IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

This has been such a thorough and enlightening discussion! As someone who's been putting off monetizing my content specifically because of tax uncertainty, this thread has been a game-changer. The consensus is really clear: start simple with a tip jar approach, keep meticulous records from day one, benefit from the £1,000 Trading Allowance initially, then transition to Self Assessment when you exceed that threshold. The separate business bank account advice is particularly valuable - even for small amounts, that clean separation will save so much time and stress later. What I find most reassuring is seeing how many creators have successfully navigated this process. The tax side seemed like this insurmountable barrier, but with proper planning and record-keeping, it's actually quite manageable. The key seems to be treating it professionally from the start, even when amounts are small. I'm particularly grateful for the insights about platform fees being deductible expenses, currency conversion timing, and the importance of understanding trading income vs simple donations. These are exactly the kinds of practical details you can't find in official guidance but make all the difference in real implementation. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this thread should be essential reading for any UK content creator considering donation platforms. Time to finally set up that Buy Me a Coffee page with confidence!

0 coins

Absolutely echo your sentiment about this being essential reading! As someone just getting started with content creation myself, I was completely overwhelmed by the tax implications until reading through everyone's experiences here. The progression from Trading Allowance to Self Assessment actually seems quite logical when laid out this way. What really struck me was how many people mentioned that once they got their systems set up properly (separate accounts, good record keeping, understanding allowable expenses), the ongoing management became much less daunting than they'd initially feared. I'm particularly taking to heart the advice about starting simple rather than jumping into complex reward tiers right away. It seems like there's plenty of time to add that complexity later once you're comfortable with the basic tax processes. Better to build a solid foundation first than create unnecessary complications from day one. Thanks to everyone who took the time to share such detailed, practical advice. It's exactly this kind of community knowledge sharing that makes the difference between being paralyzed by uncertainty and actually taking action. Looking forward to joining the ranks of UK content creators who've successfully navigated these waters!

0 coins

Ella Harper

•

This thread has been absolutely brilliant - exactly what I needed as someone in the same boat! I've been running a small tech review channel for about 6 months and was hesitant to set up any donation system because the tax side seemed so complicated. Reading through everyone's experiences, I'm now confident about moving forward with a simple tip jar approach on Buy Me a Coffee. The key insights that really helped me are: keeping it simple initially (no rewards/tiers), setting up that separate business bank account from day one, and understanding that the £1,000 Trading Allowance gives me breathing room to learn the system properly. One thing I'm curious about - for those tracking equipment expenses, how do you handle items that serve dual purposes? For example, I upgraded my phone partly for better video recording, but obviously use it for personal stuff too. Is there a standard way to calculate what percentage can be claimed as a business expense, or is it more of a "reasonable proportion" judgment call? Also really appreciate the currency conversion guidance - I hadn't even considered that complexity but it makes sense that international support could quickly add up. Thanks everyone for sharing such detailed real-world advice. This community knowledge is invaluable for newcomers like myself who want to do things properly from the start!

0 coins

Ryan Young

•

Great question about dual-purpose equipment! For items like phones that serve both personal and business use, HMRC generally expects you to make a reasonable estimate of the business proportion. For a phone used partly for content creation, you might claim 20-30% if you can justify that level of business use (filming, editing apps, responding to comments, etc.). The key is being able to demonstrate your reasoning if asked. Keep notes about how you calculated the percentage - for example, if you estimate you use your phone 25% for content creation activities, document that logic. Some creators track their usage for a few weeks to establish a baseline. For equipment like cameras or microphones that are primarily for content creation but occasionally used personally, you can usually claim a much higher percentage (80-90%) as long as you're honest about the split. The "reasonable and justifiable" test is what HMRC cares about. They'd rather see conservative estimates with clear reasoning than aggressive claims you can't support. When in doubt, err on the side of caution - it's better to claim 25% you can defend than 50% that might raise questions during an inquiry. This is another area where keeping good records pays off. A simple note explaining your reasoning for each percentage claim can save hours of stress later!

0 coins

Jayden Hill

•

As someone new to this community, I really appreciate all the detailed advice here! I'm in a similar boat - won about $150 at a local casino last month and had no idea about the reporting requirements. The consensus seems to be that while technically all gambling winnings should be reported, the practical enforcement for small amounts without casino documentation is minimal. What really helped me understand this better was the point about itemizing vs. standard deduction - if you can't itemize to offset losses, you're paying taxes on gross winnings which could be more costly than the risk of not reporting small amounts. For peace of mind though, I think I'm going to report mine anyway and just consider it the "cost of doing the right thing." Better to be overly cautious with tax matters, especially as someone who's never dealt with gambling income before. Thanks everyone for the education!

