Can self-employed 1099 workers qualify for EDD unemployment in California?
I've been working as an independent contractor for a marketing agency for about 8 months (paid via 1099). They just suddenly ended my contract yesterday with zero notice. I'm completely caught off guard and worried about paying bills next month. A friend mentioned I should apply for unemployment, but I thought that was only for W-2 employees? Can you actually file for unemployment in California if you were paid on a 1099? Has anyone successfully done this? The EDD website is super confusing on this topic.
43 comments


Diego Rojas
Regular UI benefits are typically only for W-2 employees. As a 1099 worker, you're technically self-employed, which normally disqualifies you from standard unemployment. However, there are some situations where you might qualify. If you believe you were misclassified as a contractor but were actually treated like an employee, you could file and let EDD investigate. California has strict rules about worker classification under AB5. I recommend checking out Claimyr (claimyr.com) - they helped me get through to an EDD specialist to discuss my complex employment situation within 15 minutes instead of waiting days. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/JmuwXR7HA10?si=TSwYbu_GOwYzt9km
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•Thank you! I didn't know about the misclassification thing. They did control my schedule and provided all the tools/equipment I used... Maybe I was misclassified? I'll check out that Claimyr service to talk to someone at EDD about my specific situation.
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
I WENT THROUGH THIS EXACT THING last year! The key is whether you were ACTUALLY an independent contractor or if the company was just calling you that to avoid paying taxes/benefits. If they controlled HOW and WHEN you worked, provided equipment, required specific hours, etc., you might actually have been an employee under CA law. File anyway and let EDD decide - the worst they can say is no. During pandemic they had special benefits for 1099 workers (PUA) but those are gone now.
0 coins
Sean O'Donnell
•yep this is right, its all about control. my friend was a "contractor" for 2 years but the company told her when to work, where to work, what to wear etc. she filed for unemployment and after a phone interview they approved her claim bc she was misclassified
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•Thanks for sharing your experience! They definitely controlled my schedule and required me to use their software and equipment. I had to attend team meetings too. Sounds like I should at least apply and see what happens.
0 coins
Zara Ahmed
Dont listen 2 these people they dont know what there talking about. I was 1099 and EDD denied me right away saying i wasnt eligible. Waste of time unless ur a w2 employee.
0 coins
StarStrider
•Actually, this is incorrect. The determination isn't simply about the tax form you received but rather the nature of your working relationship. California uses the ABC test under AB5 to determine if workers are properly classified. Many 1099 workers are improperly classified and DO qualify for UI benefits after EDD investigates. I worked as an EDD consultant for six years, and I've seen countless cases where 1099 workers were approved for benefits after investigation.
0 coins
Zara Ahmed
•whatever man i just know wat happened to me I applied and got denied right away
0 coins
Luca Esposito
The biggest question is: were you TRULY self-employed or were you actually functioning as an employee but being paid on a 1099? California has the ABC test from AB5 legislation which makes it harder for companies to classify workers as independent contractors. Here's what they look at: 1) Were you free from company control in how you did your work? 2) Was the work you did outside the company's main business? 3) Do you have an independently established business doing this type of work? If the answer is "no" to ANY of these, you were likely misclassified and should be eligible for unemployment! File your claim, be honest about your situation, and be ready for a phone interview where they'll ask detailed questions about your working arrangement.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•This is SO helpful! Looking at those three points: 1) No, they controlled when and how I worked 2) No, I was doing their core marketing work 3) No, I don't have my own marketing business Sounds like I have a strong case for misclassification. I'll definitely file and see what happens.
0 coins
Nia Thompson
i had a friend who was a 1099 driver and she got approved for benefits after her company fired her. EDD did a phone interview and decided she was actually an employee. took like 6 weeks but she got backpay for all of it.
0 coins
Sean O'Donnell
just a heads up if you do file - be super honest about how they treated you and your working conditions. my buddy tried applying and kinda messed up by making it sound like he had more independence than he really did & got denied. when edd calls for the interview (and they will) have examples ready of how they controlled your work
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•Good advice - thank you! I'll make sure to be very specific about how they controlled my schedule, required me to use their equipment, made me attend meetings, etc.
