IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls โ€“ which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Lucas Adams

โ€ข

The 'as of' date bouncing around is totally normal and honestly pretty common during PATH processing! I went through the same thing last year - my date changed 4 times in 10 days and I was convinced something was wrong. Turns out it's just the IRS systems running their weekly update cycles. The fact that your PATH processing shows as normal is actually the most important indicator. Those date changes are basically just the system's way of saying "hey, I'm still working on this" rather than indicating any actual issues. Try to resist the urge to check constantly (easier said than done, I know!) - the stress really isn't worth it when these fluctuations are so routine. Your refund will come through when it's ready, regardless of what the 'as of' date is doing! ๐Ÿ˜Š

0 coins

This is exactly what I needed to hear! I've been checking my transcript obsessively and those date changes were making me think something was wrong with my return. It's so reassuring to know this is just normal system behavior. I really appreciate you sharing your experience - it helps calm my nerves knowing others have been through the same thing and everything worked out fine. Going to try my best to step away from checking so frequently!

0 coins

Gabriel Freeman

โ€ข

I completely understand your anxiety about this! I went through the exact same thing with my 'as of' dates jumping around like crazy - March 12, then March 19, back to March 5, then March 26. I was convinced something was wrong and spent way too much time researching what it all meant. Turns out it's completely normal during PATH processing! The IRS systems run automated update cycles that can cause these date fluctuations, and it doesn't indicate any problems with your return. My refund actually came through about a week after the dates finally stabilized. Your doctor is right about reducing stress - I know it's hard, but try to limit checking to maybe once or twice a week instead of multiple times daily. The constant checking just made my anxiety worse and didn't speed up the process at all. Hang in there! ๐Ÿ™‚

0 coins

Yuki Kobayashi

โ€ข

Based on everyone's responses here, it sounds like you're definitely on the right track - you don't need to check the multiple jobs box since you're only working one job currently. One thing I'd add is that if you're worried about your withholding being accurate (especially with the salary increase from $62k to $71k), you might want to run the IRS withholding calculator in a few months once you have a couple paystubs from your new job. That way you can see if you need to adjust anything for the rest of 2025. Also, keep in mind that having that gap between jobs might actually work in your favor tax-wise since your total 2024 income was probably lower than it would have been if you'd worked the full year at either salary level.

0 coins

Maya Lewis

โ€ข

That's a really good point about the income gap potentially working in your favor! I hadn't thought about that angle. Since you were unemployed for a few months, your total 2024 income was definitely lower than a full year at either job would have been. Just wanted to add - when you do run that IRS withholding calculator that others mentioned, make sure you have your final paystub from your old job handy so you can enter the exact amounts that were already withheld. That'll give you the most accurate picture of whether you need to adjust anything going forward.

0 coins

LilMama23

โ€ข

Great question! I went through something similar when I switched jobs last year. Everyone here is absolutely right - that multiple jobs checkbox is only for when you're working more than one job at the same time, not for sequential employment like your situation. Since you're only working one job now, you can skip that entire section. The W4 is all about setting up proper withholding going forward from your current employer, not accounting for what happened earlier in the year. One tip though - since your new job pays more ($71k vs $62k), you might want to check the IRS withholding estimator in a month or two once you have a few paystubs. The higher salary could put you in a different tax situation, and it's better to catch any underwithholding early rather than owe a big chunk next April! But for now, just fill out the W4 as if this is your only job (because it is), and you should be all set.

0 coins

Kaitlyn Jenkins

โ€ข

This is such helpful advice! I'm actually in a similar boat - just started a new job after being laid off earlier this year, and I was stressing about the W4 form. It's reassuring to hear from someone who went through the same thing. Quick question though - when you mention checking the IRS withholding estimator in a month or two, do you enter info from both your old job AND your new job for 2024? Or just focus on the new job since that's what's affecting your 2025 withholding? I want to make sure I'm doing this right!

