IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Oliver Brown

β€’

I'm going through this exact same situation right now and this thread has been a lifesaver! I wanted to add one more resource that just helped me today. If your company has ever used tax software like Drake, ProSeries, or TaxAct for business returns, check the software's client database or company profile settings. I found our TCC stored in our Drake Tax software under the "Electronic Filing" section of our company profile - it had been sitting there for years but nobody knew to look for it. Most professional tax software packages store electronic filing credentials (including TCCs) as part of the client setup process, especially if you've ever e-filed information returns through the software. The TCC is usually listed alongside your EFIN and other electronic filing identifiers. This saved me from having to make any phone calls or go through the IRS recovery process. Might be worth checking if you use any tax preparation software before trying the other methods. The information is probably already sitting in your system somewhere! Also want to echo what others have said about documentation - once you find it, make sure to store it in multiple places with clear labels. We're creating a "Tax Credentials" binder with physical copies and digital backups so this never happens again.

0 coins

Amina Bah

β€’

This is such a valuable addition to all the solutions mentioned in this thread! The tax software angle is brilliant - I never would have thought to check there. We use ProSeries for our business returns, so I'm definitely going to log in and check the electronic filing section right after I post this comment. It makes perfect sense that tax software would store TCC information since they need it to process electronic filings. This could be the quickest solution yet for people who use professional tax preparation software. Much faster than waiting on hold with the IRS or even calling payroll services. Your point about creating a "Tax Credentials" binder really resonates too. It's clear from reading this entire thread that proper documentation and storage of these credentials is crucial for business continuity. Too many of us have learned this lesson the hard way when key employees leave without proper handoffs. Thanks for sharing this tip - hopefully it helps other people avoid the stress of thinking they need to go through complex recovery processes when the information might already be sitting in their own systems!

0 coins

This thread has been absolutely incredible - I can't believe how many different approaches there are to recover a lost TCC! As someone who's been dreading making that call to the IRS, I'm feeling much more optimistic about resolving this issue. I'm planning to try the systematic approach several people mentioned: first checking our email archives and tax software (we use QuickBooks Pro), then contacting our payroll service provider, and finally trying the IRS fax line before resorting to phone calls. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet - has anyone had success checking with their business bank? Sometimes banks keep copies of tax-related correspondence in business account files, especially if you've ever needed to provide tax documentation for business loans or credit applications. Our business banker has helped us locate other important documents in the past, so it might be worth a quick call. Also wanted to say thanks to everyone who emphasized the importance of proper documentation going forward. Reading about all these situations where TCCs got lost during staff transitions has really highlighted how crucial it is to have multiple backup copies and clear handoff procedures. This thread should be required reading for anyone managing business tax compliance!

0 coins

Keisha Taylor

β€’

That's a really interesting idea about checking with your business bank! I hadn't thought of that approach, but it makes sense that they might have copies of tax documents in their files, especially if you've applied for business credit or loans that required financial documentation. Your systematic approach sounds perfect - starting with the quickest/easiest options before moving to more complex ones is definitely the way to go. The QuickBooks Pro suggestion is particularly good since Oliver just mentioned finding his TCC stored in Drake Tax software. QuickBooks often stores electronic filing credentials in similar ways. I've been following this thread closely too, and I'm amazed at how comprehensive it's become! It really shows how common this issue is and how many different places these credentials can end up stored. Between email archives, payroll services, tax software, former CPAs, and now potentially banks, most people should be able to find their TCC without having to deal with IRS phone lines. Definitely agree about this being essential reading for business tax compliance! The number of people who've shared stories about staff transitions causing documentation gaps really highlights the need for better handoff procedures. Good luck with your search - with all these options, I'm confident you'll find your TCC quickly!

0 coins

Can my employer make unreimbursed business travel expenses taxable income when submission delays were due to company policy? (IRS 60-day rule)

I'm a corporate compliance auditor who travels about twice a month for client visits. This has created a major tax headache for many of us at the company. The issue: Our company requires us to get pre-approval from the travel department before we can submit our travel expense reports in the company system (Expensify). Due to staffing issues in the travel department, many of our reports aren't being approved for submission until well past 60 days after the travel occurred. I recently learned about an IRS rule stating that business expense reimbursements submitted after 60 days are considered taxable income. So for example, if I had a $2,500 trip and couldn't submit until after 60 days due to our company's process, I'm being taxed as if I earned an extra $2,500 in income. That means about $550 taken out of my paycheck for expenses that weren't actually income! This has affected over 20 people on my team. Some colleagues have had as much as $18,000 in expenses reclassified as taxable income, resulting in around $4,000 in additional taxes withheld from their paychecks. When we raised this with management, their only solution was to "wait until next tax season and file for a refund for overpayment." I consulted with a tax professional who confirmed this is incorrect advice - the IRS considers these late reimbursements as properly taxed income, not an overpayment. My tax advisor explained the proper solution is for the company to reimburse us for the tax impact (essentially a tax gross-up) and report it as a business loss. Management hasn't responded to our follow-up complaints other than saying "this is all we can do, just don't submit expense reports late" - even though their own processes make it impossible to submit on time. I have documented evidence (emails, process documents) showing that the company's own policies and delays caused these submissions to be late. Is this a form of wage theft? Do we have any legal recourse if management continues to ignore the issue? Many team members are considering quitting over this. If legal action is appropriate, what agencies or resources should we contact?

