IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Weighing Section 179 vs bonus depreciation vs standard deduction for business vehicle - need help deciding

I'm a freelance consultant who purchased an SUV (under 6,000 lbs) in late December 2023. I literally only used it for business twice before year-end - once driving home from the dealership (6 miles) and once to a client meeting (7 miles). That put me just over 50% business use for 2023, but I know my business usage is gonna drop below 50% for 2024. I'm trying to figure out the smartest tax move here. TurboTax shows I could take either Section 179 or bonus depreciation deduction this year (about $14,200 deduction which would save me approximately $3,100 in federal taxes). But I'm worried about depreciation recapture next year when my business use drops. Should I just claim the standard mileage rate for 2023 (basically nothing since I barely drove it) to avoid dealing with recapture taxes in 2024? Seems like I'm just borrowing from myself - save $3,100 this year but pay it back next year due to recapture. For anyone good with numbers: The SUV cost $40,300. I believe straight-line depreciation would be around $4,030 per year over five years. But some depreciation calculators showed first year (just those two trips on 12/29/2023) would only be about $200, and then $4,835 each year from 2024-2028 (assuming 5-year value is 40% less = $16,120). So would recaptured depreciation be $14,200 minus $4,030 = $10,170? Or would it be $14,200 minus $200 = $14,000? Then do I multiply either $10,170 or $14,000 by my tax rate (24%) to figure my additional 2024 tax burden? That gives me either $2,441 or $3,360 in extra taxes next year, which is close to what I'd save this year. Really appreciate any help sorting this out! Also, TurboTax seems to default to Section 179 vs bonus depreciation - not sure if that matters knowing my business use is dropping below 50%.

Ravi Kapoor

•

Based on your situation, I'd strongly recommend considering bonus depreciation over Section 179 given that your business use is dropping to around 30% next year. Here's why: With Section 179, when your business use drops below 50%, you'll face recapture on the ENTIRE excess depreciation taken above what normal depreciation would have been. So you'd potentially recapture close to that full $14,000 amount. With bonus depreciation, the recapture is proportional to your business use reduction. If you go from 51% to 30% business use, you'd only recapture based on that 21 percentage point reduction, not the entire deduction. Given your specific numbers and the fact that you barely used the vehicle for business in 2023, here's what I'd consider: 1. **Bonus depreciation** - Better than Section 179 for your situation 2. **Partial bonus depreciation** - Maybe only take 30-40% of the allowable deduction now to minimize future recapture 3. **Standard mileage** - Simplest option, minimal 2023 deduction but no recapture headaches The standard mileage route might actually be smartest here since you had such minimal business use. You'd get about $8.50 deduction for 2023 (13 miles Ɨ $0.655) but avoid all the complexity and recapture risk. Sometimes the simplest path is the best one, especially when the "benefit" is really just borrowing from future tax years.

0 coins

Sean Murphy

•

This is excellent analysis! I'm leaning heavily toward the standard mileage option after reading everyone's comments. That $8.50 deduction for 2023 sounds pathetic compared to $14,200, but avoiding the recapture complexity seems worth it given my minimal business use. One quick question though - if I go with standard mileage for 2023, am I locked into that method for the life of the vehicle? Or could I switch to actual expenses in future years if my business use increases significantly? I know there are some restrictions about switching methods, but I'm not clear on the specifics. Also, @fa9c4b54bd03, your point about partial bonus depreciation is intriguing. Could you elaborate on how that would work practically? Like, if bonus depreciation allows 100% first-year deduction, could I elect to only take 30% of that amount to better match my expected future business use?

0 coins

Lucy Lam

•

Great questions! Regarding switching methods - once you choose standard mileage in the first year you place the vehicle in service, you can switch to actual expenses in later years. However, if you start with actual expenses (including depreciation), you're generally locked into that method for the life of the vehicle. So starting with standard mileage gives you more flexibility. For partial bonus depreciation, yes, you can elect to take less than the full 100% bonus depreciation allowed. You'd make this election on Form 4562 by specifying the percentage you want to claim. So if 100% bonus depreciation would be $14,200, you could elect to take only 30% ($4,260) or any other percentage you choose. This creates a middle ground that might better align with your expected future business use patterns. Given your situation, I'm actually agreeing more with the standard mileage approach. It keeps your options open and avoids the complexity entirely. You could always reassess in future years if your business use patterns change significantly.

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

•

This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation with my consulting business vehicle. One thing I'd add is that you might want to consider your overall tax planning strategy for both years, not just the vehicle depreciation in isolation. If you expect your income to be significantly different between 2023 and 2024, that could influence the decision. For example, if you're having an unusually high income year in 2023 due to a large project, taking the larger deduction now (even knowing you'll face recapture) might make sense if it pushes you into a lower tax bracket or helps with other income-based thresholds. Also, don't forget about state tax implications - some states handle depreciation recapture differently than federal, so the timing decision might have different impacts depending on where you're located. That said, given your minimal 2023 business use, the standard mileage approach really does seem like the cleanest solution. Sometimes avoiding complexity is worth more than maximizing every possible deduction, especially when you're essentially just shifting the tax burden between years rather than actually saving money.

