IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Diego Flores

•

This exact thing happened to my neighbor last month! Turns out it was an old state unemployment overpayment from 2020 that she had actually appealed and won, but the state never updated their records with Treasury. Here's what I'd recommend based on what worked for her: 1. Call the Treasury Offset Program at 800-304-3107 first thing Monday morning (they open at 8 AM EST). Have your SSN ready and ask for the specific agency and debt amount. 2. Once you know which agency, call them immediately. Don't wait - some agencies have stricter timelines for disputes. 3. Ask for everything in writing. Request the original debt notice, payment history, and any correspondence they have on file. 4. If it's truly not your debt, file a formal dispute and provide proof of your identity (driver's license copy, etc.). 5. Consider contacting your local Taxpayer Advocate Service office if the agency isn't responsive - they can sometimes intervene faster than going through normal channels. My neighbor got her full refund ($2,847) released within 3 weeks once she proved the debt wasn't valid. The key was being persistent and documenting every single phone call. Good luck!

0 coins

This is super helpful, thank you! šŸ™ Just to clarify - when you say "first thing Monday morning," is that because they're typically less busy then, or is there another reason for the timing? I'm trying to figure out the best strategy to actually get through to a human instead of sitting on hold forever. Also, did your neighbor have to provide any specific forms or just informal documentation when she disputed it? I want to make sure I have everything ready before I start making calls.

0 coins

I went through this nightmare in 2023 and it was absolutely maddening! Here's what I learned the hard way: **First priority:** Get your tax transcript from the IRS website (irs.gov/individuals/get-transcript) - look for transaction codes starting with "766" or "898" which indicate offsets. This will show you the exact amount and date of the offset action. **Then follow this order:** 1. Call Treasury Offset at 800-304-3107 (best times are 8:00-8:30 AM EST on weekdays) 2. Get the agency name, debt type, and reference number 3. Call that agency's offset department immediately - don't go through general customer service 4. Request a "debt verification letter" and ask about their dispute process **Red flags to watch for:** - If they can't provide specific dates or amounts - If the debt is supposedly from years ago with no prior notice - If the agency seems confused about your case In my situation, it was a clerical error where my SSN got mixed up with someone who had the same last name. Took 6 weeks to resolve but I got every penny back plus interest. Document EVERYTHING - names, times, case numbers. The squeaky wheel gets the grease with federal agencies! What's the approximate amount they're claiming? That might give us clues about which agency is likely involved.

0 coins

This is a really common issue that catches people off guard! The good news is you'll definitely get that withheld tax back when you file your return. Just make sure to include the amount from Box 4 of your 1099-INT on line 25 of your Form 1040. For such a small interest amount, the withholding was almost certainly triggered by either a missing/incorrect SSN on file with your bank, or a name mismatch between your bank account and IRS records. I'd suggest calling your bank to verify they have your correct information on file - you might need to submit a new W-9 form to fix it for next year. The withholding rate for backup withholding is 24%, so if you earned $135 in interest, they probably withheld around $32. You should see this exact amount in Box 4 of your 1099-INT form.

0 coins

Eduardo Silva

•

Thanks for breaking down the math on the 24% withholding rate! That matches exactly what I was seeing - around $32 withheld on $135 interest. I called my bank this morning and you were right about the name mismatch issue. They had my middle initial wrong in their system, which apparently was enough to trigger the backup withholding. Bank said they'll send me a corrected W-9 to fill out, and the withholding should stop once they process it. Really appreciate everyone's help figuring this out - I was worried I'd lost that money permanently!

0 coins

Esteban Tate

•

That's great that you got it sorted out so quickly! Middle initials and name formatting issues are surprisingly common triggers for backup withholding. Once your bank processes the corrected W-9, you shouldn't have this problem again. Just a heads up - even though you're fixing it going forward, make sure you still report both the $135 interest income AND the $32 withheld tax on your current year's return. The IRS needs to see both numbers to properly credit you for the withholding. The interest goes on your 1040 (or Schedule B if you have over $1,500 total interest), and the $32 withholding goes on line 25.

