


Ask the community...
Hey OP, just curious - how long have you been trying to get this sorted? I'm in a similar boat and wondering how long I'm gonna be treading water šāāļø
Just started tbh. But from what everyone's saying, looks like I'm in for a long haul š©
Based on my experience, here's what I'd recommend for getting that Letter of Indemnity: 1. **Call early in the morning** (like 7-8 AM) - wait times are usually shorter 2. **Have your EIN/SSN ready** plus the exact bank routing/account info 3. **Be super specific** about what the letter needs to say - the IRS reps aren't mind readers 4. **Get a case number** for your request so you can reference it in follow-ups Also, some banks have specific forms they want the IRS to use, so check with your bank first about their requirements. Saved me a lot of back-and-forth when I had to do this for a business account issue. The whole process took about 2-3 weeks for me, but that was with one revision needed. Good luck! š¤
This is super helpful! @StarSurfer Do you remember what specific info your bank needed included in the letter? I'm worried about getting it wrong and having to start over š¬
Check the IRS2Go app daily if you're concerned. Most people see offset indicators within 24-48 hours of final processing. If you're really worried about student loans, studentaid.gov shows your current status. Don't wait until the last minute if you need this refund soon!
From my experience, the offset won't appear until your return is completely processed and the IRS has calculated your final refund amount. Since you mentioned you're still in processing, you're likely safe from seeing any offset indicators right now. However, since you graduated last year and are concerned about student loans, I'd recommend checking your loan status on studentaid.gov to make sure you're actually current. Sometimes people think they're in good standing but might have missed a payment or had a loan transferred to collections. Better to verify now than get surprised when your transcript updates with an unexpected offset code.
Question - I'm planning to hold my property for only 5-7 years. Does a cost segregation study still make sense in that case? I've heard there can be depreciation recapture issues when you sell.
Absolutely valid concern. When you sell, any depreciation taken on the property will be recaptured at a 25% tax rate (for real property) or your ordinary income rate (for personal property items like those identified in cost segregation). However, the time value of money still makes cost segregation attractive even for 5-7 year holds. Getting larger tax deductions now and paying recapture later is essentially an interest-free loan from the government. You get to use that cash flow during your ownership period. Also consider a 1031 exchange when you sell, which can defer the recapture tax if you reinvest in another property. This strategy can make cost segregation even more valuable for shorter-term holds.
Thanks, that helps clarify things. I hadn't considered the time value aspect. And I am planning to do a 1031 exchange when I sell, so that might mitigate some of the recapture issues. Looks like I need to get some quotes for a proper study.
I've been through this process twice now with different commercial properties, and I want to echo what others have said about not doing it yourself. The IRS Audit Techniques Guide for Cost Segregation is incredibly detailed and technical - it's not just about identifying components, but properly valuing and documenting them according to specific engineering principles. One thing I learned the hard way on my first property: make sure whoever you hire has experience with your specific property type. Industrial buildings have different segregation opportunities than office buildings or retail spaces. The cost segregation specialist should be familiar with the construction methods and systems typical to your property type. Also, don't forget about the "lookback" provision if you've owned the property for a while. You can still do a cost segregation study on properties you've owned for years and capture missed depreciation through a Form 3115 (Application for Change in Accounting Method). This can result in a significant one-time deduction in the year you file the study. The upfront cost stings, but the cash flow benefits are real. On my 1.2M industrial property, the study cost $12k but generated about $180k in additional depreciation deductions over 7 years.
This is really helpful perspective, especially about the property-specific experience. I'm dealing with an industrial building too and wasn't sure if all cost segregation specialists would understand the unique systems involved. Can you elaborate on the "lookback" provision? I purchased my property about 18 months ago and have been taking straight-line depreciation this whole time. Are you saying I could still do a cost segregation study now and somehow capture the accelerated depreciation I missed in prior years as a lump sum deduction? Also, when you mention $180k in additional depreciation over 7 years - is that compared to what you would have gotten with regular building depreciation, or is that the total segregated amount?
Has anyone used TurboTax to figure out form 2210 for capital gains? I'm in a similar situation and wondering if the software handles the annualized income method properly.
Just want to add that you should also look into whether you can increase your withholding at your regular job for the remainder of the year. The IRS treats withholding as if it was paid evenly throughout the year, even if you actually increase it all at the end. So if you bump up your W-4 withholding significantly for your last few paychecks, it can help cover those earlier quarters and potentially eliminate penalties entirely. I did this when I had a similar situation with some unexpected freelance income. Had my employer withhold an extra $3,000 from my December paychecks, and it was treated as if I had paid $750 each quarter. Saved me from having to deal with Form 2210 calculations entirely since my total withholding ended up covering 100% of my prior year tax liability.
A Man D Mortal
quick question - wouldn't this situation be simpler if the parents just reported the entire sale on their return since they got most of the money? seems like unnecessary complication for the kid to report anything if they just got a small gift from the proceeds.
0 coins
Douglas Foster
ā¢No, that's actually incorrect and could cause problems. When multiple people are listed on a 1099-S, the IRS expects each person to report their portion of the sale. If the student was legally on the title/deed, they must report their ownership percentage regardless of how the proceeds were distributed. The $6,800 received isn't a "gift" - it's sale proceeds from an asset they partially owned. Not reporting it would be a mismatch with the 1099-S the IRS received. The parents can't report the student's portion on their return.
0 coins
Isabel Vega
@Haley Bennett - I went through something very similar when my mom added me to her house deed before selling. Since your parents gifted you the ownership interest, you definitely need to report your portion even though you only received $6,800. Here's what worked for me: First, figure out your exact ownership percentage from the deed (sounds like it might be equal thirds if all three names are listed). Then on Form 8949, report only your percentage of the $240k proceeds. For basis, since it was a gift from your parents, you'll use your share of their original purchase price plus any improvements they made before gifting your interest. In FreeTaxUSA, when you get to the 1099-S section, there should be an option to edit or override the amounts. Enter your calculated portion and add a description like "Reporting 33.33% ownership interest per deed" in the description field. The key is making sure your reported numbers match your actual ownership percentage, not the cash you received. Don't stress too much - this is actually a common situation and the IRS sees it all the time with family property sales!
0 coins