IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Avery Saint

•

Has anyone else noticed how absurdly complex our tax system is for expats and people with foreign accounts? I literally have a basic savings account in Canada (I'm dual citizen) and I need to file FBAR, possibly Form 8938, and deal with FATCA. The compliance costs are insane compared to the actual tax owed (which is usually zero because of foreign tax credits)!

0 coins

Taylor Chen

•

Tell me about it! I pay my accountant $1,200 every year just to file these foreign asset forms, and I've never owed a penny of additional US tax on them. The penalties are so ridiculously disproportionate too - $10,000 for a paperwork error on accounts where you've paid all taxes due? It's just revenue generation at this point.

0 coins

Rosie Harper

•

Just want to echo what others have said - you definitely need to file Form 8938 based on your $65K year-end balance. The "either/or" rule is really important to understand. One thing I'd add is that you should also double-check if you need to file an FBAR (FinCEN Form 114) since that has its own separate $10,000 threshold. With $65K in foreign accounts, you'd almost certainly need to file that too if you haven't already. Also, don't feel bad about your accountant's mistake - international tax rules are incredibly complex and many preparers who don't specialize in expat/international situations miss these nuances. The key is catching it now before you file. Good luck getting it sorted out!

0 coins

I'm a tax preparer and I see this issue constantly with TurboTax Desktop. The software has a specific bug with Section 199A calculations for limited partners in real estate when only UBIA is provided on the K-1. Quick fix: In TurboTax, after entering your K-1, go to: 1. Forms mode (Ctrl+H) 2. Search for Form 8995 or 8995-A (depending on your income level) 3. Manually enter your QBI information and UBIA amount directly on this form TurboTax's interview mode often fails to properly handle this specific scenario, but entering it directly on the form works every time. This is especially important for real estate partnerships where the UBIA can significantly impact your QBI deduction limits.

0 coins

Lucas Turner

•

This is exactly the issue! I had the same problem and switching to forms mode was the only way I could get it to work. TurboTax's normal interview process just doesn't handle the UBIA for limited partners correctly. One additional tip: if your K-1 doesn't specifically list a QBI amount (Code V), you generally can use the ordinary business income amount from Box 1 as your starting point for QBI, unless your partnership has specified otherwise.

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I was having the exact same issue with TurboTax Desktop not recognizing my UBIA from my real estate partnership K-1. After reading through all the suggestions here, I tried the forms mode approach that Eleanor mentioned and it worked perfectly. For anyone else struggling with this: go to Forms mode (Ctrl+H), find Form 8995, and manually enter your QBI and UBIA amounts directly. The interview mode in TurboTax just doesn't handle this scenario properly for limited partners. I also want to echo what others have said about the income thresholds - even if you're below the $191K/$382K limits where UBIA limitations don't apply, it's still worth entering the information to ensure TurboTax is calculating everything correctly. In my case, it added back about $3,200 in deductions that the software was missing. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences and solutions!

0 coins

QuantumQuest

•

This is such a relief to read! I've been pulling my hair out trying to figure out why TurboTax wasn't picking up my UBIA for the QBI calculation. I'm also a limited partner in a real estate LLC and have been going in circles with this for weeks. I tried the forms mode approach you mentioned (Ctrl+H to get to Form 8995) and it finally worked! For anyone else following along, make sure you're looking at the right form - if your income is above the threshold limits, you'll need Form 8995-A instead of the regular 8995. One question though - when you manually entered the QBI amount on the form, did you just use the ordinary business income from Box 1 of your K-1? My partnership didn't provide a separate Code V entry either, so I'm assuming that's the right approach based on what Lucas mentioned earlier. Thanks again to everyone who shared their solutions. This community is a lifesaver when TurboTax support falls short!

