


Ask the community...
I'm going through this exact same thing right now! Filed in early February, already got my refund, but my wage & income transcript is completely blank while all my other transcripts updated normally. I was getting really worried that maybe there was an issue with my employer's W-2 submission or something was wrong with my return. But after reading everyone's experiences here, it sounds like this is just how the IRS processes things - they can verify our income internally for return processing even though it doesn't show up on the public transcripts right away. Really appreciate everyone sharing their timelines and experiences. Makes me feel a lot better knowing this is normal and I'm not the only one dealing with it!
@James Maki You re'definitely not alone! I m'actually brand new to this community and dealing with the exact same situation. Filed in late January, got my refund three weeks ago, but my wage transcript is still completely empty. I was starting to think maybe my employer messed up their W-2 submission or there was some kind of system error with my SSN. It s'so reassuring to see that literally everyone here has experienced this same thing! The fact that the IRS can process returns and issue refunds without the wage data being visible on our transcripts is honestly mind-blowing to me. Thanks for posting about this - sometimes it just helps to know you re'not the only one stressing out over these things!
I'm new to this community and dealing with this exact same issue! Just checked my transcripts today and my wage & income transcript is completely blank even though I filed back in January and already received my refund. I was starting to panic thinking maybe there was an error with my return or my employer didn't submit my W-2 properly. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful - it's reassuring to know this is a common experience and not something I need to worry about. The fact that the IRS can process our returns and issue refunds while the wage transcript stays blank is definitely confusing, but at least now I understand it's just how their system works. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and timelines - really helps put things in perspective for someone new to navigating all this!
Pro tip: If you don't see movement after 30 days, call the Taxpayer Advocate Service. They can sometimes help speed things up after an audit closes. Keep all your audit closure docs handy when you call.
I went through the same thing last year! After my audit closed, it took about 4 weeks to get my direct deposit. The key is checking your transcript weekly - once you see the 846 code Wesley mentioned, you'll usually get your money within 5-7 business days. Just be patient, the IRS processing after audits is painfully slow but it will come!
I just want to add that you should also keep an eye on your mail even if you don't get an immediate notice. Sometimes the IRS sends bills months later, and by then the interest and penalties have really added up. I had a friend who ignored what she thought was a "small" tax debt from an amended return, and two years later she got a notice that it had grown to almost double the original amount due to compounding interest. If you know you owe the money, don't wait for them to tell you - just pay it. The IRS charges interest from the original due date of the return (usually April 15th), not from when they send you a bill. So even though you just found out about this debt, if it's from last year's amended return, you've probably already been accruing interest for months.
This is such an important point that I wish more people understood! I made this exact mistake a few years ago - I owed about $300 from an amended return and thought "I'll wait for them to send me a bill." By the time I finally got a notice, it had grown to over $500 with all the penalties and compound interest. The worst part is that the interest rate the IRS charges is actually pretty high compared to what you'd get from a savings account, so there's really no financial benefit to waiting. Plus, as you mentioned, they calculate interest from the original due date, not from when you discover the debt. So even if you genuinely didn't know you owed money, you're still on the hook for all that accumulated interest. It's definitely a "pay now, ask questions later" situation when it comes to tax debts.
I had almost the exact same situation happen to me! Filed an amended return that showed I owed about $220, never got a notice from the IRS, and then was surprised when they didn't take it out of my next year's refund. What I learned is that the IRS computer systems aren't as integrated as you'd expect - your current year refund processing and prior year debt collections don't always talk to each other automatically. Plus, when you file an amended return, you're technically supposed to include payment right then and there, not wait for a bill. I ended up calling the IRS directly (took forever to get through) and found out I had accumulated about $45 in interest and penalties over the 8 months I waited. The agent told me that even though they hadn't sent a formal notice, the debt was valid and growing from the day I filed the amendment. My advice: don't wait for them to contact you. Log into your IRS online account to see the exact balance with current penalties, then pay it ASAP. The longer you wait, the more expensive it gets, and trust me, those small amounts add up faster than you'd think!
