IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Paolo Rizzo

β€’

This has been such an incredibly helpful discussion! As a field service technician who works on industrial equipment at various manufacturing facilities, I was also completely confused by this "50-mile rule" that my coworkers kept mentioning. Reading through everyone's experiences, it's clear that I've been making this way more complicated than necessary. What really opened my eyes is understanding that the focus should be on legitimate business necessity, not arbitrary distance measurements. I often get dispatched for emergency equipment repairs that require me to be on-site during specific production windows - sometimes starting at 5 AM when the plant comes online, or working through scheduled maintenance shutdowns that can run 12-16 hours. These operational constraints make it completely impractical to drive home and return, regardless of whether the facility is 35 miles or 75 miles away. The insight about "tax home" being your principal place of business is also really important for my situation. I work from our main service depot about 70% of the time between field assignments, so that clearly establishes my base for applying per diem rules. What gives me the most confidence is hearing from so many people who've actually been audited and had their documentation accepted based on business justification rather than distance thresholds. Plus having a tax professional confirm there's no official IRS mileage requirement completely eliminates my anxiety about this supposed "rule." I'm definitely going to start documenting my dispatch requirements, equipment shutdown schedules, and safety protocols that necessitate overnight stays. Thanks to everyone for sharing such valuable real-world experiences - this community knowledge is exactly what I needed to understand these rules properly!

0 coins

PixelPrincess

β€’

Your field service situation is such a great example of why the IRS focuses on operational necessity rather than distance measurements! Those emergency repairs during specific production windows and 12-16 hour maintenance shutdowns are exactly the kind of business constraints that clearly justify per diem - you can't exactly leave in the middle of a critical equipment repair just to drive home and come back. As someone who's also new to understanding these rules properly, what strikes me most about this entire discussion is how widespread this "50-mile rule" myth has become across so many different industries. It's actually reassuring to know that experienced professionals in field service, healthcare, consulting, and other travel-heavy jobs were all making the same mistake of obsessing over distance instead of documenting legitimate business reasons. Your approach of documenting dispatch requirements and safety protocols makes perfect sense - those operational constraints are compelling business justifications that have nothing to do with how many miles you traveled. Combined with your clear tax home situation at the main service depot, you should have solid documentation for any legitimate per diem claims. This whole thread has been incredibly educational for understanding how these rules actually work in practice across different professions. Thanks for adding the field service perspective - it really helps show how the principles apply to emergency response situations!

0 coins

Sebastian Scott

β€’

This thread has been incredibly enlightening! As a traveling IT consultant who frequently works on system implementations at various corporate locations, I've been dealing with this exact per diem confusion for the past two years. Like everyone else here, I was desperately searching for this mythical "50-mile rule" in IRS publications and getting frustrated when it didn't exist anywhere. What really transformed my understanding is the consistent message about focusing on business necessity rather than arbitrary distance measurements. I often have system migrations that must happen during specific maintenance windows - sometimes starting at 3 AM to minimize business disruption, or running through entire weekends for critical infrastructure updates. These technical requirements clearly make overnight stays necessary regardless of whether the client site is 40 miles or 90 miles away. The clarification about "tax home" being your principal place of business has also been crucial for my situation. I work from my home office about 75% of the time between client projects, which should clearly establish my base for tax purposes. What gives me the most confidence is hearing from the tax preparer and seeing so many successful audit stories where documentation focused on legitimate operational constraints rather than distance thresholds. I'm definitely going to start keeping better records of my project schedules, maintenance window requirements, and technical constraints that necessitate extended on-site presence. Thanks to everyone who shared their real-world experiences - this community discussion has been far more valuable than any tax advice I've found elsewhere! Finally feel like I understand how to properly document my travel expenses without being overly conservative due to non-existent distance requirements.

0 coins

RaΓΊl Mora

β€’

Your IT consulting situation is such a perfect illustration of why the IRS focuses on practical business requirements rather than distance measurements! Those 3 AM system migrations and weekend infrastructure updates are exactly the kind of technical constraints that make overnight stays absolutely necessary - you can't exactly leave in the middle of a critical system deployment just to drive home and come back. As someone who's completely new to this community and these tax rules, this entire thread has been such an eye-opener. I was making the same mistake as everyone else - frantically trying to find this "50-mile rule" that apparently doesn't even exist in official IRS documentation! Your point about maintenance windows and technical requirements is really helpful for understanding how business necessity works in practice. It's amazing how many different professionals from various industries have all been dealing with this same confusion about mythical distance thresholds. Your home office situation sounds ideal for establishing a clear tax home too - working from there 75% of the time between client projects gives you solid documentation for your principal place of business. Thanks for adding the IT perspective to this discussion - it really helps newcomers like me understand how these principles apply to technical work that has such specific scheduling and operational requirements!

