


Ask the community...
Another thing to try - if you have access to your IRS online account, check for any notices or letters they might have sent about the RIVO hold. Sometimes they'll post updates there that can give you more info about what they need to release your refund. Also, when you do get through to someone, ask specifically about Form 8379 (Injured Spouse Allocation) if you're married - sometimes RIVO holds are related to that and they can expedite the process if you qualify.
This is really helpful info! I didn't know about Form 8379 - that might actually apply to my situation since I'm married and my spouse had some old debt issues. Definitely going to check my online account first before calling again. Thanks for the detailed advice! š
Had this happen to me last year - RIVO cases are such a pain! One thing that helped me was calling the IRS early in the morning (like 7-8am) and asking to speak to someone in the "refund department" specifically. When you mention the RIVO lead number, they should be able to pull up your case and give you a timeline. Also, if you filed electronically, check if your tax prep software has any tools to track refund status - sometimes they have backdoor access to more detailed info than the regular "Where's My Refund" tool.
Great advice about calling early! I'm definitely going to try the 7am thing tomorrow. Quick question though - when you say "refund department" do you literally ask for that by name or is there a specific extension/menu option? I always get lost in their phone tree system š
As someone who recently navigated a similar non-resident alien tax situation, I wanted to share a few practical tips that helped me get through the HSA and IRA filing process. For the Form 8889 issue with Sprintax - I found it helpful to complete the Sprintax return first, then print out a draft to see exactly where the HSA deduction should flow. The key is making sure the deduction amount from Form 8889 gets properly reflected on Schedule 1, Line 13, and then recalculating your AGI manually. I used a simple spreadsheet to track the adjustments and make sure everything balanced. One thing I learned the hard way - if you're filing electronically through Sprintax, you'll need to print and mail your return anyway once you attach the manual Form 8889. The IRS systems can't process mixed electronic/paper filings, so you lose the e-file option. For the IRA deduction question - since you mentioned you're on a TN visa from Canada, you should definitely be eligible for the deduction assuming you meet the income requirements. The US-Canada tax treaty actually has favorable provisions for retirement savings. Just make sure you're not also claiming RRSP contributions in Canada for the same income, as that could create treaty complications. One final tip - keep detailed records of all your manual calculations and adjustments. If the IRS has questions later, you'll want to be able to show exactly how you arrived at your numbers.
This is incredibly helpful! I'm just starting to deal with my non-resident alien filing and the manual calculation part seems daunting. When you say you used a spreadsheet to track adjustments - did you basically recreate all the tax calculations that Sprintax did, or just the parts affected by the HSA deduction? Also, the point about losing e-file capability is something I hadn't considered. Do you know if there's any way to still get faster processing, or does mailing it in mean waiting the full 6-8 weeks for any refund?
@Ava Kim For the spreadsheet tracking, I didn t'recreate all of Sprintax s'calculations - just the key ones affected by adding the HSA deduction. Specifically, I tracked the AGI adjustment subtracting (the HSA contribution ,)then recalculated the standard deduction application, taxable income, and final tax liability. The math is pretty straightforward once you have the HSA amount from Form 8889. Unfortunately, mailing does mean slower processing. Paper returns typically take 6-8 weeks minimum, sometimes longer during busy season. There s'no way around this when you have to attach manual forms that the e-file system can t'handle. The trade-off is getting your deductions properly claimed versus faster processing. One small tip - if you re'expecting a refund, make sure to double-check your bank account information on the return since direct deposit can still work even with paper filing, which speeds up the refund portion once they process it.
I wanted to add another perspective as someone who dealt with a similar HSA/IRA situation as a non-resident alien. One thing that caught me off guard was the timing requirements for HSA contributions versus when you can actually claim the deduction. Even though you can contribute to your HSA through April 15th for the previous tax year, if you're manually filing Form 8889 with your non-resident return, you'll want to make sure all contributions are actually completed before you file. Unlike regular filers who might estimate and adjust later, the manual process makes corrections much more complicated. For your IRA situation on the TN visa - definitely confirm your contribution limits based on your earned income. As a non-resident alien, you can only contribute up to 100% of your US earned income or the annual limit ($7,000 for 2024), whichever is less. This is different from residents who might have other forms of compensation that count. Also, one practical tip for the Sprintax + manual Form 8889 approach - complete everything in Sprintax first, then print the entire return. Fill out Form 8889 separately, and physically attach it to the printed return before mailing. Don't try to modify the Sprintax PDF directly as it can cause formatting issues that might confuse IRS processing. The manual recalculation process mentioned by others is definitely doable - I found it helpful to work backwards from the final tax owed to make sure my adjustments were correct.
