IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Just to add a bit more detail to the corporation tax calculation... The fast food chain making $30m profit would normally pay: $30,000,000 Ɨ 21% = $6,300,000 in federal tax After donating $1.75m: Taxable income becomes $28,250,000 New tax is $28,250,000 Ɨ 21% = $5,932,500 Total tax savings: $367,500 So the govt "loses" $367,500 in tax revenue, while charities gain $1.75m. The company is still out-of-pocket $1,382,500 after tax benefits. Doesn't seem like a pure tax dodge to me.

0 coins

This is super helpful! Do state corporate taxes work the same way? Like do they get to deduct the donation amount from their state tax calculations too?

0 coins

Ethan Davis

•

Yes, most states do allow charitable deductions for corporate taxes, but the specifics vary significantly by state. Some states have their own charitable contribution limits that might be different from the federal 25% cap, and a few states don't allow the deduction at all. For example, if your fast food chain operates in California (9.6% corporate tax rate), they'd likely get an additional state tax savings of about $168,000 on that $1.75m donation. Combined with the federal savings, total tax benefit would be around $535,500, making their net cost about $1.2m instead of $1.38m. But if they operate in a state like Nevada or Wyoming with no corporate income tax, they'd only get the federal benefit. The key is checking each state's specific rules since some have caps, phase-outs, or restrictions on certain types of charitable organizations.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of breakdown I was hoping for! So if I'm understanding correctly, the whole "corporations donate to avoid taxes" narrative is pretty misleading. They're still spending significantly more than they save, even with the tax benefits. One thing I'm curious about though - you mentioned the 25% limit on charitable contributions. Does that mean if a company wanted to donate more than 25% of their taxable income in a single year, they wouldn't get the full deduction? And what happens to the excess - can they carry it forward to future years? Also, are there any restrictions on what types of organizations qualify for these deductions? Like, could a fast food chain start their own "food education foundation" and get the same tax benefits while basically promoting their own interests?

0 coins

Jamal Wilson

•

You're absolutely right that the "tax avoidance" narrative is misleading! Regarding your questions about the 25% limit - yes, if a corporation tries to deduct more than 25% of their taxable income in charitable contributions, the excess doesn't just disappear. They can carry forward the unused portion for up to 5 years and apply it against future taxable income (subject to the same 25% annual limit). As for qualifying organizations, the IRS is pretty strict about what counts as a legitimate charity. Even if your fast food chain creates a "food education foundation," it would need to be a genuine 501(c)(3) organization with legitimate charitable purposes, independent governance, and restrictions on how much benefit can flow back to the donor company. The foundation would have to actually serve public charitable purposes, not just promote the company's business interests. The IRS has detailed rules to prevent exactly the kind of self-serving arrangements you're thinking about. So while companies do get tax benefits from charitable giving, the system has safeguards to ensure the donations serve legitimate charitable purposes rather than being pure tax schemes.

0 coins

Diego Rojas

•

One thing I'd add is to be very careful about the business purpose requirement. The IRS has been scrutinizing these arrangements more closely lately, especially when it's a single-owner S corp renting the owner's residence. Make sure your meetings have a genuine business purpose that couldn't reasonably be conducted elsewhere - like confidential strategic planning, board meetings with sensitive information, or client meetings requiring privacy. I've seen cases where the IRS challenged rentals for routine staff meetings that could have been held at the regular office. Also, spread your 14 days throughout the year rather than clustering them together, as that looks more natural and less like tax avoidance. Document everything meticulously - meeting agendas, attendee lists, business outcomes, and photos if possible.

0 coins

Connor Byrne

•

This is really helpful advice about the business purpose requirement. I'm curious about the documentation aspect - when you mention taking photos of meetings, what exactly should those photos show? Just the meeting in progress, or should they capture specific business materials being discussed? Also, regarding spreading the 14 days throughout the year, is there a minimum time gap the IRS expects between rental periods, or is it more about avoiding obvious patterns that look artificial?

0 coins

Great points about business purpose documentation! I'd also recommend keeping contemporaneous notes during each meeting that clearly outline the business decisions made and why the home setting was necessary. For example, if you're discussing a potential acquisition, document that the confidential nature required a private setting away from employees who might overhear at the office. Regarding timing, while there's no specific IRS rule about spacing, I've found that having rentals coincide with natural business cycles (quarterly planning sessions, annual strategy meetings, etc.) helps establish legitimacy. The key is that each rental should have an independent business justification rather than appearing to be manufactured just to hit the 14-day limit. One more tip: consider having your attorney or CPA attend some of these meetings when appropriate. Their presence and professional notes can add significant credibility if questioned later.

