IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Diego Vargas

•

11 Don't forget about education tax credits! Even as a dependent, you might qualify for the American Opportunity Credit or Lifetime Learning Credit if you're paying for education expenses yourself. Made a huge difference for me when I was in your situation.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

19 I thought education credits go to whoever claims you as a dependent? My parents always get those credits, not me.

0 coins

It depends on who actually pays the education expenses! If you paid for your own tuition, books, or other qualified expenses with your internship money, you might be eligible to claim the credits even as a dependent. The key is who made the actual payments. If your parents paid, then they get the credits. But if you used your own earnings to pay for school expenses, you could potentially claim them on your return. This is another area where talking to a tax professional or the IRS directly could really help clarify your specific situation.

0 coins

AstroAce

•

This is such a helpful thread! I'm a tax preparer and see this confusion all the time. Your mom's concern is understandable but misplaced - the "kiddie tax" only applies to unearned income (dividends, interest, capital gains) for dependents, not wages from a job. With $27k in earned income and 35% withholding, you're looking at roughly $9,450 withheld. Your taxable income after the standard deduction would be around $12,400 ($27k - $14,600 standard deduction). At current tax rates, your actual tax liability would be much less than what was withheld, so you should definitely expect a refund. One tip: make sure you file your own return even though you're claimed as a dependent. You need to file to get your refund, and being claimed as a dependent doesn't prevent you from filing - it just affects certain deductions and credits available to you.

0 coins

Ezra Collins

•

This is exactly what I needed to hear from a professional! Thank you for breaking down the actual numbers. I was getting really stressed about potentially owing money when I was counting on that refund. One quick question - when you say I need to file my own return even as a dependent, do I need to coordinate with my parents at all, or can I just file independently using my W-2 and other documents?

0 coins

This is an excellent discussion that covers most of the key issues! I wanted to add a practical tip that helped me when I dealt with a similar situation last year. When preparing the final K-1 for Partner C, I found it helpful to include a supplemental schedule that breaks down the liquidation transaction in plain English. This included: 1. Opening capital account balance: ($38,000) 2. Cash distribution received: $32,000 3. Resulting capital account before adjustment: ($70,000) 4. Deemed contribution to restore deficit: $70,000 5. Final capital account balance: $0 6. Total taxable gain to Partner C: $70,000 This schedule made it crystal clear to Partner C's tax preparer exactly how we arrived at the $70,000 taxable gain, and it provided a clean audit trail if the IRS ever questions the treatment. One additional consideration - make sure your partnership's accounting system properly reflects the reallocation of Partner C's negative capital balance to the remaining partners. This adjustment affects their outside basis going forward and could impact future distributions or liquidations. I learned this lesson when we had to prepare amended K-1s because we initially forgot to update the remaining partners' capital accounts to reflect their absorption of Partner C's deficit. The documentation suggestions from previous commenters are spot-on - partnership liquidations definitely warrant extra attention to detail!

0 coins

Jamal Harris

•

This supplemental schedule approach is brilliant! I wish I had thought of that when I was dealing with my partnership liquidation last year. Breaking it down step-by-step like that would have saved so much back-and-forth with the departing partner's tax preparer. One thing I'd add to your excellent schedule - it might be worth including the specific IRC sections that govern this treatment (like Section 731 for the distribution and Section 752 for the deemed contribution aspects). Not all tax preparers are familiar with partnership liquidation rules, so having the code references right there can help them research and verify the treatment if they have questions. Also, regarding the reallocation to remaining partners that you mentioned - that's such a crucial point that often gets overlooked! We actually had to file amended partnership returns because our accountant initially missed updating the capital account allocations. The IRS caught it during a routine review and we had to explain why the remaining partners' capital accounts didn't properly reflect their absorption of the liquidated partner's deficit. Having clear documentation of how that reallocation was calculated would have prevented that whole mess. Thanks for sharing such practical advice - this thread has become an amazing resource for anyone dealing with partnership liquidations!

