IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

StarSeeker

•

Different situation but similar frustration - I couldn't figure out why my refund was stuck in processing for weeks. Called IRS multiple times with no luck. Finally used Claimyr to get through to an agent (claimyr.com) and found out there was a simple error code that needed to be manually cleared. Got my refund 3 days later. Sometimes you just need to talk to a human!

0 coins

Liam Cortez

•

I'm dealing with the exact same thing! DDD of 3/14 with Capital One and still nothing. Last year my refund hit 3 days early, but this year seems totally different. I've been obsessively checking my account every few hours like it's going to magically appear lol. From what I'm reading in the comments, it sounds like banks are being more cautious this year and the IRS processing is just generally slower. The waiting is driving me insane but I guess we just have to be patient until our actual DDD passes. At least we're not alone in this frustrating experience!

0 coins

Taylor To

•

Has anyone used those "inherited annuity specialists" that advertise online? I'm in a similar situation with an inherited annuity from my uncle, and I've been getting bombarded with emails from companies claiming they can help minimize taxes. Not sure if they're legit or just trying to sell me something else.

0 coins

Ella Cofer

•

I met with one of those "specialists" after inheriting my grandma's annuity. Total waste of time - they were just insurance salespeople trying to convince me to roll the money into a new annuity they sold (which would have given them a big commission). They kept emphasizing "tax advantages" but wouldn't give straight answers about the fees. Go with a fee-only financial advisor instead who charges by the hour and doesn't sell products. I paid $300 for a 90-minute session that saved me thousands in potential mistakes and gave me a clear plan.

0 coins

I'm sorry for your loss, Jasmine. Dealing with inherited annuities can be overwhelming, especially during a difficult time. Based on what you've shared, you're looking at about $77,500 in taxable income from the gain portion of your inheritance. Given that you have a stable government job with a pension and 457b, plus you're already contributing to a Roth IRA, you seem to have a good foundation for retirement planning. For your situation, I'd lean toward the stretch payments over 5 years rather than the lump sum for a few reasons: 1. It will likely keep you from jumping into a higher tax bracket in any single year 2. You can potentially time the distributions to coordinate with your other tax planning (like maximizing your 457b contributions in high-distribution years) 3. It gives you more flexibility to adjust based on changes in your income or tax situation Since you work for the government, you might also have access to an Employee Assistance Program that offers free financial counseling - worth checking if your employer provides this benefit. When you do consult with a professional, make sure they're fee-only and not trying to sell you additional products. The key is to run the numbers based on your current tax bracket and projected income over the next 5 years. Keep detailed records of whatever you choose, and don't let anyone pressure you into rolling this into a new annuity product.

0 coins

15 My wife sells handcrafted items online and was in your exact position last year. What really helped was scheduling a FREE consultation with a VITA (Volunteer Income Tax Assistance) volunteer. They offer free tax help to people who make under $60,000. They walked her through everything - what receipts to keep, how to categorize expenses, and even showed her how to track everything in a basic spreadsheet. Totally changed her perspective on the tax side of her business. Google "VITA tax help" plus your city name to find locations. They typically operate January through April, but some offer year-round guidance.

0 coins

1 I had no idea this free service existed! Do they help with business taxes too or just personal returns? I'm worried my situation might be too complicated since I'm selling on multiple platforms.

0 coins

15 They absolutely help with simple business returns like yours! Schedule C (which is what you'll use as a sole proprietor) is definitely within their scope. The key qualification is income-based (under $60k), not complexity-based. Just be sure to bring all your records - sales reports from both platforms, receipts for supplies, information about any home office space, etc. The more organized you are, the more they can help. And don't worry about the multiple platforms - that's very common and basically just means adding together your income from both sources.

0 coins

Ava Thompson

•

I completely understand your frustration! As someone who went through this exact same confusion when I started my small online business, let me share what I've learned. First, don't let the tax complexity discourage you from your creative business - it's really not as scary as it seems once you understand the basics. You're absolutely right to be confused about the 1099-K forms and thresholds, as the rules have changed recently. Here's what you need to know for your situation: - Yes, you'll likely receive 1099-K forms since you exceeded $600 in sales - BUT you only pay taxes on your PROFIT, not your total sales - All those material costs, shipping supplies, Etsy/eBay fees, and even a portion of your internet bill can be deducted as business expenses For your ~$4,900 in total sales, if you spent $3,000+ on legitimate business expenses, your actual taxable income could be much lower than you think. You'll report this on Schedule C when filing your regular tax return. Michigan doesn't require special business registration for sole proprietors using their own name. Start keeping better records now - even just a simple spreadsheet tracking income and expenses will make next year much easier. Don't give up on growing your jewelry business over this! Many successful sellers started exactly where you are now.

0 coins

NeonNinja

•

People are missing an important point here - depending on your income levels, filing incorrectly might have BENEFITED you tax-wise. "Single" filing status often gives better tax treatment than "married filing separately" which has the worst tax treatment of all filing statuses. If your income was significantly higher than your husband's, you might have actually paid LESS tax by filing single. The IRS is much more likely to come after people who underpaid, not those who overpaid. Of course, you should still fix it, but I wouldn't panic until you know if you actually owe anything. Get a good tax pro to run the numbers both ways before you do anything.

0 coins

That's an interesting perspective I hadn't considered. My income is about 30% higher than my husband's, so maybe that's why the difference wasn't flagged? Is there a way to calculate this myself before I go to a new accountant just to see if I'm looking at owing money or possibly getting refunds?