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

Just wanted to add that if you're still having trouble getting through to the IRS or your bank to resolve this, don't get discouraged! Backup withholding issues are actually pretty straightforward to fix once you know what caused them. A few additional tips from my experience: - Keep a copy of any corrected W-9 you submit to your bank for your records - If this happened with one bank, check any other accounts you have - sometimes the same name/SSN issue affects multiple institutions - The corrected information usually takes 1-2 statement cycles to take effect, so don't panic if you see withholding on your next month's interest And definitely don't forget to claim that $32 on your tax return! It's essentially a prepayment of your taxes, so you'll either get it back as a refund or it'll reduce what you owe. For such a small amount of interest income, you'll almost certainly get the full amount back.

0 coins

Mia Alvarez

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm dealing with a similar situation and didn't realize it could affect multiple accounts. I just checked my other savings account at a different bank and sure enough, they're also withholding on my interest there too. Looks like I'll need to submit corrected W-9 forms to both institutions. One question - when you say it takes 1-2 statement cycles to take effect, does that mean I might still see withholding for another month or two even after I fix the paperwork? Just want to set my expectations correctly so I don't think the fix didn't work.

0 coins

Myles Regis

•

Sometimes you can appeal the overpayment if it wasn't your fault. Worth looking into tbh

0 coins

Salim Nasir

•

already tried appealing... struck out on that one šŸ˜”

0 coins

Sorry you're going through this! Just wanted to add that you should also check if you have any outstanding federal debts (student loans, back taxes, etc.) because those agencies can also intercept your refund through TOP. If multiple agencies are in line, they prioritize by submission date. You might want to call the Treasury Offset Program at 1-800-304-3107 to see what offsets are pending against your SSN so you know exactly what to expect.

0 coins

this is super helpful info! didn't even think about other debts getting in line first. definitely calling that number tomorrow to see what's queued up against me

0 coins

Demi Hall

•

This is super helpful info everyone! I had no idea about the self-employment tax on top of regular income tax - that 15.3% is definitely going to change my budgeting. One thing I'm still confused about though - if I missed the April quarterly payment, do I need to pay the penalty right away or does it just get calculated when I file my 2024 taxes next year? I want to make sure I'm not going to get a surprise bill in the mail before then. Also, for calculating the June payment to cover both quarters like Charlotte mentioned - would that be 50% of my expected annual tax burden, or is there a different calculation for catching up on missed payments?

0 coins

Great questions! The penalty won't hit you until you file your 2024 tax return next year - you won't get a separate bill in the mail. The IRS calculates underpayment penalties when you file and either adds it to what you owe or reduces your refund. For catching up on the missed April payment, you'd want to calculate what you should have paid for Q1 based on your actual income January-March, then add that to your regular Q2 payment. So if Q1 should have been $2,000 and Q2 is $2,000, you'd pay $4,000 in June. The IRS doesn't require exactly 25% each quarter - they just care that you've paid enough by each deadline to avoid penalties. One tip: if your income is really variable, consider using the annualized income installment method (Form 2210) when you file. It can reduce or eliminate penalties if your income was legitimately low in early quarters and picked up later in the year.

0 coins

Olivia Kay

•

As someone who's dealt with this exact situation, I'd strongly recommend setting up a separate business savings account specifically for taxes if you haven't already. I learned the hard way that irregular income makes it really tempting to "borrow" from tax money when cash flow gets tight. What I do now is immediately transfer 30% of every payment I receive into that tax account - whether it's a $500 headshot session or a $5,000 wedding. That way when quarterly payments come due, the money is already set aside and I'm not scrambling to come up with thousands of dollars at once. Also, keep really detailed records of all your business expenses throughout the year. Camera equipment, editing software, travel to shoots, even the percentage of your phone bill used for business - it all adds up and reduces your taxable income. I use a simple spreadsheet but there are tons of expense tracking apps that make it easier. The penalty situation sucks but don't let it stress you too much. Focus on getting caught up with the June payment and staying on track going forward. Once you get into a rhythm with quarterly payments, it becomes much more manageable than one giant tax bill in April.

0 coins

This is such solid advice! I wish I had known about the separate tax savings account when I first started freelancing. I made the mistake of keeping everything in one account and definitely "borrowed" from tax money a few times when business was slow. One thing I'd add - if you're using a business banking app, many of them now have automatic savings features where they can round up transactions or transfer a percentage of deposits automatically. I set mine to transfer 25% of any deposit over $100 straight to my tax savings account, so I don't even have to think about it anymore. The expense tracking is huge too. I started taking photos of every receipt with my phone right when I get them - saves so much hassle at tax time compared to trying to remember what that random $47 charge from six months ago was for!