0 coins
StarStrider
To give you the most accurate information: Under regular circumstances, true independent contractors (1099 workers) aren't eligible for traditional unemployment insurance in California. However, if your working arrangement doesn't meet the legal definition of an independent contractor under California's AB5 law, you may qualify. When you file, EDD will investigate your working relationship. Be prepared to wait longer than a typical claim - misclassification investigations can add 4-6 weeks to the process. During your eligibility interview, they'll ask specific questions about: 1. Who controlled your work schedule 2. Who provided tools and equipment 3. Whether you worked exclusively for this company 4. If you had the ability to accept/reject assignments 5. How you were paid (hourly vs. project-based) If EDD determines you were misclassified, they'll calculate your benefit amount based on your earnings and you'll receive benefits retroactively from your filing date. The company may also face penalties for misclassification.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•Thank you for this detailed information! I really appreciate knowing what to expect. Based on everything everyone has shared, I'm going to file this week and prepare for the eligibility interview. Would it help to gather emails showing how they controlled my schedule and required me to attend meetings?
0 coins
StarStrider
•Yes, absolutely! Collect any evidence showing control over your work: emails about schedules, meeting requirements, performance reviews, dress codes, company policies you had to follow, etc. Having documentation ready for your interview will significantly strengthen your case.
0 coins
Mateo Rodriguez
this happened to my brother last year he was a "contractor" for three years but really was treated like employee. he filed for unemployment and had to do a phone interview. took like 5 weeks but they approved him AND they made the company pay penalties lol
0 coins
Chloe Martin
Just wanted to update everyone! I filed my claim last week and got a notice that they've scheduled my eligibility interview for next Friday. I've gathered emails showing how they controlled my schedule and required specific hours. Feeling more hopeful now that I understand the process better. Thanks for all the advice!
0 coins
Luca Esposito
•Good luck with your interview! Just remember to be completely honest and provide specific examples of how they treated you as an employee. Don't exaggerate but don't downplay the control aspects either. Let us know how it goes!
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
•Rooting for you! The fact that they scheduled an interview is actually a good sign - means they're taking your claim seriously enough to investigate.
0 coins
Malik Davis
Best of luck with your interview on Friday! From what you've described about your working situation, it really does sound like you have a strong case for misclassification. The fact that they controlled your schedule, provided equipment, and required you to attend meetings are all red flags that suggest an employer-employee relationship rather than true independent contracting. Make sure to speak clearly about these specific control factors during your interview. Also, don't be discouraged if the process takes a few more weeks after the interview - these misclassification determinations can be thorough but they're worth the wait if you qualify. Keep us posted on how it goes!
0 coins
Oliver Brown
Hey Chloe! I just went through something similar about 6 months ago. I was working as a "freelance" graphic designer for a tech startup but they basically treated me like a regular employee - set my hours, made me work from their office, used their computers and software, had to get approval for everything. When they let me go, I was hesitant to file for unemployment because of the 1099 situation, but I'm so glad I did! EDD scheduled my phone interview about 2 weeks after filing, and the investigator asked really detailed questions about my day-to-day work. I was honest about how controlled my work environment was, and they approved my claim about a month later. Got retroactive benefits from my filing date too. The whole process took about 6 weeks total, but it was definitely worth it financially while I looked for new work. Your situation sounds even more clear-cut than mine was based on what you've described. Good luck with your interview - sounds like you're well prepared with documentation!
0 coins
Layla Sanders
•Thanks for sharing your experience Oliver! It's really encouraging to hear from someone who went through the same thing. The fact that you got approved even though you were hesitant to file gives me hope. Your situation does sound similar - being required to work from their office and use their equipment definitely shows they were controlling how you worked. I'm feeling more confident about my interview on Friday now. Did they ask you about specific incidents or was it more general questions about your work arrangement?
0 coins
CosmicVoyager
I'm a newcomer here but wanted to share that I'm currently going through a similar situation. I was working as a 1099 "consultant" for a marketing firm for almost a year, but looking back, they definitely controlled way more than they should have for true independent contractor work. They set my daily schedule, required me to use their CRM system, attend weekly team meetings, and even had me follow their specific processes for client communication. When they terminated my contract last month, I was initially discouraged from filing for unemployment by friends who said "1099 workers don't qualify." But after reading through this thread and doing more research on AB5, I realized I might have been misclassified. I filed my claim two weeks ago and just got my eligibility interview scheduled for next week. Chloe, it sounds like we're in very similar boats - I'm also gathering email evidence showing how they controlled my work. This community has been incredibly helpful in understanding that it's not just about the tax form you received, but about the actual working relationship. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - it's given me confidence to pursue this properly!
