idk why they make this so complicated fr. like why cant they just tell us exactly when were getting paid 🤔

I feel your pain! The "as of" date is basically meaningless for predicting refunds - it's just an accounting date that updates automatically. What you really want to look for is the 846 refund issued code on your transcript. That's the only reliable indicator of when your money is actually coming. I waited 12 weeks last year and that date changed probably 20 times before I finally got the 846 code. Hang in there! 🤞

I'm dealing with a similar situation with my PEO (Paychex) refusing to file amended 941s for our ERTC claim. The January 31, 2024 deadline has me incredibly stressed since we're looking at potentially losing around $95K in legitimate credits. After reading through all these responses, I'm wondering if anyone has successfully used the "Protective Claim Filing" approach that was mentioned? The idea of using Form 8821 plus documented requests to preserve claim rights sounds promising, but I want to make sure I'm not wasting precious time on something that won't actually work. Also, has anyone tried going directly to their state's Department of Labor or filing complaints with regulatory bodies that oversee PEOs? I'm thinking maybe external pressure from regulators might motivate them to cooperate where legal arguments haven't worked. Time is running so short and these PEOs seem to have all the power in this situation. Any additional strategies or success stories would be incredibly helpful right now.

I just went through this exact situation with my PEO (Justworks) and managed to get our ERTC claim filed just in time before the January 31 deadline. Here's what worked for me: First, I used the Claimyr service mentioned by others to get through to an IRS agent. The wait was about 18 minutes, and the agent confirmed the Protective Claim Filing procedure is legitimate. They walked me through filing Form 8821 along with a detailed written statement documenting all attempts to get the PEO to cooperate. But what really broke the deadlock was escalating within the PEO itself. Instead of dealing with our regular account rep, I found the contact info for their VP of Tax Services through LinkedIn and sent a formal business letter explaining our situation, the approaching deadline, and the potential liability exposure they faced by refusing to fulfill their contractual obligations. Within 48 hours of that letter, I got a call from their legal department saying they would process our amended 941s. Apparently, once it reached the executive level, they realized the risk wasn't worth the hassle. The key is hitting them from multiple angles simultaneously - regulatory complaints, executive escalation, and the IRS protective filing to preserve your rights. Don't give up - these PEOs are banking on you backing down before the deadline.

Everyone's talking about the tax benefits, but nobody's mentioned the practical challenges of these investments. I've worked with 3 OZ funds and here's what you should know: The 10-year hold period is BRUTAL in practice. That's an extremely long illiquid investment - especially for something like tech with much shorter natural cycles. The regulatory overhead is massive. Quarterly and annual testing, substantial documentation, maintaining specific percentages... it's a compliance nightmare. Most OZ funds have 2-3% annual fees PLUS carried interest, which eats into returns significantly. Make sure your returns are high enough to justify this over a regular investment. Many OZ businesses struggle because they're in economically disadvantaged areas. The tax benefits might not overcome the fundamental business challenges.

Great discussion everyone! As someone who's been advising clients on OZ investments for the past few years, I want to add a few practical considerations that might help with your fund planning. First, regarding the cash flow modeling - don't forget to factor in the present value of tax deferral. Even though you'll pay the deferred taxes in 2026, that 2-4 year deferral period has real economic value that should be included in your IRR calculations. Second, for your multi-state fund idea (NC, NY, SC, MA) - be aware that some states don't conform to federal OZ tax treatment. You might get the federal benefits but still owe state capital gains taxes immediately. Massachusetts in particular has some quirks with how they treat OZ investments. Third, consider structuring flexibility from day one. We've seen funds use feeder structures that allow investors to potentially roll into new QOFs if early exit opportunities arise, maintaining their tax benefits while providing some liquidity options. The Series 65 will definitely help with the regulatory side, but I'd also recommend connecting with attorneys who specialize in OZ fund formation. The documentation requirements are extensive and mistakes can be costly. What specific geographies within those states are you targeting? Some zones have much better fundamentals than others.

Has anybody used care.com or similar services for finding backup childcare? I'm wondering if using an agency vs hiring directly affects the tax deduction situation at all.

One thing to keep in mind is that your irregular 1099 schedule might actually work in your favor for justifying these additional childcare expenses. Since you can't predict when you'll be called in for those 14+ hour shifts or overnight assignments, having backup childcare available becomes a legitimate necessity for maintaining your income. The key is documentation - keep a detailed log of your work calls/assignments and how they correlate with your childcare needs. This will help support your claim that the nanny/au pair expenses are directly tied to your ability to work, especially during times when regular daycare isn't available (evenings, weekends, extended hours). Also consider that with your unpredictable schedule, you might qualify for a higher percentage of the Child and Dependent Care Credit if your irregular income puts you in a lower AGI bracket. The credit percentage can be up to 35% of qualifying expenses for lower income levels.

Has anyone used the "Reasonable Cause Statement" approach when filing Form 2553 late? What kind of language actually works?? I'm in a similar spot and need to file under Rev. Proc. 2013-30 but worried about getting rejected.

I went through this exact same situation two years ago and can share what worked for me. With your income level at $230k, the S-corp election will likely save you significant money even for just one month - potentially $4-6k in self-employment tax savings. Here's what I'd recommend: File Form 2553 immediately using Rev. Proc. 2013-30 relief. For the reasonable cause statement, keep it straightforward - something like "Taxpayer was unaware of the election deadline and filing requirements but intended to elect S-corp status upon learning of the tax benefits." For payroll, you'll need to establish a reasonable salary for December. With your income, aim for around $7-8k for December (roughly $90-100k annualized). Yes, it's a hassle to set up payroll for one month, but the tax savings usually outweigh the setup costs. One thing others haven't mentioned - make sure you have adequate business bank account records showing clear separation between business income and personal draws. The IRS will want to see that you've been operating as a legitimate business entity. The key is acting quickly since you're already in December. Even if it feels rushed, the potential tax savings make it worthwhile for your income level.