0 coins

Dylan Fisher

•

I've been researching the Augusta Rule for my S corp as well, and one critical aspect I haven't seen mentioned yet is the impact on your homeowner's insurance. When you start using your residence for business meetings, even just 14 days a year, you may need to notify your insurance company or potentially add a business rider to your policy. Some insurers could deny claims if they discover undisclosed commercial use of the property. Also, for those tracking fair market rates, I've found it helpful to document not just the rental rate but also what specific amenities justify that rate - things like high-speed internet, presentation equipment, catering facilities, or privacy features that make your home particularly suitable for business use. This additional documentation can really strengthen your position if the IRS questions your rental rate during an audit. One more consideration: if you're planning to do this strategy long-term, consider how it might affect a future sale of your home. While the Augusta Rule income is tax-free, you'll want clean documentation showing the business use was minimal and temporary to avoid any complications with the home sale exclusion under Section 121.

0 coins

This is excellent advice about the homeowner's insurance implications - I hadn't even considered that angle! The point about documenting specific amenities that justify your rental rate is particularly valuable. I'm curious about the Section 121 home sale exclusion you mentioned - could you elaborate on what kind of complications might arise? Are you referring to potential issues with the "business use" test, or is there something specific about the Augusta Rule rentals that could affect the $250k/$500k exclusion when selling your primary residence? I want to make sure I'm not creating any unintended tax consequences down the road.

0 coins

Harold Oh

•

Does anyone know if Robinhood's tax documents show wash sales clearly? I sold some Tesla at a loss in November and then bought back in December (price was too good to pass up) but I don't know if that affects my taxes.

0 coins

Amun-Ra Azra

•

Yes, Robinhood does report wash sales on their 1099-B. Look for a code "W" next to any transactions - that indicates it was identified as a wash sale. The problem is they only identify wash sales within the same brokerage. If you sold on Robinhood and bought on Fidelity within 30 days, for example, it wouldn't be flagged, but it's still technically a wash sale that you're supposed to report.

0 coins

Emma Taylor

•

Hey Abby! I totally understand the confusion - I went through the same thing my first year with investment taxes. Here's a quick breakdown to help you navigate your Robinhood 1099: The 1099-DIV section shows dividends you received from stocks you owned. Even if it's a small amount, you'll need to report this as income on your tax return. For your actual stock trading, look for the 1099-B section - this shows all your buy/sell transactions and calculates your capital gains or losses. The good news is you don't need to enter every single transaction manually if you use tax software that can import directly from Robinhood. Since you mentioned crypto, keep an eye out for a separate 1099-MISC form for those transactions, as crypto is reported differently than stocks. With only $2,500 invested, your tax situation shouldn't be too complex. If you had any losses, those can offset your gains, which might actually reduce your tax burden. Just make sure to report everything - the IRS gets copies of all these forms too, so they'll know if something's missing. Most tax software will walk you through each section step by step, which makes it much less overwhelming than trying to figure out the forms manually.

0 coins

Noah Irving

•

I've been in a similar mixed-use situation for about 2 years now and wanted to add a few thoughts based on my experience. One thing I discovered that might be helpful: if you're planning to deduct vehicle expenses for business trips that start from your mixed-use location, the IRS treats your home office as your "business location" for mileage deduction purposes. This means trips from your office to client meetings, supply runs, etc. can be fully deductible business miles rather than commuting miles. Also, regarding the lease structure question - I initially signed personally but later had my LLC assume the lease when my landlord was willing to do a lease assignment. This gave me the flexibility to start simple but transition to cleaner business accounting as my operations grew. Not all landlords will allow this, but it's worth asking about when negotiating. One record-keeping tip that's saved me time: I use a simple smartphone app to log my office usage and take timestamped photos of my workspace setup monthly. It takes about 5 minutes but creates a consistent documentation trail that shows exclusive business use over time. The CPA meeting you mentioned is definitely the right move - they can help you model out the tax implications of both lease structures based on your specific business projections and personal tax situation.