This is really helpful timing advice! I'm actually in the middle of this exact situation right now. One question about the HSA contribution timing - if I made contributions through payroll deduction throughout 2024 but also made some additional direct contributions in early 2025 (before April 15), do I need to wait for those direct contributions to fully process before filing? My bank shows them as pending but not yet posted to the HSA account. I'm worried about claiming a deduction for contributions that might not technically be "made" yet according to IRS rules, especially since I'm already doing the manual Form 8889 process. Also, regarding the earned income limit for IRA contributions - does this include only salary/wages, or would it also include things like bonuses or stock compensation that show up on my W-2? My situation is a bit more complex since I have both regular salary and some equity compensation.
Anyone know if the IRS has a preference between these reporting methods? I use TradeLog and have always added wash sale amounts to cost basis on replacement shares, but my accountant is questioning it because his other clients' reports from their brokers do it the other way.
The IRS doesn't explicitly state a preference as long as all wash sales are properly identified and reported. But in practice, most major brokerages (Schwab, Fidelity, etc.) now report wash sales by adjusting the cost basis of replacement shares, which is the TradeLog approach you mentioned.
I've been dealing with wash sale reporting for years as a day trader, and what you're experiencing is actually pretty common. The key thing to understand is that both GainsKeeper and TradeLog are likely correct - they're just applying different but valid interpretations of the wash sale rules. The IRS allows flexibility in how you report wash sales on Form 8949 as long as you're consistent and don't ultimately avoid recognizing the disallowed losses. Some software applies adjustments immediately when the wash sale occurs, while others defer the adjustments until you exit the position completely. My advice would be to pick one method and stick with it consistently across all your trading. If you're unsure which to choose, the method that adjusts cost basis on replacement shares (like TradeLog did for your LINE 4) tends to be more widely accepted and is what most major brokerages use in their year-end tax documents. Just make sure your total gains/losses for the year are roughly the same between both systems - that's the real test of whether the calculations are equivalent.
This is really helpful context! As someone new to dealing with wash sales, I'm curious - when you say "exit the position completely," does that mean I need to wait until I've sold all shares of that security before the wash sale calculations are finalized? I have some positions where I've been buying and selling the same stock multiple times throughout the year, so I'm not sure when the "wash sale chain" actually ends.
Great question! The "wash sale chain" can get really complex when you're actively trading the same security. You don't necessarily need to exit the entire position - it's more about tracking each specific lot of shares and their associated wash sale adjustments. For example, if you buy 100 shares, sell at a loss (wash sale), then buy 100 replacement shares, the disallowed loss gets added to the cost basis of those replacement shares. When you eventually sell those replacement shares, that's when the wash sale "resolves" for that particular chain - regardless of whether you still hold other shares of the same stock. The tricky part is when you have overlapping wash sale periods with multiple buys and sells. Most good tax software will track these individual chains automatically, but if you're doing it manually, you'll want to use FIFO (First In, First Out) or specific lot identification to keep track of which shares are tied to which wash sale adjustments. This is actually another reason why the software discrepancies you're seeing happen - different programs may use slightly different methods for matching up wash sale chains when you have complex trading patterns.