0 coins

Nia Harris

•

This is exactly the kind of holistic thinking that's needed for this decision! You're absolutely right about considering the bigger tax picture, not just the vehicle depreciation in isolation. The state tax angle is particularly important and often overlooked. Some states don't conform to federal bonus depreciation rules, so you could end up with different depreciation schedules for state vs federal purposes, creating even more complexity. Given all the discussion here, I'm convinced that for @618db9ad3f82's situation with such minimal 2023 business use, standard mileage is the smart play. That $8.50 deduction might feel tiny compared to $14,200, but avoiding the recapture maze and keeping future flexibility seems invaluable. Plus, if business use increases significantly in future years, there's always the option to switch to actual expenses then. Sometimes the best tax strategy is the one that lets you sleep well at night without worrying about complex recapture calculations!

0 coins

Emily Jackson

•

Another option: you can actually get your wage and income transcript directly from the IRS website which will show any 1099s filed for you. Go to IRS.gov and search for "Get Transcript Online." If nothing shows up for that company, they probably haven't filed it yet. Also, keep in mind you're supposed to get your 1099s by January 31st. If companies don't comply, they can face penalties. The IRS actually takes this seriously because they want the tax revenue from contractors.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

Thanks for this tip! I just checked the IRS transcript and you're right - nothing from this company shows up at all. Looks like they haven't filed anything. Does this mean I'm definitely going to have issues with my return?

0 coins

Emily Jackson

•

No, you won't necessarily have issues with your return. The fact that nothing shows up actually supports your case - it shows the company hasn't fulfilled their obligation. Just report the income accurately based on your bank records. If they file late and there's a discrepancy, the IRS will more likely question the company than you, especially if your reported amount is higher than what eventually gets reported. The key is documentation - keep those bank statements and records of your attempts to contact them.

0 coins

Liam Mendez

•

Had this same problem last year. What I did was file Form 8919 "Uncollected Social Security and Medicare Tax on Wages" along with my return. This is for when you were treated as an independent contractor but should actually have been an employee. The benefit is you only pay the employee portion of FICA taxes (7.65%) instead of the full self-employment tax (15.3%). Check out the criteria on the form - if you were essentially working like an employee (they controlled your schedule, provided equipment, etc.), this might apply to you and save you some money.

0 coins

Sophia Nguyen

•

This is interesting but also sounds risky. Couldn't this trigger an audit if you're claiming the company misclassified you?

0 coins

Pedro Sawyer

•

It can potentially trigger scrutiny, but if you legitimately meet the criteria for employee classification, it's completely legal and proper to file Form 8919. The IRS actually wants to identify misclassification because employers owe their share of FICA taxes too. The key is being honest about the working relationship - if they set your hours, told you how to do the work, provided tools/equipment, and you worked primarily for them rather than having multiple clients, you might have a case. But if you truly worked independently, stick with reporting it as contractor income on Schedule C. @Liam Mendez - did the IRS follow up with you or the company after you filed Form 8919?

0 coins

This is a really frustrating situation, but you're handling it the right way by documenting everything and filing with the labor board. From a tax perspective, you're actually in a straightforward position - you only need to report the income that's actually shown on your W-2 for 2024, regardless of what you should have been paid. One thing I'd add to the great advice already given: make sure to keep copies of ALL your documentation (timesheets, pay stubs, communications with your employer) in multiple places - digital copies, physical copies, maybe even email them to yourself. If this drags out or if your employer tries to retaliate, having bulletproof documentation will be crucial. Also, don't let your employer intimidate you about this. What they're doing is wage theft, plain and simple, and it's illegal in every state. The fact that they're claiming it's for "break times" or that you were "rounding up" when you have documentation proving otherwise shows they know they're in the wrong. Stay strong and keep fighting for what you're owed!

0 coins

Evelyn Xu

•

This is such solid advice, especially about keeping multiple copies of documentation. I learned this the hard way when dealing with a similar situation - my employer "mysteriously" lost their copies of my timesheets when I started asking questions. Having digital backups saved me. One thing I'd add: if you have any text messages or emails where your manager discusses the hour changes (even if they're trying to justify it), screenshot those immediately. Employers sometimes delete digital communications once they realize there might be legal issues. Also, if you have coworkers who witnessed the time manipulation or experienced it themselves, get their contact info now in case you need witness statements later. You're absolutely doing the right thing by not backing down. Wage theft affects way more workers than people realize, and employers often count on people being too intimidated to fight back.

