IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Ava Thompson

•

Bro why do tax preparers give such garbage advice sometimes? This is literally basic tax stuff smh

0 coins

CyberSiren

•

cause they got their certification from a cereal box šŸ’…

0 coins

Nia Davis

•

Your tax preparer definitely gave you bad advice here. The IRS specifically asked for BOTH forms for a reason - the 1095-A shows what you received from the marketplace, but the 8962 is what actually reconciles your premium tax credits on your return. Without the 8962, they can't verify that you claimed the correct amount of credits. I'd recommend getting both forms together and sending them as requested, or you'll likely just get another letter in a few months asking for the missing 8962.

0 coins

PixelPioneer

•

Wait, I thought Schedule C doesn't even have a place for COGS unless you check the inventory box? If you're getting stuff for free, can't you just leave that box unchecked and avoid the whole COGS section entirely?

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

That's not correct. If you're selling products (as opposed to just services), you need to check "Yes" to the inventory question on Schedule C, which then requires you to complete the COGS section. The fact that you acquired inventory for free doesn't change this requirement - those items still count as inventory with a zero cost basis. Trying to avoid the COGS section by incorrectly answering the inventory question would be misrepresenting your business operations and could create problems. The proper approach is to complete the COGS section accurately, even if many of your entries show zero cost.

0 coins

Evelyn Kelly

•

I've been dealing with a similar situation in my resale business. One thing that helped me was understanding that the IRS Publication 334 (Tax Guide for Small Business) specifically addresses inventory valuation methods, including situations where you acquire goods at little to no cost. The key insight I learned is that even with zero-basis inventory, you still need to maintain proper records showing the flow of goods through your business. This actually protects you more than it hurts you - it demonstrates that you're running a legitimate business operation rather than just having unexplained income. For your $150 in actual purchases, definitely include those in COGS. For the free items, track them with zero cost but document the source (donations, estate sales, etc.). This creates a clear paper trail that supports your business model if you're ever questioned. Your high profit margin becomes explainable rather than suspicious when you have proper documentation showing legitimate acquisition methods.

0 coins

Just want to add something no one mentioned yet - if you're self-employed, don't forget about the self-employment tax (15.3% for Social Security and Medicare)! Deducting education expenses on Schedule C doesn't just save you income tax, it also reduces your self-employment tax. Sometimes that makes the business deduction more valuable than education credits, depending on your situation.

0 coins

This is super important! When I was calculating which was better for me (education credits vs business deduction), I almost forgot to factor in the SE tax savings. Made a huge difference in the final numbers!

0 coins

Ella Lewis

•

This is such a helpful thread! As someone who's also navigating the self-employment + student combo, I wanted to add that timing can really matter here. If you're planning to graduate soon and your income is expected to increase significantly after graduation, it might be worth considering whether to take the business deduction this year (which reduces your current SE tax burden) or save some expenses for next year when you might be in a higher tax bracket. Also, keep really detailed records of which specific courses relate to your consulting work. The IRS likes to see a clear connection between the education and your business activities. I keep a simple spreadsheet noting how each class directly applies to the services I provide - makes it much easier come tax time! One last thing - if you're paying for textbooks, software, or other course materials that you also use for your freelance work, those can often be deducted as business expenses too, separate from tuition.

0 coins

Honorah King

•

Quick question - does the 1042-S/1040NR filing affect your ability to use tax preparation software? I tried using FreeTaxUSA last year and it couldn't handle my situation at all.

0 coins

Oliver Brown

•

Most of the mainstream tax software isn't great with international situations. I had decent luck with Sprintax which is specifically designed for nonresident tax returns, but it's not free.

0 coins

Mary Bates

•

OLT.com actually has a decent nonresident version that handled my 1042-S and treaty benefits correctly. It's cheaper than Sprintax but still costs about $40-50 for federal filing.

0 coins

Amun-Ra Azra

•

Just to add another perspective - I'm also an international student (from Canada) and went through this same confusion last year. Even though my scholarship was fully exempt under the treaty, I still had to file the 1040NR to officially claim that exemption. One thing that helped me was keeping really good records of which treaty article applied to my situation (Article XX for scholarships in the US-Canada treaty). The IRS wants to see that you're actively claiming the treaty benefit, not just ignoring the 1042-S form. Also, don't stress too much about making small mistakes on the form - the important part is filing it and clearly indicating your treaty position. I made a minor error on Schedule OI last year and the IRS just sent a letter explaining the correction, no penalties or anything scary. The whole process is definitely annoying, but it's worth it to stay compliant and protect your visa status. Good luck with your filing!

0 coins

Philip Cowan

•

Has anybody used Kinder Spankneberg & Co for cost segregation? My CPA recommended them but their quote is about $1,500 higher than recostseg.

0 coins

Caesar Grant

•

I used Kinder Spankneberg for two commercial properties last year. They're very thorough and their reports are extremely detailed. When I compared their results to a cheaper company I used previously, Kinder identified about 15% more components that qualified for accelerated depreciation. The extra $1,500 in fees generated about $12,000 in additional first-year tax savings for me. They also provide audit support for life, which the cheaper company didn't offer.

0 coins

Philip Cowan

•

Thanks for sharing your experience! That's really helpful. The 15% additional components they identified makes the higher fee seem worth it. I'll probably go with them even though they're more expensive than recostseg. I'm more concerned about maximizing my tax benefits in the long run than saving a bit on the upfront cost.

0 coins

Dyllan Nantx

•

Thanks for starting this thread! I'm in a similar situation - just closed on my first duplex last month and my CPA mentioned cost segregation but I wasn't sure where to start. Reading through everyone's experiences has been super helpful. One thing I'm curious about - for those who've done cost segregation studies, did you do them in the first year of ownership or can you go back and do them later? I'm wondering if I should rush to get one done before filing this year's taxes or if I have more flexibility on timing. Also seeing a lot of mixed opinions on company selection. Sounds like the engineering-based approach and audit support are key factors to consider over just price. The potential tax savings everyone is mentioning definitely seem to justify paying for quality work!

0 coins

Prev1...26892690269126922693...5645Next