As someone who went through this exact situation when my spouse and I both started having self-employment income, I can confirm that either approach works fine from the IRS perspective. We initially made separate payments because I was worried about mixing things up, but switched to combined payments the following year for simplicity. The key thing to remember is that your quarterly estimated tax payments need to cover both your income tax AND self-employment tax on the gig income. Don't forget that self-employment tax is 15.3% on top of your regular income tax rate. One tip that helped us: if your spouse's W-2 job already has decent withholding, you might not need to pay as much in estimated taxes as you think. The withholding from her regular job counts toward your joint tax liability, so factor that in when calculating how much you need to pay quarterly. We were overpaying significantly until we realized this! Also, make sure you're making payments by the quarterly deadlines (Jan 15, Apr 15, Jun 15, Sep 15) to avoid any underpayment penalties. Good luck!
This is such helpful advice! I'm actually in a similar boat - just started gig work this year while my partner has been doing it for a while. The point about factoring in W-2 withholding is something I hadn't really considered. Do you have any rough guidelines for how to calculate that? Like if my regular job withholds $X per year, how do I figure out how much that reduces my quarterly estimated payments? Also, those quarterly deadlines you mentioned - are those the same for every state or do some states have different due dates? I'm in California and want to make sure I'm not missing anything on the state side.
Great question about calculating the W-2 withholding impact! Here's a simple way to think about it: look at your spouse's most recent paystub and multiply the federal tax withheld per pay period by the number of pay periods in the year. That gives you the annual withholding amount that's already going toward your joint tax liability. For example, if $400 is withheld from each biweekly paycheck, that's $400 Ć 26 = $10,400 per year in withholding that reduces what you need to pay in estimated taxes. As for California, the state quarterly due dates are the same as federal (Jan 15, Apr 15, Jun 15, Sep 15), but California has its own estimated tax requirements that might be different from your federal calculation. You'll want to use Form 540ES for California estimated payments. The good news is most tax software or tools like the ones mentioned above can handle both federal and state calculations together. The key is to calculate your total expected tax liability (federal + state + self-employment tax), subtract what's already being withheld from W-2 jobs, and then divide the remainder by 4 for your quarterly payments.
Great question! I went through this same confusion when my spouse and I both started having gig income. The IRS doesn't require separate payments for married filing jointly - you can absolutely make one combined quarterly payment that covers both of your self-employment incomes. What I found helpful was creating a simple spreadsheet to track our combined gig income throughout the year and calculate our quarterly obligations together. Since you're already experienced with estimated payments, you can just expand your current calculation to include your wife's gig income along with yours. One thing to watch out for: make sure you're accounting for the self-employment tax (15.3%) on both incomes when calculating your payments. Also, since your wife has W-2 withholding, that will help reduce your overall quarterly payment needs since the withholding applies to your joint tax liability. I'd recommend using Form 1040-ES to recalculate your payments now that you have two sources of self-employment income. The worksheet will help ensure you're paying enough to avoid underpayment penalties while not overpaying unnecessarily.
This is really helpful! I'm new to self-employment taxes and wondering - when you mention the 15.3% self-employment tax, is that in addition to regular income tax rates? So if I'm in the 22% tax bracket, would I be looking at roughly 37.3% total on my gig income? That seems really high but want to make sure I'm calculating this correctly for our quarterly payments.
Sophie Hernandez
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in a similar situation with a relocation package, but mine has an interesting wrinkle - the company structured it as a "forgivable loan" that gets forgiven over 24 months if I stay. Since I'm planning to leave after 18 months, I'll owe about 25% back. What's confusing me is whether this gets treated the same as a regular relocation payment for tax purposes. The company told me it won't show up on my W-2 initially since it's technically a loan, but then when portions get "forgiven" each month, those amounts will be added to my taxable income. Has anyone dealt with this type of forgivable loan structure? I'm wondering if the repayment process is different when it was originally structured as a loan versus a direct payment like the OP's situation. Also curious if the partial forgiveness each month creates additional complications. The documentation advice everyone's giving is spot on though - I've been saving every email and document related to this since day one after seeing similar horror stories from friends who didn't keep good records!