0 coins

Freya Nielsen

โ€ข

Don't overlook the basis adjustment issues with QSBS when gifting. If you gift shares to a trust, the trust takes your basis (carryover basis), but if you wait and the shares pass at death, the basis gets stepped up to fair market value. This means that if your primary goal is QSBS stacking, gifting during life makes sense. But if you expect the value to grow beyond the $10M QSBS exclusion per trust, you might be better off keeping some shares to pass at death to get the basis step-up. Also, make sure you're monitoring the "active business" requirement - if your company starts accumulating too many investments or has too much passive income, you could jeopardize the QSBS qualification altogether.

0 coins

Omar Mahmoud

โ€ข

That's a great point about basis step-up vs QSBS exclusion. Is there a simple rule of thumb for when one strategy is better than the other? Like if you expect shares to be worth more than $X, hold until death, otherwise gift for QSBS stacking?

0 coins

NebulaNomad

โ€ข

@Freya Nielsen raises a crucial point about the tradeoff. Generally, if you expect the total gain per trust to exceed around $15-20M, the basis step-up at death might be more valuable than the QSBS exclusion during life. This is because the QSBS exclusion caps at $10M per trust, but basis step-up applies to the full fair market value. However, this assumes you can reliably predict timing and values, which is tough with startups. Plus, you lose the benefit of removing future appreciation from your estate with lifetime gifts. For most founders, I d'recommend a hybrid approach: gift enough shares now to maximize QSBS benefits across multiple trusts while (values are still reasonable for gift tax purposes ,)but retain some shares to potentially benefit from basis step-up if the company becomes extremely valuable. The key is running the numbers with different scenarios and not putting all your eggs in one tax basket.

0 coins

Diego Flores

โ€ข

This is such a timely discussion! I'm dealing with similar QSBS planning questions for my SaaS company. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the importance of getting a qualified appraisal done before making any gifts to trusts. The IRS pays close attention to valuation discounts when gifting private company shares. Since you're gifting minority interests in a closely-held company, you can often apply discounts for lack of control and marketability - sometimes 20-40% depending on your company's specifics. This means you can gift more shares while using less of your lifetime exemption. Also, consider the timing around any board resolutions or major company decisions. If you're planning to authorize a new stock option pool or make other decisions that could affect valuation, coordinate the timing of your gifts accordingly. The other thing to watch out for is making sure your company doesn't inadvertently lose QSBS status. I've seen companies lose qualification because they acquired too many assets that weren't used in the active business, or because they started holding too much cash without a clear business purpose. Keep detailed records of how any excess cash is being used for business operations.

0 coins

Debra Bai

โ€ข

This is really valuable advice about the appraisal and valuation discounts - I hadn't considered that angle! Quick question: do you need to get the appraisal done by a specific type of firm, or would any qualified business appraiser work? Also, how close to the gift date does the appraisal need to be completed? I'm wondering if I should get one done now even if I'm not planning to execute the gifts for another few months.

0 coins

Avery Flores

โ€ข

@Diego Flores Great points about appraisals! For IRS purposes, you ll'want an appraiser who holds the ASA American (Society of Appraisers ,)ABV Accredited (in Business Valuation ,)or similar professional designation and has specific experience with private tech companies. The IRS scrutinizes appraisals closely for gift tax purposes, so you want someone who can defend their methodology. Timing-wise, the appraisal should be as close to the actual gift date as possible - ideally within 60 days. If you get one done now but don t'execute for several months, market conditions or company developments could make it stale. However, getting a preliminary valuation analysis now could help with planning purposes and give you a baseline. One other tip: if you re'doing multiple gifts to different trusts, you can often use the same appraisal for all contemporaneous gifts, which saves on costs. Just make sure the appraiser specifically addresses the valuation discounts available for minority interests - this is where a lot of value can be created for gift tax purposes.