0 coins

Caden Turner

β€’

This is exactly why having a second opinion is so valuable for complex tax situations. Your Big 4 tax preparer should definitely know better than to classify insurance proceeds as ordinary business income without proper analysis. Based on what others have shared here, it sounds like you have a strong case for treating this as an involuntary conversion under Section 1033. The key factors working in your favor are: (1) you received insurance proceeds for property damage, (2) you reinvested those proceeds in repairing the same property, and (3) you completed the repairs within the allowable timeframe. Since your total repair costs ($158k based on your comment) exceeded the insurance payout ($135k), you actually have a net casualty loss of $23k rather than taxable income. For S-Corp business property, this loss should flow through to your K-1 without the personal casualty loss limitations. I'd strongly recommend getting documentation together showing the total damage, insurance settlement, and complete repair costs, then having a frank conversation with your tax preparer about why they're not considering the involuntary conversion rules. If they're not familiar with this area, it might be worth consulting with a tax professional who specializes in casualty losses and Section 1033 elections.

0 coins

This is really helpful - I'm completely new to dealing with insurance claims and tax implications. Just to make sure I understand correctly: since my repair costs ($158k) were higher than the insurance payout ($135k), I should actually be able to claim a $23k business casualty loss rather than having to pay taxes on $135k of "income"? That would be a huge difference in my tax liability. I'm definitely going to push back on my tax preparer's initial assessment. Do you know if there are any specific forms or documentation I should prepare before that conversation? I want to make sure I'm presenting this correctly since they seemed pretty confident about their original position.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

β€’

Yes, you've got it exactly right! Since your repair costs ($158k) exceeded the insurance proceeds ($135k), you have a net casualty loss of $23k that should be deductible as a business expense, rather than $135k of taxable income. That's a massive difference in tax treatment. For your conversation with your tax preparer, I'd recommend gathering these key documents: 1. Your insurance claim documentation and settlement letter 2. All receipts/invoices showing the $158k in actual repair costs 3. Photos documenting the damage and completed repairs 4. A copy of IRS Publication 547 (Casualties, Disasters, and Thefts) - specifically pages covering business casualty losses 5. Form 4684 (Casualties and Thefts) which is used to calculate and report casualty gains/losses You'll want to emphasize that this isn't ordinary business income but rather an insurance reimbursement for property damage, which should be analyzed under the casualty loss rules in Section 165 and potentially the involuntary conversion rules in Section 1033. The fact that you have documentation showing out-of-pocket costs beyond the insurance payout makes your position very strong. If your Big 4 preparer still pushes back after seeing this documentation, you might want to ask them to consult with a senior tax partner who specializes in casualty losses, since this is a fairly specialized area of tax law.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful - I'm dealing with a similar situation where my accountant wanted to classify flood damage insurance proceeds as regular business income. After reading through all the responses here, I realized I needed to educate myself more on casualty loss rules. One thing I'd add for anyone in a similar situation: make sure you understand the difference between insurance proceeds that exceed your property's adjusted basis (which could result in a gain) versus total repair costs that exceed the insurance payout (which results in a loss). The distinction is crucial for tax treatment. Also, timing matters a lot. If you received insurance money in one tax year but made repairs in another, you need to be careful about which year you report the casualty event and whether you're making a Section 1033 election to defer any potential gain. The documentation aspect can't be overstated - keep everything related to the damage, insurance claim, and repairs. I learned this the hard way when I had to reconstruct my records months later. Having a clear paper trail showing the progression from damage β†’ insurance claim β†’ actual repair costs makes the tax treatment much clearer to defend if questioned.

0 coins

Harper Hill

β€’

This is such valuable advice, especially about the timing issues between receiving insurance proceeds and completing repairs. I'm just starting to deal with my first business casualty loss situation and the complexity is overwhelming. Your point about understanding the difference between proceeds exceeding adjusted basis versus repair costs exceeding proceeds is really important. I initially thought any insurance money would just be treated as income, but learning about these casualty loss rules has been eye-opening. The documentation tip is gold - I'm going through something similar right now and thankfully started keeping detailed records from day one. Having photos of the damage, all correspondence with the insurance company, and every repair receipt organized has already saved me hours when working with my tax preparer. One question for anyone who's been through this: how long should we typically keep all this casualty loss documentation? I assume it's longer than the normal 3-year statute of limitations given the complexity of these situations?