0 coins
Butch Sledgehammer
•Welcome to the community! Your situation sounds very similar to what many of us have experienced. The fact that they controlled your daily schedule, required specific software use, and mandated team meetings are all strong indicators of an employer-employee relationship under AB5. It's frustrating how many companies misclassify workers to avoid paying proper taxes and benefits. Good luck with your eligibility interview next week! Make sure to emphasize those control factors you mentioned - the scheduled work hours and required processes are exactly what EDD looks for when determining misclassification. Keep us updated on how it goes, and don't hesitate to ask if you have questions before your interview!
0 coins
Chloe Mitchell
Welcome to the community! As someone who just went through a similar situation, I wanted to add my experience. I was working as a "freelance" social media manager for a small business for about 10 months, but they treated me exactly like an employee - required specific work hours (9-5), made me use their branded templates and approval processes, and even gave me performance reviews. When they suddenly cut my contract last month, I was devastated financially. I initially didn't think I could get unemployment because of the 1099, but after reading about AB5 and worker misclassification, I decided to file anyway. My eligibility interview was last week, and I was really nervous, but the EDD investigator was actually very thorough and fair. They asked detailed questions about my work arrangement, and I was honest about how controlled my daily work was. I'm still waiting for their decision, but the investigator seemed to understand that the 1099 classification might not have been appropriate. Chloe, your situation with the marketing agency sounds very similar to mine - especially the part about them controlling your schedule and providing equipment. That's exactly what the investigator focused on during my interview. I'd definitely recommend filing and letting EDD make the determination. Even if it takes a few weeks, the potential benefits could really help while you're looking for new work. Best of luck with your interview on Friday!
0 coins
Emma Davis
•Thanks for sharing your experience! It's really reassuring to hear from someone who just went through their eligibility interview. Your situation with the social media management work sounds almost identical to mine - the required 9-5 hours and performance reviews are exactly the kind of employee treatment that shouldn't happen with true independent contractors. I'm keeping my fingers crossed that you get approved! Your advice about being honest during the interview is really helpful. I've been practicing how to clearly explain the control aspects without overthinking it. Hoping we both get good news soon!
0 coins
Jungleboo Soletrain
As someone new to this community, I wanted to share that I'm currently dealing with a very similar situation. I worked as a "contract" content writer for a digital marketing company for about 6 months, but they definitely crossed the line into employee territory. They assigned me specific daily tasks, required me to attend morning stand-up meetings via Zoom, set strict deadlines, and even had editorial guidelines I had to follow exactly. When they ended my contract two weeks ago citing "budget cuts," I was completely blindsided. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been incredibly eye-opening. I had no idea about the AB5 law and worker misclassification issues. Based on what I'm learning, it seems like I should definitely file for unemployment - they controlled when I worked, how I worked, and what tools I used (their content management system, style guides, etc.). I'm planning to file my claim this week and gather evidence like Chloe did. Thank you all for sharing your stories and advice - this community is exactly what I needed to find right now. It's given me hope that there might be financial relief available while I search for new work. I'll definitely keep everyone updated on my progress!
0 coins
Omar Hassan
•Welcome to the community! Your content writing situation sounds like a textbook case of misclassification - the daily task assignments, required Zoom meetings, and strict editorial guidelines are all major red flags that show they were treating you as an employee rather than an independent contractor. The fact that they controlled your work processes so tightly really strengthens your case under AB5. It's unfortunate how common this type of misclassification is in the marketing/content industry. Definitely file this week like you're planning - gather any emails about meeting requirements, task assignments, or style guide mandates as evidence. The "budget cuts" reason for termination also sounds like typical employer behavior rather than ending a contractor relationship. Keep us posted on your filing process and interview when it gets scheduled. You've got a strong community here rooting for you!
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
I'm new to this community but found myself in a very similar situation and wanted to share my experience. I worked as a "freelance" digital marketing specialist for a tech startup for about 7 months, but looking back, they definitely treated me like an employee. They required me to work specific hours (10am-6pm), use their project management software, attend weekly all-hands meetings, and follow their exact processes for client reporting. When they suddenly terminated my contract last week, I was devastated and unsure about my options. After reading through this entire thread, I realize I was likely misclassified under AB5. They controlled not just what I did, but how and when I did it - which seems to be the key factor everyone's mentioning. I'm planning to file for unemployment this week and gather documentation like emails about required meeting attendance and their work hour expectations. This community has been incredibly helpful in understanding that worker misclassification is more common than I thought, especially in the marketing industry. It's given me confidence to pursue benefits rather than just accepting that "1099 workers don't qualify." Thank you to everyone who shared their experiences - it's exactly what I needed to hear right now while dealing with this stressful situation!