0 coins
Jace Caspullo
ā¢The forgivable loan structure is actually quite different from a direct relocation payment! With your setup, you're correct that the loan itself isn't initially taxable income since it's a debt you owe back. However, each monthly "forgiveness" portion does become taxable income as it's forgiven, which is why it shows up on your paystub gradually. When you leave and have to repay the unforgiven portion, you're essentially just paying back a loan - there shouldn't be any tax deduction for that repayment since you never paid taxes on that money in the first place. This is actually simpler than @0be550eed602's situation where they received taxable income upfront and then have to navigate the repayment complexities. The tricky part with your structure might be if you've already been taxed on some forgiven portions but then leave before the full 24 months. You'd want to confirm with your company whether they'll issue a corrected W-2 to remove the taxable income for portions that weren't actually forgiven due to your early departure, or if you'll need to handle that adjustment on your tax return. Definitely keep documenting everything since the monthly forgiveness creates a more complex paper trail than a lump sum payment!
0 coins
Madeline Blaze
Wow, this thread has been a goldmine of information! As someone who works in HR and deals with relocation packages regularly, I want to add a few key points that might help @0be550eed602 and others in similar situations. First, regarding timing - if at all possible, try to coordinate your Oregon departure and Colorado start dates so the repayment happens in the same tax year you received the money. This will make your life infinitely easier come tax time, as your Oregon employer should be able to issue a corrected W-2 rather than you having to navigate the cross-year repayment complications. Second, when you do repay the Oregon money, make sure you understand whether they want the gross amount (what was added to your wages before taxes) or the net amount (what you actually received after withholdings). This is often a point of confusion and can lead to disputes later. Third, don't forget about unemployment taxes (SUTA/FUTA) - when you received the relocation payment, your employer likely paid unemployment taxes on that amount. When you repay it, they should also reverse those tax payments, but this is something that often gets overlooked. Finally, for your Colorado relocation package, ask upfront about their tax handling procedures and get it in writing. Some companies gross up relocation payments (pay additional money to cover the taxes you'll owe), while others just add it to your wages and let you deal with the tax burden. Knowing this ahead of time will help you plan. The multi-state aspect everyone mentioned is definitely real - you'll likely need to file part-year resident returns in both Oregon and Colorado, and the timing of when you establish residency in each state can affect how the relocation payments are taxed at the state level. Document everything and consider consulting with a tax professional who understands multi-state tax issues. This situation is complex enough that the cost of professional advice will likely save you money and headaches in the long run!
0 coins
Muhammad Hobbs
ā¢This is incredibly helpful insight from an HR perspective! I had no idea about the unemployment tax aspect - that's definitely something I wouldn't have thought to ask about. One question about the gross vs. net repayment amount: if they want the gross amount back but I only received the net amount after taxes, am I essentially paying back more than I actually got? That seems like it could create a real financial burden, especially if you're also dealing with moving expenses to the new job. Also, regarding the timing coordination you mentioned - is this something I can actually negotiate with both companies? I'm worried that trying to coordinate departure/start dates around tax implications might look unprofessional or create issues with either employer. How do you typically see people handle this kind of timing request? The multi-state filing requirements are definitely something I need to research more. I hadn't even considered that establishing Colorado residency timing could affect the tax treatment. Do you know if there are any general rules about when you're considered a resident for tax purposes after relocating for work? Thanks for all the practical advice - it's exactly the kind of real-world insight that's hard to find elsewhere!
0 coins
Mateo Lopez
ā¢Yes, if they want the gross amount back, you would be paying more than you actually received - this is unfortunately common and can create a real cash flow problem! For example, if they paid you $13k gross but you only received $10k after taxes, you'd still owe back the full $13k. Some companies will work with you on this (like accepting the net amount or setting up a payment plan), but others stick to the contract terms. Definitely clarify this upfront! Regarding timing coordination - you can absolutely discuss this professionally! Frame it as wanting to ensure a smooth transition for both companies. Something like "I want to make sure I handle all obligations properly with my current employer before starting" sounds much better than "I'm trying to optimize my tax situation." Most HR departments understand these logistics. For state residency, it typically depends on where you're physically present and where your "domicile" is, but the rules vary by state. Generally, you become a resident when you move there with intent to stay permanently. Colorado considers you a resident starting from your move date, while Oregon will consider you a resident until you leave. You'll likely file part-year returns in both states covering the portions of the year you lived in each. The key is planning ahead and getting everything documented!
0 coins