This is actually a great point that hadn't occurred to me! I just checked and you're absolutely right - I apparently signed up for their "Complete Protection Bundle" for $425 which got deducted from my federal refund. The description shows it includes audit defense, tax expert assistance, and identity protection. I honestly have zero recollection of agreeing to this! Must have clicked through too quickly during the filing process. That plus the standard $75 processing fee accounts for almost exactly the missing amount. Mystery solved! Thank you so much for suggesting this - I would have continued freaking out while waiting for some explanation from the IRS that was never going to come. Lesson learned to pay more attention to those "recommended" add-ons during the filing process.

The tax prep companies are so sneaky with this stuff. They make those screens with the add-on services look like you NEED to select something, when really "none" is an option they hide or make look risky. I almost got charged $200 for their "MAX" bundle until I noticed and unchecked it.

Can you explain the stock basis part again? I thought the issue was the difference between original purchase price of the asset and current FMV? How does stock basis factor in?

So there are actually two separate tax events happening in a liquidation: First, the corporation is treated as selling its assets to you at FMV. Since the expensed items have $0 basis to the corporation, the entire FMV is gain that flows through to you as the S-Corp shareholder. Second, you're surrendering your stock in exchange for these assets. You recognize gain/loss based on the difference between the FMV of assets received and your stock basis. Your stock basis includes your original investment plus all income that's flowed through to you minus distributions over the years. If your stock basis is high enough (from retained earnings for example), it can offset the asset distribution value, potentially resulting in no additional gain at the shareholder level.

I did this last year. My accountant had me focus only on items that still had meaningful value and could be sold on the secondary market. We didn't bother with office supplies, furniture under $200, etc. We documented everything with photos and current marketplace listings for comparable items. For really small stuff, we did group some items together as "office equipment" with a reasonable bulk value. The IRS isn't going to audit you over a $30 stapler, but they might care about that $2,000 computer or specialized equipment.

Omg that's terrifying! Did she try getting help from the Taxpayer Advocate Service? I've heard they can sometimes intervene in these penalty situations especially if there was genuine confusion about the requirements.

She did contact the Taxpayer Advocate Service, and they were helpful in getting the IRS to actually review her reasonable cause argument. The process is still ongoing, but they've at least gotten the collection activities paused while they review her case. The TAS representative explained that the IRS considers several factors for reasonable cause: whether she tried to learn about filing requirements, if there was a history of compliance with other tax obligations, and if this was her first time dealing with international tax issues. Having documentation of her efforts to understand the requirements has been crucial to her case.

Thank you for bringing this up. The property isn't currently being rented out, but I might want to do that in the future. Is there a good resource you found that explains all these different forms? I feel like I'm discovering new requirements every day.

The IRS has a decent publication called "U.S. Citizens and Resident Aliens Abroad" (Publication 54) that covers many of these requirements. There's also a specific section on their website about international taxpayers that lists the various forms. I found the most comprehensive help came from a tax attorney who specializes in international taxation. It was expensive, but worth it for the initial setup year. Once I understood all the requirements, I was able to handle most of it myself in subsequent years using tax software that supports international situations. Just be aware that not all tax software handles these specialized international forms well - you might need to use one of the more comprehensive packages.

Wait, what if I already contributed to my employer's 401k? Does that reduce how much I can put in my Roth IRA? And do rollovers from previous employer 401ks count against the contribution limits?

Contributing to your employer's 401k doesn't reduce how much you can put in your Roth IRA. The limits are completely separate, so you can max out both if you have the funds. For 2022, you could contribute up to $20,500 to your 401k AND still put $6,000 in your IRA. Rollovers from previous employer 401ks to an IRA don't count against your contribution limits at all. You can roll over any amount without affecting your ability to make your annual IRA contribution. That's actually a great way to consolidate your retirement accounts without using up your yearly contribution space.

So true! My Vanguard account defaults to the current year unless I specifically select the previous year. Does anyone know if there's a way to fix this if you realize the mistake after a few months? Like if I contributed in February but just now realized it went to the wrong tax year?

If you catch the mistake within the same tax year, you can usually get it fixed by calling your brokerage. They have a process for redesignating contributions to the correct tax year. But there's a deadline - you can't redesignate after the tax filing deadline (April 18th this year). If you discover it after the deadline passed, it gets much more complicated. You might face excess contribution penalties if the mistaken designation put you over the limit for a year. Some brokerages will work with you on this issue, but it's always best to triple-check the year designation when making contributions between January and April!

This is so important! My company had me set as "Single" for my first 3 paychecks despite me telling HR I was married with kids. When they finally fixed it, the difference was huge. OP should definitely double check this!

Absolutely right! The difference between "Single" and "Married Filing Jointly" withholding can be substantial. In my case, it was almost a 15% difference in take-home pay. I'd also recommend looking at the actual pay stub carefully. Sometimes there are other deductions beyond just taxes - health insurance, retirement contributions, or other benefits that might be reducing the take-home amount. These can be especially confusing when you're new to the US system since benefit packages work differently than in many other countries.

That tool is super confusing for non-citizens though. It doesn't account for visa status at all and some of the questions don't even apply to people who just moved to the US. I tried using it last year and ended up more confused.

That's a fair point. The tool does assume a lot of prior knowledge about the US tax system that newcomers wouldn't have. I found I had to research several terms before I could even answer the basic questions. When I used it, I had already been in the US for about a year, so I had some understanding of how things worked. For someone completely new to the system, you're right that it might create more confusion than clarity.