0 coins

Welcome to the community! I'm also pretty new to dealing with gambling income questions. Your approach of reporting it anyway for peace of mind makes a lot of sense, especially after reading all the insights from folks like @d95f093627ea who work in tax prep. I was initially leaning toward not reporting my small winnings, but the point about being consistent with ALL gambling activity really stuck with me. If I'm going to be honest about one casino visit, I should probably be prepared to track and report everything going forward. Plus, as you said, it's probably worth the small tax cost to avoid any potential headaches down the road, even if the enforcement risk is low. Thanks for sharing your perspective as someone in a similar situation!

0 coins

CosmicCowboy

•

@0e8b937137ec That's a really thoughtful approach! I'm also relatively new to this type of tax situation and your "cost of doing the right thing" mindset resonates with me. After reading through all these responses, I think I'm going to take the same route and report my small casino winnings too. What struck me most from @d95f093627ea's professional perspective is that consistency point - if we're going to report gambling income, we really need to be prepared to track everything properly going forward. It's not just about this one instance, but establishing good habits for any future gambling activity. The math does work out to paying taxes on gross winnings without offsetting losses if we take the standard deduction, but like you said, the peace of mind is probably worth the extra tax cost. Thanks for sharing your decision-making process - it's helpful to hear from someone in the same situation!

0 coins

Carmen Lopez

•

I've been following this discussion and wanted to share some additional perspective. As someone who's dealt with similar questions, I think the key thing many people miss is that gambling winnings are just one piece of your overall tax picture. For Dylan's $275 blackjack win, the actual tax impact would be relatively small - probably $60-80 depending on tax bracket. But what's more important is understanding the precedent you're setting for yourself. If you plan to gamble again in the future, you really need to decide upfront whether you're going to properly track and report ALL gambling activity or none of it. The IRS doesn't like cherry-picking - reporting only some gambling income while ignoring other sessions looks suspicious if you ever get audited. So if you report this $275 win, make sure you're prepared to keep detailed records of any future casino visits, poker games, sports betting, etc. One practical tip: if you do decide to report it, keep all your documentation from that night (ATM receipts, parking tickets, anything that shows you were at the casino) just in case you need to prove the amount later. The IRS generally accepts reasonable estimates for small amounts, but having some backup never hurts.

0 coins

@80ce69a51837 This is such excellent advice about thinking holistically about your gambling tax strategy! I hadn't considered the precedent-setting aspect - you're absolutely right that consistency is key if you ever face an audit. Your point about keeping documentation from the casino visit is really practical too. Even something as simple as a parking receipt or ATM withdrawal record could help substantiate your story if questions ever come up later. It shows you were actually there on that date and gives some context to the transaction. I'm curious though - when you mention "reasonable estimates" for small amounts, is there any guidance on what the IRS considers reasonable? Like if Dylan remembered winning around $275 but wasn't 100% certain of the exact amount, would reporting something in that ballpark be sufficient? Or is it better to be more conservative and round down to be safe? The cherry-picking warning is something I definitely needed to hear as someone new to this. It makes sense that partial reporting could look suspicious - better to be all in or all out with your approach to gambling income reporting.

0 coins

@80ce69a51837 @a31a51c578c0 This whole discussion has been incredibly eye-opening for someone like me who's never had to deal with gambling income before! The point about setting a precedent is really crucial - I think a lot of people (myself included) don't think about the long-term implications of their reporting decisions. Regarding the "reasonable estimates" question that Isabella raised, I did some digging and from what I can find, the IRS generally expects you to be as accurate as possible but understands that exact amounts aren't always available for cash transactions. The key is good faith effort to report the correct amount. If Dylan remembers it being "around $275" then reporting $275 should be fine, but if there's uncertainty, being slightly conservative might be the safer approach. What I'm taking away from all this is that for future gambling, keeping a simple log on your phone noting date, location, game type, and approximate win/loss amounts could save a lot of headaches later. Even if you're just planning occasional casino visits, having that documentation ready makes the consistency issue much more manageable. Thanks to everyone sharing their experiences and expertise here - this has been way more helpful than anything I found in the IRS publications!

0 coins

AstroAce

•

Code 766 is definitely a positive sign - it means the IRS has processed your refundable credits! The 4-15-2025 date is just the tax year deadline, not your refund timing. I went through this same confusion last year. What you're waiting for now is code 846 to appear on your transcript - that's when you'll see your actual refund issue date. In my experience, it typically shows up 1-3 weeks after seeing the 766 code. Keep checking your transcript every few days and don't worry too much about the other random codes for now. You're on the right track!