This is really helpful to hear from someone who went through the exact same thing! I'm definitely going to check my IRS online account today to see what the current balance is with all the accumulated interest. It sounds like even though it started at $180, it's probably grown quite a bit by now since it's been almost a year. I'm kicking myself for not knowing I was supposed to pay when I filed the amendment. My tax preparer really should have explained that better - I thought amended returns were just like regular returns where they bill you if you owe money. Now I know for next time, but this is an expensive lesson to learn! Did you have any trouble setting up the online account with the IRS? I've heard mixed things about their website being difficult to navigate.
Setting up the IRS online account wasn't too bad, but you do need to have some specific information ready. They'll ask for details from a recent tax return, your Social Security number, and they'll want to verify your identity through credit report questions or by mailing you a verification code (which takes 5-10 days). The website itself is pretty clunky and old-fashioned looking, but once you're logged in, you can see your account balance, payment history, and any notices they've sent. It's definitely worth doing because you'll be able to see exactly how much interest has accumulated on your $180. One tip: if you decide to pay online through their system, make sure to allow a few business days for the payment to process before the next interest calculation kicks in. I learned that the hard way when I thought I was cutting it close with my payment timing!
This is such valuable information - thank you for sharing your situation! I'm actually a tax professional who works specifically with high-income earners using rental properties for tax optimization, and you're absolutely right that this can be a powerful strategy when done correctly. A few additional considerations for your specific situation that I haven't seen mentioned yet: **Quarterly estimated taxes** - With your income level, you'll want to adjust your quarterly payments to account for the rental losses. This can improve your cash flow throughout the year rather than waiting for a refund. **Section 199A deduction** - If structured properly, your rental activity might qualify for the 20% pass-through deduction, which could provide additional tax savings on top of the depreciation benefits. **Future exit strategy planning** - Consider how depreciation recapture will work when you eventually sell the property. There are like-kind exchange strategies that can help defer this, but planning early is key. Given your income complexity (W2 + 1099 + rentals), I'd specifically recommend finding an EA (Enrolled Agent) or CPA who holds additional credentials in real estate taxation. Look for someone with the RCS (Real Estate Certified Specialist) designation or similar. One red flag to avoid: any tax professional who guarantees specific dollar savings without thoroughly reviewing your complete tax situation first. The legitimate ones will want to see your full financial picture before making promises. Start documenting everything now - even this research time you're spending counts toward potential real estate professional hours!
This is incredibly helpful! I had no idea about the Section 199A deduction potentially applying to rental activities. Could you explain a bit more about how that works with short-term rentals specifically? Also, you mentioned quarterly estimated tax adjustments - how quickly should someone in OP's situation start making those changes? I imagine with a $650k income, the quarterly payments are already pretty substantial, so getting this wrong could be costly. The point about finding someone with RCS designation is great advice. I've been burned before by general accountants who missed rental-specific deductions, so having that specialized credential seems like a smart filter when interviewing tax professionals.
Great question about Section 199A! For short-term rentals, the key is whether your rental activity rises to the level of a "trade or business" rather than just investment activity. If you're materially participating (which is easier to achieve with STRs due to the active management required), the rental income can potentially qualify for the 199A deduction. This is especially beneficial for high earners who are otherwise phased out of the deduction. Regarding quarterly payments - I'd suggest making adjustments starting with the next quarter after you implement the strategy. Don't wait until year-end! With OP's income level, underpayment penalties can be steep. Work with your tax pro to model the depreciation and loss projections, then adjust your quarterlies accordingly. You can always true-up later, but getting ahead of it helps with cash flow. The RCS credential really does make a difference. I've seen too many situations where general CPAs miss things like bonus depreciation elections, proper cost segregation opportunities, or fail to optimize the material participation documentation. When you're dealing with this level of income and complexity, the specialized knowledge pays for itself many times over.
This thread has been incredibly informative! I'm in a somewhat similar situation (around $400k combined income) and just started looking into Airbnb as a tax strategy after maxing out my 401k and other traditional deductions. One thing I'm curious about that I haven't seen mentioned - what happens if your Airbnb doesn't actually generate a profit? I mean, if after all the depreciation, expenses, and deductions you're showing a loss on paper but the property is still cash-flow positive, how does that work for tax purposes? Can you still claim those losses against your W2 income? Also, for those who've gone through this - how much time did you realistically spend in your first year learning all these rules and getting everything set up properly? I'm trying to figure out if this is something I can reasonably tackle while still maintaining my day job or if I need to plan for a significant time investment upfront. Thanks again to everyone who's shared their experiences - this is exactly the kind of real-world advice that's impossible to find in generic tax guides!