0 coins

I went through something very similar with a previous employer who was consistently "adjusting" my hours downward. One additional thing to consider - if your employer has been doing this systematically, they may also owe you interest or penalties on the unpaid wages, depending on your state's laws. When you file your complaint with the labor board, ask specifically about penalty wages (sometimes called "waiting time penalties") that might apply if your employer willfully withheld wages. In some states, employers can be required to pay additional compensation equal to your daily wage for each day the wages remain unpaid, up to a certain maximum. Also, keep an eye on your next few paychecks to make sure your employer doesn't retaliate by further manipulating your hours or suddenly finding reasons to reduce your shifts. Document everything going forward too - retaliation for filing wage complaints is illegal and can strengthen your case significantly. The tax advice others have given is spot on - just report what's on your W-2 this year, and any settlement will be taxable when you actually receive it. But don't let the potential tax implications discourage you from pursuing what you're rightfully owed. $1,718 is nothing to sneeze at!

0 coins

Has anyone tried negotiating an Offer in Compromise? I've heard you can settle for pennies on the dollar but not sure if that's just marketing hype from those tax relief companies.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

My brother got an OIC approved last year, but he had to prove serious financial hardship. They look at your assets, income, expenses - everything. He ended up settling about $45k for around $12k, but only because he had medical issues that prevented him from working full time and very few assets. If you have a decent income or any significant assets (home equity, retirement accounts, etc), you probably won't qualify. The IRS has a pre-qualifier tool on their website that's pretty accurate.

0 coins

I went through something similar with about $25k in back taxes a couple years ago. Here's what I learned: 1. **Don't panic** - The IRS actually wants to collect what you owe, so they're motivated to work with you rather than let it sit unpaid. 2. **Start with an installment agreement** - For your amount ($28k), you can likely get a 72-month payment plan online. That would be roughly $390/month, but you can often negotiate lower payments if you can show financial hardship. 3. **Consider Currently Not Collectible status** if you truly can't afford payments right now. This pauses collection activities while you get back on your feet financially. 4. **File any missing returns immediately** if you haven't already - the IRS can't work with you on payment plans until all required returns are filed. 5. **Avoid most tax relief companies** - they charge thousands for what you can do yourself. The legitimate ones that might be worth it are few and far between. The key is being proactive. Once you have an agreement in place, the stress drops dramatically. I was able to get my monthly payment down to something manageable and even got some penalties waived for first-time non-compliance. Don't let this consume you - there are definitely solutions available.

0 coins

I went through something very similar when I sold my Magic: The Gathering collection last year. Had about $8,000 in sales but definitely sold most cards at a loss from what I originally paid. Here's what I learned: You're right that you generally won't owe income tax on personal items sold at a loss, but you still need to handle the 1099-K properly. I created a simple spreadsheet with three columns: Item Description, Estimated Original Cost, and Sale Price. For items where I couldn't remember exact prices, I used current retail prices from when I bought them (you can often find historical pricing data online for video games). The key is being reasonable and consistent with your estimates. Don't lowball the sale prices or inflate the original costs, but honest estimates based on your memory and research are acceptable. I also took photos of my collection before selling and kept screenshots of completed eBay listings as additional documentation. When tax time came, I reported the 1099-K income but offset it by showing these were personal items sold at a loss. No issues with the IRS at all. The important thing is having some documentation of your thought process, even without original receipts.

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

This is super helpful, thank you! I never thought about looking up historical pricing data online - that's a really smart approach for establishing reasonable cost basis estimates. Did you find good sources for historical video game prices, or was it more of a general research approach? Also, when you say you "offset" the 1099-K income, did you do that on Schedule 1 or did you use a different form? I want to make sure I handle this correctly since my collection value is pretty substantial.

0 coins

Great question! For video game historical pricing, I found PriceCharting.com to be incredibly helpful - they have historical data going back years for most games. You can also check Wayback Machine snapshots of GameStop, Best Buy, or Amazon for retail prices from specific time periods. For really old games, I looked at forums and collector sites that discussed original MSRP. Regarding the offset, I used Schedule 1 and reported the 1099-K amount on line 8i "Other Income" with a description like "eBay sales - personal items." Then I attached a statement showing my cost basis calculations and noting these were personal items sold at a loss, so the net taxable income was $0. Some tax software makes this easier than others - TurboTax let me add explanatory text, but with other software I had to attach a separate document. Since your collection is worth $13,500, I'd definitely recommend keeping detailed records and maybe even consulting with a tax professional for the first year you do this. The documentation approach I described worked well for my $8K situation, but with your higher dollar amount, having professional guidance on the proper reporting method could save you headaches later. The key is being thorough and transparent about your methodology.

0 coins

Dmitry Popov

•

This is exactly the kind of detailed guidance I was hoping to find! Thank you for mentioning PriceCharting.com - I had no idea that resource existed. As someone who's been gaming for over a decade, I know I paid retail or close to it for most of my collection, but having actual historical data to back up my estimates will make me feel much more confident if the IRS ever questions anything. The Schedule 1 approach with an attached statement sounds like the way to go. I'm definitely leaning toward getting a tax professional involved for this year given the dollar amount involved. Better to spend a few hundred on proper guidance than potentially mess up a $13,500 reporting situation. Really appreciate you sharing your real-world experience with this - it's so much more helpful than just theoretical advice!

0 coins

Prev1...31353136313731383139...5643Next