


Ask the community...
Same thing happened to me last month! Had code 570 with an adjustment and was panicking. Took about 2.5 weeks to resolve - got the 971 notice code after about a week like Madison mentioned, then 571 to release the hold. The adjustment was actually in my favor too (they corrected a calculation error I made). Just keep checking your transcript every few days and try not to stress too much about it. The IRS computer systems are slow but they do work through these holds eventually.
That's so reassuring to hear! @Javier Morales did you have to do anything during those 2.5 weeks or just wait? And was the adjustment obvious when you looked back at your return or was it something you wouldn t'have caught?
Been through this exact scenario twice now! The first time I panicked and called the IRS hotline (waste of 3 hours on hold lol). Second time I just waited it out and it resolved in about 18 days. The key thing is don't file any amendments or send extra paperwork unless they specifically ask for it - that can actually slow things down more. Your transcript will update usually on Wednesdays or Fridays so those are the best days to check. The 570 hold with adjustment combo is super common this time of year, especially if you have any business income or complex deductions.
This is super helpful advice! @Fatima Al-Rashid the part about not filing amendments unless they ask is something I wouldn t'have thought of. Good to know about the Wednesday/Friday update schedule too - I ve'been checking randomly every day like a maniac š Really appreciate everyone sharing their experiences, makes this whole situation way less stressful knowing it s'normal and will resolve!
Reading through this thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation with my fitness studio. We were forced to close completely for 3 months in 2020, then allowed to reopen but with severe capacity restrictions (from 40 people per class down to 8) and no group fitness classes allowed - which was about 60% of our revenue. I've been hesitant to claim the ERC because I wasn't sure if the capacity restrictions counted as a "partial suspension" once we reopened. But based on what everyone's shared here, it sounds like we clearly meet the "more than nominal" threshold since group classes were such a significant part of our operations. The documentation advice about keeping records of specific government orders is spot on. I still have all the health department notices that detailed exactly when restrictions changed and what we were/weren't allowed to do. One question for those who've been through this process: when calculating qualified wages, do you include wages paid to employees who were working reduced hours due to the capacity restrictions, or only wages paid during periods of complete closure? The IRS guidance on this specific scenario has been confusing. Thanks to everyone who's shared their experiences - it's made me much more confident about moving forward with our claim!
Great question about qualified wages during capacity restrictions! For periods when you were operating under partial suspension (like your capacity limits), you can generally include wages paid to all employees, even those working reduced hours due to the restrictions. The key is that the wages need to be paid during a quarter when your business qualified for ERC due to the partial suspension. So if your capacity was limited to 8 people per class instead of 40, and group classes were suspended entirely, those restrictions likely qualify your entire business for that quarter - meaning wages paid to instructors, front desk staff, cleaning crew, etc. during that time would all be eligible. However, there are some nuances around wages paid to employees who were providing services versus those who couldn't work due to the suspension. I'd definitely recommend getting professional guidance on the specific calculation since the wage rules can get complex, especially when you're dealing with both complete shutdowns and partial reopening periods. Your situation with the documented progression from complete closure to capacity restrictions sounds like a textbook case for ERC qualification across multiple quarters. The fact that group classes (60% of revenue) were completely suspended even during "reopening" really strengthens your case.
This has been such a valuable discussion! I'm a CPA who's helped dozens of clients with ERC claims, and I wanted to add a few additional points that might help others navigating this process. First, for those still unsure about documentation - the IRS isn't looking for perfect financial analysis. They want to see that you can reasonably demonstrate the government orders had a meaningful impact. A simple comparison showing your normal operations versus what you were allowed to do under restrictions is often sufficient. Second, don't overlook the interconnected nature of business operations. Even if one part of your business could continue, restrictions on another part can qualify your entire business. For example, if a restaurant's dining room closure forced them to lay off servers and reduce kitchen staff, the impact extends beyond just the dining area. Third, timing matters for quarterly qualification. You need to identify the specific quarters when restrictions were in effect. Some businesses qualify for 2020 Q2-Q4, others might qualify for different periods depending on when their local orders were implemented. Finally, I've seen businesses miss out on legitimate claims because they assumed they didn't qualify. The "more than nominal" test is more forgiving than many realize - if you had to significantly change how you operate due to government orders, you likely qualify. Don't let perfect be the enemy of good when it comes to documentation. The tools and resources mentioned in this thread (like taxr.ai for analysis and Claimyr for IRS communication) can definitely help, but the most important thing is getting started and not leaving money on the table due to confusion or hesitation.