0 coins

Something else to consider - Form 8958 is for allocating income between spouses in community property states, but there are exceptions to the 50/50 split rule. Certain types of income might be considered separate property, not community property. For example, if you received an inheritance, gifts specifically to you, or owned property before marriage, that might be separate property. Also, if you have a valid pre-nuptial agreement that defines certain income as separate, that could change how you fill out this form.

0 coins

Do you know how disability payments work with this form? I get VA disability which I thought wasn't taxable anyway, but the software is asking me to include it on this form and I'm confused why.

0 coins

VA disability payments are generally not taxable, so they typically wouldn't need to be included on tax forms related to income allocation. This sounds like an error in the software. The software might be asking you to list all sources of income initially, but then it should recognize that VA disability is non-taxable and exclude it from tax calculations. I'd recommend indicating that it's VA disability specifically when entering it, as most tax programs have special categories for this type of income that will handle it correctly.

0 coins

Quick tip: the instructions for Form 8958 on the IRS website are actually pretty good. Here's what they say about filling out the columns: "For each line, the amounts in columns (a) and (b) should add up to the combined amount reported on both spouses' returns." So if you earned $80,000 from Company A and it's community income in a community property state, you'd report $40,000 in your column and $40,000 in your spouse's column. Each of you would then report your respective amounts on your separate returns.

0 coins

The instructions never make sense to me lol. So if we have separate companies we work for do I still need to do this form? I make 70k from my job and she makes 55k from hers. We live in California.

0 coins

Steven Adams

•

As someone who's been through multiple partnership AARs in CCH Axcess, I wanted to add a few practical tips that might save you some headaches: First, before you even start the AAR process in CCH, create a spreadsheet tracking all the adjustments by partner and income type. This becomes your master reference and helps catch errors before they make it into the software. I learned this the hard way after having to redo an entire AAR because of calculation mistakes. Second, pay close attention to the CCH workflow for generating the corrected K-1s. The software sometimes doesn't automatically update all the necessary fields when you make adjustments, especially for things like Section 199A information or state-specific items. Always review each K-1 individually rather than assuming CCH got everything right. One thing that caught me off guard on my first AAR - if your partnership has any debt basis adjustments or suspended losses that need to be reallocated along with the income, those calculations can get complex quickly. CCH Axcess doesn't always handle the cascading effects of these adjustments automatically, so you may need to manually verify the debt basis and at-risk calculations for affected partners. Finally, keep a detailed log of every step you take in CCH during the AAR preparation process. If you run into issues or need to recreate the return later, having that documentation is invaluable. The AAR workflow in CCH isn't always intuitive, and it's easy to forget the specific sequence of steps that worked. Hope this helps with your filing!

0 coins

Zainab Ahmed

•

This is incredibly helpful advice! I'm just starting out with partnership tax work and the spreadsheet tracking idea is brilliant. I can already see how that would prevent the calculation errors you mentioned. Quick question about the debt basis adjustments you brought up - in CCH Axcess, is there a specific screen or module where you can review these cascading effects, or do you have to calculate them manually outside the software? I'm working on a case where we have suspended losses that need to be reallocated along with the income adjustments, and I want to make sure I'm not missing anything. Also, when you mention keeping a log of the CCH workflow steps, do you mean screenshots of each screen, or more like written notes about which menus and options you selected? I'm trying to figure out the best way to document this process for future reference. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's exactly the kind of practical guidance that helps newcomers avoid costly mistakes!

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

For debt basis adjustments in CCH Axcess, there isn't a dedicated screen that shows the cascading effects automatically. You'll need to manually track these calculations, which is why that master spreadsheet Steven mentioned is so crucial. I usually create separate tabs for: (1) original allocations, (2) corrected allocations, (3) debt basis impacts, and (4) suspended loss adjustments. In CCH, you can find the partner debt basis information in the K-1 detail screens under "Partner's Capital Account Analysis" and "Partner's Share of Liabilities," but the software won't automatically recalculate how your income reallocations affect these numbers. You'll need to manually verify that partners still have adequate basis to absorb their corrected losses. For documentation, I do both - screenshots of key screens (especially the Form 8082 setup and final K-1 summaries) plus written notes about the menu path and any non-obvious settings. Something like: "Forms Menu > Partnership > Administrative Adj Request > Selected 'Income Reallocation' option > Entered adjustments in Part II, Lines 1-3." The debt basis piece is particularly tricky with AARs because you're essentially unwinding and redoing the basis calculations from the reviewed year. If you have complex suspended losses, you might want to consider getting a second review from someone experienced with partnership basis rules before filing.