I'm confused about something - my understanding is that your employer can set whatever reimbursement policies they want, even terrible ones? Is this really a legal issue or just a bad company policy?

0 coins

Emma Garcia

β€’

There's an important distinction here. Companies can set their own reimbursement policies, but they can't implement policies that effectively push their business expenses onto employees' tax bills. When an employee travels for business, those are company expenses, not personal ones. If the company's policies make it impossible to submit within the IRS's 60-day window, and then the company refuses to gross-up the tax impact, they're essentially making employees pay part of the company's business expenses through increased personal taxes. Many states have laws requiring employers to reimburse necessary business expenses. California Labor Code Section 2802, for example, specifically requires employers to indemnify employees for all necessary expenditures incurred in the course of employment.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

β€’

@Emma Garcia is absolutely right about the legal distinction. What makes this particularly problematic is that the company is creating a situation where employees are financially penalized for following company policy. Think of it this way - if your employer required you to use your personal credit card for business expenses but then refused to reimburse you for the interest charges that accrued due to their slow approval process, that would clearly be shifting business costs to employees. This is essentially the same thing, just with tax consequences instead of interest. The Department of Labor has ruled in similar cases that when company policies directly cause employees to incur additional costs whether (interest, fees, or in this case taxes ,)the employer has a duty to make the employee whole. The fact that management s'only solution is don "t'be late when" their own process makes it impossible to be on time shows they understand the problem but are choosing to ignore their responsibility. @NeonNova, I d'definitely recommend following @Maya Patel s suggestion'about filing with your state DOL. The documentation you have showing the policy and approval delays should make this a pretty clear-cut case.

0 coins

Zara Perez

β€’

This is a clear case of the company shifting their business expenses to employees through poor policy design. I've seen this exact scenario play out at multiple organizations, and it's definitely not something employees should have to absorb. The 60-day IRS rule exists specifically to prevent abuse of accountable plans, but it assumes employees have reasonable control over submission timing. When company policies make compliance impossible, the employer bears responsibility for the tax consequences. A few additional points that might help your case: 1. **Documentation is key** - Keep records showing when you completed your expense reports vs. when you were finally allowed to submit them. Email trails showing approval delays are especially valuable. 2. **Collective action works** - Companies often ignore individual complaints but take notice when multiple employees raise the same issue together. 3. **Know your state laws** - Many states have stronger employee protection laws than federal requirements. Some states explicitly require employers to reimburse ALL costs associated with business expenses, including tax implications. 4. **Consider the broader pattern** - If this is happening regularly, it suggests the company knows their process is broken but chooses not to fix it because employees absorb the cost. The "wait until tax season" advice from management is particularly problematic because it shows they don't understand (or are pretending not to understand) that these are now legitimate tax obligations, not overpayments to be refunded. Your tax advisor's recommendation for a gross-up is the standard industry solution. Any competent corporate tax department should know this.

0 coins

Ruby Blake

β€’

This is incredibly helpful context, thank you! I'm documenting everything as suggested. One thing I'm curious about - when you mention "standard industry solution" for the gross-up, is there a specific way companies typically calculate this? Our finance department keeps claiming they "don't know how" to do a proper gross-up calculation, but I suspect they're just hoping we'll give up. If there's an industry standard approach, it might help us push back more effectively when they claim it's too complicated to figure out. Also, has anyone had success getting retroactive gross-ups for expenses that were already processed incorrectly months ago? We have people who were hit with this tax impact as far back as last year.

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

β€’

Gotta disagree w/ previous commenter! Time = money w/ tax issues. Sure, u can DIY everything if u have endless hrs to research tax codes & decipher transcript jargon. But w/ ur Apr 30 deadline looming, u need answers NOW. I spent 3 wks trying to figure out my transcript b4 giving up & using help. Solved in 10 mins what I couldn't in 3 wks. Sometimes paying a little saves a lot. Esp w/ divorce docs on the line!

0 coins

Zoe Walker

β€’

I work at a local IRS office and can provide some clarity on the walk-in situation. Since 2021, all TACs operate under strict appointment-only protocols - no exceptions for walk-ins. However, your divorce settlement deadline might qualify as an "extreme hardship" case. When you call back, specifically mention these keywords: "extreme financial hardship due to court-ordered deadline" and ask to speak with a manager. Also, try calling first thing Monday morning at 7am local time - that's when they release any cancelled appointment slots. If all else fails, you can file Form 911 (Request for Taxpayer Advocate Service) which can sometimes expedite urgent cases within 30 days. Don't give up - the right person just needs to understand your situation!