This is such helpful perspective from a professional! I'm new to this community and have been lurking while trying to understand if my small photography business qualifies for ERC. We had to cancel all indoor photo shoots and wedding receptions for about 5 months due to local health orders, which was roughly 80% of our business. We pivoted to outdoor sessions only, but that severely limited our capacity and revenue potential. Based on everything shared in this thread, it sounds like we clearly meet the "more than nominal" test since indoor events were such a major part of our operations. I've been hesitant to pursue this because the rules seemed so complex, but your point about not letting perfect be the enemy of good really resonates. Quick question - when you mention quarterly qualification, if restrictions started mid-quarter (like March 15th), does the entire quarter qualify or do you need to prorate based on when orders went into effect? Thanks to everyone who's contributed to this discussion - it's given me the confidence to move forward with documenting our situation properly!
Has anyone used the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator for this kind of situation? I tried it but it got super confusing when entering multiple jobs.
I used it last year and it was pretty accurate but tedious. You need your most recent paystubs from all jobs and it asks a lot of detailed questions. The recommendations it gives are solid though - it told me exactly what to put in each box of the W-4 for both my jobs.
I had almost the exact same thing happen to me! Been working two jobs for about 4 years, and suddenly my part-time employer started withholding federal taxes right after I changed my main job. What I figured out was that the new W-4 form has this "multiple jobs worksheet" section that's way more sensitive than the old system. Even if you don't explicitly check the multiple jobs box, certain combinations of how you fill out the form can trigger withholding changes across employers. The easiest fix is to go to your HR department at your full-time job and ask for a blank W-4. Fill it out exactly like your old one (conservative approach - just your basic info and filing status, no extra complications). That should reset things back to how they were. You can also submit a new W-4 to your part-time job requesting exemption from federal withholding if you prefer to handle it all through your main job like before. I'd recommend running the numbers through a tax calculator first though to make sure you're still withholding enough overall - the new system might actually be more accurate for your situation even if it's annoying!
Has anyone considered using a foreign subsidiary? The US C Corp could establish a subsidiary in the foreign country where the owner lives, then have a legitimate service agreement between the companies. The foreign owner could then be directly employed by the foreign subsidiary. This adds complexity but potentially solves several issues at once.
This is definitely a tricky situation that requires careful planning. One approach I've seen work well is structuring the payments as a combination of reasonable management fees and consulting services, but you absolutely need to document everything properly to satisfy transfer pricing rules. The key is establishing that the compensation is at arm's length rates. You'll want to get comparability studies showing what similar services would cost from unrelated third parties. Consider having the foreign owner provide specific, measurable services like strategic planning, business development, or technical consulting that can be clearly documented. Also worth noting - if your foreign owner is in a country with a tax treaty with the US, that could significantly reduce withholding tax rates on certain types of payments. The treaty might have more favorable rates for business profits versus dividends. I'd strongly recommend getting professional advice from a tax attorney or CPA who specializes in international tax before implementing any structure. The penalties for getting transfer pricing wrong can be severe, and the IRS has been increasingly aggressive in this area.
Toot-n-Mighty
Umm just talk to your team lead?? Tell them you won't be able to use it by the deadline and ask if there's any flexibility. In my experience, most reasonable managers will work with you if you're upfront about it. Maybe they'll let you order groceries instead or extend the deadline. Creating fake receipts is just asking for trouble especially if your company does expense audits. My coworker tried something similar and got caught during a random audit - ended up with a formal warning and nearly got fired. So not worth it for a few thousand rupees.
0 coins
Lena Kowalski
ā¢This is honestly the most sensible advice here. Just be straightforward with your manager instead of committing fraud. If they say no, then accept the loss rather than risking your job and reputation.
0 coins
GalaxyGuardian
Creating fake receipts is absolutely fraud, and using someone else's GSTIN without permission could land you in serious legal trouble. As a tax professional, I've seen cases where employees faced criminal charges for fabricating business expense documents - it's not worth the risk. Instead of risking your career and legal standing, consider these legitimate alternatives: ask your manager about extending the deadline, see if unused allowances can be donated to charity (some companies allow this), or check if you can purchase legitimate food items in bulk that you'll actually consume later. Many companies also allow meal kit subscriptions or grocery store purchases under food allowances. Remember, this money isn't "lost" if you can't use it - it was never guaranteed income to begin with. Don't compromise your integrity and professional reputation for what amounts to a relatively small sum. The consequences of getting caught far outweigh any short-term financial benefit.
0 coins
Yara Khoury
ā¢This is exactly the kind of professional advice everyone should listen to. As someone new to understanding tax implications, I really appreciate you breaking down the legal risks so clearly. I had no idea that using someone else's GSTIN could be considered identity fraud - that's terrifying! The alternatives you mentioned sound much more reasonable. I'm curious though - when you say some companies allow donations to charity, does that still count as using the allowance properly from a tax perspective? And do you know if meal kit subscriptions are generally accepted by most companies, or is that something that varies a lot by employer? Thanks for keeping people like me from making terrible decisions!
0 coins