Great question about showing losses while being cash-flow positive! This is actually one of the most powerful aspects of rental property taxation. Yes, you can absolutely claim those "paper losses" (created primarily by depreciation) against your W2 income, subject to the passive loss limitations we've discussed. Here's how it works: Let's say your Airbnb brings in $50k in rent but you have $30k in actual expenses plus $25k in depreciation deductions. You'd show a $5k loss on paper for tax purposes, even though you pocketed $20k in cash ($50k - $30k actual expenses). That $5k loss can offset your W2 income if you meet the active participation requirements. Regarding time investment - I spent probably 40-50 hours in my first year just researching and setting up systems (tracking spreadsheets, separate banking, learning the rules, finding the right tax professional). It's definitely front-loaded work, but once you have the systems in place, ongoing maintenance is much more manageable - maybe 2-3 hours per month for record keeping. The learning curve is real, but think of it as an investment that pays dividends for years. With your $400k income, even modest tax savings from this strategy could easily justify the time spent. Just don't try to become an expert overnight - focus on getting the basics right and let a qualified professional handle the complex stuff.
Lauren Wood
Does anyone know if there's a minimum amount of loss to make this worth reporting? I only had about $800 worth of crypto on the exchange when it went bankrupt, and I've already received about $200 in distributions. Is it even worth the hassle of calculating all this for a potential $600 loss?
0 coins
Lauren Wood
ā¢Thanks for that explanation! I didn't realize I could use it to offset my regular income too. I do have some stock investments that had gains this year, so I'll definitely claim the crypto loss to help balance those out. One last question - do I need any special forms or documentation to claim this loss on my taxes? Or do I just report it as a capital loss on Schedule D?
0 coins
Reginald Blackwell
ā¢You'll report it on Schedule D as a capital loss, just like any other investment loss. The key is making sure you have proper documentation - keep records of your original cost basis (what you paid for the crypto), any distributions you've received, and documentation from the bankruptcy proceedings showing the loss. Since you've already received $200 in distributions, you'll want to wait until you know whether more distributions are coming before claiming the full loss. If the bankruptcy court has indicated no further distributions will be made, then you can claim the remaining $600 as a capital loss for 2024. If there's a chance of additional distributions in 2025, you might want to be conservative and only claim a partial loss this year. The good news is that even if you have to spread the loss across multiple years as distributions come in, you can still benefit from the tax savings each year.
0 coins
Dmitry Ivanov
This is such a helpful thread! I'm in a similar situation with about $5,000 worth of crypto that was lost in the bankruptcy. I've been putting off dealing with the tax implications because it seemed so complicated, but reading through everyone's explanations makes it much clearer. One question I have - does anyone know how to handle staking rewards that were earned on the exchange before it went bankrupt? I had been staking some of my assets and earning rewards that were automatically added to my balance. Similar to the interest situation that Dylan mentioned, these rewards were taxable income when I received them, but now they're also lost. Also, has anyone dealt with the situation where you had pending trades or limit orders that never executed when the exchange froze? I'm not sure if those should be factored into the loss calculation or just ignored since the trades never actually completed. The bankruptcy process has been such a nightmare to navigate, but at least understanding the tax side of things will help me plan better for this year's filing. Thanks to everyone who's shared their experiences and knowledge here!
0 coins
Aisha Hussain
ā¢Great questions about staking rewards and pending orders! For staking rewards, you'll handle them exactly like the interest situation Jessica explained earlier. Since you already paid taxes on those rewards as income when you received them, they become part of your cost basis for the loss calculation. So if you received $500 in staking rewards over time and paid taxes on that amount, you'd add that $500 to your original investment amount when calculating your total loss. For the pending trades/limit orders that never executed - those shouldn't factor into your loss calculation at all. Since the trades never completed, you still technically owned the original crypto assets you had deposited, not whatever you were trying to trade for. Only include the actual assets that were in your account when the exchange froze. The key is to think of your loss as: (Original cost basis of all assets + Previously taxed earnings like staking rewards) - (Any distributions received or expected). This ensures you're not getting double tax benefits or missing deductions you're entitled to.
0 coins