0 coins

Nathan Kim

β€’

Has anyone considered that the type of YouTube channel might matter? I have a gaming channel with income from both ads and gaming sponsorships. My tax preparer said the sponsorships are definitely Schedule C, but put the ad revenue on Schedule E since they're technically royalties from my existing content. Been doing it this way for 3 years with no issues.

0 coins

Eleanor Foster

β€’

That's interesting! My accountant does the exact opposite. She puts my YouTube ad revenue on Schedule C and my book royalties on Schedule E. Her reasoning was that YouTube ad revenue is tied to a platform where I built a business presence, while book royalties are more passive. The IRS seems to accept both approaches.

0 coins

Eva St. Cyr

β€’

This is exactly the kind of gray area that drives people crazy during tax season! I've been dealing with a similar situation with my old blog that still generates affiliate commissions. After years of going back and forth, here's what I've learned: The IRS generally looks at the "origin and character" of the income rather than your current level of activity. Since you originally created YouTube content as part of what was essentially a business venture (even if informal), the income retains that business character even when the channel goes dormant. I'd recommend sticking with Schedule C for consistency, especially since you've been filing it that way for 7+ years. The IRS tends to scrutinize sudden changes in income classification, and you could face questions during an audit about why you switched approaches. One silver lining: even with a dormant channel, you might still be able to deduct certain ongoing expenses like internet costs (percentage used for business), software subscriptions for video editing tools you maintain, or even a portion of your phone bill if you use it to monitor analytics. These deductions can help offset some of that self-employment tax burden. The peace of mind from consistent filing often outweighs the SE tax savings, especially at your income level where we're talking about maybe $200 in additional taxes.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

β€’

This is really helpful, thank you! I hadn't thought about the "origin and character" concept - that makes a lot of sense. You're right that consistency is probably worth more than the potential tax savings, especially since I've been doing it the same way for so long. I'm curious about those deductions you mentioned though. I actually do still pay for Adobe Creative Suite since I occasionally think about making new videos (even though I never do), and I have a business internet plan that I've maintained. Are those still legitimate deductions even if I'm not actively creating content? I always assumed I needed to be actively working to claim business expenses.

0 coins

IRS Account Says "Information Not Available" for 2024 During Adjustment Processing - When Will Access Return?

I had my account balance showing before but now when I check my IRS account at 12:43 it shows "Your Information Is Not Available at This Time" for my 2024 tax year. The message specifically says "If you requested an adjustment to your account your information will not be available until that transaction is complete." I'm looking at my IRS online account details right now, and I can see all these options available: - Recently filed or processing returns - Pending payments or adjustments - Information on your business account - Installment agreement fees - Make a payment - Frequently Asked Questions About Balances When I look at the "Details By Year" section, it shows: Tax Year | You Owe ------------------------ 2024 | INFO Income Tax | Your Information Is Not Available at This Time And directly under that unavailable information message, there's text that says "If you requested an adjustment to your account your information will not be available until that transaction is complete." Meanwhile, my 2023 balance shows $0.00 clearly, so I know the system is working for previous years. I'm accessing this through the IRS website (sa.www4.irs.gov) on my mobile phone with LTE connection at 68% battery. Everything was showing fine before, so I'm confused about why my 2024 information disappeared suddenly. Does anyone know what this means or how long it'll take for my information to show up again? Did I trigger something by filing an adjustment request?

Yuki Tanaka

β€’

Hey! Just joined this community after discovering this thread while desperately googling this exact same issue at 2am! πŸ˜… My 2024 info disappeared about 4 days ago after filing an amended return last week, and I was absolutely convinced I had somehow completely destroyed my tax account! That "Information Not Available" message is genuinely terrifying when you have zero context - I've been refreshing my account obsessively hoping it would magically come back. Meanwhile my 2023 balance is just sitting there fine at $0.00, which made the whole thing even more confusing! Reading through everyone's experiences here has been such a massive relief though. It's wild how many of us are going through this identical situation with absolutely no heads up from the IRS. Like seriously, would it be that hard for them to add one simple notification saying "your account info will be temporarily unavailable during processing, don't panic"? Would save us all from those frantic middle-of-the-night Google sessions! Based on all the timelines shared here, sounds like I'm looking at another 1-3 weeks of waiting, which is stressful but at least now I know I didn't accidentally break the entire tax system. The uncertainty is definitely the worst part when you can't see what's happening behind the scenes. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and wait times - this community is such a lifesaver for helping us newcomers understand what's actually normal vs. what's worth losing sleep over! Really appreciate having a place where people actually explain what to expect instead of just saying "call the IRS and wait" πŸ™