0 coins

Ethan Davis

•

This has been such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with my first partnership AAR and feeling much more confident after reading through everyone's experiences. One additional tip for newcomers working with CCH Axcess - make sure to check the "Print Options" settings before generating your final Form 8082 and K-1s. By default, CCH sometimes excludes certain supplemental statements that are crucial for AARs. Go to File > Print Options and verify that "Include All Statements" is selected, especially if you're making the push-out election that Diego mentioned earlier. Also, I learned the hard way that you should save multiple versions of your AAR return as you work through it. CCH Axcess can be finicky with AARs, and I've had returns corrupt during the preparation process. Save after each major section is completed - it's saved me from having to start over completely. For anyone still struggling with the partner reallocation calculations, I found it helpful to work backwards from the corrected K-1s to verify that everything flows properly to Form 8082. Print draft K-1s first, manually verify the adjustments make sense, then check that those same adjustments appear correctly on the Form 8082 summary. The learning curve is steep, but once you get through your first AAR successfully, the process becomes much more manageable!

0 coins

AaliyahAli

•

Thank you so much for the print options tip! I'm completely new to partnership tax work and just started working on my first AAR case. This kind of practical advice is exactly what I need. I have a question about the multiple versions suggestion - when you save different versions in CCH Axcess, do you just use "Save As" with different filenames, or is there a version control feature built into the software? I want to make sure I'm protecting my work properly as I go through this process. Also, working backwards from the K-1s is a great idea. I've been getting confused trying to make sure all the numbers tie out between Form 8082 and the individual partner adjustments. Does CCH Axcess have any built-in reconciliation reports that show how the Form 8082 adjustments flow to each partner's K-1, or do you just compare them manually? This community has been incredibly welcoming and helpful for someone just starting out with these complex partnership issues!

0 coins

You can absolutely use a different preparer. I recommend calling your original preparer and simply asking for a complete copy of your return if you don't already have it. Then take that to any preparer you choose. H&R Block charges around $125-150 for basic amendments, while independent CPAs might charge $200-300 depending on complexity. Some preparers even offer free amendments if they made the error.

0 coins

Yes, you can absolutely use a different tax preparer for your amendment! There's no legal requirement to stick with your original preparer, and given that you already paid $600+ and they want to charge you more for the amendment, shopping around makes perfect sense. A few things to keep in mind: - Make sure you have a complete copy of your original return (all pages and schedules) - The new preparer will need to understand what was filed originally to prepare the 1040-X correctly - Get quotes from multiple preparers - amendment fees can vary significantly - Some preparers offer free amendments if they find additional errors that benefit you I'd recommend calling around to local CPAs or tax services to compare pricing. Many charge flat fees for amendments ($150-250 is typical) rather than hourly rates. Just make sure whoever you choose has experience with amended returns since the process is a bit different from original filings. Good luck getting this sorted out without paying your original preparer even more money!

0 coins

This is such helpful advice! I'm new to dealing with tax amendments and had no idea that preparers could charge such different amounts. The flat fee range you mentioned ($150-250) is really useful to know when I start calling around. I'm curious though - when you mention that some preparers offer free amendments if they find additional errors that benefit you, do you mean they waive their fee if they find you're owed more money? That sounds almost too good to be true but would be amazing if that's actually a thing some places do!

0 coins

Prev1...13511352135313541355...5644Next