0 coins

That's a really smart point about vehicle mileage deductions! I hadn't thought about how having a home office changes the classification of business trips. That could add up to significant savings over time, especially if you're meeting clients regularly. The lease assignment approach sounds like a great middle ground - gives you flexibility to test the waters without committing to business liability upfront. I'll definitely ask my potential landlord about that option during negotiations. The smartphone app idea for documentation is brilliant too. Do you mind sharing which app you use? I'm looking for something simple that can handle timestamped photos and basic logging without being overly complicated. Thanks for the practical insights - it's really helpful hearing from someone who's actually navigated this transition successfully!

0 coins

One aspect I haven't seen mentioned yet is the impact on your business insurance needs. When I set up my mixed-use space, I discovered that standard homeowners/renters insurance typically excludes coverage for business equipment and liability. You'll likely need either a business owner's policy (BOP) or at minimum a business personal property endorsement to your existing policy. Also, consider the long-term implications if you decide to move. If you establish your business address at this mixed-use location, you'll need to update that address with the state, IRS, clients, vendors, etc. when you relocate. It's not a dealbreaker, but something to factor into your decision-making process. From a practical standpoint, I'd recommend starting with measurements and floor plans before you sign anything. Walk through the space with a tape measure and sketch out exactly which areas would be exclusively business use. This exercise often reveals that the usable business percentage is different from your initial estimate, which could significantly impact your cost-benefit analysis. The fact that you're meeting with a CPA shows you're thinking about this correctly. Make sure to bring photos and measurements of the space to that meeting so they can give you specific advice rather than general guidelines.

0 coins

Zoe Stavros

•

Has anyone dealt with the California Franchise Tax Board in a situation like this? I had a similar issue last year, and while I resolved the federal part, the state side was a whole separate nightmare.

0 coins

Jamal Harris

•

California actually has a taxpayer advocate service specifically for this. Call 916-845-4775. They were surprisingly helpful for me when I had issues with my preparer. The state has different procedures than the IRS, so definitely address both separately.

0 coins

Ava Williams

•

I went through something very similar two years ago when my preparer was caught in a scheme affecting dozens of clients. Here's what I learned that might help: Document EVERYTHING from now on. Create a timeline of your relationship with this preparer - when you started using them, what documents you provided, any red flags you might have missed. This becomes crucial evidence that you were acting in good faith. Contact the IRS Taxpayer Advocate Service (1-877-777-4778) - they have special procedures for victims of preparer fraud. They can sometimes pause collection activities while you sort things out and may expedite your case review. Don't ignore the audit notice deadline, but you can request an extension by calling the number on the notice. Explain your situation - they're usually understanding when there's documented preparer fraud involved. One thing that really helped me was getting a "verification of non-filing" letter from the IRS for the tax year in question, which shows what they have on file versus what was actually submitted. Sometimes fraudulent preparers file completely different returns than what they show you. The good news is that victims of preparer fraud often qualify for penalty relief, and the IRS has gotten better at handling these cases. It's stressful, but you're not automatically liable for everything just because it was filed under your name.

0 coins

Ryder Ross

•

This is incredibly helpful - thank you for sharing your experience! I had no idea about the "verification of non-filing" letter. That sounds like it could be a game-changer for understanding what was actually submitted versus what I thought was filed. Quick question - when you contacted the Taxpayer Advocate Service, did they assign you a specific advocate to work with throughout the process? And roughly how long did it take from when you first contacted them until you had some resolution? I'm trying to get a sense of the timeline I might be looking at. Also, you mentioned creating a timeline of red flags - I keep beating myself up thinking I should have known something was wrong. It's reassuring to hear that the IRS recognizes people can be victims in these situations.

0 coins

Yes, they assigned me a specific advocate who became my main point of contact throughout the entire process. Her name was Sarah and she was incredibly knowledgeable about preparer fraud cases. Having one person who understood my situation made such a difference - I wasn't constantly re-explaining everything to different people. Timeline-wise, it took about 4-5 months from first contact to full resolution, but that included getting penalty relief and having the fraudulent portions of my return corrected. The advocate was able to put a hold on collection activities within about 2 weeks of taking my case, which gave me breathing room to gather documentation without panic. Don't beat yourself up about missing red flags! My preparer had been in business for over 15 years and had great reviews online. Sometimes these people are very good at appearing legitimate. The fact that you trusted a seemingly established professional doesn't make you naive - it makes you human. The IRS absolutely recognizes this, especially when there are multiple victims involved like in your situation. One more tip: ask your advocate about getting a "determination letter" at the end of the process that officially documents you were a victim of preparer fraud. This can be helpful if any issues come up in future years related to this situation.

0 coins

Prev1...33423343334433453346...5644Next