0 coins

I see a lot of great explanations here, but let me add one practical tip that might help you verify this on your own pay stub. Look at your year-to-date (YTD) totals and do this simple check: take your YTD federal income tax withholding and divide it by your YTD gross income. This will give you your effective federal income tax rate - which should be noticeably lower than your marginal tax bracket (your 22%) because of how the progressive system works. Then separately, you can verify the FICA taxes: your YTD Social Security should be exactly 6.2% of your gross (up to the wage base), and Medicare should be exactly 1.45% of your gross. These percentages will be the same regardless of whether you make $30k or $300k (well, except for the Social Security wage cap and high-earner Medicare surcharge). This helped me finally understand that my "tax bracket" was just one piece of the puzzle, not my overall tax burden. The FICA taxes are completely predictable flat rates, while only the federal income tax portion follows the bracket system everyone talks about.

0 coins

Skylar Neal

β€’

This is exactly the kind of practical verification I needed! I just checked my pay stub using your method and it all makes sense now. My YTD federal income tax divided by gross income came out to about 14%, which is way less than my 22% bracket because of the progressive system. And sure enough, my Social Security was exactly 6.2% and Medicare was exactly 1.45% - completely separate from the income tax calculation. Thanks for giving me a concrete way to see how this actually works with real numbers from my own paycheck!

0 coins

NebulaNova

β€’

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I just want to add one more perspective as someone who recently switched from being a W-2 employee to freelancing. When you're self-employed, you really see how separate these taxes are because you have to pay them separately. I now pay quarterly estimated taxes for my federal income tax (which varies based on my income and deductions), but I also have to pay self-employment tax of 15.3% (which is essentially both the employee and employer portions of FICA taxes combined). The self-employment tax is calculated on a flat rate basis just like regular FICA taxes - it has nothing to do with income tax brackets. So even if my income puts me in a lower federal tax bracket this year, I'm still paying that full 15.3% for Social Security and Medicare on my self-employment income. This really drove home for me how these are completely different tax systems that just happen to both be federal taxes. When I was an employee, seeing them all deducted together made it seem like one big "tax," but they're actually funding different programs and calculated in totally different ways.

0 coins

Connor O'Brien

β€’

Has anyone had success with fixing this by switching to a different tax software? I'm having the exact same issue with [popular tax software] but wondering if [competitor] handles Form 8995 better?

0 coins

Yara Sabbagh

β€’

I switched from TurboTax to H&R Block this year specifically because of Form 8995 issues. H&R Block's interface shows the calculation steps more clearly and let me see exactly why my deduction was being limited. TurboTax was just giving me a final number with no explanation.

0 coins

Connor O'Brien

β€’

Thanks for the suggestion. I'll try H&R Block and see if it handles my situation better. Did you need to re-enter everything or were you able to import your data from TurboTax?

0 coins

Amara Okafor

β€’

I had the exact same problem with my S-corp QBI deduction last month! The issue turned out to be that my software wasn't properly handling the interaction between the SSTB phase-out and the taxable income limitation. Here's what I learned after digging deep into this: With $192k in business income, you're likely above the SSTB phase-out threshold ($196,950 for single filers). If your consulting business qualifies as an SSTB (which it probably does), the software should be phasing out your QBI deduction as your income approaches that threshold. The "incomplete calculation" you're seeing might actually be the software correctly applying a phase-out but not showing you the math. Try looking for a detailed Form 8995-A in your forms list instead of the simple 8995 - that's the form used when you're above the income thresholds or have SSTB income. Also, double-check that you've entered a reasonable salary for yourself as an S-corp owner. The IRS expects S-corp owners to pay themselves W-2 wages, and the QBI calculation depends on having actual W-2 wages reported, not just distributions.

0 coins

Anna Stewart

β€’

This is really helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation and think I might be in the SSTB phase-out range too. Quick question - when you say "reasonable salary," is there a specific percentage or amount the IRS expects for S-corp owners? I've been taking mostly distributions because the payroll taxes are so much lower, but now I'm worried this might be hurting my QBI deduction calculation. Also, did switching to Form 8995-A end up giving you a better or worse deduction compared to what the software was originally calculating?

0 coins

Sean Doyle

β€’

@c9b46ddd6b4b This is exactly the guidance I needed! I just checked and you're right - my software generated Form 8995-A instead of the simple 8995, but it wasn't showing me the detailed calculations clearly. I'm definitely in SSTB territory with my consulting business, and my income is right at that phase-out threshold. The "incomplete" calculation I was seeing was actually the software applying the phase-out correctly but not explaining it well. Quick follow-up question - you mentioned the reasonable salary requirement. I've been taking only distributions this year to avoid payroll taxes, but now I'm realizing this might be creating problems beyond just the QBI calculation. What's considered "reasonable" for a consulting business? Should I be looking at comparable salaries in my industry, or is there a simpler rule of thumb the IRS uses?

0 coins

Prev1...14911492149314941495...5643Next