0 coins

Ethan Davis

•

This has been an incredibly thorough discussion! As someone who's dealt with several partnership liquidations over the years, I wanted to add one more consideration that can sometimes trip people up - the impact on guaranteed payments or preferred returns. If Partner C had any guaranteed payments or preferred return arrangements that were accrued but unpaid at the time of liquidation, those need to be properly characterized and reported separately from the liquidating distribution. These amounts would typically be reported as ordinary income to Partner C rather than capital gain treatment, and they wouldn't be part of the capital account restoration calculation. Also, for future reference, it's worth noting that if your partnership has been making Section 754 elections in prior years, you'll want to carefully review whether any previous basis adjustments need to be taken into account when calculating the final distribution amounts. This is particularly important if the partnership has appreciated assets, as the inside/outside basis differences can affect the tax consequences of the liquidation. One final practical tip - consider having Partner C sign an acknowledgment that they understand the tax implications of receiving the liquidating distribution, especially the $70,000 gain recognition. This can help prevent disputes later if they're surprised by the tax bill. I've seen situations where departing partners thought they were just receiving "their money back" and didn't realize they'd have a significant tax liability. Great work everyone on covering all the technical aspects so thoroughly!

0 coins

Oscar Murphy

•

Excellent point about guaranteed payments and preferred returns! I hadn't thought about how those would interact with the liquidation distribution. This is exactly the kind of nuanced issue that can cause problems if not handled correctly. Your suggestion about getting an acknowledgment from the departing partner is really smart too. I can definitely see how someone might think a "liquidation payment" is just getting their investment back, especially when they had a negative capital account to begin with. Having them acknowledge the tax implications upfront could save everyone a lot of headaches come tax season. One question on the Section 754 elections - if the partnership does have previous basis adjustments, would those adjustments effectively "travel" with Partner C upon liquidation, or would they remain with the partnership and get reallocated among the remaining partners? I'm dealing with a similar situation where we've had 754 elections in place for a few years and I want to make sure I'm handling the basis adjustments correctly. This thread has been incredibly helpful - between the technical explanations, the practical documentation tips, and now these additional considerations, I feel much more confident about handling our partnership liquidation properly. Thanks to everyone who has shared their expertise!

0 coins

One important consideration that hasn't been fully addressed is the self-employment tax implications. With an S-Corp, rental income is generally NOT subject to self-employment tax (which is a 15.3% savings), whereas with an LLC taxed as a sole proprietorship or partnership, you might face self-employment tax on the rental income depending on your level of involvement. However, if you're actively managing the property (collecting rent, handling maintenance, etc.), the IRS might argue it's subject to SE tax regardless of entity type. The key is documenting that you're a passive investor rather than actively running a rental business. Also, keep in mind S-Corps have additional compliance requirements - you'll need to file a separate corporate tax return (Form 1120S) and possibly pay yourself a reasonable salary if you're providing services to the corporation. These additional costs and complexities might outweigh the tax benefits for a single rental property. For most small rental property investors, a single-member LLC taxed as a disregarded entity often provides the best balance of simplicity and protection, but definitely consult with a tax professional who can analyze your specific situation.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

This is really helpful clarification on the self-employment tax angle! I hadn't considered that the S-Corp structure could potentially save me 15.3% on SE taxes. But you mentioned having to pay myself a "reasonable salary" - how does that work if all the rental income is going toward mortgage payments? Would I still be required to take a salary even if the S-Corp has no cash flow after expenses? Also, when you say "documenting that you're a passive investor" - what kind of documentation would satisfy the IRS? I was planning to handle most of the property management myself (screening tenants, collecting rent, coordinating repairs) so I'm wondering if that would automatically make me "active" in their eyes.

0 coins

Philip Cowan

•

Great question about the salary requirement! If you're providing services to the S-Corp (like property management), you're technically required to pay yourself a reasonable salary regardless of cash flow. However, many tax professionals argue that if the rental activity is truly passive investment (minimal services), no salary is required. The challenge is that active property management activities like tenant screening, rent collection, and repair coordination would likely be considered "services" to the corporation, triggering the reasonable salary requirement. This creates a cash flow problem when all rental income goes to mortgage payments. For documentation of passive vs. active status, the IRS looks at factors like: hours spent on the activity, whether you hire property management companies, your level of real estate expertise, and whether rental income is your primary business. If you're doing day-to-day management yourself, it's hard to argue it's passive. This is actually a major reason why many rental property investors choose LLCs over S-Corps - you avoid the salary complications while still getting liability protection. The SE tax savings from an S-Corp often get eaten up by payroll processing costs and the administrative burden of maintaining corporate formalities.

