


Ask the community...
I'm a Robinhood user and switched CPAs last year because of similar issues. First CPA wanted to charge me $200 extra for my Robinhood forms. Second CPA included it in their base price of $275 for everything. The difference? The second CPA uses Drake tax software which apparently handles Robinhood imports much better than whatever the first CPA was using. Might be worth asking what tax software they use and if they've tried importing your form directly rather than manual entry. Some CPAs are still manually entering every transaction which is why they charge so much!
That's really helpful insight! I'll definitely ask what software she's using and if she's doing manual entry. I just checked my Robinhood 1099 again and I literally only made 7 trades last year, so manual entry wouldn't even be that time-consuming. Maybe it's worth getting a quote from another CPA who uses better software.
I've been preparing taxes for over 15 years and can tell you that $250 specifically for a Robinhood 1099 with minimal trading activity is definitely excessive. For context, most CPAs charge between $50-150 extra for investment forms, depending on complexity. The fact that she's processing other brokerage statements for free but singling out Robinhood suggests she either has a workflow issue with that specific platform or is using outdated pricing assumptions. Many CPAs developed negative opinions about Robinhood forms during the early days when their reporting was genuinely problematic, but their 1099s have improved significantly. With only a few trades and under $1,000 in gains, your form should be straightforward to process. I'd recommend asking her to justify the specific additional work required for your particular situation. If she can't provide a clear explanation, consider getting quotes from other tax professionals. You shouldn't have to pay premium fees for what amounts to basic Schedule D preparation. Also, double-check that your gains are actually reportable - if they're all long-term gains from simple stock sales with proper basis reporting, the complexity should be minimal regardless of the brokerage.
thx for the update! guess ill try again tomorrow
Same issue here! Been trying to access my transcript since early this morning and getting the exact same "Service Outage: February 14th" message. Really frustrating timing since I'm also waiting on my refund - filed early and have been obsessively checking for updates. The fact that even the basic navigation links aren't working confirms this is a major system-wide issue. Hopefully it's resolved soon since tax season is in full swing and people need access to their account information.
whatever happens to warner, i bet his sentence will be WAY lighter than what would happen to any of us!! my brother forgot to report $2000 of side gig income and the irs came after him like he was al capone lol... meanwhile this dude hides MILLIONS and will probably get house arrest in his mansion š the whole system is rigged for the rich. they make the tax laws complicated on purpose so regular people mess up and get penalized while billionaires hire fancy lawyers to find all the loopholes. just watch, he'll get some minimal sentence and be back to counting his beanie baby billions in no time.
While I understand your frustration, there's an important distinction here. Your brother's situation was likely considered tax negligence (failing to report income), while Warner's case involves willful evasion through hiding money in offshore accounts. They're different categories of tax issues with different legal frameworks.
This case really highlights how the wealthy can afford to play games with the tax system that regular people can't. Warner had the resources to set up complex offshore structures and hide millions, while most of us are just trying to figure out basic deductions without getting in trouble. What bothers me most is the emotional courtroom display. I've seen plenty of cases where average taxpayers facing penalties were scared and remorseful too, but they don't get the same sympathy from the system. The fact that he's a billionaire crying about consequences for deliberately hiding money feels pretty tone-deaf. I'm curious if this case will actually lead to any meaningful changes in how the IRS prioritizes enforcement. Seems like they spend way too much time going after small mistakes while cases like this take years to develop. The resources needed to investigate complex offshore schemes are probably why so many wealthy tax evaders get away with it for so long.
You're absolutely right about the resource disparity. As someone new to this community, I've been following tax policy issues closely, and the Warner case is a perfect example of how enforcement priorities are backwards. The IRS has openly admitted they focus on simpler cases because complex offshore investigations require specialized agents and can take years to build. What really gets me is that one successful prosecution of someone like Warner probably recovers more tax revenue than hundreds of audits of regular people, yet they continue to primarily target easier cases. The whole system seems designed to make examples out of small-time mistakes while treating billionaire tax evasion as a cost of doing business. The crying in court thing is particularly galling - like you said, plenty of regular taxpayers are genuinely remorseful when they make honest errors, but they don't get kid glove treatment from judges who see them as "pillars of the community" despite literally stealing from the tax system.