0 coins

Yara Khoury

โ€ข

This is such valuable information! I wish more parents knew about this scholarship exception. Just to add one more important detail - make sure you understand the difference between "tax-free" scholarships and "taxable" scholarships when calculating your penalty-free withdrawal amount. If your daughter received scholarships that exceeded her qualified education expenses, that excess amount would be considered taxable income to her. You can only take penalty-free 529 withdrawals up to the amount of tax-free scholarships she received. So if she got $30K in scholarships but only $25K was tax-free (because $5K exceeded her qualified expenses), you could only withdraw $25K penalty-free from the 529. This is a nuance that trips up a lot of families, so definitely worth double-checking with the school's financial aid office or a tax professional if you're unsure about the tax treatment of any specific scholarships.

0 coins

This is such an important distinction that I hadn't considered! So if I'm understanding correctly, I need to look at each scholarship individually to see if it was applied to qualified expenses or if any portion exceeded those expenses and became taxable income to my daughter? This seems like it could get really complicated with multiple scholarships from different sources. Do schools typically provide this breakdown on their financial aid statements, or would I need to calculate this myself by comparing total scholarship amounts to her actual qualified education expenses for each year? I'm wondering if this is where having professional help might be worth it, since getting this calculation wrong could lead to problems down the road if audited.

0 coins

Sofia Gomez

โ€ข

Great question about the scholarship tax treatment! You're absolutely right that this can get complicated with multiple scholarships from different sources. Most schools will provide a Form 1098-T that shows the total scholarships/grants received and qualified tuition/fees paid, but they typically don't break down which specific scholarships were applied to qualified expenses versus excess amounts that became taxable income to your daughter. Here's what I'd recommend: Start by gathering all scholarship award letters and your daughter's 1098-T forms for each year. Then compare the total scholarship amounts to her qualified education expenses (tuition, fees, required books/supplies). Any scholarship money that exceeded those qualified expenses would have been taxable income to her (and should have been reported on her tax returns). You're spot-on that professional help can be valuable here - a tax professional can help you reconstruct this analysis for each year and ensure you're calculating the correct penalty-free withdrawal amount. The stakes are high enough with potential penalties and interest that getting expert guidance is often worth the cost, especially when dealing with multiple years and substantial amounts. The key is being conservative and well-documented. When in doubt, it's better to withdraw slightly less than risk penalties on an overly aggressive interpretation.

0 coins

Amara Nnamani

โ€ข

This is exactly the kind of detailed guidance I was hoping to find! As someone just learning about these 529 scholarship rules, the distinction between qualified vs. excess scholarship amounts is crucial but not well explained in most basic articles I've read. One follow-up question: if my child received scholarships in one year but we spread out her qualified expenses across multiple semesters that spanned two tax years, how does that affect the calculation? For example, if she got a $15K scholarship in 2022 but her spring semester tuition was paid in early 2023, does that complicate which year's scholarship amount I can use for penalty-free withdrawals? I'm starting to see why so many families miss out on this benefit - the rules seem straightforward on the surface but get complex quickly when you dig into the details. Thank you for emphasizing the importance of being conservative and well-documented!

0 coins

Is a Tutor considered a Specified Service Trade or Business (SSTB) for tax purposes?

I'm pretty confused about whether my tutoring business would fall under the Specified Service Trade or Business (SSTB) category and if I'd be subject to the phase-out at higher income levels. Been trying to make sense of what the IRS says. The IRS website states that an SSTB is "a trade or business involving the performance of services in the fields of health, law... or any trade or business where the principal asset is the reputation or skill of one or more of its employees or owners." It continues to say the principal asset is reputation/skill if "the trade or business consists of the receipt of income from endorsing products or services, the use of an individual's image, likeness, voice, or other symbols associated with the individual's identity, or appearances at events or on radio, television, or other media formats." I also found in CFR ยง 1.199Aโ€‘5 it says: "(xiii) Any trade or business where the principal asset of such trade or business is the reputation or skill of one or more of its employees or owners as defined in paragraph (b)(2)(xiv) of this section." And that section breaks it down as applying to: (A) Endorsing products/services (B) Licensing your image/likeness/name/etc. (C) Getting paid for appearing at events or on media I'm confused because tutoring seems like it's entirely based on my skill and reputation as a tutor, but the specific examples listed seem more focused on celebrity-type endorsements and appearances. Does anyone know if a tutoring business counts as an SSTB? My income is approaching the threshold where this might matter for my taxes.