0 coins

NeonNinja

•

You can use one of the major tax software packages to run a simulation using your past information. Input all your data as "married filing separately" and see what the difference is compared to "single" for each year. The software will calculate everything and show you the difference in tax liability. If it turns out you've been paying more by filing as single, the IRS might actually owe you money for the past three years (the limit for claiming refunds). Just be prepared that if you've been paying less, you'll need to address that with amended returns and possibly penalties. But knowing the numbers first will help you approach this strategically with a new tax professional.

0 coins

I'm an enrolled agent and see this more often than you'd think. Quick clarification on some earlier comments: the IRS has 3 years to assess additional tax in most cases, but 6 years if you omit more than 25% of your income, and unlimited time if there's fraud. For your situation, it sounds like the open years would be 2021-2023. For the Roth IRA issue, you have until October 15 of the year following the contribution to correct excess contributions without the 6% penalty. Beyond that deadline, you'll face the penalty until corrected. The most important advice: DO NOT contact the IRS directly until you have a plan. Get a qualified professional (EA or CPA) to review everything and develop a strategy. Sometimes a Qualified Amended Return can help reduce penalties. And definitely get a new accountant! The fact that your husband's returns showed MFS while yours showed Single is a major error that should never have happened.

0 coins

Sean Murphy

•

Is there any required consistency between spouses' filing statuses? Like, if one spouse files as "married filing separately," does the IRS system automatically flag if the other spouse files as "single"? I'm surprised their system didn't catch this automatically.

0 coins

Amara Chukwu

•

Great question! Yes, there should be consistency. When one spouse files as "married filing separately," the other spouse MUST also file as "married filing separately" - they can't file as single. The IRS does have matching systems that should catch these discrepancies, but they don't always flag immediately. What likely happened here is that the IRS systems haven't cross-matched these returns yet, or the matching process flagged it but hasn't generated correspondence. The IRS often takes 1-3 years to send notices about mismatched filing statuses. This is actually why I recommend getting ahead of it with amended returns rather than waiting for the IRS to contact you - being proactive usually results in better treatment and reduced penalties. The fact that this went undetected for 5+ years suggests either the returns haven't been fully processed through all IRS matching systems, or there's a delay in their correspondence system. Either way, it will eventually be caught.

0 coins

Does qualified nonpersonal use vehicle escape the heavy SUV limit on Section 179 depreciation?

Hey tax folks, I'm trying to make sure I understand the depreciation rules correctly for my business vehicle. Not asking for legal advice, just hoping to understand this better as a small business owner. From what I've read in Publication 946, Passenger Automobiles are defined as 4-wheeled vehicles primarily designed/used to carry passengers on public roads with a GVWR of 6000 lbs or less. But there's this exception for "qualified nonpersonal use vehicles" which includes trucks or vans with a company logo painted on them. Then Publication 463 talks about limits on Section 179 depreciation for 4-wheeled passenger vehicles over 6000 lbs GVWR that aren't subject to passenger automobile limits. Here's my confusion: If I have a truck that would qualify as a nonpersonal use vehicle because it has my company logo painted on it, but it's over 6000 lbs GVWR, does the Section 179 limit still apply? The qualified nonpersonal use rules mention trucks and vans under "other property used for transportation" which includes vehicles over 6000 lbs and specifically mentions "flatbed trucks." For example, I'm looking at a truck with a 5.5ft bed that's around 9000 lbs GVWR with my company logo painted on. By definition, it seems like a qualified nonpersonal use vehicle even though it's over 6000 lbs. But it also seems to fit the criteria for the Limit for Sport Utility and Certain Other Vehicles since it's a 4-wheeled vehicle over 6000 lbs GVWR. Could it be that trucks aren't considered "designed to carry passengers"? Maybe the driver isn't considered a "passenger" and the vehicle is primarily designed for hauling equipment? What about trucks designed for some off-road use - would they be exempt since they're not primarily for road use? Any insights on where the distinction lies in these rules? Also wondering if the truck bed really needs to be 6ft or if 5.5ft might be acceptable for these purposes? Thanks in advance for any help!

Has anyone successfully taken the position that a crew cab pickup with a 5.5' bed qualifies as primarily designed for cargo rather than passengers? My accountant is being super conservative and saying any truck with a full back seat automatically falls under the SUV limitations.

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

In my experience, crew cab trucks can still qualify if you can demonstrate they're primarily for business use. I added a permanent toolbox that takes up half the bed, removed the back seats entirely, and installed storage where the back seats were. Made it pretty clear the truck wasn't for hauling people around!

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

I've been dealing with similar vehicle classification questions for my HVAC business, and what I've learned is that the IRS looks at the overall design and purpose of the vehicle, not just passenger capacity. For crew cab pickups with shorter beds, the key factors seem to be: 1) Is there a separate cargo area distinct from the passenger compartment? 2) What modifications have been made that demonstrate business purpose? 3) How is the vehicle actually used in practice? Even with a 5.5' bed, if you add permanent business equipment like toolboxes, ladder racks, or other work-related modifications, it strengthens your case that the vehicle is primarily designed for cargo/equipment rather than passengers. The fact that it CAN carry passengers doesn't mean that's its primary design purpose. I'd suggest documenting everything - take photos of the modifications, keep receipts for business equipment installed, and maintain detailed records of how the vehicle is used. Your accountant might be erring on the side of caution, but there's definitely precedent for crew cab trucks qualifying for full Section 179 treatment when they're clearly configured and used for business purposes. The 6-foot bed "rule" is more of a guideline than a hard requirement. The real test is whether the vehicle's primary design purpose is hauling cargo/equipment versus passengers.

0 coins

Prev1...25892590259125922593...5645Next