UCC Filing Issues with Loan and Security Agreement Template - Name Mismatch Problems
I'm dealing with a frustrating situation where our loan and security agreement template seems to be causing UCC-1 filing rejections. We've been using the same template for months, but suddenly the Secretary of State keeps rejecting our filings due to debtor name inconsistencies. The template has the borrower listed as 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' but when I check the charter documents, it shows 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' (with a comma). I thought this was just a minor formatting difference, but apparently it's causing major headaches. Has anyone else run into issues where their loan and security agreement template doesn't perfectly match the exact legal name format? I'm worried we might have invalid liens on previous filings if this has been an ongoing problem. Any advice on how to clean this up would be really appreciated.
32 comments
Join the conversation
Jean Claude
Oh wow, this exact thing happened to us last year! The comma issue is actually a huge deal - the SOS systems are super picky about exact name matches. You'll need to pull the official charter docs for every debtor and compare them word-for-word with your loan and security agreement template. Even tiny differences like commas, periods, or 'Inc' vs 'Incorporated' can cause rejections.
0 coins
Chris Elmeda
•That's what I was afraid of. Do you know if the existing UCC-1 filings are still valid even with the name discrepancy? I'm panicking that we might have unperfected liens.
0 coins
Jean Claude
•The existing filings should still be searchable under the substantially similar name doctrine, but it's definitely risky. I'd recommend filing UCC-3 amendments to correct the debtor names ASAP to be safe.
0 coins
Charity Cohan
This is exactly why I always do a charter-to-loan-agreement cross-check before any UCC filing. The loan and security agreement template needs to pull the EXACT legal name from the formation documents. One trick - I actually started using a document verification tool that catches these mismatches automatically. Certana.ai has this feature where you upload your loan docs and UCC forms together, and it flags any name inconsistencies between them. Saved me from several rejected filings.
0 coins
Josef Tearle
•Never heard of that tool but sounds useful. How does it work exactly?
0 coins
Charity Cohan
•You just upload PDFs of your charter docs, loan agreement, and UCC forms. It automatically compares debtor names across all documents and highlights any discrepancies. Really simple but catches stuff I would have missed manually.
0 coins
Shelby Bauman
•Interesting, might have to check that out. Manual comparison is such a pain and I always worry I'm missing something.
0 coins
Quinn Herbert
UGH the comma thing drives me INSANE! Why can't the SOS systems be more flexible with punctuation? It's obviously the same entity. I've had filings rejected for the dumbest formatting differences.
0 coins
Salim Nasir
•I feel your pain but honestly the strict matching probably prevents more problems than it causes. Imagine if they were loose with names - you could end up with liens against the wrong entities.
0 coins
Quinn Herbert
•Fair point I guess. Still annoying though when you're trying to close a deal and the filing gets bounced back for a missing comma.
0 coins
Hazel Garcia
Your loan and security agreement template should have a provision requiring the borrower to provide certified copies of their formation documents. That way you can verify the exact legal name before preparing any UCC filings. Also consider adding language that any name changes must be immediately disclosed to avoid this kind of mismatch.
0 coins
Chris Elmeda
•That's a good suggestion. Our current template just has them represent that the name is correct, but requiring the actual docs would be better verification.
0 coins
Laila Fury
•Yes definitely do this. I learned the hard way that borrower representations about their legal name aren't always accurate. People genuinely don't realize there are formatting differences.
0 coins
Geoff Richards
Quick question - when you say the template has been used for months, have you actually had successful UCC filings with the incorrect name format? Or is this the first time you're trying to file UCCs with this particular template?
0 coins
Chris Elmeda
•Good question. We've filed probably 15-20 UCCs using this template over the past 6 months. Some got accepted, others rejected. I'm starting to think it depends on which borrowers had the comma in their actual charter vs which ones didn't.
0 coins
Geoff Richards
•That makes sense. So it's not that the template is wrong per se, it's that you need different versions of the debtor name depending on each entity's actual formation documents.
0 coins
Simon White
•This is why I always customize each loan and security agreement rather than using a standard template. More work upfront but avoids these headaches later.
0 coins
Hugo Kass
Had this same issue last month. What I did was pull fresh copies of the Articles of Incorporation or LLC formation docs for every active borrower and compared them to our loan files. Found discrepancies in about 40% of them! Had to file a bunch of UCC-3 amendments to correct the names.
0 coins
Nasira Ibanez
•40%?? That's crazy high. Makes me worried about our portfolio now.
0 coins
Hugo Kass
•Right? It was eye-opening. The good news is that most of the discrepancies were minor formatting issues that probably wouldn't affect lien validity, but better safe than sorry.
0 coins
Khalil Urso
I ran into similar problems and ended up using that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier. Really glad I did because it caught a bunch of name mismatches I would have missed. The system flagged cases where our loan and security agreement template had 'Corp' but the charter showed 'Corporation' - stuff like that. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with a lot of filings.
0 coins
Myles Regis
•How long does the verification usually take?
0 coins
Khalil Urso
•Pretty much instant. You upload the docs and it shows you a comparison report within a few seconds. Way faster than doing it manually.
0 coins
Brian Downey
This thread is making me paranoid about our own filings now. We use a standard loan and security agreement template too and I'm wondering how many name mismatches we might have missed.
0 coins
Jacinda Yu
•Same here. Might be worth doing an audit of recent filings just to be safe.
0 coins
Landon Flounder
•Definitely do the audit. I found several discrepancies when I went back and checked our files. Better to catch them now than during a workout situation.
0 coins
Callum Savage
For what it's worth, I've seen courts be pretty reasonable about minor name discrepancies in lien validity disputes, especially if the name is substantially similar and there's no confusion about which entity is intended. But obviously it's better to get it right from the start.
0 coins
Ally Tailer
•True but why risk it? UCC-3 amendments are cheap and easy to file.
0 coins
Chris Elmeda
•Agreed, I'd rather spend the time fixing it now than worry about it later if there's ever a dispute.
0 coins
Aliyah Debovski
One more tip - if you're going to standardize your loan and security agreement template, consider adding a field that requires the exact legal name to be inserted from the formation documents rather than having it pre-filled. That way you're forced to verify it for each deal.
0 coins
Miranda Singer
•Smart approach. Forces you to do the verification step every time instead of just assuming the template is correct.
0 coins
Cass Green
•We actually did something similar - added a checklist requirement that formation docs must be reviewed before any UCC filing. Helps catch these issues early.
0 coins