As a newcomer to this community, I have to say this thread has been incredibly enlightening! I'm just getting started with my own tutoring business (primarily helping high school students with chemistry and physics) and honestly had never even heard of SSTB classifications before stumbling across this discussion. The whole "reputation or skill" provision initially had me panicking - of course my tutoring relies on my scientific knowledge and teaching skills! But seeing everyone break down the actual Treasury Regulations and explain how narrowly this provision is interpreted has been so reassuring. The distinction between celebrity endorsements/media appearances and regular educational services makes perfect sense once you understand the regulatory intent. What I find most valuable is seeing the range of approaches people have taken to get official clarity - from AI tools to IRS consultation services to working with tax professionals. Since I'm just starting out and nowhere near the income thresholds where this would significantly impact my taxes, I don't need immediate documentation. But it's great to know there are concrete resources available as my business grows. I'm also fascinated by the business structure discussions, particularly around S-Corps. As someone who's currently just operating as a sole proprietor, I had no idea how entity choice could interact with QBI deductions and self-employment taxes. Definitely something to research further as my tutoring income increases! Thanks to everyone for sharing their experiences and creating such a comprehensive resource. This is exactly the kind of practical, real-world guidance that's invaluable when you're trying to navigate the business and tax aspects of tutoring for the first time.

0 coins

Jamal Carter

โ€ข

Welcome to the community, Oliver! Your chemistry and physics tutoring background is really interesting, and you're smart to be thinking about these tax implications early on. It's funny how many of us had that same initial panic reaction when first reading about the "reputation or skill" provision - the IRS language really can be misleading at first glance! What strikes me about your situation is that chemistry and physics tutoring is such a clear example of educational services rather than the celebrity-type work the SSTB rules are actually targeting. You're teaching scientific concepts and problem-solving skills, not endorsing products or making media appearances based on your personal brand. I think your approach of learning about these concepts now while your income is still growing is really wise. Even though the immediate tax impact might be minimal, understanding the framework helps you make informed decisions as you scale up. Plus, knowing about options like S-Corp structures ahead of time means you can plan the transition at the optimal income level rather than scrambling to catch up later. The resources people have shared in this thread - from AI analysis tools to IRS consultation services - are definitely worth bookmarking for future reference. Having that toolkit available when you need official documentation will be incredibly valuable. Thanks for adding your perspective to this discussion! It's great to see new tutors joining the community and thinking proactively about the business side of things.

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I want to express my gratitude for this incredibly thorough and helpful discussion! I'm in the early stages of building my tutoring business (primarily working with elementary and middle school students on reading comprehension and basic math skills) and had absolutely no awareness of SSTB classifications or their potential tax implications. Like many others have mentioned, my initial reaction to reading about the "reputation or skill" provision was pure anxiety - obviously my tutoring work depends entirely on my teaching abilities and knowledge! But this thread has done an amazing job of clarifying how narrowly the IRS interprets this provision. The distinction between celebrity endorsements/media work and regular educational services is so much clearer now. What I find particularly valuable is seeing the variety of resources and approaches people have used to get official clarification on their situations. While my current income levels don't make this an immediate concern, it's reassuring to know there are established pathways - whether through AI analysis tools, direct IRS consultation, or tax professionals - to get the documentation needed for confidence in tax positions. The business structure discussion has also been eye-opening. As someone currently operating as a sole proprietor with no real understanding of alternatives, learning about how S-Corp elections can interact with QBI deductions and self-employment tax strategies is incredibly useful for future planning. This thread perfectly demonstrates the value of community knowledge-sharing. Instead of trying to decode complex tax regulations in isolation, we can learn from others' real experiences and research. Thank you to everyone who contributed - this will definitely be a resource I reference as my business develops!

0 coins

Prev1...14611462146314641465...5645Next