0 coins

Hey there! Just joined this community after going through this exact same panic-inducing situation. My 2024 info disappeared from my IRS account about 6 days ago after I filed an amended return two weeks ago, and I was absolutely terrified that I had somehow completely broken my entire tax profile! 😰 That "Information Not Available" message with zero context is honestly nightmare fuel when you're new to dealing with IRS stuff. I've been checking my account like every few hours hoping it would magically reappear, while my 2023 and earlier years show up perfectly fine - which just made the whole thing more confusing! Reading through everyone's experiences in this thread has been such an incredible relief though. It's amazing how many of us are going through this identical process with absolutely no warning from the IRS about what to expect. Like seriously, would it really be that difficult for them to add a simple notification saying "hey, your account info will be temporarily hidden while we process your amendment, this is totally normal"? Would save so many people from those anxiety-filled 3am Google rabbit holes we've all apparently been doing! πŸ˜… Based on all the timelines people have shared here, sounds like I'm looking at another week or two of waiting, which is nerve-wracking but at least now I know it's completely normal and I didn't accidentally destroy the tax system. The uncertainty of not being able to see what's happening behind the scenes is definitely the hardest part, but this community has been amazing for helping newcomers like me understand what's actually normal vs. what's worth panicking about. Thanks to everyone who took the time to share their wait times and experiences - you're all lifesavers for those of us navigating this terrifying process for the first time! This place is such a valuable resource for getting real answers instead of just generic "wait it out" responses. πŸ™

0 coins

Dmitry Sokolov

β€’

I'm dealing with a nearly identical situation with Anchor Accounting and wanted to add some additional perspective for anyone else going through this nightmare. They filed my Self-Employment Tax Credit in January 2024 with the same "15-20 day" promise that seems to be their standard line. What I've discovered through my own research is that the IRS created a moratorium on processing these credits in late 2023 due to massive fraud concerns. Legitimate preparers should have known this and adjusted their timelines accordingly, but companies like Anchor apparently continued making unrealistic promises to acquire clients. I've already revoked their power of attorney using Form 2848 and filed complaints with both my state's consumer protection agency and the FTC. The state agency told me they've received dozens of similar complaints about tax preparation services making false timeline promises for these specific credits. For anyone still considering using services like this - the "advance payment" programs they advertise are essentially payday loans with terrible terms. You're much better off waiting for the IRS to process your legitimate claim, even if it takes longer than expected. I'd also strongly recommend joining the waiting list for the IRS's own direct file system for next year. After dealing with predatory preparers, handling your own taxes through the official system seems much safer, even if it requires more work upfront.

0 coins

Cynthia Love

β€’

This is exactly the information I needed to understand what's really happening! The moratorium you mentioned explains why all these companies were making promises they couldn't keep - they either didn't know about the IRS changes or chose to ignore them to keep acquiring clients. I'm definitely going to follow your lead and file complaints with both state and federal agencies. It sounds like there are enough similar cases that regulatory action might actually happen. The fact that your state agency has received dozens of complaints about the same issue gives me hope that something will be done about these predatory practices. Your point about the IRS direct file system is really important too. After this experience, I never want to deal with a third-party preparer again, especially for something as scrutinized as these employment credits. Even if it means doing more research myself, at least I'll know exactly what's being filed and won't have to worry about overclaiming or interception issues. Thanks for sharing the timeline details and agency feedback - it really helps to see the bigger picture of what's happening industry-wide rather than just thinking it's my individual case.

0 coins

I'm currently in the middle of a very similar situation with Anchor Accounting and this entire thread has been incredibly eye-opening. They filed my Self-Employment Tax Credit back in March 2024 with the same unrealistic "15-20 day" timeline that seems to be their standard sales pitch. After reading through everyone's experiences here, I'm realizing that I need to take immediate action rather than continuing to wait for their excuses. I'm going to revoke their power of attorney first thing tomorrow using Form 2848, then try the Claimyr service to actually speak with an IRS agent about what's really happening with my refund. What's particularly concerning to me after reading the tax professional's insights is that these companies may have been knowingly making false timeline promises even after the IRS moratorium on processing these credits. That feels like deliberate deception to acquire clients, especially when combined with their "advance payment" loan programs. I'm also planning to run my documents through taxr.ai to verify whether they overclaimed my credit like several others discovered. At this point I'd rather know the truth about my eligibility and file an amended return if necessary than risk an audit down the line. Thanks to everyone who shared their resources and experiences - this thread has given me a clear action plan when I was feeling completely lost dealing with Anchor's runaround. I'll make sure to update with my progress in case it helps others in similar situations.

0 coins

Prev1...12081209121012111212...5643Next