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
•Welcome to the community, Ethan! Your situation with the tech startup sounds incredibly similar to what many of us have experienced - the required 10am-6pm hours and mandatory all-hands meetings are exactly the type of control that indicates an employee relationship rather than true independent contracting. It's really encouraging to see more people understanding their rights under AB5 and not just accepting the "1099 workers don't qualify" narrative that companies often push. The marketing/tech industry seems particularly prone to this type of misclassification. Make sure to document those specific work hour requirements and meeting mandates when you file - that evidence will be crucial during your eligibility interview. You're taking the right steps by filing this week. This community has been amazing for support and practical advice, so don't hesitate to keep us updated on your progress. Wishing you the best of luck with your claim!
0 coins
Emma Thompson
As someone new to this community, I'm in almost the exact same situation and this thread has been incredibly helpful! I was working as a "contract" graphic designer for a marketing agency for about 10 months, but they definitely treated me like an employee. They required me to work 9-5 Monday through Friday, attend daily team standup meetings, use only their design software and brand guidelines, and get approval on every project before submitting to clients. When they terminated my contract yesterday with just an email saying "we're restructuring," I was completely shocked. Reading everyone's experiences here has opened my eyes to the AB5 law and worker misclassification issues. I had no idea that the tax form you receive isn't the only factor in determining unemployment eligibility. The fact that they controlled my schedule, work location (had to work from their office 3 days a week), and creative processes seems to clearly indicate I was misclassified as an independent contractor. I'm planning to file my claim tomorrow and start gathering evidence like meeting invites, emails about required work hours, and their style guide mandates. Thank you all for sharing your stories and practical advice - it's given me hope during this stressful time. Chloe, best of luck with your interview on Friday! I'll definitely keep everyone updated on my progress through this process.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•Welcome to the community, Emma! Your graphic design situation sounds like one of the clearest cases of misclassification I've read about - requiring you to work specific office hours, attend daily standups, and work from their office 3 days a week are all major red flags under AB5. The fact that they controlled your creative process through mandatory style guides and approval requirements really seals the deal that this was an employee relationship. It's so frustrating how these companies use "restructuring" as an excuse when they're really just laying off workers they've been misclassifying. You're absolutely doing the right thing by filing tomorrow and gathering that evidence. The meeting invites and work hour emails will be perfect documentation for your eligibility interview. This community has been such a lifesaver for understanding these situations aren't isolated incidents. Keep us posted on your filing and interview process - we're all rooting for you!
0 coins
Sofia Rodriguez
I'm new to this community and just wanted to say how incredibly helpful this entire thread has been! I'm currently in a similar situation - worked as a "freelance" content strategist for a digital agency for 9 months, but they controlled everything from my daily schedule to requiring me to use their specific project management tools and attend mandatory client calls. They ended my contract last Friday citing "budget adjustments" and I was completely unprepared financially. Reading through everyone's experiences with AB5 and worker misclassification has been eye-opening. I had always assumed that receiving a 1099 automatically disqualified me from unemployment benefits, but now I understand it's really about the actual working relationship and level of control the company had over my work. The fact that they set my hours (8:30am-5:30pm), required me to work from their office twice a week, and had me follow their exact content approval processes seems to clearly indicate I was treated as an employee rather than a true independent contractor. I'm planning to file my claim this week and gather evidence like email chains about required work schedules and their mandatory process documentation. Thank you to everyone who shared their stories and practical advice - especially about being thorough during the eligibility interview. This community has given me the confidence to pursue benefits rather than just accepting the "1099 means no unemployment" myth. I'll definitely keep everyone updated on my progress!
0 coins
Liam O'Reilly
•Welcome to the community, Sofia! Your content strategist situation sounds like another textbook case of misclassification - the required 8:30am-5:30pm schedule, mandatory office days, and controlled approval processes are exactly the kind of employee treatment that violates AB5's independent contractor guidelines. It's really unfortunate how common this "budget adjustments" excuse is when companies are essentially conducting layoffs of workers they've been improperly classifying. You're absolutely taking the right approach by filing this week and documenting those work schedule requirements and process mandates. The evidence you're gathering about mandatory client calls and office attendance will be crucial during your eligibility interview. This thread has been such a valuable resource for all of us dealing with similar situations - it's clear that worker misclassification in the marketing/content industry is more widespread than many people realize. Don't let anyone discourage you with the "1099 means no benefits" myth. Keep us posted on your filing process and interview when it gets scheduled. We're all supporting each other through these challenging situations!