0 coins

Ava Johnson

•

The discussion about regulatory specialization is spot-on, but there's another dimension worth considering: the Cayman Islands has also become a critical piece of international tax treaty networks. Many countries have tax treaties with the UK that extend to British Overseas Territories, giving Cayman-domiciled entities access to reduced withholding taxes and other treaty benefits that wouldn't be available in standalone tax havens. This treaty access is particularly valuable for institutional investors who need to efficiently move capital across multiple jurisdictions. A pension fund or sovereign wealth fund structuring investments through the Caymans can often access treaty benefits that reduce friction costs significantly compared to direct investment or using non-treaty jurisdictions. The irony is that this system was probably never intended to work this way - these treaties were designed for legitimate bilateral trade and investment between the UK and other countries, not to facilitate global fund structures. But the Caymans has effectively leveraged this historical accident into a sustainable competitive advantage that's much harder to replicate than simple tax rates. Even if there were perfect international coordination on corporate tax rates, the treaty network effects and regulatory specialization discussed earlier would likely keep the Caymans competitive. They've essentially built multiple layers of competitive advantage that work together synergistically.

0 coins

Amina Toure

•

This treaty network angle is absolutely fascinating and something I never would have thought of! It's like the Caymans accidentally inherited a massive competitive advantage through historical quirks of British colonial relationships. The fact that they can offer treaty benefits that were never intended for offshore fund structures shows how creative legal minds can find value in unexpected places. What really strikes me about your point is how this creates yet another layer of switching costs for institutional investors. Even if tax rates were perfectly harmonized globally, moving away from Cayman structures would mean giving up treaty benefits that could represent millions in additional costs for large funds. It's brilliant how they've essentially locked in their position through multiple overlapping advantages. This makes me think the original question about why they don't raise taxes misses the bigger picture entirely. They've built such a comprehensive competitive moat through regulatory specialization, treaty access, network effects, and institutional expertise that modest tax increases probably wouldn't meaningfully impact their market position anyway. They're not really competing on price anymore - they're competing on the total value proposition of their entire financial ecosystem.

0 coins

This has been an incredibly enlightening discussion that really changed my understanding of how the Cayman Islands operates. When I first asked the question, I was thinking about it purely from a tax revenue perspective - why leave money on the table when you have all these companies registered there? But reading through all these responses, I realize I was completely missing the sophisticated economic model they've actually built. The combination of fee-based revenue, regulatory specialization, treaty network advantages, and network effects creates a much more sustainable and defensible position than simple tax competition ever could. The point about them essentially becoming the global infrastructure for alternative investments is particularly striking. They're not just offering low taxes - they're providing specialized legal and regulatory products that have genuine economic value and would be costly to replicate elsewhere. What's most impressive is how they've managed to evolve and adapt to international pressure while actually strengthening their competitive position. Instead of being undermined by transparency requirements, they've used compliance as a way to legitimize their role and differentiate themselves from less sophisticated tax havens. I guess the real answer to my original question is that they don't need to raise taxes because they've found a much smarter way to capture value from the global financial system while providing genuine services that their clients are willing to pay premium fees for. It's actually a pretty brilliant economic strategy when you look at it holistically.

0 coins

Myles Regis

•

This whole discussion has been absolutely fascinating! As someone new to this community, I had no idea how sophisticated these offshore financial structures actually are. Your original question made me think it was just about rich people hiding money, but the reality is so much more complex. What really blew my mind was learning about the treaty networks and how the Cayman Islands basically inherited these advantages through historical accidents with British colonial relationships. The fact that they've leveraged that into becoming the global hub for 75% of hedge funds is incredible strategic thinking. The regulatory specialization angle also makes perfect sense now - they're not just competing on taxes, they're providing actual valuable services that would be expensive and risky to replicate elsewhere. It's like they've become the Amazon Web Services of international finance - once you're built on their infrastructure, the switching costs become enormous. I'm curious though - do you think other small jurisdictions could potentially replicate this model in different financial sectors, or are the network effects and first-mover advantages too strong at this point? It seems like the Caymans found the perfect sweet spot at exactly the right time in financial history.

0 coins

Prev1...31853186318731883189...5644Next