


Ask the community...
I'm pretty sure you need to file Form 8606 along with your return when dealing with distributions from inherited Roth IRAs, especially when there's potentially taxable amounts involved. The form helps document your basis calculation. Has anyone here had to fill that out for a similar situation?
Yes, you're right about Form 8606, but Part III is specifically for Roth IRA distributions. It walks you through the calculation to determine the taxable amount. It's fairly straightforward - you'll enter the total distribution, then your basis (the contribution amount), and it will calculate the taxable portion for you.
Just want to add another important consideration that I haven't seen mentioned yet - make sure you understand the distribution timeline requirements for inherited Roth IRAs. As a non-spouse beneficiary, your husband will need to completely distribute the entire inherited Roth IRA within 10 years of your mother-in-law's death (assuming she passed away in 2020 or later). This is separate from the tax calculation you're dealing with now, but it's crucial for planning purposes. Unlike the old "stretch" rules, you can't keep the money growing in the inherited Roth indefinitely. The good news is there are no required minimum distributions during those 10 years - you can take it all out in year 10 if you want, or spread it out however works best for your tax situation. Given that you're dealing with a relatively small taxable amount (if any), this might actually work in your favor for tax planning over the next decade.
This is really helpful information about the 10-year rule that I wasn't aware of! So just to make sure I understand correctly - since my husband is inheriting from his mother (non-spouse), he has until 10 years from her death date to fully distribute the account, but he can choose when and how much to take out each year during that period? Given that we're potentially looking at only $1,500 in taxable earnings (if the 5-year rule isn't met), it sounds like we could strategically time future distributions to minimize tax impact. Are there any other tax considerations we should be thinking about for future distributions from this inherited Roth, or would subsequent distributions be completely tax-free since the earnings portion was already taxed this year?
One thing nobody has mentioned - leasing might be a better option if you plan to upgrade vehicles frequently. No depreciation recapture to worry about since you never owned the asset. Plus you can still deduct the lease payments as a business expense.
Leasing has its own issues though. The payments are often higher than financing, and there are typically mileage restrictions that can be problematic for many businesses. Also, you lose the opportunity for any equity buildup.
Something to consider that might help with your planning - the recapture calculation gets more complex if you use the vehicle for both business and personal use. If your heavy-duty truck is used 80% for business and 20% personal, only the business portion of the depreciation is subject to recapture rules. Also, keep detailed records of your business mileage and usage from day one. The IRS can challenge your depreciation deductions if you can't prove the business use percentage, which would affect both your original deduction and any recapture calculations later. One more tip: if you're considering the trade-in route, get multiple appraisals for the fair market value before making the deal. Dealerships sometimes manipulate trade-in values to make deals look better, but the IRS will use actual fair market value for recapture calculations, not whatever number appears on the dealer paperwork.
This is really helpful advice about the business vs personal use percentage! I hadn't thought about how that would affect the recapture calculation. Quick question though - if I use the truck 80% for business, does that mean I can only claim 80% of the purchase price for Section 179/bonus depreciation in the first place? And then later, only that 80% business portion would be subject to recapture? Want to make sure I understand this correctly before I make my purchase decision.
Has anyone successfully gotten the IRA portion of the underpayment penalty waived? I'm in a similar situation where I took an IRA distribution without withholding and got hit with the 2210 penalty.
I had this exact scenario in 2023. I couldn't get it waived specifically because of the IRA, but I was able to reduce it by using the annualized income installment method on Form 2210. Basically, if your IRA distribution happened later in the year, this method can lower the penalty since it calculates based on when you actually received the income.
I went through this exact same situation last year! The IRA distribution without withholding is definitely what triggered your Form 2210. What caught me off guard was that even though I had been doing gig work for years without issues, the IRA distribution pushed me over the threshold where my withholding wasn't sufficient anymore. One thing that helped me was calculating whether I qualified for any of the safe harbor exceptions mentioned by others here. Also, for next year, I started making quarterly estimated payments specifically to cover my gig income - it's actually much easier than I thought it would be. You can do it online through EFTPS or even by phone. The good news is that once you understand how it works, it's pretty straightforward to avoid in the future. Just make sure to either have taxes withheld from any retirement distributions or increase your W-2 withholding to compensate.
Thanks for sharing your experience! I'm curious about the quarterly estimated payments - how do you calculate how much to send in each quarter? I'm worried about either underpaying again or overpaying and giving the IRS an interest-free loan. Do you just divide your expected annual tax liability by 4, or is there a more precise method?
Has anyone else noticed how poorly written the IRS instructions are for these partnership audit forms? I read the same section of the website 5 times and still couldn't figure out what they were trying to say. It's like they deliberately make things confusing.
I completely agree with everyone saying the non-BBA partnership doesn't need to issue 8985/8986 forms in this situation. I dealt with this exact scenario last year and spent way too much time second-guessing myself because the IRS guidance is so confusing. What helped me was breaking it down step by step: 1) Your client is non-BBA, 2) They received favorable adjustments with no imputed underpayment, 3) Non-BBA partnerships generally don't have push-out obligations like BBA partnerships do. They just need to account for the adjustments on their own return and flow through any partner-level changes via amended K-1s if necessary. The key thing to remember is that the 8985/8986 reporting requirements were primarily designed for the BBA partnership audit regime. Since your client is outside that regime, they're not subject to those specific reporting obligations. Save yourself the stress - document your reasoning like Ryan suggested and move on!
This is exactly the kind of step-by-step breakdown I needed! As someone new to partnership tax issues, I've been overwhelmed by all the different forms and requirements. Your three-point analysis really helps clarify the situation. I'm curious though - you mentioned amended K-1s might be necessary. In what situations would a non-BBA partnership need to issue amended K-1s after receiving favorable adjustments on Form 8986? Is it only if the adjustments are significant enough to materially change the partners' tax positions?
StarSeeker
Don't forget about city/county tax jurisdictions! Depends on your state, but where I am we have state, county AND city sales taxes - all with different rates and filing requirements. Almost screwed myself over by only filing state taxes my first year.
0 coins
Ava Martinez
ā¢Omg yes, THIS. I'm in Colorado and we have like 7 different sales tax jurisdictions depending on the exact address. It's a total nightmare. I used to think I could just charge one rate for everything.
0 coins
Asher Levin
As someone who's been through this exact confusion with my small bakery, I feel your pain! The biggest lightbulb moment for me was realizing that sales tax is literally just a collection service - you're collecting money on behalf of the state, not paying a tax on your business income. Think of it this way: when a customer pays you $10.80 for a $10 meal, you actually received $10 in revenue for your business and $0.80 that belongs to the state. That $0.80 should go straight to a separate "sales tax collected" account and get sent to the state exactly as collected. Your business expenses (food costs, delivery app fees, etc.) are completely separate and get deducted when you file your income tax returns, not your sales tax returns. Two totally different forms for two totally different purposes. Most states have pretty good online resources for new business owners - definitely worth checking your state's revenue department website for restaurant-specific guidance. Also, many states offer free workshops for new business owners that cover sales tax basics. Hang in there!
0 coins
Alfredo Lugo
ā¢This is such a helpful way to think about it! The "collection service" analogy really clicked for me. I've been making this way more complicated than it needs to be. Quick question though - when you mention keeping the sales tax in a separate account, do you mean literally a different bank account? Or just tracking it separately in my bookkeeping? I've just been lumping everything together in one business checking account and trying to figure out the math later. Also, did you find your state's workshops actually useful? I saw some listed on my state's website but wasn't sure if they'd be too basic or actually cover the restaurant-specific stuff we deal with.
0 coins