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

This is exactly what I needed to hear! I've been checking my transcript obsessively since I saw that 766 code and was starting to panic thinking something was wrong. It's reassuring to know that it's actually a good sign and I just need to be patient for the 846 code. Thanks for sharing your experience - it really helps to hear from someone who's been through this before! šŸ™

0 coins

Alicia Stern

•

Code 766 is actually a great sign! It means the IRS has successfully processed and approved your refundable credits (like EITC, additional child tax credit, etc.). That 4-15-2025 date you're seeing is just the standard tax filing deadline for 2024 returns - it has nothing to do with when you'll actually receive your refund. What you want to watch for next is code 846 appearing on your transcript, which will show your actual refund issue date. Based on what I've seen, code 846 typically appears anywhere from 1-3 weeks after code 766 shows up. Just keep checking your transcript every few days and try not to stress about all the other codes for now!

0 coins

Thais Soares

•

Thanks for the explanation! This whole transcript system is so confusing when you're new to it. I've been checking mine daily since filing and seeing code 766 had me worried I did something wrong. It's such a relief to know it's actually good news! Now I know what to look for with code 846. Really appreciate everyone taking the time to help newcomers like me understand this stuff šŸ˜…

0 coins

Don't forget to check if there were any surrender charges on this annuity withdrawal! If the code is 7D and it was taken before the surrender period ended, there might be penalties that aren't reflected on the 1099-R but will impact the actual amount received.

0 coins

PaulineW

•

Surrender charges don't actually affect the taxability though - they just reduce the amount you receive. The 1099-R reports the gross amount before any surrender charges. The taxability question is separate from whether penalties were applied.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

I went through this exact same situation with my grandmother's annuity last year! The blank Box 2a was really confusing at first, but after doing some research and speaking with a tax professional, here's what I learned: When Box 2a is blank AND the full amount appears in Box 5, it means you're receiving a return of your original premium payments (what you put into the annuity), not earnings. This is non-taxable because it's money that was already taxed when originally earned. The key thing to remember is that annuities work on a "recovery of basis first" principle. Your father-in-law will continue to receive non-taxable distributions until he's recovered all of his original investment. Only after that will future distributions become taxable. For filing purposes, you should enter $0 as the taxable amount since Box 2a is blank. The 1099-R itself serves as documentation that this was properly reported by the insurance company. Make sure to keep good records of these distributions so you can track when the basis is fully recovered and future distributions become taxable. The distribution code 7D confirms this is a normal distribution from the annuity contract, which supports the non-taxable treatment.

0 coins

This is really helpful, thank you! I'm new to dealing with annuity distributions and this situation has been so confusing. Just to make sure I understand - when you say "recovery of basis first," does that mean the insurance company automatically tracks how much of the original investment has been returned, or do we need to keep track of that ourselves? Also, is there any chance the IRS might question why we're reporting $0 taxable income when there's a $24,000 distribution showing on the 1099-R? I want to make sure we're covered if there are any follow-up questions.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

Does anyone know if the $1040 income from watching a special needs family member would be considered household employment (requiring Schedule H) rather than self-employment? I had a similar situation and my accountant said it made a difference in how it's taxed.

0 coins

Sofia Morales

•

It depends on who controlled the work. If the family directed exactly how and when care was provided, it might be household employment. If OP was more independent in providing care on their own terms, it's likely self-employment. The distinction matters because household employees don't pay self-employment tax, but employers should pay their share of FICA taxes.

0 coins

This is a frustrating but solvable situation! You're definitely not alone in getting surprise tax documents after filing. Here's what I'd recommend based on what others have shared: First, don't panic about deadlines - you have 3 years from your original filing deadline to amend, so there's plenty of time. The key is doing this correctly rather than rushing. For the immediate issue with H&R Block's software not allowing a second amendment, you'll need to switch to paper filing using Form 1040-X. Wait until your first amended return (with the surprise W-2) is completely processed by the IRS - this usually takes 16+ weeks but you can track it on IRS.gov. When filing your second amendment, include ALL the changes from the beginning: your original W-2, the surprise W-2, AND the new 1099 income. Don't just add the 1099 - recalculate everything as if you're amending from your original return. For that $1040 in childcare income, you'll likely need Schedule C (for self-employment income) and Schedule SE (for self-employment tax), unless it qualifies as household employment (which depends on how much control the family had over your work). The most important thing is being thorough in Part III of Form 1040-X - clearly explain that you're reporting previously unreported 1099 income to avoid any confusion during processing.

0 coins

Prev1...446447448449450...5643Next