< Back to UCC Document Community

Isaiah Thompson

UCC filing for cash security agreement - debtor name complications

Running into issues with a UCC-1 filing where the collateral is a cash security agreement. The debtor operates under multiple business names and I'm not sure which exact legal name to use on the filing. The original loan documents reference "ABC Construction LLC" but their articles of incorporation show "ABC Construction Holdings LLC". The cash is held in an account under the DBA name "ABC Builders". This is for a $2.8M construction loan and I cannot afford to get the debtor name wrong. Has anyone dealt with cash collateral filings where the debtor has multiple legal entities? What's the safest approach to ensure the UCC-1 doesn't get rejected for name discrepancies?

Ruby Garcia

•

Cash security agreements can be tricky with UCC filings. You absolutely need to use the exact legal name from the debtor's organizational documents - so "ABC Construction Holdings LLC" would be correct if that's what the articles show. The DBA name won't work for UCC purposes. Double-check the Secretary of State records to confirm the exact spelling and punctuation.

0 coins

This is exactly right. I learned this the hard way when a filing got rejected because I used the DBA instead of the legal entity name. The SOS systems are very strict about exact name matches.

0 coins

But what if the loan documents are all signed under the other name? Wouldn't that create a mismatch between the loan and the UCC filing?

0 coins

I had a similar situation last month with a cash security agreement. The key is making sure your loan documents and UCC filing use the same debtor name. If there's a discrepancy, you might need to get an amendment to the loan docs before filing the UCC-1. For $2.8M, definitely worth getting it right the first time.

0 coins

That's my concern - the loan docs reference ABC Construction LLC but the legal entity is ABC Construction Holdings LLC. Should I amend the loan first or can I file the UCC with the legal name and explain the discrepancy?

0 coins

Ruby Garcia

•

File with the legal entity name. The UCC system doesn't care what your loan documents say - it only cares about the debtor's actual legal name per state records.

0 coins

Maya Lewis

•

Wait, that seems risky. If the loan docs and UCC don't match, how do you prove the security interest attaches to the right entity?

0 coins

Isaac Wright

•

I actually found a tool that helps with these exact issues - Certana.ai has a document verification system where you can upload your charter documents and UCC-1 draft to check for name consistency before filing. It caught a similar discrepancy for me where the debtor name on my UCC didn't exactly match their articles of incorporation. Saved me from a rejection and having to refile.

0 coins

That sounds helpful. Does it check against actual state records or just compare the documents you upload?

0 coins

Isaac Wright

•

It does a cross-check between documents you upload - so you'd upload the articles of incorporation and your draft UCC-1 and it flags any name mismatches. Really helpful for catching those small spelling differences that cause rejections.

0 coins

Lucy Taylor

•

Never heard of this but honestly anything that prevents UCC rejections is worth trying. The refiling process is such a pain.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

Cash as collateral is straightforward for UCC purposes - it's the debtor name that's your main concern here. Run a UCC search on both names to see if there are existing filings under either entity. That might give you a clue about which name other lenders are using.

0 coins

Good idea. I'll check both names in the UCC database. If other lenders are consistently using one name over the other, that might indicate the safer choice.

0 coins

KhalilStar

•

Just remember that other lenders might have made the same mistake you're trying to avoid. Always go back to the Secretary of State records as the authoritative source.

0 coins

UGH I hate when debtors have multiple entity names like this. It's like they're trying to make our jobs harder. Why can't they just stick with one legal name and be done with it?? Last month I spent 3 hours on the phone with the SOS office trying to figure out the correct name for a similar situation.

0 coins

Kaiya Rivera

•

Tell me about it! And then when the filing gets rejected, the client acts like it's your fault for not being psychic about their corporate structure.

0 coins

At least with cash collateral you don't have to worry about detailed collateral descriptions. Silver lining I guess?

0 coins

Noah Irving

•

For cash security agreements, make sure you're also considering the deposit account control agreement if the cash is in a specific account. The UCC filing should reference the security agreement, but the DACA gives you control over the actual funds.

0 coins

Yes, we have the DACA in place with the bank. The UCC filing is more for notice purposes and to perfect our security interest in the cash collateral.

0 coins

Noah Irving

•

Perfect. Then you're covered on the control side. Just get that debtor name right and you should be good to go.

0 coins

Vanessa Chang

•

What's a DACA? Sorry, still learning all these acronyms...

0 coins

KhalilStar

•

I've been doing UCC filings for 15 years and name discrepancies are still the #1 cause of rejections. For a $2.8M deal, I'd recommend having your attorney review the entity structure before filing. Better to spend a few hundred on legal review than risk perfection issues later.

0 coins

That's probably the safest approach. I'll have our counsel confirm which entity name should be used and whether we need to amend any loan documents.

0 coins

Smart move. On deals this size, the legal review cost is nothing compared to the potential issues if you get it wrong.

0 coins

Isaac Wright

•

Actually, one more thing about that Certana tool I mentioned - it's really easy to use. You just upload PDFs of your documents and it automatically flags inconsistencies. For situations like yours where you're dealing with entity name variations, it can save a lot of headaches by catching the issues before you file.

0 coins

Does it work with all state filing systems or just certain ones?

0 coins

Isaac Wright

•

It's document-based verification so it works regardless of which state you're filing in. It's comparing the names and details in your actual documents rather than checking state databases.

0 coins

Quick question - is the cash being held as collateral for the full loan amount or just a portion? That might affect how you describe the collateral in the UCC filing.

0 coins

It's cash collateral for the full loan amount. The description will be pretty straightforward - just the cash security agreement and related deposit accounts.

0 coins

Good, that keeps the collateral description simple. Now you just need to nail down that debtor name and you're set.

0 coins

Way easier than trying to describe complex equipment or inventory as collateral!

0 coins

Ruby Garcia

•

Final recommendation: Use the exact legal entity name from the Secretary of State records (ABC Construction Holdings LLC), file your UCC-1 with that name, and if needed, amend your loan documents to match. The UCC system doesn't care about your internal loan documentation - it only cares about the debtor's legal name as registered with the state.

0 coins

Thanks everyone. I think this is the right approach. I'll verify the exact legal name with the Secretary of State and file accordingly. Really appreciate all the input on this.

0 coins

Lucy Taylor

•

Good luck with the filing! Cash collateral deals are usually pretty clean once you get the names sorted out.

0 coins

Maya Lewis

•

Hope it goes smoothly. Keep us posted if you run into any other issues with the filing.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today