0 coins
Alina Rosenthal
I'm new to this community and found myself in a very similar situation to many of you. I worked as a "contract" SEO specialist for a marketing firm for about 8 months, but they clearly treated me like an employee. They required me to work strict 9am-6pm hours, attend weekly strategy meetings, use only their approved SEO tools and reporting templates, and even gave me quarterly performance reviews. When they suddenly terminated my contract two days ago citing "shifting priorities," I was completely caught off guard. This entire thread has been incredibly educational about AB5 and worker misclassification. Like many others here, I always thought that getting a 1099 meant I couldn't qualify for unemployment benefits. But reading everyone's experiences has helped me understand that it's really about the actual working relationship and how much control the company exercised over my work. The fact that they dictated my schedule, required specific tools, and controlled my work processes seems to clearly indicate I was misclassified. I'm planning to file my claim tomorrow and start collecting evidence like emails about required meeting attendance, their SEO process guidelines I had to follow, and documentation of my set work hours. Thank you to everyone who shared their stories - especially the detailed advice about the eligibility interview process. This community has given me the confidence to pursue this rather than just accepting that "contractors don't get benefits." I'll definitely keep you all updated on how my case progresses!
0 coins
Elijah O'Reilly
•Welcome to the community, Alina! Your SEO specialist situation sounds like yet another clear case of worker misclassification - the strict 9am-6pm hours, mandatory weekly meetings, required use of specific tools, and quarterly performance reviews are all strong indicators of an employee relationship under AB5. It's really telling how many of us in the marketing industry have experienced this same pattern of companies misclassifying workers to avoid proper employment obligations. The "shifting priorities" termination reason you mentioned is exactly the kind of employer-style decision making that further supports your case. You're absolutely doing the right thing by filing tomorrow and gathering that evidence about meeting requirements and process guidelines. The SEO tool restrictions and reporting templates they required you to use will be excellent documentation for your eligibility interview. This thread has been such a valuable resource for all of us navigating these situations - it's clear that understanding our rights under AB5 is crucial when companies try to push the "1099 means no benefits" narrative. Don't let anyone discourage you from pursuing what you're rightfully entitled to. Keep us posted on your filing process and how your eligibility interview goes when it gets scheduled!
0 coins
Demi Lagos
I'm new to this community but wanted to share that I'm currently going through almost the exact same situation! I was working as a "freelance" marketing coordinator for a small agency for about 6 months, but they definitely controlled way more than they should have for true independent contractor work. They required me to work specific hours (8am-5pm), attend daily check-in calls, use their CRM and project management systems exclusively, and even had me complete monthly goal-setting sessions with my "supervisor." When they terminated my contract last week saying they were "going in a different direction," I was initially discouraged from filing because of the 1099 status. But reading through this entire thread has been incredibly enlightening about AB5 and worker misclassification! I had no idea that the actual working relationship matters more than just the tax form you receive. Based on everyone's experiences here, it sounds like I should definitely file - they controlled my schedule, provided all the tools I used, and treated me exactly like their W-2 employees in terms of oversight and expectations. I'm planning to file my claim this week and gather evidence like emails about required meeting attendance and their mandatory reporting processes. Thank you all for sharing your stories and practical advice - this community has given me the confidence to pursue benefits rather than just accepting that "contractors don't qualify." I'll keep everyone posted on my progress!
0 coins
Yuki Watanabe
•Welcome to the community, Demi! Your marketing coordinator situation sounds like another textbook example of worker misclassification - the required 8am-5pm schedule, daily check-in calls, exclusive use of their systems, and monthly goal-setting sessions with a "supervisor" are all major red flags that indicate an employee relationship under AB5. It's so frustrating how these companies use vague termination reasons like "going in a different direction" when they're essentially laying off workers they've been improperly classifying. You're absolutely making the right decision by filing this week! The evidence you're planning to gather about mandatory meetings and reporting processes will be crucial for your eligibility interview. This thread has been such an amazing resource for all of us dealing with similar misclassification situations in the marketing industry. Don't let anyone discourage you with outdated information about 1099 workers - your actual working conditions are what matter under California law. Keep us updated on your filing process and interview when it gets scheduled. We're all here supporting each other through these challenging situations!