0 coins

Another angle to consider is the depreciation recapture implications when you eventually sell the property. With an S-Corp structure, any depreciation you've claimed over the years will be "recaptured" at a 25% tax rate when you sell, regardless of your ordinary income tax bracket at that time. This is particularly important given your situation where mortgage principal payments aren't deductible but depreciation is. You might find yourself in a scenario where you're claiming significant depreciation deductions each year to offset the phantom income from principal payments, but then face a substantial tax bill on sale due to depreciation recapture. One strategy some investors use is a 1031 like-kind exchange when selling to defer the depreciation recapture, but this requires buying another investment property of equal or greater value. The rules are complex and the timelines are strict (45 days to identify replacement property, 180 days to close). Also worth noting - if you're considering this as your first rental property, you might want to start with a simpler structure (like holding it personally or in a single-member LLC) to get familiar with the tax implications before adding the complexity of S-Corp compliance requirements. You can always transfer the property to an S-Corp later, though that might trigger its own tax consequences depending on timing and values.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of forward-thinking analysis I needed! The depreciation recapture at 25% is something I completely overlooked. So if I'm understanding correctly, I could end up claiming say $10,000 in depreciation annually to offset the phantom income from principal payments, but then when I sell in 10 years, I'd owe 25% tax on that $100,000 total depreciation regardless of what my income tax bracket is at that time? The 1031 exchange option is intriguing but sounds like it just kicks the can down the road - eventually you have to pay the piper unless you hold rental properties until death, right? Your suggestion about starting simple makes a lot of sense. Maybe I should buy this first property personally, see how the numbers actually work out in practice, and then consider entity restructuring once I have real-world experience with the cash flows and tax implications. Thanks for the reality check on jumping straight into S-Corp complexity!

0 coins

Nolan Carter

•

This has been such a comprehensive discussion! As someone who just went through the L2 visa remote work situation myself, I wanted to add a few practical tips that might help others avoid some of the pitfalls I encountered. **Documentation is everything**: Start keeping meticulous records NOW, before you even move. I created a spreadsheet tracking every day I was physically present in each country, all tax payments made, and copies of every form filed. This saved me countless hours during tax season and will be invaluable if USCIS ever questions my compliance history. **Banking strategy**: I kept my foreign accounts open but opened a dedicated US account specifically for tax obligations. Having separate "buckets" made it much easier to track what I owed to each country and avoid accidentally spending money I'd earmarked for taxes. **Quarterly payments are crucial**: Don't underestimate the importance of making quarterly estimated payments to the US. Even if you expect foreign tax credits to offset most of your liability, being late on estimated payments can trigger penalties that add up quickly. **State tax research**: Definitely research your destination state's specific rules. I moved to a state I thought would be tax-friendly, only to discover they had very aggressive sourcing rules for foreign income that cost me more than I'd budgeted for. The immigration compliance angle mentioned earlier is spot-on - proper tax compliance really is an investment in your future US immigration prospects. Getting professional help upfront is much cheaper than trying to fix mistakes later when you're applying for permanent residence. For anyone just starting this journey, feel free to reach out if you have specific questions about the practical day-to-day aspects of managing this situation!

0 coins

PrinceJoe

•

Thank you so much for sharing these practical insights! As someone who's just starting to navigate this process, the documentation advice is particularly valuable. I'm curious about your spreadsheet setup - did you track anything beyond physical presence days and tax payments? For example, did you also track things like income earned in each location or work hours performed in each country? The banking strategy of having separate "buckets" makes a lot of sense. I'm wondering if you found it helpful to estimate your tax obligations in advance and set up automatic transfers, or if you preferred to manage it manually as you went along? Your point about quarterly payments is really important - I hadn't fully grasped that even if foreign tax credits ultimately offset most of the liability, I could still face penalties for not making estimated payments on time. Do you have any guidance on how to estimate what those quarterly payments should be when dealing with foreign tax credits and treaty provisions? I'd love to take you up on your offer to answer practical questions! One thing I'm struggling with is timeline planning - how far in advance did you start working with tax professionals before your move? And did you find it necessary to work with professionals in both countries, or were you able to find someone who could handle the entire situation comprehensively?