Does anyone know if ProSeries handles this better? We're considering switching tax software next year and this Form 3804 override issue is one of many frustrations we've had with CCH.
ProSeries actually makes this type of override much easier. There's a clear field for "calculated amount" and a separate field for "amount paid" - and you can choose which one to use for the return and flow-through entities. It's one of the things I like better about ProSeries compared to CCH, though it has its own quirks for sure.
I've dealt with this exact CCH Axcess issue multiple times! Here's what worked for me: First, make sure you're looking in the right place - in newer versions of CCH Axcess, the override isn't always in the obvious spot. Go to the partnership return, then look for "Form 3804" in the left navigation panel. Click directly on that form rather than going through the Payments section. Once you're on Form 3804 itself, you should see both the "Calculated Extension Amount" and a field for "Extension Payment Made." The key is to enter your actual payment amount in that second field, then look for a small dropdown or radio button that says something like "Use payment amount for K-1 reporting" or "Override calculated amount for distributions." After making this change, you MUST regenerate all the K-1s from scratch - just recalculating won't always pick up the override. Go to Forms > K-1s and click "Regenerate All" rather than just "Calculate." One more tip: if you're still having trouble, check the partnership's "Allocation Methods" settings. Sometimes there's a global setting that forces the software to use calculated amounts regardless of your overrides. Hope this helps - I know how frustrating this can be!
This is exactly what I needed! I've been struggling with this same issue for weeks. I found the "Use payment amount for K-1 reporting" option you mentioned and it was buried in a completely different spot than I expected. The regenerate all K-1s tip was crucial too - I had been just doing regular recalculations which weren't picking up the override. One thing I'll add for anyone else reading this - make sure to double-check that the override actually took effect by spot-checking a few K-1s before finalizing everything. I had one case where the regeneration seemed to work but one partner's K-1 was still showing the calculated amount instead of the actual payment. Had to manually adjust that one individually. Thanks so much for the detailed walkthrough! This saved me from another call to CCH support.
Andrew Pinnock
Has anyone used TurboSelf-Employed for reporting craft sales? I'm trying to decide between that and H&R Block.
0 coins
Brianna Schmidt
ā¢I used TurboSelf-Employed last year for my candle business and it was pretty good! Very straightforward with the Schedule C stuff and it walked me through all the possible deductions. It costs more than regular TurboTax though.
0 coins
Paige Cantoni
@Sophia Long, yes you absolutely need to report that $4,200! Even though it seems like a small amount compared to your regular job, the IRS requires you to report ALL income. Since you made over $400 from self-employment, you'll also owe self-employment taxes (about 15.3% for Social Security and Medicare). Here's what you need to do: 1. File Schedule C to report your business income and expenses 2. File Schedule SE for self-employment tax 3. Start tracking everything NOW - save all receipts for materials, shipping, packaging, even part of your phone/internet bills Don't panic about not having perfect records this year. Try to reconstruct what you can remember spending on supplies, and the IRS is generally reasonable about estimates if they're realistic. One tip: you can deduct the cost of materials, Etsy fees, PayPal fees, packaging supplies, and even a portion of your home if you have a dedicated workspace. These deductions will reduce your taxable income significantly. You've got this! It's not as scary as it seems once you get organized.
0 coins
Issac Nightingale
ā¢This is really helpful advice! I'm just starting out with selling my pottery online and made about $800 last year. Question about the home office deduction - do I need to have a completely separate room, or can I deduct a portion if I use part of my dining room table for my workspace? I don't have a dedicated craft room but I do all my glazing and packaging at one end of my dining room.
0 coins