UCC Security Agreement Notarization - Does a Security Agreement Need to Be Notarized?
Got a weird situation here - working on a commercial equipment loan and the borrower is asking if we need to get the security agreement notarized. I've been doing UCC filings for about 3 years now and honestly can't remember ever having to notarize a security agreement itself. We always file the UCC-1 financing statement of course, but the underlying security agreement document... I'm drawing a blank. The loan is for $175K in manufacturing equipment and our legal dept is out of office until next week. Anyone know if security agreements need notarization? This is holding up our closing and I don't want to tell the client wrong info. Thanks in advance!
35 comments
Join the conversation
Dylan Campbell
No, security agreements don't require notarization under Article 9 of the UCC. The security agreement just needs to be authenticated by the debtor - which usually means signed. Notarization isn't part of the perfection requirements. Your UCC-1 filing is what perfects the security interest, not notarizing the underlying agreement.
0 coins
Sofia Hernandez
•This is correct. I've handled hundreds of secured transactions and never once notarized a security agreement. The authentication requirement is satisfied by the debtor's signature.
0 coins
Dmitry Kuznetsov
•Wait, are you sure about this? I thought some states might have different requirements...
0 coins
Ava Thompson
Actually had this exact same question last month! Spent way too much time researching it. The UCC is pretty clear - no notarization required for security agreements. However, some lenders choose to notarize them anyway for extra authentication evidence, but it's not legally required for perfection or enforceability.
0 coins
Miguel Ramos
•That's a good point about lenders choosing to notarize. Belt and suspenders approach I guess?
0 coins
Zainab Ibrahim
•Exactly. Some banks have internal policies requiring notarization even though the UCC doesn't mandate it.
0 coins
StarSailor
I used to stress about every little detail like this until I found Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload your security agreement and UCC-1 together and it instantly checks if everything aligns properly - debtor names, collateral descriptions, all that stuff. Takes the guesswork out of whether your docs are consistent and properly executed. Really saved me from some embarrassing mistakes.
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
•Interesting, never heard of that service. Does it actually check the legal requirements too or just document consistency?
0 coins
StarSailor
•It focuses on document consistency - making sure your security agreement debtor name matches your UCC-1 debtor name exactly, that sort of thing. For legal requirements you'd still want to check with counsel, but it catches the technical alignment issues that can cause problems later.
0 coins
Yara Sabbagh
•That actually sounds really useful. I've had UCC-1s rejected because of tiny name discrepancies between the security agreement and filing.
0 coins
Keisha Johnson
Just to add another perspective - while notarization isn't required, make sure your security agreement clearly identifies the collateral and contains a granting clause. Those are the key requirements for attachment. The UCC-1 filing handles perfection, but your security agreement needs proper attachment language first.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
•Good reminder about the granting clause. Can't tell you how many security agreements I've seen that are vague about what's actually being secured.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
•Yes! And make sure the collateral description in the security agreement is sufficient for attachment purposes. It can be more specific than what you put in the UCC-1.
0 coins
Amina Sy
Ugh this stuff is so confusing sometimes. I'm dealing with my first big equipment loan and between the security agreement, UCC-1, and all the other docs I feel like I'm drowning. Why can't they just make this stuff simpler?
0 coins
Oliver Fischer
•Hang in there! It gets easier once you do a few deals. The key is having a good checklist and understanding what each document does.
0 coins
Natasha Petrova
•I feel your pain. When I started out I was second-guessing everything. Now it's pretty routine.
0 coins
Javier Morales
•Don't feel bad, we've all been there. The UCC can be overwhelming at first but you'll get the hang of it.
0 coins
Emma Davis
One thing to watch out for - even though the security agreement doesn't need notarization, if you're dealing with real estate fixtures you might need to consider whether any real estate documents in the transaction require notarization. That's a separate issue but worth keeping in mind.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•Good point about fixtures. That's a whole different ballgame with different filing requirements.
0 coins
Malik Robinson
•Yeah fixture filings are tricky. You're dealing with both UCC and real estate recording requirements.
0 coins
Isabella Silva
I've been doing this for 15 years and have never notarized a security agreement. The UCC doesn't require it and I've never had an enforceability issue because of lack of notarization. Focus on getting your debtor information correct and your collateral description adequate - those are way more important than notarization.
0 coins
Ravi Choudhury
•This is reassuring to hear from someone with that much experience. Sometimes you start to doubt yourself on these basic questions.
0 coins
Freya Andersen
•Absolutely agree about debtor info being critical. I see more problems from name mismatches than anything else.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
For what it's worth, I ran into this same question and ended up using that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier. Uploaded my security agreement and draft UCC-1 and it flagged that I had slightly different entity names between the docs. Saved me from filing a UCC-1 that might have been ineffective. Pretty handy for catching those detail issues.
0 coins
CosmicCadet
•That's exactly the kind of mistake that can come back to bite you later. Good catch.
0 coins
Chloe Harris
•Entity name variations are the worst. LLC vs LLC. vs Limited Liability Company - drives me crazy.
0 coins
Diego Mendoza
Just to close the loop on this - no notarization required for security agreements under the UCC. The requirements are: (1) authentication by debtor (signature), (2) reasonable identification of collateral, and (3) granting language. That's it. Your UCC-1 filing is what perfects the interest, not notarizing the security agreement.
0 coins
Anastasia Popova
•Perfect summary. This should be the definitive answer.
0 coins
NeonNova
•Thanks everyone! This is exactly what I needed. Going to move forward without notarization and get this deal closed.
0 coins
Sean Flanagan
•Glad we could help. These basic questions come up more often than you'd think.
0 coins
Zara Shah
One more thought - while notarization isn't required, make sure you have proper corporate authority if your debtor is an entity. Board resolutions, operating agreements, whatever is needed to show the person signing has authority to grant the security interest.
0 coins
NebulaNomad
•Great point about corporate authority. That's a separate issue but equally important for enforceability.
0 coins
Luca Ferrari
•Yes, I always get a corporate authorization along with the security agreement. Covers you if there are questions later about who had signing authority.
0 coins
Sofia Rodriguez
Just jumping in as someone new to UCC work - this thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm working on my first secured transaction and was wondering about the same notarization question. One follow-up: when you say the security agreement needs "authentication by debtor," does that mean it has to be an original signature or can it be electronically signed? Our client is asking about using DocuSign for the security agreement.
0 coins
Amara Oluwaseyi
•Electronic signatures are generally fine for security agreements under the UCC! The authentication requirement can be satisfied through electronic signatures like DocuSign, as long as they comply with the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (E-SIGN) and your state's version of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA). Most commercial lenders use electronic signatures routinely now. Just make sure your DocuSign setup properly identifies the signer and creates an audit trail.
0 coins