0 coins

@PrinceJoe Great questions! For my spreadsheet, I tracked: physical presence days, income earned by location (really important for sourcing rules), work hours performed in each country, and any business expenses that might be deductible. I also included a column for exchange rates since my foreign income fluctuated with currency changes. For banking, I set up automatic transfers of about 30% of gross income to my tax account - this covered both US estimated taxes and set aside money for foreign taxes. I adjusted quarterly based on actual earnings and tax calculations. Regarding quarterly payments, I worked with my tax advisor to estimate based on prior year tax liability plus expected changes. The key is that estimated payments are based on what you expect to owe BEFORE foreign tax credits are applied. You can't reduce estimated payments just because you expect credits to offset everything later. Timeline-wise, I started working with professionals about 4 months before my move. This gave enough time to understand the requirements and set up proper systems. I found one advisor who handled both countries (US CPA with international credentials), which was more expensive but avoided coordination issues between separate advisors. One thing I wish I'd known earlier: some states require you to file a "newcomer" declaration within 30 days of establishing residency. Missing this deadline can trigger penalties even if you don't owe any state tax. Definitely worth researching your specific state's requirements!

0 coins

Liam Cortez

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful - I'm in almost the exact same situation as the original poster! Planning to move to the US on an L2 visa in about 3 months while continuing remote work for my UK employer. One thing I wanted to add based on my research so far: it's worth checking if your UK employer has any existing US business registration or tax obligations. Even if they don't have a physical presence, they might already be registered for sales tax or other purposes in certain states, which could affect how they handle your employment situation. Also, for those mentioning the substantial presence test calculation - I found the IRS has a helpful online tool (Publication 519) that walks through the weighted calculation including prior years. It's worth running the numbers early to understand exactly when you'll trigger US tax residency. The banking advice about keeping separate tax savings accounts resonates with me. I'm already setting aside about 35% of my income in preparation, figuring it's better to over-save initially and adjust based on actual filing experience. One question for those who've been through this: did any of you encounter issues with your UK employer's insurance coverage while working from the US? I'm wondering if their professional indemnity or workers' compensation policies have geographical restrictions that could create gaps in coverage. Thanks again to everyone who's shared their experiences - this discussion has probably saved me from making several costly mistakes!

0 coins

Yuki Sato

•

This is incredibly helpful information from everyone! I'm dealing with this exact same checkbox issue and was getting really worried about messing up my return. Just to summarize what I've gathered from this thread for anyone else who finds this: **The main solutions seem to be:** 1. Manually enter the correct standard deduction amount on line 12a (thanks Oliver for the specific amounts!) 2. Try the save/close/reopen workaround that Dmitry mentioned 3. Switch to a different tax software like TaxAct or TurboTax 4. Use services like Claimyr to get through to the IRS for official confirmation 5. Use taxr.ai to double-check your return before submitting I think I'm going to try the manual calculation first since multiple people confirmed the IRS said this would work. If I'm still nervous about it, I might use one of those analysis tools to double-check everything before hitting submit. Really appreciate everyone sharing their experiences - this community is so much more helpful than the official IRS help pages!

0 coins

Ravi Sharma

•

This is such a great summary, Yuki! I'm a newcomer here but have been lurking and dealing with the exact same frustrating checkbox issue. Your breakdown of all the solutions is super helpful - I was feeling overwhelmed by all the different suggestions scattered throughout the thread. I think I'm going to follow your approach and try the manual calculation first since multiple people got IRS confirmation that it works. It's reassuring to know there are backup options like those analysis tools if I need extra peace of mind before submitting. Thanks for organizing all this information so clearly!

0 coins

Amina Toure

•

I'm so glad I found this thread! I've been struggling with this exact same checkbox issue for the past three days and was starting to panic that I'd have to pay for tax software or miss the deadline. Reading through everyone's experiences, it sounds like the manual calculation approach is the safest bet. I'm 67 years old, so if I understand correctly from Oliver's explanation, I need to add $1,850 to my base standard deduction of $14,600, giving me $16,450 for line 12a. I'm still a bit nervous about submitting with that broken checkbox, so I think I'll also try that taxr.ai service Miguel mentioned to double-check everything before I file. At this point, spending a few dollars on peace of mind is worth it compared to dealing with potential IRS correspondence later. Has anyone who used the manual calculation method already received their refund or gotten confirmation that it processed correctly? That would really help ease my anxiety about this whole situation!

0 coins

Prev1...16771678167916801681...5643Next