0 coins
StarSailor
I'm new to this community and just wanted to say how valuable this entire discussion has been! I'm currently dealing with a very similar situation - I worked as a "contract" social media manager for a tech startup for about 7 months, but they definitely crossed the line into employee territory. They required me to work set hours (9am-6pm), attend weekly team meetings and daily standups, use only their approved social media management tools and content calendars, and even had me go through their standard onboarding process like any regular employee. When they suddenly ended my contract yesterday citing "restructuring," I was completely blindsided and worried about how I'd pay my bills. Like many others here, I initially thought that being paid on a 1099 automatically disqualified me from unemployment benefits. But reading through everyone's experiences with AB5 and worker misclassification has been incredibly eye-opening! Based on what I'm learning from this community, it seems clear that I was misclassified - they controlled when I worked, how I worked, what tools I used, and treated me exactly like their other employees in terms of meetings and expectations. I'm planning to file my claim this week and start gathering evidence like meeting invites, their social media guidelines I had to follow, and emails about required work hours. Thank you to everyone who shared their stories and practical advice, especially about the eligibility interview process. This community has given me the confidence to pursue benefits rather than just accepting that "1099 means no unemployment." I'll definitely keep everyone updated on my progress through this process!
0 coins
James Johnson
•Welcome to the community, StarSailor! Your social media manager situation sounds incredibly similar to what so many of us have experienced - the required 9am-6pm hours, mandatory daily standups, controlled tool usage, and standard employee onboarding process are all crystal clear indicators of misclassification under AB5. It's really telling how common this pattern is across the tech and marketing industries where companies try to avoid employment responsibilities by slapping a "contractor" label on what is clearly an employee relationship. The "restructuring" termination reason you mentioned is exactly the kind of employer decision-making that further supports your case. You're absolutely taking the right approach by filing this week and documenting those meeting requirements and social media guidelines! The evidence about their onboarding process will be particularly powerful during your eligibility interview since true independent contractors typically don't go through standard employee orientation. This thread has been such a lifeline for all of us navigating these situations - it's clear that understanding our rights is crucial when companies push the "1099 means no benefits" myth. Don't hesitate to reach out if you have questions as you go through the filing process. We're all here supporting each other through these challenging times!
0 coins
Harper Thompson
I'm new to this community and finding myself in almost the exact same situation as many of you! I was working as a "freelance" email marketing specialist for a digital agency for about 5 months, but they definitely treated me more like an employee than an independent contractor. They required me to work specific hours (9am-5:30pm), attend weekly campaign planning meetings, use only their email platform and brand templates, and even had me submit weekly performance reports to my assigned "team lead." When they terminated my contract yesterday saying they were "optimizing their contractor spend," I was devastated and had no idea what my options were. Like everyone else here, I assumed that getting paid on a 1099 meant I couldn't qualify for unemployment benefits. But reading through this entire thread about AB5 and worker misclassification has been incredibly enlightening! Based on all the experiences shared here, it's clear that I was likely misclassified - they controlled my schedule, dictated which tools I could use, required regular reporting, and supervised my work just like their W-2 employees. I'm planning to file my claim tomorrow and gather evidence like meeting invitations, their email template requirements I had to follow, and documentation of my set work hours. Thank you to everyone who shared their stories and practical advice about the eligibility interview process. This community has given me the confidence to pursue benefits rather than just accepting the "contractors don't get unemployment" myth. I'll definitely keep you all updated on how my case progresses!
0 coins
Levi Parker
•Welcome to the community, Harper! Your email marketing specialist situation sounds like another perfect example of worker misclassification that's unfortunately all too common in the digital marketing space. The required 9am-5:30pm schedule, mandatory campaign planning meetings, exclusive use of their platform and templates, and weekly performance reports to a "team lead" are all textbook indicators of an employee relationship under AB5. It's really frustrating how these agencies use corporate speak like "optimizing contractor spend" when they're essentially conducting layoffs of workers they've been improperly classifying to avoid employment costs. You're absolutely making the right decision by filing tomorrow! The evidence you're planning to gather about meeting invitations and template requirements will be crucial documentation for your eligibility interview. The fact that they assigned you a "team lead" for supervision is particularly damning evidence that this was an employee relationship rather than true independent contracting. This thread has been such a valuable resource for all of us dealing with similar situations - it's clear that these misclassification practices are widespread across the marketing industry. Don't let anyone discourage you with outdated information about 1099 status automatically disqualifying you from benefits. Keep us posted on your filing process and eligibility interview when it gets scheduled - we're all here cheering each other on through these challenging times!
0 coins