


Ask the community...
This is actually pretty common with state tax systems! The refund processing and status tracking systems often aren't synced in real-time. Nebraska's system is known for having delays between when checks are issued and when their online portal reflects the updated status. Since you already have your physical check, you're all good - just deposit it normally. The online status will eventually catch up, sometimes taking weeks after you've already received and deposited your refund. No need to worry about any discrepancies here!
Glad to hear others have experienced this too! I had the exact same situation with my Colorado state refund a couple years back - got my check on a Thursday but the state website didn't update until almost 3 weeks later. These government systems are notorious for being out of sync. As long as you have that physical check in hand, you're golden. Just deposit it and don't stress about the website status - it'll update eventually (or maybe it won't, but it doesn't matter since you already got paid). The important thing is your refund processed correctly and arrived way faster than their estimated 30-day timeline!
Wow, 3 weeks for Colorado to update? That's crazy! Makes me feel better about Nebraska's delay though. Thanks for sharing - it's reassuring to know this isn't just a Nebraska thing š
Have you considered composite returns? Some states allow partnerships to file a single composite return on behalf of all nonresident partners, which can dramatically simplify your filing burden. Not all states offer this option, but many do. The requirements vary by state, but essentially the partnership pays tax on behalf of the partners for that state's sourced income. It's typically a flat rate and while sometimes higher than individual rates, the administrative convenience can be worth it. I manage several partnerships with similar multi-state issues, and we've reduced our state filings by about 60% using composite returns where available.
This sounds promising! Does filing a composite return eliminate the need for me to file individual nonresident returns in those states? And how do I figure out which states allow this option?
Yes, that's exactly the benefit - filing the composite return typically eliminates the need for individual nonresident returns in those states. The partnership pays the tax at the entity level on behalf of the nonresident partners. Most states with income taxes offer some form of composite filing, but the rules vary significantly. Major states that allow composite returns include California, New York, Georgia, Massachusetts, Illinois, and Pennsylvania, but with different requirements. Some states require election forms to be filed early in the tax year. For your specific situation, you might want to create a spreadsheet with these columns: State, Allows Composite, Election Deadline, Tax Rate, and Requirements. You can find this information on each state's department of revenue website under partnership or pass-through entity filing sections.
I run into this issue every year with my investment partnerships. Here's my practical approach that's worked for 15+ years: 1. Always file in your home state plus any state with income over $1,000 2. File in "aggressive" states regardless of amount (CA, NY, MA, NJ, IL) 3. For states with income under $500, I keep documentation showing the amount but don't file unless they contact me 4. For amounts between $500-$1,000, I make a case-by-case decision based on the state's reputation Following this approach, I've only had two states ever contact me about non-filing (Oregon and Connecticut), and in both cases, the penalties were minimal compared to the preparation costs I saved over the years. Just know that technically you're supposed to file everywhere you have income, so this approach does have some risk. But from a practical standpoint, the tax departments in many states are too understaffed to pursue very small amounts.
This is super helpful - thank you! Have you ever had a state come after you years later with compounded penalties that made you regret not filing?
In my experience, the worst case was Connecticut - they came after me about 3 years later for $47 in tax on partnership income. By the time they sent the notice, with penalties and interest, it was around $180. Still way less than what I would have paid a preparer to file there for multiple years. The key is keeping good records. When states do contact you, they're usually reasonable if you can show the income amount was minimal and you weren't trying to hide anything. I always keep a spreadsheet with all the K-1 details and income by state, so if anyone asks, I can quickly provide documentation. Oregon was actually more reasonable - they just wanted the $23 in tax owed with minimal penalties since I responded promptly to their inquiry. The risk-reward calculation really depends on your comfort level and the amounts involved. For partnership income under $200 per state, I've found the enforcement risk to be very low.
Your transcript looks good! Since you filed Jan 29th and it processed Feb 25th, you're actually past the PATH Act hold period (which typically ends mid-February). Those April dates on codes 766 and 768 are just system placeholders - they don't mean you have to wait until April. With cycle 20250605, you should see movement on Wednesdays/Thursdays. I'd expect your 846 refund code to show up within the next week or two. No need for an 806 code first - you can go straight to 846 with your refund amount of $5,755!
I might be able to help you with this one. I'm a tax preparer who has probably completed hundreds of 8962 forms over the years. In most cases, your tax software should actually handle the calculations for you once you input your 1095-A information correctly. The software should ask for the monthly premium amounts, SLCSP (Second Lowest Cost Silver Plan) amounts, and advance payment amounts from your 1095-A. If you've already entered that information and the software is still asking you to complete the 8962 manually, there might be something unusual about your situation - perhaps a mid-year change in coverage or family size. If you can share a bit more about your specific situation (without revealing personal details), I could possibly provide more targeted advice.
I went through this exact same struggle when I first moved here! The 8962 was like trying to decode a foreign language. What finally clicked for me was realizing that Part I (the household income calculation) is the foundation for everything else - if you get that wrong, the rest falls apart. A few things that saved me: First, make absolutely sure you're using the right Federal Poverty Line table for your state and family size. Second, when calculating your Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI), don't forget to include any untaxed foreign income if applicable - that tripped me up my first year. Third, if your income changed significantly from what you estimated when you enrolled, that's totally normal and the form accounts for it. The reconciliation part in Part II is basically just comparing what the government gave you in advance (Column C from your 1095-A) versus what you actually qualified for based on your real income. If you got too much help, you pay some back. If you got too little, you get more as a credit. One last tip: if you're still stuck after trying all the suggestions here, consider calling the IRS directly with your forms in hand. Yes, the wait times are brutal, but sometimes talking through it with an agent while looking at your actual numbers makes everything suddenly make sense. Good luck!
Marilyn Dixon
Did anyone consider that maybe the IRS calculator is including self-employment tax? If any of that $58,000 is from self-employment, you'd owe an additional 15.3% on that portion for Social Security and Medicare taxes. That could make a HUGE difference in the final number.
0 coins
Louisa Ramirez
ā¢This is a really good point. When I was calculating taxes on my self-employment income last year, I kept getting confused because I was forgetting that SE tax. On $58k of pure self-employment income, you'd owe about $8,200 JUST in self-employment tax, before even calculating regular income tax!
0 coins
Mateusius Townsend
This is such a common source of confusion! I went through the exact same thing when I first started doing my own taxes. The key thing that helped me understand the discrepancy was realizing that the IRS online calculators often include assumptions about your filing status, deductions, and credits that you might not be accounting for in your manual calculations. A few things to double-check: 1. Are you using the correct tax year's brackets and standard deduction amounts? 2. Do you have any pre-tax deductions from your paycheck (like health insurance, 401k contributions, HSA contributions) that reduce your taxable income before the standard deduction is even applied? 3. Are you eligible for any tax credits that the calculator might be automatically including? Also, if you're getting a W-2, your employer has already been withholding taxes throughout the year based on your filing status and allowances, so your actual tax owed might be different from what you calculate as your total tax liability. The IRS calculator might be showing you what you still owe or your refund amount rather than your total tax. Try using the IRS's Interactive Tax Assistant tool - it walks you through step by step and explains each calculation, which might help you identify where the discrepancy is coming from.
0 coins
Nia Watson
ā¢This is really helpful! I think you hit on something important about pre-tax deductions that I hadn't considered. I've been calculating based on my gross salary but completely forgot that my employer deducts health insurance premiums and 401k contributions before calculating my taxable income. That could easily account for a few thousand dollars difference right there. The Interactive Tax Assistant sounds like exactly what I need - I didn't even know that existed on the IRS website. Thanks for breaking this down so clearly!
0 coins