non-profit has already done some small-scale work showing how our methods can refill groundwater tables and significantly increase biodiversity. I've got a few burning questions: - Is this syndicated conservation easement approach even realistic for what we're trying to do? - What kind of legal/financial structure would make this work while staying compliant with regulations? - How does the process of selling these tax credits actually work? What are the regulatory landmines we need to avoid? I feel like there could be a win-win here - taxpayers get meaningful tax benefits while actually funding real conservation work that improves land health. Plus, it seems like it would strengthen the case with the IRS since there's genuine environmental benefit happening. Would love to chat with anyone who has experience in this area or knows someone who does. We're serious about making this work if it's viable!
Join the conversation
I've worked with several non-profits on similar structures. One approach to consider is forming a separate for-profit entity that acquires the land, with investors who are looking for the tax benefits. The non-profit would then be granted specific rights to implement the regenerative agriculture projects. The key is making sure the conservation easement genuinely restricts development rights that have real value. If you're looking at agricultural land with legitimate development potential that you're permanently restricting, that can work. But if you're trying to inflate values artificially, you're heading for trouble.
Thanks for sharing this structure! I'm curious - how do you typically handle the ongoing relationship between the for-profit entity that holds the land and the non-profit doing the regenerative work? Is there a lease arrangement, or do you set up some kind of management agreement?
We typically use a long-term management agreement that gives the non-profit the right to implement their regenerative programs while the for-profit entity maintains ownership. This agreement needs to be established before the easement is placed, as it becomes part of the baseline documentation. For funding, we usually structure it so a portion of the tax benefit received by investors flows to the non-profit through a contractual arrangement. This provides ongoing operational funding beyond just the initial land access. Be careful though - the management fees must be reasonable and market-based, or the IRS might view the entire arrangement as a disguised donation scheme rather than a legitimate business structure.
Has anyone tried using partnership structures where investors get both tax benefits AND a share of agricultural revenue? We set up something similar for a client where they placed a conservation easement on 70% of the property, but kept 30% available for sustainable agricultural production. The investors got their tax deduction plus ongoing income from the farming operation.
That's actually really smart. We did something similar but with sustainable timber harvesting. The key was having a qualified appraiser who understood both the development value being restricted and the remaining economic use. Made the valuation much more defensible.
Private Credit Union Loan vs. IRS Fresh Start program for $10k tax debt - which is better?
So my husband and I are in a bit of a mess with our taxes - we owe about $13.5k to the IRS because I was working as an independent contractor last year and totally underestimated my quarterly payments (rookie mistake!). I'm already setting aside money for this year's taxes so I don't repeat this nightmare. My husband has a regular W-2 job, while I've been on 1099 until recently. Our combined income last year was around $95k, but we're expecting to hit about $140k this year since I'm transitioning to W-2 employment soon. Our monthly expenses are already pretty tight - I'm drowning in student loan payments (around $1500/month), we have two car payments with some equity but not much, and we're still chipping away at some credit card debt. My credit score is decent at 760, but my husband's is only around 620 since he moved here a few years ago and doesn't have much credit history. I'm trying to figure out the smartest approach here. Should we apply for the IRS Fresh Start program? We did have a small tax debt of about $1500 a couple years back that we paid through an installment plan (which is completed now), so I'm not sure if that affects our eligibility. Alternatively, our credit union offers personal loans at around 4% interest. Would that be better than whatever interest/penalties the IRS charges? I just don't have $13.5k to hand over in one lump sum, and with all our monthly obligations, I can't commit to massive monthly payments to the IRS while still saving for this year's taxes. Any advice would be super appreciated!
Join the conversation
Something nobody's mentioned yet - if you go with the IRS installment plan, make sure you adjust your W-4 and make estimated quarterly payments so you don't end up owing AGAIN next year while still paying off this debt. That happened to my cousin and it was a disaster. The Fresh Start program is good, but the IRS gets really strict if you owe taxes while already in a payment plan for previous taxes. They can cancel your agreement and demand full payment immediately.
That's a really good point I hadn't considered. Since I'm transitioning to W-2 soon, what's the best way to make sure enough is withheld? Should I just put "0" allowances on my W-4? And how much should I set aside from my remaining 1099 income for the rest of this year?
I'd recommend using the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator on their website to calculate exactly what you need for your W-4. With your student loans and other deductions, putting "0" might withhold too much and hurt your monthly cash flow when you're already tight. For your remaining 1099 income, the general rule is to set aside about 30-35% of your gross earnings for federal, state, and self-employment taxes. Since you're in a combined income situation with your husband's W-2, it gets more complicated, but that percentage should keep you safe. Make quarterly estimated payments on those earnings to stay compliant and avoid next year's penalties.
One thing to consider - a credit union loan will show up on your credit report, while an IRS payment plan won't (unless they file a tax lien, which they typically don't for amounts under $25k if you're on a payment plan). So if you're planning any major purchases in the next few years that would require financing, the extra debt on your credit report might impact your rates.
This is actually not entirely correct. The IRS can file a Federal Tax Lien even for amounts under $25k in some circumstances. Also, while being on a payment plan itself doesn't report to credit bureaus, if you default on your payment plan, it absolutely can impact your credit indirectly through collection actions.
Mei Liu
I work at a bank (not for the IRS) and I can tell you that sending 183,000 money orders would probably result in them being returned to you unprocessed. We have policies about handling large volumes of instruments like this, and I'm sure the IRS does too. Plus, money orders usually cost $1-2 each to purchase, so you'd be spending an extra $183k-$366k just on fees! If you're serious about resolving your tax issue, consider reaching out to a tax attorney who specializes in IRS disputes. The upfront cost might seem high, but they often save you way more than their fee in the long run.
0 coins
Aisha Rahman
AuthorI never thought about the fees for the money orders! That would be wild to pay double just to make a point. Do tax attorneys actually have any success fighting the IRS? Everyone I've talked to makes them sound like an unstoppable force.
0 coins
Mei Liu
Tax attorneys absolutely can be successful against the IRS. The key is finding one who specializes specifically in tax controversy or tax resolution, not just a general tax preparer. The IRS makes mistakes all the time, and they have various programs like Offers in Compromise that can reduce legitimate tax debts. I've seen clients get tax bills reduced by 50-70% with the right representation. The IRS is powerful but not infallible, and they have internal procedures for resolving disputes. The biggest mistake people make is trying to handle complex tax issues themselves without understanding the technical aspects of tax law.
0 coins
Liam O'Sullivan
Have you considered requesting an audit reconsideration? If the amount is incorrect, you can submit documentation showing why the assessment is wrong. I had a $68k bill that was based on incorrect information from my employer, and after filing for reconsideration with the right documentation, it was reduced to under $4k.
0 coins
Amara Chukwu
This is the real answer! Audit reconsideration saved me when I had a similar issue. The key is having all your documentation extremely organized and being very specific about what errors were made in the original assessment.
0 coins